Foreign holding company domestication qualified as an F reorganization
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A foreign holding company domesticated under state law and became a domestic corporation. For federal tax purposes, it was treated as transferring all assets and liabilities to the domestic corporation for stock, followed by a liquidating distribution of that stock to its owners. The IRS ruled that the migration qualified as a section 368(a)(1)(F) reorganization and that both corporations were parties to the reorganization. It also ruled that the deemed exchange was a reverse acquisition under the consolidated return regulations. As a result, the existing life-nonlife consolidated group continued with the domesticated holding company as its new common parent.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Does the foreign holding company's domestication qualify as an F reorganization, and does its consolidated group continue afterward?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC § 368(a)(1)(F); Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-75(d)(3)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202524004 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/13/2025 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 368.00-00, 368.06-00,
1502.00-00, 1502.75-10 Person To Contact:
-----------------------------, ID No. -------------
-------------------- -----------------
------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------- ---------------------
--------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:B01
PLR-111623-24
Date:
March 14, 2025
LEGEND
Foreign Partnership = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
LLC 1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Foreign Holding = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Parent = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Fsub 1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Fsub 2 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Fsub 3 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
PLR-111623-24 2
Domestic Partnership = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Sub 1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Domestic Holding = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
State A = -------------
Country X = ---------------------
Country Y = ------------
Date 1 = ----------------------
a = ---
b = --
c = ---
d = ---
Dear ----------------:
This letter responds to your representatives’ letter dated June 21, 2024, requesting
rulings on certain Federal income tax consequences of a completed transaction (the
“Migration,” as defined below). The material information provided in that request and in
subsequent correspondence is summarized below.
This letter is issued pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2024-1, 2024-1 I.R.B. 1. This office
expresses no opinion as to any issue not specifically addressed by the rulings below.
The rulings contained in this letter are based on facts and representations submitted by
the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalties of perjury statement executed by an
appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the materials submitted in support
of the request for rulings. Verification of the information, representations, and other data
may be required as part of the audit process.
PLR-111623-24 3
Summary of Facts
Foreign Partnership is a Country X limited partnership classified as a partnership for
Federal income tax purposes. Foreign Partnership owns, indirectly through a series of
entities disregarded as separate from Foreign Partnership for Federal income tax
purposes, all the outstanding equity interest in LLC 1, a Country Y limited liability
company that is disregarded as an entity separate from Foreign Partnership for Federal
income tax purposes. LLC 1 operates as a holding company for a worldwide group of
foreign and domestic entities (the “LLC 1 Worldwide Group”). The following summary
describes the relevant ownership structure of the LLC 1 Worldwide Group immediately
prior to the Migration.
LLC 1 owned all the outstanding equity interests in Foreign Holding, a Country Y limited
company classified as a corporation for Federal income tax purposes. Foreign Holding
owned all the outstanding stock of Parent, a State A corporation. Parent was the
common parent of an affiliated group of corporations that previously elected to file a life-
nonlife consolidated federal income tax return in accordance with the provisions of
sections 1501, 1502, and 1504(c)(2) and the Treasury regulations promulgated
thereunder (the “Parent Consolidated Group”).
Foreign Holding owned all the outstanding equity interests in Fsub 1, Fsub 2, and Fsub
3, each a Country Y limited company classified as a corporation for Federal income tax
purposes. Foreign Holding owned approximately a percent of the outstanding equity
interest in Domestic Partnership, a State A limited partnership classified as a
partnership for Federal income tax purposes. Fsub 3 owned the remaining
approximately b percent of equity interests in Domestic Partnership. Foreign Holding
owned approximately c percent of the outstanding equity interests in Sub 1, a Country Y
limited company that has made an election pursuant to section 953(d) to be treated as a
domestic corporation for Federal income tax purposes. Domestic Partnership owned the
remaining approximately d percent of equity interests in Sub 1.
Completed Transaction
For what are represented to be valid corporate business purposes, on Date 1, Foreign
Holding effected a domestication under State A law and incorporated itself as Domestic
Holding (the “Migration”).
