S corporation status preserved after two trusts missed QSST elections
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2024, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Two grantor trusts held stock in an S corporation when their grantor died. The trusts remained eligible S corporation shareholders for two years after the death, but continued holding the stock after that period without their beneficiaries making qualified subchapter S trust elections. That failure terminated the corporation's S election. The corporation represented that the lapse was inadvertent, that the trusts otherwise met the QSST requirements, that all returns consistently treated the corporation as an S corporation, and that the parties would make required adjustments. The IRS preserved S corporation status from the termination date onward, conditioned on both beneficiaries filing retroactive QSST elections within 120 days.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the corporation retain S status after two trusts failed to make QSST elections when their post-death eligibility periods expired?
- Outcome: Approved, conditioned on both beneficiaries filing QSST elections within 120 days
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(c)(2), 1361(d), 1362(f)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202444001 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/1/2024 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------------- -----------------, ID No. -----------------
------------------------------ Telephone Number:
------------------ --------------------
------------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------------------------------- CC:PSI:B03
PLR-101382-24
Date:
July 22, 2024
Legend:
X = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
A = ----------------------
B = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
C = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
State = ------------------
Trust 1 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Trust 2 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Date 1 = ---------------------------
Date 2 = ----------------
Date 3 = --------------------------
Date 4 = --------------------------
PLR-101382-24 2
Dear ------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated January 9, 2024, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representatives, requesting
a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).
FACTS
According to the information submitted and representations within, X was
incorporated in State on Date 1, and elected to be treated as an S corporation effective
Date 2. On Date 3, A the grantor of Trust 1 and Trust 2, referred to as Trusts, died.
Trusts ceased to be grantor trusts but continued to qualify as eligible S corporation
shareholders under § 1362(c)(2)(A)(ii) for the 2-year period beginning on the day of the
deemed owner’s death. However, Trusts continued to hold the X stock after the 2-year
period had ended on Date 4. According to X, Trust 1 and Trust 2 each qualify as a
qualified subchapter S trust (QSST), but each of the respective trust beneficiaries, B
and C made no QSST election for their respective trust. As a result, X’s S corporation
election terminated on Date 4.
X represents that Trust 1 and Trust 2 both met the requirements of a QSST
within the meaning of § 1361(d)(3) at all time since Date 4, except that the respective
beneficiaries of Trust 1 and Trust 2 failed to make the election under § 1361(d)(2).
X further represents that the circumstances resulting in the termination of X’s S
election were inadvertent and were not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax
planning. Additionally, X represents that X and its shareholders have filed all returns
consistent with X’s status as an S Corporation. X and its shareholders agree to make
any adjustments (consistent with the treatment of X as an S Corporation) as may be
required by the Secretary.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1362(a) provides that a small business corporation may elect to be an S
corporation.
Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to
any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is
in effect for such year.
Section 1361(b)(1) provides that the term “small business corporation” means a
domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not (A) have
more than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate,
a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is
PLR-101382-24 3
not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more
than one class of stock.
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) provides that, for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), a trust all
of which is treated (under subpart E of part 1 of subchapter J of chapter 1) as owned by
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States is a permitted S
corporation shareholder.
Section 1361(c)(2)(B)(i) provides that for purposes of § 1361(b)(1), in the case of
a trust described in § 1362(c)(2)(A)(i), the deemed owner shall be treated as the
shareholder.
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) provides that a trust which was described in
§1361(c)(2)(A)(i) immediately before the death of the deemed owner and which
continues in existence after such death, is a permitted shareholder, but only for the 2-
year period beginning on the day of the deemed owner’s death.
Section 1361(d)(1) provides that, in the case of a QSST with respect to which a
beneficiary makes an election under § 1361(d)(2), (A) such trust shall be treated as a
trust described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i), (B) for purposes of § 678(a), the beneficiary of such
trust shall be treated as the owner of that portion of the trust which consists of stock in
the S corporation with respect to which the election under § 1361(d)(2) is made.
Section 1362(f) provides relevant part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by
any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined
without regard to § 1362(b)(2)), by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of
§ 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents, or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2)
or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such
ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of
time after discovery of the event resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps
were taken (A) so that the corporation for which the election was made or the
termination occurred is a small business corporation, and (4) the corporation, and each
person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified
pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment
of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with
respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such
ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation shall be treated as an S corporation
during the period specified by the Secretary.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that
X’s S corporation election terminated on Date 4 was inadvertent within the meaning of
§ 1362(f). We further hold that, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated
PLR-101382-24 4
as continuing to be an S Corporation from Date 4 and thereafter, provided that X’s S
corporation election was valid and was not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).
This ruling is contingent upon B and C the respective beneficiaries of Trust 1 and
Trust 2 filing a QSST election for their respective trust effective Date 4 within 120 days
from the date of this letter. A copy of this letter should be attached to the election. If X
or its shareholders fail to treat themselves as described above, this ruling is null and
void.
Except as specifically rules upon above, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
eligibility of X to be an S corporation.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on
examination.
These rulings are directed only to the taxpayer requesting them.
Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of
this letter to X’s authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Richard T. Probst
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosure:
Copy of this letter for § 6110 purposes
PLR-101382-24 5
cc: -----------------------------
--------------
---------------------------------
------------------------------------
-------------------------
----------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
-------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2024, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.