Trust modification preserves generation-skipping transfer tax exemption
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An irrevocable trust created before September 25, 1985, sought to modify how property would pass to descendants after the settlors' daughter died. Instead of distributing certain shares outright, the modification would retain them in separate lifetime trusts and give each beneficiary a testamentary general power of appointment. The separate trusts also had to end within the period allowed by state law. The IRS concluded that the changes would neither shift a beneficial interest to a lower-generation beneficiary nor extend vesting beyond the original trust's period. Because the trust was already exempt from generation-skipping transfer tax and no post-1985 additions had been made, the modification would not cause it to lose that exemption. The ruling addressed only the GST tax result and did not decide other possible tax consequences.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Will the court-approved trust modification cause a grandfathered trust to lose its GST tax exemption?
- Outcome: Approved. The modification does not cause the trust to lose GST-exempt status or otherwise become subject to GST tax.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 2601, 2611, 2041(a)(2), 2652(a)(1); Treas. Reg. § 26.2601-1(b)(1), (b)(4).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202518009 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/2/2025 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2601.00-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------, ID No. -----------------
----------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------
------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------- CC:PT&E:B04
------------------------------------------- PLR-114159-24
Date:
February 04, 2025
In Re: ----------------------------------------------------
Legend
Trust = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Husband = -------------------------------
Wife = ----------------------------
Daughter = ---------------------------
Date 1 = ----------------
Date 2 = ---------------------
Date 3 = --------------------------
Date 4 = -------------------
State Statute = ----------------------------------
State = ------------------
Court = -----------------------------------------------------------
Dear -----------------------------------------------------:
This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated July 31,
2024, requesting a ruling concerning the federal generation-skipping transfer (GST)
consequences of the proposed modification of Trust.
The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:
On Date 1, a date prior to September 25, 1985, Husband and Wife (Settlors)
established an irrevocable trust, Trust, for the benefit of Settlors’ daughter, Daughter,
and Daughter’s descendants.
Paragraphs 2 and 3 of Trust provide that the trustee may distribute income and
principal to Daughter for her maintenance, support, care, and comfort.
PLR-114159-24 2
Paragraph 4 of Trust provides that upon the death of Daughter, the remainder of
Trust will be held in further trust for the benefit of Daughter’s children and the
descendants of any deceased child of Daughter. The trustee may distribute income and
principal to such beneficiaries for their maintenance, support, and education.
Paragraph 5 of Trust provides that Trust shall terminate after Daughter’s death,
when Daughter’s youngest child reaches the age of 21, and the remainder will be
distributed outright in equal shares to Daughter’s children with an equal share, per
stirpes, being distributed outright to the descendants of any deceased child of Daughter.
On Date 2, Daughter and the living remainder and contingent beneficiaries of
Trust executed a nonjudicial settlement agreement to modify the terms of Trust,
effective upon the issuance of a favorable private letter ruling. On Date 3, the trustees
of Trust petitioned Court to approve the nonjudicial settlement agreement, and on Date
4, Court issued an order approving the nonjudicial settlement agreement.
The relevant provisions of Trust, as modified by the Date 4 order, are
summarized as follows:
Paragraph 5(a), as modified, provides that Trust shall terminate after Daughter’s
death, when Daughter’s youngest child reaches the age of 21, and the remainder will be
distributed outright in equal shares to Daughter’s children with an equal share, per
stirpes, passing into further trust for any descendant of a deceased child of Daughter.
Paragraph 5(b), as modified, provides that the trustee of a trust established for a
descendant of a deceased child of Daughter may distribute income and principal to
such descendant for their maintenance, support and education, and that each such trust
will terminate upon the earlier death of such descendant or 21 years after the date of
death of the last to die of Daughter and Daughter’s lineal descendants living on the date
of the execution of Trust. Upon the death of each such descendant, the remainder of
such descendant’s trust will be distributed according to the descendant’s exercise of a
general power of appointment. If such descendant does not exercise the general power
of appointment, the unappointed principal passes into further trust for the benefit of such
descendant’s lineal descendants, to be governed according to the provisions of
Paragraph 5(b).
Paragraph 5(c), as modified, provides that any trust established under Paragraph
5 will terminate 21 years after the date of death of the last to die of Daughter and
Daughter’s lineal descendants living on the date of the execution of Trust, with the
remainder distributed outright to the then-beneficiary of such trust.
You have requested a ruling that the proposed modification of the terms of Trust
will not cause Trust to lose GST-exempt status or otherwise become subject to the GST
tax.
PLR-114159-24 3
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 2601 imposes a tax on every GST, which is defined under § 2611 as a
taxable distribution, a taxable termination, and a direct skip.
