IRS denies 501(c)(3) status to a college-athlete NIL collective for serving private interests
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An organization applied to be recognized as a tax-exempt charity under section
501(c)(3). Its business was to line up college athletes' name, image, and likeness
(NIL) rights, then provide those NIL rights as in-kind contributions to local
charities so the charities would not pay for them. The catch: the organization's
main expense was paying the athletes for their NIL, and the IRS concluded that the
real, substantial beneficiaries were the athletes, not the public. To be a charity,
an organization must operate exclusively for exempt purposes and serve a public
rather than a private interest; paying a non-charitable group (the athletes) as a
major activity is a substantial private benefit that is not merely incidental. The
IRS walked through a line of rulings and cases (art-patron sales, radio-station
support, employment registries, campaign schools) where private benefit sank
exemption, and found the same problem here. This is the IRS's final adverse
determination: the organization does not qualify under 501(c)(3), so donors
generally cannot deduct gifts to it, and it must file regular income tax returns.
The determination reflects the IRS position that NIL "collectives" chiefly benefit
the athletes and are not charitable.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Does an organization that pays college athletes for their NIL and donates those NIL rights to charities qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(3)?
- Outcome: Denied (final adverse determination; fails the operational test / serves private interests)
- Key authorities: IRC § 501(c)(3); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1; Rev. Ruls. 61-170, 70-186, 75-286, 76-152, 76-206; Better Business Bureau v. United States, 326 U.S. 279; American Campaign Academy v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 1053
Full text (IRS public release)
Department of the Treasury Date:
Internal Revenue Service 11/27/2024
Tax Exempt and Government Entities Employer ID number:
IRS Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201
Form you must file:
1120
Tax years:
All
Person to contact:
Release Number: 202508005
Release Date: 2/21/25
UIL Code: 501.03-00, 501.03-30, 501.33-00
Dear
This letter is our final determination that you don't qualify for exemption from federal income tax under Internal
Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(a) as an organization described in IRC Section 501(c)(3). Recently, we sent
you a proposed adverse determination in response to your application. The proposed adverse determination
explained the facts, law, and basis for our conclusion, and it gave you 30 days to file a protest. Because we
didn't receive a protest within the required 30 days, the proposed determination is now final.
Because you don't qualify as a tax-exempt organization under IRC Section 501(c)(3), donors generally can't
deduct contributions to you under IRC Section 170.
We may notify the appropriate state officials of our determination, as required by IRC Section 6104(c), by
sending them a copy of this final letter along with the proposed determination letter.
You must file the federal income tax forms for the tax years shown above within 30 days from the date of this
letter unless you request an extension of time to file. For further instructions, forms, and information, visit
www.irs.gov.
We'll make this final adverse determination letter and the proposed adverse determination letter available for
public inspection after deleting certain identifying information, as required by IRC Section 6110. Read the
enclosed Letter 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose - Rulings, and review the two attached letters that show our
proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow the instructions in the Letter 437 on how
to notify us. If you agree with our deletions, you don't need to take any further action.
If you have questions about this letter, you can call the contact person shown above. If you have questions
about your federal income tax status and responsibilities, call our customer service number at 800-829-1040
(TTY 800-829-4933 for deaf or hard of hearing) or customer service for businesses at 800-829-4933.
Sincerely,
Stephen A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements
Enclosures:
Letter 437
Redacted Letter 4034
Letter 4038 (Rev. 11-2021)
Catalog Number 47628K
Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
Cincinnati, OH 45201
Date: 9/19/2024
Employer ID number:
Person to contact:
Name:
ID number
Telephone
Fax
Legend: UIL:
W = State 501.03-00
X = Date 501.03-30
Y = Name 501.33-00
Dear Applicant:
We considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income tax under Internal Revenue
Code (IRC) Section 501(a). We determined that you don't qualify for exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(3).
This letter explains the reasons for our conclusion. Please keep it for your records.
Issues
Do you qualify for exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(3)? No, for the reasons stated below.
