Partnership received 120 days to make a late section 754 election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A partnership failed to make an IRC § 754 election for the year in which new partners purchased interests in it. The IRS concluded that the partnership met the standards for late regulatory-election relief and granted 120 days to file the election through the appropriate amended-return or administrative-adjustment procedure. The relief requires all resulting § 734(b) and § 743(b) basis adjustments to be reflected as though the election had been timely, including allowed-or-allowable deductions in closed years. The partners must likewise adjust their outside bases, and the partnership must use Form 1065-X or Form 8082 if an administrative adjustment request is required. The ruling does not determine whether the partnership is otherwise eligible to make the election.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the partnership receive additional time to make a section 754 election for the year new partners acquired interests?
- Outcome: Approved, with a 120-day extension subject to corrective basis and filing conditions
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 734(b), 743(b), 754, 6227(b); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1, 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202510007 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 3/7/2025 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 754.00-00, 9100.00-00,
9100.15-00 Person To Contact:
--------------------, ID No. -----------------
------------------------ Telephone Number:
------------------------------------- --------------------
----------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------- CC:PSI:B01
-------------------------------- PLR-111610-24
---------------------------- Date:
December 04, 2024
LEGEND
X = --------------------------------------------
-----------------------
State = -------------
Date 1 = -------------------
Date 2 = ------------------------
Date 3 = --------------------------
Date 4 = --------------------------
Dear ----------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated June 21, 2024, submitted on behalf of X by X’s
authorized representatives, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election under § 754 of the Internal
Revenue Code (“Code”).
PLR-111610-24 2
FACTS
According to the information submitted, X was formed on Date 1 as a limited liability
company under the laws of State and is treated as a partnership for federal tax
purposes. On Date 2, interests in X were purchased by new partners. X inadvertently
failed to make a § 754 election for its taxable year ended Date 3.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 754 provides, in part, that if a partnership files an election, in accordance with
the regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of partnership property is
adjusted, in the case of a distribution of property, in the manner provided in § 734, and,
in the case of a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in § 743. Such
an election applies with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and to
all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year with respect to which
the election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.
Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that an election
under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b) with
respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a
partnership, shall be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the
taxable year during which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be
valid, the return must be filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e)
(including extensions thereof) for filing the return for the taxable year.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) provides that the term
“regulatory election” includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation
published in the Federal Register.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will
use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section
301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time for making
certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the Commissioner will
use to determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Under § 301.9100-3, a request for relief will be granted when the taxpayer provides
evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good
faith, and (2) the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.
PLR-111610-24 3
CONCLUSION
Based solely upon the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that
the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, X
is granted an extension of time of one hundred-twenty (120) days from the date of this
letter to make a § 754 election for the taxable year ended Date 3 and thereafter. The
election should be made in a written statement filed with the appropriate service center
accompanying Form 1065-X, Amended Return or Administrative Adjustment Request
(AAR), or Form 8082, Notice of Inconsistent Treatment or AAR, and for any related
filings as instructed in Form 1065-X or Form 8082, as appropriate, for X’s taxable year
ended Date 4 to be associated with X’s return for its taxable year ended Date 3. A copy
of this letter should be attached to the relevant filing.
This ruling is contingent on X’s relevant filing(s) containing adjustments to the basis of
X’s properties to reflect any § 734(b) or § 743(b) adjustments that would have been
made if the § 754 election had been timely made. These basis adjustments must reflect
any additional deductions for the recovery of basis related to X’s property that would
have been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of whether
the statutory period of limitations on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired
for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Any deductions for the recovery of basis
allowable for an open year are to be computed based on the remaining useful life or
recovery period and using property basis adjusted by the greater of such deductions
allowed or allowable in any prior year had the § 754 election been timely made.
If X is required to file an AAR in order to properly amend a partnership return, then this
ruling is contingent on X filing Form 1065-X or Form 8082 and taking into account the
adjustments as required by § 6227(b).
Additionally, the partners of X must adjust the basis of their interests in X to reflect what
the basis would be if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of whether
the statutory period of limitations on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired
for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Specifically, the partners of X must
reduce the basis of their interest in X in the amount of any additional deductions for the
recovery of basis related to X’s property that would have been allowable if the § 754
election had been timely made.
Except for the specific ruling above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the
federal tax consequence of the facts of this case under any other provision of the Code.
In addition, § 301.9100-1(a) provides that the granting of an extension of time for
making an election is not a determination that the taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make
the election.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
PLR-111610-24 4
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to X’s authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Holly Porter
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
By:__________/s/_____________
Christiaan T. Cleary
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosure
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc: -----------------
-------------------------------
-------------
--------------------------------
----------------------------
------------------------
---------------------------------
--------------
----------------------
----------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.