🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Determination Letter 202523013 Released June 6, 2025 Approved Transcribed from scan

One-time restructuring transfer treated as unusual grant

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A publicly supported organization expected to receive most of the net assets of an affiliated section 501(c)(4) organization as part of a restructuring and merger. The transferor was not disinterested, but the transfer was a one-time event between organizations with similar missions, and the transferor would cease to exist afterward. The recipient expected the support sources it would assume to satisfy the public-support test after the transfer. The IRS concluded that the proposed transfer qualifies as an unusual grant under Treasury Regulation section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii). The grant may therefore be excluded when applying the relevant public-support fraction.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does the one-time transfer of most of an affiliated organization's net assets qualify as an unusual grant for public-support testing?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 170, 501, 507, 509, and 4946; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and 1.509(a)-3(c)(4); Rev. Rul. 76-440

Full text (IRS public release)

Department of the Treasury Date:
Internal Revenue Service 03/11/2025
Tax Exempt and Government Entities Employer ID number:
PO Box 2508 Person to contact:
Cincinnati, OH 45201 Name:
ID number:
Release Number: 202523013 Telephone:
Release Date: 6/6/2025

LEGEND UIL: 509.02-01
B = Organization

C = Date

D = Activity

e dollars = Amount

Dear :

We have considered your September 11, 2024 request for recognition of an unusual grant under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and related provisions.

Based on the information provided, we concluded that the proposed grant constitutes an unusual grant under
Treas. Reg. Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and related provisions of the regulations. The basis for our conclusion
is discussed below.

Facts:

You are closely affiliated with B, a long-standing IRC Section 501(c)(4) social welfare organization that
supports and implements government and D efforts, provides and furthers environmental education, and
supports other similar purposes. B intends to transfer a majority of its net assets to you as part of a major
restructuring plan, resulting in an unusual grant. The grant is unusual because it represents a one-time transfer
of net assets from B, in furtherance of your and B's exempt purposes and differs from your ongoing broader
support from other stewards for D services. Currently, you intend to implement the restructuring transfer with B
in C. The transfer in the amount of approximately e dollars will depend on receiving the unusual grant
determination requested in this submission.

B is not a disinterested party whose support would generally qualify as an unusual grant. However, B has a
similar charitable mission as you, and this is a one-time transfer due to your merger with B. If the grant is not
considered unusual, you would be classified as a private foundation, which would handicap or disable the
restructuring, which you believe is the best way to continue the public benefits of your activities. There will be
no ongoing connection with B, as it will be merged out of existence after the one-time transfer. In addition, B's
historic sources of support that you will take over are expected to readily satisfy the public support test,
provided this one-time transfer is held to be an unusual grant.

Letter 4787 (Rev. 11-2021)
Catalog Number 58230Y

Law:

Two sections of the Treasury Regulations set forth the criteria for an unusual grant. They are:

Treasury Regulation Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii)

This section states that, for purposes of applying the 2% limitation to determine whether the 33 1/3% of-support
test is satisfied or the 10 % support limitation is met, one or more contributions may be excluded from both the
numerator and the denominator of the applicable percent-of-support fraction. The exclusion is generally intended
to apply to substantial contributions or bequests from disinterested parties which:

  • are attracted by reason of the publicly supported nature of the organization;

  • are unusual or unexpected with respect to the amount thereof; and

  • would, by reason of their size, adversely affect the status of the organization as normally being publicly
    supported.

Treasury Regulation Section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4)

This section states that all pertinent facts and circumstances will be taken into consideration to determine
whether a particular contribution may be excluded. No single factor will necessarily be determinative. Such
factors may include:

  • Whether the contribution was made by a person who;

a. created the organization;

b. previously contributed a substantial part of its support or endowment;

c. stood in a position of authority with respect to the organization, such as a foundation manager within
the meaning of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 4946(b);

d. directly or indirectly exercised control over the organization, or;

e. was in a relationship described in IRC Section 4946(a)(1)(C) through 4946(a)(1) (G) with someone
listed in bullets a, b, c, or d above.

A contribution made by a person described in bullets a through e is ordinarily given less favorable consideration
than a contribution made by others not described above.

  • Whether the contribution was a bequest or an inter vivos transfer. A bequest will ordinarily be given more
    favorable consideration than an inter vivos transfer.

  • Whether the contribution was in the form of cash, readily marketable securities, or assets which further the
    exempt purposes of the organization, such as a gift of a painting to a museum.

  • Whether (except in the case of a new organization) prior to the receipt of the particular contribution, the
    organization (a) has carried on an actual program of public solicitation and exempt activities and
    (b) has been able to attract a significant amount of public support.

  • Whether the organization may reasonably be expected to attract a significant amount of public support after
    the particular contribution. Continued reliance on unusual grants to fund an organization's current operating
    expenses (as opposed to providing new endowment funds) may be evidence that the organization cannot
    reasonably be expected to attract future public support.

  • Whether, prior to the year in which the particular contribution was received, the organization met the
    one-third support test described in Treas. Reg. Section 1.509(a)-3(a)(2) without the benefit of any
    exclusions of unusual grants pursuant to Treas. Reg. Section 1.509-3(c)(3);

  • Whether the organization has a representative governing body as described in in Treas. Reg. Section
    1.509(a)-3(d)(3)(i); and

  • Whether material restrictions or conditions within the meaning of Treas. Reg. Section 1.507-2(a)(7) have
    been imposed by the transferor upon the transferee in connection with such transfer.

Letter 4787 (Rev. 11-2021)
Catalog Number 58230Y

Application of Law:

Revenue Ruling 76-440 states a large inter vivo gift of undeveloped land from a disinterested donor to a Code
section 501(c)(3) organization, conditioned on the land's being used in perpetuity to further the exempt
organization's purposes of preserving natural resources, is an unusual grant and will not adversely affect the
organization's status as a publicly supported organization under section 170(b)(1)(vi).

We'll make this determination letter available for public inspection after deleting personally identifiable information,
as required by IRC Section 6110. We've enclosed Letter 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose - Rulings, and a
copy of the letter that shows our proposed deletions.

  • If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow the instructions in the Letter 437 on how to notify us.

  • If you agree with our deletions, you don't need to take any further action.

We've sent a copy of this letter to your representative as indicated in your power of attorney.

If you have questions, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter.

Sincerely,

Stephen A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Enclosures:
Redacted Letter 4787
Letter 437

Letter 4787 (Rev. 11-2021)
Catalog Number 58230Y

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.