Partnership receives 120 days for a late § 754 election after an interest sale
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A limited liability company taxed as a partnership engaged in a transaction that it represented was a sale of partnership interests for federal tax purposes. It inadvertently failed to make a § 754 election for that year and represented that it acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government. The IRS granted 120 days to make the election through the appropriate amended-return or administrative-adjustment filing. The partnership must include all property-basis and basis-recovery adjustments that would have applied if the election had been timely, even for years closed by the statute of limitations. Its partners must make corresponding outside-basis adjustments, and the filing must account for the centralized partnership audit rules under § 6227(b). The IRS did not decide how the transaction should be treated or whether the partnership was otherwise eligible for the election.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May a partnership receive extra time to make a § 754 election after a transaction involving the represented sale of partnership interests?
- Outcome: Approved, with 120 days and required retroactive basis adjustments.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 6227(b), 734(b), 743(b), 754; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202517004 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/25/2025 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 754.00-00, 754.02-00,
9100.00-00, 9100.15-00 Person To Contact:
-------------------------, ID No. -----------------
--------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------ --------------------
------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
-------------------------------------- CC:PT&E:B03
PLR-113420-24
Date:
January 24, 2025
Legend
X = ---------------------------------
-----------------------
State = -------------
Date 1 = --------------------------
Year = -------
Dear -------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated July 10, 2024, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted on behalf of X by X's authorized representatives, requesting
an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations to file an election under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
FACTS
According to the information submitted, X was formed as a limited liability
company under the laws of State and is treated as a partnership for federal tax
purposes. On Date 1, X engaged in a transaction (the “Transaction”) that X represents
resulted in the sale for federal income tax purposes of interests in X. X inadvertently
failed to file a § 754 election to adjust the basis of partnership property for
PLR-113420-24 2
its Year taxable year. X represents that it has acted reasonably and in good faith, and
that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 754 provides that if a partnership files an election, in accordance with
regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of partnership property shall be
adjusted, in the case of a distribution of property, in the manner provided in § 734 and,
in the case of a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in § 743. Such
an election shall apply with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and
to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year with respect to
which such election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.
Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an election
under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b), with
respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a
partnership, must be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the
taxable year during which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be valid,
the return must be filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e) (including
extensions) for filing the return for such taxable year.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) provides that the term
“regulatory election” includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation
published in the Federal Register.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time
for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory
elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Under § 301.9100-3, a request for relief will be granted when the taxpayer
provides evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good
faith, and (2) the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
CONCLUSION
Based solely upon the facts submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied.
As a result, X is granted an extension of time of one hundred-twenty (120) days from
the date of this letter to make a § 754 election for its Year taxable year. The election
PLR-113420-24 3
should be made in a written statement filed with the appropriate service center
accompanying Form 1065-X, Amended Return or Administrative Adjustment Request
(AAR), or Form 8082, Notice of Inconsistent Treatment or AAR, and for any related
filings as instructed in Form 1065-X or Form 8082, as appropriate.
This ruling is contingent on X's relevant filing(s) containing adjustments to the
basis of X's properties to reflect any § 734(b) or § 743(b) adjustments that would have
been made if the § 754 election had been timely made. These basis adjustments must
reflect any additional deductions for the recovery of basis related to X's property that
would have been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of
whether the statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund has
expired for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Any deductions for the recovery of
basis allowable for an open year are to be computed based on the remaining useful life
or recovery period and using property basis as adjusted by the greater of any such
deductions allowed or allowable in any prior year had the § 754 election been timely
made.
Additionally, this ruling is contingent on X filing Form 1065-X or Form 8082 and
taking into account the adjustments as required by § 6227(b).
Additionally, the partners of X must adjust the basis of their interests in X to
reflect what that basis would be if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless
of whether the statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund
has expired for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Specifically, the partners
of X must reduce the basis of their interests in X in the amount of any additional
deductions for the recovery of basis related to X's property that would have been
allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made.
Except for the specific ruling above, we express or imply no opinion concerning
the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the
Code or the regulations thereunder, including the treatment of the Transaction. In
addition, § 301.9100-1(a) provides that the granting of an extension of time for making
an election is not a determination that the taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the
election.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section
6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-113420-24 4
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of
this letter to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs, Trusts, and Estates)
By: _____________________________
Robert D. Alinsky
Branch Chief, Branch 3
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs, Trusts, and Estates)
Enclosure:
Copy of this letter for § 6110 purposes
PLR-113420-24 5
cc: --------------------------------
---------------------------------------
--------------------------------
---------------------------------
----------------------------------
-------------------------------------
-------------------------
---------------------------------
----------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
-------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.