🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202443016 Released October 25, 2024 Approved

Supplemental ruling preserves S status after six trusts missed ESBT elections

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2024, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

This supplemental ruling modifies an earlier private letter ruling about a corporation's S election. Six shareholder trusts were eligible to be electing small business trusts, but their trustees did not timely make the required ESBT elections. Three trusts became ineligible shareholders on one date, and the other three did so on a later date, causing or potentially causing the S election to terminate. The IRS accepted the representation that the missed elections were inadvertent and not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. It ruled that the corporation would continue to be treated as an S corporation if the trustees filed the ESBT elections within 120 days and the corporation and shareholders filed any necessary original or amended returns. The IRS also extended by 60 days the time to complete elections and payments referenced in the earlier ruling.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Will the corporation retain S status after six shareholder trusts failed to make timely ESBT elections?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to corrective filings
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(e), 1362(d), 1362(f)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202443016 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/25/2024 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------- -----------------------------------, ID No. -------
------------------------------------------- -----------------
----------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------- --------------------
------------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------- CC:PSI:B03
PLR-113020-24

                                             Date:
                                             July 26, 2024

Dear -----------------:

  This letter supplements and modifies PLR-119806-23, issued May 09, 2024

(Previous Letter).

   Paragraphs 2 and 3 on page 3 of the Previous Letter are modified as follows:

   X represents that Trust 2, Trust 3, Trust 4, Trust 9, Trust 10, and Trust 11 were

eligible to make Electing Small Business Trust (ESBT) elections under § 1361(e)(3),
effective Date 3 and Date 4, respectively. However, the trustees failed to make ESBT
elections for the trusts to be eligible S corporation shareholders. Thus, Trust 2, Trust 3,
and Trust 4 became ineligible shareholders of X on Date 3 and Trust 9, Trust 10, and
Trust 11 became ineligible shareholders of X on Date 4. Accordingly, the failure to
make ESBT elections caused X’s S election to terminate on Date 3 and if it had not
already terminated it would have terminated on Date 4.

  X represents it filed income tax returns consistent with having an election to be

treated as an S corporation for all taxable years since its formation. X represents that
Trust 2, Trust 3, Trust 4, Trust 9, Trust 10, and Trust 11 have always met the
requirements of an ESBT within the meaning of § 1361(e), except that the trustees of
did not make a timely ESBT election under § 1361(e)(3). It is represented that failure to
file ESBT elections were inadvertent and not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive
tax planning. X and each of its shareholders agree to make any adjustments required
by the Secretary as a condition of obtaining relief under the inadvertent termination rule
as provided under § 1362(f).

PLR-113020-24 2

  Paragraphs 1, 2, and 5 on page 5 of the Previous Letter are modified as follows:

  Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that

X’s S corporation election terminated on Date 3 because the trustees of Trust 2, Trust 3,
and Trust 4 failed to timely make ESBT elections under § 1361(e)(3). Further, X’s S
corporation election would have terminated on Date 4 because the trustees of Trust 9,
Trust 10, and Trust 11 failed to timely make ESBT elections under § 1361(e)(3).
However, the ineffectiveness of X’s S corporation election was inadvertent within the
meaning of § 1362(f). Accordingly, X shall be treated as an S corporation from Date 3
and thereafter, provided its S corporation election is not otherwise terminated under
§ 1362(d).

   This letter ruling is subject to the conditions that within 120 days from the date of

this letter (1) the trustees of Trust 2, Trust 3, Trust 4, Trust 9, Trust 10, and Trust 11
must file ESBT elections with respect to Trust 2, Trust 3, Trust 4, Trust 9, Trust 10, and
Trust 11, effective Date 3 or Date 4, as appropriate, with the appropriate service center
and (2) X and its shareholders file any necessary original or amended returns consistent
with the relief granted in this letter. A copy of this letter should be attached to the ESBT
election and any original or amended returns.

  Except as specifically ruled above, we express or imply no opinion concerning

the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of
the Code and the regulations thereunder, including whether X was otherwise a valid S
corporation or whether Trust 2, Trust 3, Trust 4, Trust 9, Trust 10, and Trust 11 are valid
ESBTs within the meaning of § 1361(e)(3).

   Because of the amendments made to the Previous Letter by this supplemental

ruling letter, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this
supplemental ruling letter to file the elections and make the payments referenced in the
Previous Letter.

                                  Sincerely,



                                  Robert D. Alinsky
                                  Branch Chief, Branch 3
                                  Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                  (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures
Copy for § 6110 purposes

PLR-113020-24 3

Cc: -------------------------
---------------------------------------
--------------------------
--------------
-----------------------------
--------------------------

  --------------------------
  ---------------------------------------
  --------------------------
  --------------
  ----------------------------
  --------------------------

  ----------------------------------
  --------------------------------------------------
  -------------------------------------------------------------
  -------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2024, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.