Facts
You incorporated in W on X. Your Articles of Incorporation state your specific purposes are to conduct
charitable activities, make charitable distributions to IRC Section 501(c)(3) organizations, and conduct any
activities consistent with such purposes. Upon dissolution, your assets shall be distributed for one or more
Section 501(c)(3) exempt purposes, or to such organization or organizations that qualify for exemption as
Section 501(c)(3) organizations.
Your Bylaws indicate that you are formed to help strengthen, promote, and otherwise support W tax-exempt
charitable organizations and the communities and individuals they serve. You accomplish your purposes by
primarily coordinating the use of the names, images, and likenesses (NIL) of Y intercollegiate (IC) athletes with
whom you contract. Specifically, you secure and manage the use of the NIL of these athletes which you provide
as in-kind contributions to W charitable organizations. Your goal is for the partner organizations not to have any
costs for the license for the right to use the IC athlete's NIL and that any costs for such license are paid by you.
The athletes you seek for the use of their NIL depends primarily on the need of your partner charities, and what
sport, gender, and athlete may be the best fit to accomplish and fulfill the charitable partner's need(s) and
Services.
You also explained that:
• You do not develop NIL opportunities rather you investigate the needs of the charitable organizations, and then
Letter 4034 (Rev. 01-2021)
Catalog Number 47628K
2
contact the IC athletes that may fit a charity's need and discuss the charity, event, and the NIL services needed for
that charity or charity's event, and if the athlete is willing to provide the desired NIL services, you will enter into a
NIL services agreement with that IC athlete.
• Your service agreements for the use of the NIL's are such that the IC athlete grants/provides a non-exclusive
license to you and the partner charity for the use of their NIL.
• Pursuant to the services agreements for the NIL's, the IC athletes retain the ownership of the rights to their NIL.
• After the NIL services agreement is entered into between you and the athlete, you assist in coordinating and
making sure that the services were provided, confirm the services were satisfactorily provided, and pay the athlete
for services rendered.
You explained that your activities increase the charitable organizations' visibility and reach in W and their local
communities, provide unique athletic and physical education to beneficiaries served by the charitable
organizations, raise awareness of the need of beneficiaries served by charitable organizations, attract donors and
volunteers to the charitable organizations and enhance the charitable organizations' relationships among served
populations. Examples of your services to charitable organizations using the NIL's of IC athletes and the IC
athletes themselves include, but are not limited to, holding athletic skill camps and physical education events,
conducting charitable activities and events within the lines of service offered by charitable organizations, and
providing the services of the IC athletes as organizational spokespersons, motivational speakers, group speakers
and advisors on relationships with and needs of served populations. You further stated that the specific services
you provide to partner charities depend in large part on the particular needs of your partner charities and the
specific events and activities that those charities are engaged in and the individuals/populations that those
particular charities serve.
Currently volunteers organize and manage your operations as well as secure and manage the use of the NIL of
IC athletes with whom you contract. In the future, you may hire either on a part-time or full-time basis for
positions for administrative and day-to-day functions at locally competitive wages or salaries.
You are funded through fundraising activities and contributions from both individuals and entities. Your
primary expense is for the use of the NIL of IC athletes from Y with whom you contract.
Law
IRC Section 501(c)(3) provides exemption under Section 501(a) for organizations organized and operated
exclusively for one or more of the exempt purposes set forth in Section 501(c)(3).
Treasury Regulation Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) provides that, in order to be exempt as an organization
described in IRC Section 501(c)(3), an organization must be both organized and operated exclusively for one or
more of the purposes specified in such section. If an organization fails to meet either the organizational test or
the operational test, it is not exempt.
Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) provides that an organization will be regarded as operated exclusively
for one or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in activities which accomplish one or more of
such exempt purposes specified in IRC Section 501(c)(3). An organization will not be so regarded if more than
an insubstantial part of its activities is not in furtherance of an exempt purpose.
Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) provides that an organization is not organized and operated
exclusively for exempt purposes unless it serves a public rather than a private interest. To meet this
Letter 4034 (Rev. 01-2021)
Catalog Number 47628K
3
requirement, an organization must establish that it is not organized or operated for the benefit of private
interests such as designated individuals, the creator or his family, shareholders of the organization, or persons
controlled, directly or indirectly, by such private interests.
Revenue Ruling 61-170, 1961-2 C.B. 112, held that an association of professional nurses that operated a nurses'
registry to provide greater employment opportunities to its members and to organize an adequate and available
nursing placement service for the community did not qualify for exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(3). By
operating an employment service principally for the benefit of its members, the organization served private
interests more than insubstantially and consequently was not organized and operated exclusively for charitable
or other exempt purposes.
Rev. Rul. 70-186, 1970-1 C.B. 128, held that an organization formed to preserve a lake as a public recreational
facility qualified for exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(3), even though the organization's activities also
benefited lakefront property owners. The Service determined that the benefits of the organization's activities
flowed principally to the general public and that it would have been impossible for the organization to
accomplish its exempt purposes without providing some benefit to the lakefront property owners.
Rev. Rul. 75-286, 1975-2 C.B. 210, held that an organization formed by the residents of a city block to beautify
and preserve that block did not qualify for exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(3). The restricted nature of the
organization's membership and the limited area in which its improvements were made indicated that the
organization was organized and operated to serve private interests by enhancing the value of its members'
property rights.
Rev. Rul. 76-152, 1976-1 C.B. 151, held that an organization formed by art patrons to promote community
understanding of modern art trends did not qualify for exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(3). The
organization exhibited and sold the artwork of local artists, who received 90 percent of sales proceeds. This
provision of direct benefits served the private interests of the artists and could not be dismissed as being merely
incidental to its other purposes and activities, and therefore the organization was not operated exclusively for
educational purposes.
Rev. Rul. 76-206, 1976-1 C.B. 154, held that an organization formed to generate community interest in the
retention of classical music programs by a local for-profit radio station did not qualify for exemption under IRC
Section 501(c)(3). The organization's activities enabled the radio station to increase its total revenue and, by
increasing its listening audience, would enhance the value and salability of the station's airtime. The
organization's activities benefited the station in a more than incidental way and served a private rather than a
public interest.
Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. United States, 326 U.S. 279, 283 (1945), held that the
presence of a single nonexempt purpose, if substantial in nature, will preclude exemption regardless of the
number or importance of truly exempt purposes.
Ginsberg v. Commissioner, 46 T.C. 47 (1966), held that an organization formed to dredge certain waterways
was organized and operated primarily for the benefit of persons owning property adjacent to the waterways
rather than for public charitable purposes.
Letter 4034 (Rev. 01-2021)
Catalog Number 47628K
4
Christian Manner International, Inc. v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 661 (1979), held that an organization whose
primary activity was the publication and sale of religious books written by its founder did not qualify for
exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(3). The Tax Court noted in this case that when an activity furthers both an
exempt and nonexempt purpose, qualification for exemption depends on whether the nonexempt purpose is so
incidental to the exempt purpose as not to disqualify the organization for exemption.
American Campaign Academy v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 1053, 1076-78 (1989) held that a school that trained
individuals for careers as political campaign professionals was not described in IRC Section 501(c)(3) because
its operations benefited the private interests of entities and candidates associated with a single political party.
The Tax Court observed that an organization's conferral of benefits on disinterested persons (i.e., unrelated
third parties) may cause the organization to serve private rather than public interests.
Application of law
IRC Section 501(c)(3) and Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) set forth two main tests for an organization
to be recognized as exempt. An organization must be both organized and operated exclusively for purposes
described in Section 501(c)(3). Based on the information provided, you fail the operational test.
Qualification for exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(3) requires that an organization operate exclusively for
exempt purposes. Exclusivity with respect to Section 501(c)(3) does not mean "solely" or "without exception"
but rather contemplates that any non-exempt activities be only incidental and less than substantial. See Treas.
Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1).
