🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202507004 Released February 14, 2025 Denied

IRS denies a late portability election because the estate used hindsight

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

"Portability" lets a surviving spouse use the unused portion of a deceased spouse's federal estate-tax exclusion (the deceased spousal unused exclusion, or DSUE), but only if the first spouse's estate makes the election on a timely filed estate tax return (Form 706). Here the first spouse (Decedent) died with an estate small enough that no estate tax return was required, and the estate never filed one, so no portability election was made. The surviving Spouse then died too, and the Spouse's estate filed a return showing no estate tax. Only afterward did the family, through the son serving as executor of both estates, ask the IRS for an extension of time under section 301.9100-3 to make the late portability election for the first Decedent's estate. The section 301.9100-3 regulations allow extra time for a missed election only when the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and did not use hindsight. The IRS denied the request. It found the estate used hindsight: the decision to seek portability came after the surviving spouse had already died and the tax picture was known, which is exactly the situation the anti-hindsight rule blocks. This is a relatively uncommon denial and a caution that portability relief will not be granted when the request looks driven by later events rather than an original intent to elect.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the first decedent's estate get an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 to make a late portability election under § 2010(c)(5)(A)?
  • Outcome: Denied (estate used hindsight; requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 not satisfied)
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2001, 2010(c); Treas. Reg. §§ 20.2010-2(a), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3(b)(3)(iii)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202507004 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/14/2025 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2010.04-00, 9100.35-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------------------------- ---------------------, ID No. -----------------
----------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------- --------------------
------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------ CC:PSI:B04
PLR-109535-24
Date:
November 18, 2024


Legend

Decedent = ----------------------
= -------------------------
Spouse = -----------------------
-------------------------
Son = --------------------


Date 1 = --------------------------
Date 2 = ---------------------------
x = -----------

Dear -------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated May 1, 2024, and subsequent correspondence,
submitted on behalf of Decedent's estate, requesting an extension of time pursuant to
§ 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an election.
Decedent's estate is requesting to make an election under § 2010(c)(5)(A) of the
Internal Revenue Code (a "portability" election) to allow a decedent's surviving spouse
to take into account the deceased spousal unused exclusion (DSUE) amount.

The information submitted for consideration is summarized below.

Decedent died on Date 1, survived by Spouse. Based on the value of Decedent's gross
estate on Decedent's date of death, $x, Decedent's estate was not required under
§ 6018(a) to file an estate tax return, that is, Form 706 – United States Estate (and
Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return. Although the timely filing of Form 706 is
required in order to make a portability election, Decedent's estate did not timely file a
Form 706, and no portability election was made. See § 20.2010-2(a)(2) of the Estate
Tax Regulations (providing for the making of the portability election upon the timely filing
of a complete and properly prepared estate tax return).

Spouse died on Date 2. Son, as executor of Spouse's estate, filed Form 706 for
Spouse's estate, reporting zero estate tax liability.

Son, as executor of Decedent's estate, now requests an extension of time under
§ 301.9100-3 to make a portability election in Decedent's estate.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 2001(a) imposes a tax on the transfer of the taxable estate of every decedent
who is a citizen or resident of the United States.

Section 2010(a) provides that a credit of the applicable credit amount shall be allowed
to the estate of every decedent against the tax imposed by § 2001.

Section 2010(c)(1) provides that the applicable credit amount is the amount of the
tentative tax that would be determined under § 2001(c) if the amount with respect to
which such tentative tax is to be computed were equal to the applicable exclusion
amount.

On December 17, 2010, Congress amended § 2010(c), effective for estates of
decedents dying and gifts made after December 31, 2010, to allow portability of a
decedent's unused applicable exclusion amount between spouses. Tax Relief,
Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010,
Pub. L. No. 111-312, § 303, 124 Stat. 3296, 3302 (2010).

Section 2010(c)(2) provides that the applicable exclusion amount is the sum of the basic
exclusion amount, and, in the case of a surviving spouse, the DSUE amount.

Section 2010(c)(3) provides the basic exclusion amount available to the estate of every
decedent, an amount to be adjusted for inflation annually after calendar year 2011.

Section 2010(c)(4) defines the DSUE amount to mean the lesser of (A) the basic
exclusion amount, or (B) the excess of -- (i) the applicable exclusion amount of the last
deceased spouse of the surviving spouse, over (ii) the amount with respect to which the
tentative tax is determined under § 2001(b)(1) on the estate of such deceased spouse.

Section 2010(c)(5)(A) provides that a DSUE amount may not be taken into account by a
surviving spouse under § 2010(c)(2) unless the executor of the estate of the deceased
spouse files an estate tax return on which such amount is computed and makes an
election on such return that such amount may be so taken into account. The election,
once made, shall be irrevocable. No election may be made if such return is filed after
the time prescribed by law (including extensions) for filing such return.

Section 20.2010-2(a)(1) provides that the due date of an estate tax return required to
elect portability is nine months after the decedent's date of death or the last day of the
period covered by an extension (if an extension of time for filing has been obtained).

Under § 20.2010-2(a)(1), an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 to make a portability
election may be granted in the case of an estate that is not required to file an estate tax
return under § 6018(a), as determined solely based on the value of the gross estate and
any adjusted taxable gifts (and without regard to § 20.2010-2(a)).

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable
extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a
regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the
case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code
except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the Commissioner will use to determine
whether to grant an extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed
by a regulation (and not expressly provided by statute). Requests for relief under
§ 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith,
and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(3)(iii) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have not acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer uses hindsight in requesting relief. If
specific facts have changed since the due date for making the election that make the
election advantageous to a taxpayer, the IRS will not ordinarily grant relief. In such a
case, the IRS will grant relief only when the taxpayer provides strong proof that the
taxpayer's decision to seek relief did not involve hindsight.

In this case, based on the representation as to the value of Decedent's gross estate, the
time for filing the portability election is fixed by the regulations. Therefore, the
Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-3 to grant an extension of
time for Decedent's estate to elect portability, provided Decedent's estate establishes it
acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3
are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have not been satisfied
because Decedent's estate has used hindsight in requesting relief. Accordingly,
Decedent's estate is not granted an extension of time to make the portability election.

We neither express nor imply any opinion concerning the tax consequences of any
aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material
submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

                                       Sincerely,

                                       Associate Chief Counsel
                                       Passthroughs and Special Industries

                                       _______________________________
                                By:    Karlene M. Lesho
                                       Chief, Branch 4
                                       Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                       (Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosure
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.