Section 1433(b)(2)(A) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the Act), 1986-3 (Vol. 1)
C.B. 1, and § 26.2601-1(b)(1)(i) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations,
provide that the GST tax shall not apply to any GST under a trust that was irrevocable
on September 25, 1985, but only to the extent that such transfer was not made out of
corpus added to the trust after September 25, 1985 (or out of income attributable to
corpus so added).
Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i) provides rules for determining when a modification,
judicial construction, settlement agreement, or trustee action with respect to a trust that
is exempt from the GST tax under § 26.2601-1(b)(1), (b)(2), or (b)(3), will not cause the
trust to lose its exempt status. The rules of § 26.2601-1(b)(4) are applicable only for
purposes of determining whether an exempt trust retains its exempt status for GST tax
purposes. The rules do not apply in determining, for example, whether the transaction
results in a gift subject to gift tax, or may cause the trust to be included in the gross
estate of a beneficiary, or may result in the realization of capital gain for purposes of
§ 1001.
Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i)(D)(1) provides that a modification of the governing
instrument of an exempt trust by judicial reformation, or nonjudicial reformation that is
valid under applicable state law, will not cause an exempt trust to be subject to the
provisions of chapter 13, if the modification does not shift a beneficial interest in the
trust to any beneficiary who occupies a lower generation (as defined in § 2651) than the
person or persons who held the beneficial interest prior to the modification, and the
modification does not extend the time for vesting of any beneficial interest in the trust
beyond the period provided for in the original trust. A modification of an exempt trust
will result in a shift in a beneficial interest to a lower generation beneficiary if the
modification can result in either an increase in the amount of a GST or the creation of a
new GST.
Section 2041(a)(2) provides that the value of the gross estate shall include the
value of all property to the extent of any property with respect to which the decedent has
at the time of his death a general power of appointment created after October 21, 1942,
or with respect to which the decedent has at any time exercised or released such a
power of appointment by a disposition which is of such nature that if it were a transfer of
property owned by the decedent, such property would be includible in the decedent’s
gross estate under sections 2035 to 2038, inclusive.
Section 2652(a)(1) provides that the term transferor means, in the case of any
property subject to the tax imposed by chapter 11, the decedent, and in the case of any
property subject to the tax imposed by chapter 12, the donor. An individual shall be
PLR-114159-24 4
treated as transferring any property with respect to which such individual is the
transferor.
State Statute provides, in pertinent part, that interested persons, that is, persons
whose consent would be required in order to achieve a binding settlement were the
settlement to be approved by the court, may enter into a binding nonjudicial settlement
agreement with respect to any matter involving a trust. Matters that may be resolved by
a nonjudicial settlement agreement include the modification or termination of a trust.
Any interested person may request the court to approve a nonjudicial settlement
agreement.
In the present case, Trust was irrevocable on September 25, 1985, and you have
represented that no additions, actual or constructive, have been made to Trust after that
date within the meaning of § 26.2601-1(b)(1).
After the proposed modifications, Daughter and Daughter’s descendants have
the same interests they had before the proposed modifications, except that trust
property that would have been distributed free from trust to a beneficiary may or will be
retained in separate trust for the sole lifetime benefit of such beneficiary. With respect
to each such trust, the beneficiary is granted a testamentary general power of
appointment under § 2041(a)(2) over the trust, and each such trust must terminate and
vest within the period prescribed by State’s rule against perpetuities.
For transfer tax purposes, the grant of the testamentary general power of
appointment will cause the beneficiary’s trust to be includible in the gross estate of the
beneficiary at his or her death under § 2041(a)(2), and the beneficiary will be the
transferor of the trust for GST tax purposes under § 2652(a)(1). Therefore, with respect
to these provisions, the proposed modifications to Trust will not cause a shift of a
beneficial interest to a lower generation beneficiary nor extend the time for vesting of
any beneficial interest beyond the period provided for in the original trust.
Accordingly, based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that the proposed modifications of Trust pursuant to the Date 4 order do not
cause Trust to lose GST-exempt status or otherwise become subject to the GST tax.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, we have sent a
copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.
Except as expressly provided herein, we neither express nor imply any opinion
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
PLR-114159-24 5
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.
A copy of this letter should be attached to any gift, estate, or GST tax returns that
you may file relating to this matter.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
Passthroughs, Trusts, and Estates
_________________________
By: Daniel J. Gespass
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 4
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs, Trusts, and Estates)
Enclosure
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc: ---------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
---------------
-------------------------------------------
----------------------------
cc: ------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
---------------
-------------------------------------------
----------------------------
cc: -------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.