In the Migration, the following transaction was deemed to occur:
1. Foreign Holding (as the legal entity in existence immediately prior to the
Migration, the “Deemed Transferor Corporation”) transferred all of its assets
and liabilities to Domestic Holding (as the legal entity in existence
immediately following the Migration, the “Deemed Resulting Corporation”) in
exchange for all the Domestic Holding stock (the “Deemed Exchange”).
PLR-111623-24 4
2. Foreign Holding made a liquidating distribution of Domestic Holding stock to
its shareholders (the “Deemed Liquidation”).
Representations
Parent makes the following representations in connection with the Migration:
1. All other transactions undertaken contemporaneously with, in anticipation of,
in conjunction with, or in any way related to the Migration have been fully
disclosed.
2. All exchanges effectuating the Migration were on a value-for-value basis
under arm’s length terms.
3. The fair market value of all property transferred in any exchange effectuating
the Migration exceeded all liabilities assumed under section 357(d) at the time
of such exchange.
4. Each party to the Migration was solvent, for Federal income tax purposes,
immediately before and immediately after the Migration.
5. No party to the Migration is an organization exempt from Federal income tax
within the meaning of section 501.
6. No party to the Migration was a “personal service corporation” within the
meaning of section 269A.
7. Items of income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit, if any, will be taken into
account as required by the applicable intercompany transaction regulations.
8. Any excess loss account in the stock of the entities involved in the Migration
will be taken into account as required by Treas. Reg. §1.1502-19.
9. No party to the Migration was a U.S. real property holding corporation (as
defined in section 897(c)(2)) at any time during the five-year period preceding
the Migration, and no party to the Migration was a U.S. real property holding
corporation immediately after the Migration.
10. The Migration is not part of a plan (or series of related transactions) resulting
in an acquisition described in section 7874(a)(2)(B)(i).
11. No party to the Migration had any outstanding, or will issue any, fast- pay
stock as defined in Treas. Reg. §1.7701(l)-3.
PLR-111623-24 5
12. The Migration was not undertaken contemporaneously with, in anticipation of,
in conjunction with, or in any way related to a transaction designated as a
“listed transaction” for purposes of Treas. Reg. §§1.6011-4T(b)(2) and
301.6111-2T.
13. No party to the Migration had any outstanding, or will issue any, shares of
preferred stock as defined in section 351(g).
14. The Migration was undertaken pursuant to a plan of reorganization, as
described in Treas. Reg. §§1.368-1(c) and 1.368-2(g), that was adopted by
the taxpayer and each of its affiliates as necessary, before the Migration.
15. As a result of the Migration, the shareholders of the Deemed Transferor
Corporation owned all of the outstanding Deemed Resulting Corporation
stock and owned such stock solely by reason of their ownership of the
Deemed Transferor Corporation’s stock immediately prior to the Migration.
For purposes of this representation, a de minimis amount of stock issued by
the Deemed Resulting Corporation other than in respect of stock of the
Deemed Transferor Corporation to facilitate the organization of the Deemed
Resulting Corporation or maintain its legal existence is disregarded.
16. The shareholders of Deemed Transferor Corporation, determined
immediately prior to the Migration, owned all of the outstanding stock of the
Deemed Resulting Corporation immediately after the Migration in identical
proportions by value other than as a result of a de minimis amount, if any, of
stock issued by Deemed Resulting Corporation to facilitate its organization or
maintain its legal existence.
17. There is no plan or intention for the Deemed Resulting Corporation to issue
additional shares of its stock in the transaction.
18. Immediately before the Migration, the Deemed Resulting Corporation had no
business history, tax attributes (including those specified in section 381(c)), or
assets other than (i) business history, tax attributes, or assets owned prior to
the Migration as Deemed Transferor Corporation, and (ii) a de minimis
amount of assets to facilitate its organization or maintain its legal existence
and tax attributes related to holding those assets or proceeds of borrowings
undertaken in connection with the Migration.
19. Immediately after the Migration, no corporation other than the Deemed
Resulting Corporation held property that was held by the Deemed Transferor
Corporation immediately before the Migration, if such other corporation would
have, as a result, succeeded to and taken into account the items of the
Deemed Transferor Corporation described in section 381(c).
PLR-111623-24 6
20. Immediately after the Migration, the Deemed Resulting Corporation did not
hold property acquired from a corporation other than the Deemed Transferor
Corporation if the Deemed Resulting Corporation would have, as a result,
succeeded to and taken into account the items of such other corporation
described in section 381(c).