Based on the facts presented in your application and supporting documentation, the primary beneficiary of your
activities will be the Y athletes. Your funds will be used to pay the Y athletes for their NIL and NIL services
after the terms of the agreement are met. These athletes are not themselves a recognized charitable class. You
would be serving a private rather than a public interest because your benefits and resources would primarily
flow to the Y athletes for their NIL and NIL services. Paying for the services is not clearly incidental to the
overriding public benefit. To qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(3), you must serve a public, rather
than private interest, as described in Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii). Because your primary expense is for the use
of the NIL of IC athletes from Y with whom you contract, you operate substantially for a substantial private
interest, rather than a public interest.
Just like the artists in Rev. Rul. 76-152, who directly benefited by the exhibition and sale of their works, the Y
athletes whom you contract with for their NIL or NIL services, are directly benefited by the compensation they
receive for the use of their NIL or for their NIL services. Given that you plan on spending most of your
resources for the use of their NIL or for their NIL services, compensating Y athletes is a major activity of yours
and is serving the private interests of those Y athletes who participate in your activities. This direct monetary
benefit to Y athletes is substantial and cannot be considered merely incidental. See Rev. Rul. 76-152; "The
artists in subject case are being directly benefited by the exhibition and sale of their works, with the result that a
major activity of the organization is serving private interests of those artists whose works are displayed for sale.
Since ninety percent of all sale proceeds are turned over to individual artists, such direct benefits are substantial
by any measure and the organization's provision of them cannot be dismissed as being merely incidental to its
other purposes and activities." Similarly, you provide a direct monetary benefit to the Y athletes that is
substantial and cannot be considered merely incidental.
Letter 4034 (Rev. 01-2021)
Catalog Number 47628K
5
Like the organization in Rev. Rul. 76-206 whose activities were intentionally designed to benefit the for-profit
radio station so that it could continue broadcasting classical music, your activities are designed to increase the
number of paid NIL opportunities for Y athletes. The intentional private benefit from your activities cannot be
considered qualitatively incidental to the accomplishment of an exempt purpose.
While you explained that the Y's athlete's participation with various charitable organizations to further their
charitable missions as well as involvement with other charitable and educational initiatives, as ruled under
Better Business Bureau, even if these activities further an exempt purpose, the presence of a single non-exempt
purpose (paying IC athletes), if substantial in nature, destroys the exemption regardless of the number or
importance of truly exempt purposes. You provide a direct monetary benefit to Y's athletes that is substantial
and cannot be considered merely incidental.
You are similar to the organization in Rev. Rul. 61-170, in that your activities will increase the number of paid
NIL opportunities available for the Y athletes. You focus your efforts on arranging NIL deals between local
charities and Y athletes to further the nonexempt purpose of providing these athletes with compensation. Thus,
a substantial and non-incidental part of your activities furthers private interests.
As explained in American Campaign Academy, when an organization operates for the benefit of private
interests, the organization, by definition, does not operate exclusively for exempt purposes. Like in American
Campaign Academy, your activities are aimed at benefiting a designated group which are the IC athletes from
Y. Similarly, one of your substantial activities, providing various services to charitable organizations does not
make you exempt as charitable because this activity provides substantial private benefit to the IC athletes.
As in Christian Manner International, Inc., you are furthering a non-exempt purpose that is not incidental to an
exempt purpose. Your payments to IC athletes in exchange for the use of their NIL does not further an exempt
purpose.
Like the organizations in Ginsberg v. Commissioner, and Rev. Rul. 75-286, the direct benefit to IC athletes
from Y cannot be dismissed as being merely incidental to the exempt purpose since the NIL arrangements are
the primary goal to promote the partner exempt organizations. You are creating NIL agreements with IC
athletes of Y in order to provide services for other Section 501(c)(3) organizations in W. Your resources are
used to establish and pay the IC athletes and thus will serve the interest of the IC athletes who are a non-
charitable class.
As in Rev. Rul. 75-286, your activities result in a direct benefit to a limited group of individuals; therefore, the
private benefit from your activities is not qualitatively incidental to the exempt purposes.