21. The Deemed Transferor Corporation completely liquidated (or was deemed to
liquidate) in the Migration for Federal income tax purposes.
22. The liabilities of the Deemed Transferor Corporation that were deemed
assumed by the Deemed Resulting Corporation, within the meaning of
section 357(d), were incurred by the Deemed Transferor Corporation in the
ordinary course of business and are associated with the assets transferred.
23. The Deemed Resulting Corporation, Deemed Transferor Corporation and
Deemed Transferor Corporation’s shareholders paid their respective
expenses, if any, incurred in connection with the Migration.
24. The aggregate fair market value of the assets of Deemed Transferor
Corporation that were held by Deemed Resulting Corporation immediately
after the Migration equaled or exceeded Deemed Resulting Corporation’s
aggregate basis in such assets at that time.
25. The Migration was motivated, in whole or substantial part, by one or more
bona fide non-Federal income tax purposes as described in this request for
ruling.
26. At the time of the Migration, no party to the transaction was under the
jurisdiction of a court in a title 11 or similar case (within the meaning of
section 368(a)(3)(A)).
27. Immediately before the Migration, no party to the Migration was an investment
company within the meaning of section 368(a)(2)(F).
28. Any shareholder of Foreign Holding that is a United States person will, to the
extent provided by Treas. Reg. §1.367(b)-3, include in its income as a
deemed dividend the “all earnings and profits amount” (within the meaning of
Treas. Reg. §1.367(b)-2(d)), if any, with respect to its stock in Foreign
Holding, or recognize gain with respect to its stock in Foreign Holding under
Treas. Reg. §1.367(b)-3(c)(2), in connection with the Migration.
29. The Migration was not preceded by an indirect stock transfer described in
Treas. Reg. §1.367(a)-3(d)(1)(iii)(A).
PLR-111623-24 7
30. Immediately before the Migration, there was no “excess asset basis” (within
the meaning of Prop. Treas. Reg. §1.367(b)-3(g)(2)(i)), with respect to
Foreign Holding, as Foreign Holding’s inside basis in its assets did not
exceed the sum of (i) its current and accumulated earnings and profits, (ii) the
outside stock basis of Foreign Holding, and (iii) the aggregate amount of any
liabilities of Foreign Holding.
31. The Migration did not include the transfer of stock in any corporation that has
been the U.S. transferor, the transferee foreign corporation, or the transferred
corporation with respect to any unexpired “gain recognition agreement” within
the meaning of Treas. Reg. §§1.367(a)-3 and 1.367(a)-8.
32. Foreign Holding is not a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) (within
the meaning of section 1297) or former PFIC.
33. Foreign Holding will comply with the section 367(b) notice requirements in
Treas. Reg. §1.367(b)-1(c)(1) with respect to transfers in connection with the
Migration.
34. Immediately after the Migration, more than 50 percent of the value of the
equity of Domestic Holding was attributable to the value of the shares of
Parent.
Rulings
Based on the facts and representations received, we rule as follows with respect to the
Migration:
1. The Migration will qualify as a reorganization under section 368(a)(1)(F).
Foreign Holding and Domestic Holding each will be a “party to a
reorganization” within the meaning of section 368(b).
2. The Deemed Exchange will constitute a “reverse acquisition” within the
meaning of Treas. Reg. §1.1502-75(d)(3). The Deemed Liquidation will have
no effect on this determination. The Parent Consolidated Group will remain in
existence with Domestic Holding as the new common parent following the
Migration. Treas. Reg. §1.1502-75(d)(3)(i).
Caveats
Except as expressly provided herein, we express no opinion concerning the tax
consequences of any aspect of any matter or item discussed or referenced in this letter.
Moreover, no opinion is expressed about the tax treatment of the transactions or of any
other matter under other provisions of the Code or regulations or about the tax
PLR-111623-24 8
treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the
Migration not specifically covered in the above rulings.
Procedural Statements
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to its returns that provides the date on and control number of the
letter ruling.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
____________________________________
Kelton P. Frye
Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 2
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
cc: ---------------------
-------------------
-----------------------------------------
-------------------
----------------------------
----------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
---------------------------------
----------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.