You are unlike the organization in Rev. Rul. 70-186, which was formed to preserve a lake as a public
recreational facility. While the organization's activities clearly benefited the public at large, they also provided
some benefit to private individuals owning lakefront property, but the benefit to private interests was
qualitatively incidental. While the organization's activities benefitted the private interests, this was a necessary
concomitant of the exempt activity because it would have been impossible to accomplish the exempt purpose
without benefiting the lakefront property owners. There, the benefit to private interests was indirect and clearly
incidental to the organization's overriding purpose of preserving the lake. Here, in contrast, your activities result
in a direct monetary benefit to the Y athletes. In addition, you have not established how exclusively benefiting
the IC athletes of Y is a necessary concomitant of providing various services to local charitable organizations.
Letter 4034 (Rev. 01-2021)
Catalog Number 47628K
6
Therefore, the private interests conferred to IC athletes from your activities is not qualitatively incidental to
exempt purposes.
Conclusion
Based on the facts and circumstances presented, you do not qualify for exemption from federal income tax as an
organization described in IRC Section 501(c)(3). You are not operated exclusively for exempt purposes as set
forth in Section 501(c)(3) because you operate for substantial non-exempt purposes, specifically for the private
interests of Y athletes. Therefore, you fail to qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(3).
If you agree
If you agree with our proposed adverse determination, you don't need to do anything. If we don't hear from
you within 30 days, we'll issue a final adverse determination letter. That letter will provide information on
your income tax filing requirements.
If you don't agree
You have a right to protest if you don't agree with our proposed adverse determination. To do so, send us a
protest within 30 days of the date of this letter. You must include:
* Your name, address, employer identification number (EIN), and a daytime phone number
* A statement of the facts, law, and arguments supporting your position
* A statement indicating whether you are requesting an Appeals Office conference
* The signature of an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the
organization or your authorized representative
* The following declaration:
For an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the organization:
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this request, or this modification to the
request, including accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the request
or the modification contains all relevant facts relating to the request, and such facts are true, correct,
and complete.
Your representative (attorney, certified public accountant, or other individual enrolled to practice before the
IRS) must file a Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, with us if they haven't
already done so. You can find more information about representation in Publication 947, Practice Before the
IRS and Power of Attorney.
We'll review your protest statement and decide if you gave us a basis to reconsider our determination. If so,
we'll continue to process your case considering the information you provided. If you haven't given us a basis
for reconsideration, we'll send your case to the Appeals Office and notify you. You can find more information
in Publication 892, How to Appeal an IRS Determination on Tax-Exempt Status.
If you don't file a protest within 30 days, you can't seek a declaratory judgment in court later because the
law requires that you use the IRC administrative process first (IRC Section 7428(b)(2)).
Where to send your protest
Send your protest, Form 2848, if applicable, and any supporting documents to the applicable address:
Letter 4034 (Rev. 01-2021)
Catalog Number 47628K
7
U.S. mail: Street address for delivery service:
Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service
EO Determinations Quality Assurance EO Determinations Quality Assurance
Mail Stop 6403 550 Main Street, Mail Stop 6403
PO Box 2508 Cincinnati, OH 45202
Cincinnati, OH 45201
You can also fax your protest and supporting documents to the fax number listed at the top of this letter. If you
fax your statement, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter to confirm that they received it.
You can get the forms and publications mentioned in this letter by visiting our website at www.irs.gov/forms-
pubs or by calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676). If you have questions, you can contact the person listed at
the top of this letter.
Contacting the Taxpayer Advocate Service
The Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) is an independent organization within the IRS that can help protect your
taxpayer rights. TAS can offer you help if your tax problem is causing a hardship, or if you've tried but haven't
been able to resolve your problem with the IRS. If you qualify for TAS assistance, which is always free, TAS
will do everything possible to help you. Visit www.taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov or call 877-777-4778.
Sincerely,
Stephen A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements
Letter 4034 (Rev. 01-2021)
Catalog Number 47628K
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.