🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202439007 Released September 27, 2024 Approved

IRS grants a 60-day extension to file a late Form 8996 self-certifying a Qualified Opportunity Fund

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2024, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An LLC taxed as a partnership was formed to acquire qualified opportunity zone property and to be treated as a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF), a vehicle that lets investors defer tax on capital gains reinvested in low-income census tracts. To be a QOF, an entity must self-certify each year by attaching Form 8996 to its timely filed return. Because of a miscommunication with its accountant, the entity did not timely file its Form 1065 or the Form 8996 for the year in question. A member represented that he did not know those filings were required and relied on the accountant and attorney to handle them; the accountant did not learn the entity had been formed and had bought property until months later. The taxpayer asked the IRS for relief under the "9100" regulations (Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3), which allow more time for a missed election when the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and relief will not prejudice the government. The IRS found the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to make the election, and granted a 60-day extension to file Form 8996. The extension covers only the Form 8996, not the Form 1065, and the IRS expressed no opinion on whether the entity actually qualifies as a QOF or whether investments into it are qualifying investments.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May an entity that missed filing Form 8996 because of a miscommunication with its accountant get an extension of time to self-certify as a Qualified Opportunity Fund?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1400Z-2(d), (e)(4)(A); Treas. Reg. § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202439007
Release Date: 9/27/2024
Index Number: 9100.00-00

Third Party Communication: None
Date of Communication: Not Applicable

Person To Contact:

ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:


Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B05
PLR-107239-24

Date:
June 26, 2024

Legend:
Taxpayer = [redacted]
Date 1 = [redacted]
Date 2 = [redacted]
Date 3 = [redacted]
Date 4 = [redacted]
Date 5 = [redacted]
Date 6 = [redacted]
Date 7 = [redacted]
Date 8 = [redacted]
Date 9 = [redacted]
Date 10 = [redacted]
Date 11 = [redacted]
State = [redacted]
Member A = [redacted]
Member B = [redacted]
Member C = [redacted]
Attorney = [redacted]
Accountant = [redacted]

Dear ---------------:

This responds to Taxpayer's request dated Date 1 under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure
and Administration Regulations for an extension of time to file Form 8996, Qualified
Opportunity Fund, to (i) self-certify as a qualified opportunity fund ("QOF") as defined in
§ 1400Z-2(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), and (ii) to be treated as a QOF for
its taxable year ended Date 2, effective as of Date 3, as provided under § 1400Z-2 of
the Code and § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a) of the Income Tax Regulations.

                                      FACTS

The information and affidavits submitted reflect the following facts:

Taxpayer is a limited liability company organized under the laws of State, classified as a
partnership for Federal income tax purposes, and files its return on a calendar year
basis. The operating agreement of Taxpayer, executed on Date 4, states that the
primary purpose of Taxpayer is to acquire investments which may be treated as
qualified opportunity zone property to enable Taxpayer to be treated as a QOF.
Member A is the initial member of Taxpayer, and is treated as owned by Member B and
Member C. The operating agreement was amended effective Date 5 to add Member B
directly as an additional member of Taxpayer.

In Date 6, Member A contemplated the sale of an asset at a gain. Prior to forming
Taxpayer, Member B consulted Attorney on the possibility of creating a QOF. Member
B also discussed the possible sale of Member A's asset and the tax implications with
Accountant. Member B and Member C were long-term clients of Accountant. Member
B told Accountant that they were working with an attorney and broker familiar with
QOFs.

After forming Taxpayer and purchasing property, Member B and Attorney A recall
having a telephone conversation with Accountant in Date 7 concerning Taxpayer and
the purchased properties. Due to a miscommunication, Taxpayer's Forms 1065 and
Form 8996 for Date 6 were not filed by Date 8, the due date.

In Date 9, Member B met with Accountant regarding their personal income taxes for
Date 6. During this meeting, Member B and Accountant also discussed Taxpayer's
operations. Accountant represents that, at that time, they first learned that Taxpayer
was established, and that Taxpayer had purchased property with the intention of being
a QOF. Accountant then realized that Taxpayer had not timely filed Forms 1065 and
8996 for Date 6. Accountant investigated the possibility of filing a private letter ruling
and consulted with a tax attorney during Date 10. In Date 11, Accountant informed
Member B that the Form 8996 for Date 6 had not been filed.

Member B represents that they did not know that Taxpayer was required to file Forms
1065 and 8996 for Date 6. Member B further represents they relied upon Accountant
and Attorney to comply with tax filing requirements.

                              LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 13823(a) of Public Law 115-97, commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
of 2017, added provisions to the Code authorizing taxpayers to defer eligible capital
gain through reinvesting the funds into state-designated population census tracks in
low-income communities, known as Qualified Opportunity Zones. Section
1400Z-2(e)(4)(A) of the Code directs the Secretary to prescribe regulations to carry out
the statute's purposes, including rules for the certification of QOFs. Section
1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations provides the rules for an entity to
self-certify as a QOF. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) provides that the entity electing to
be certified as a QOF must do so annually on a timely filed return in such form and
manner as may be prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the forms or
instructions, or in publications or guidance of the Service, published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin.

To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996 with its tax return for the year
to which the certification applies. The Form 8996 must be filed by the due date of the
tax return (including extensions).

Because § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations sets forth the manner
and timing for an entity to self-certify as a QOF, these elections are regulatory elections,
as defined in § 301.9100-1(b) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations provide the standards that the Commissioner will use to determine whether
to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-3(a)
provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections, other than
automatic extensions covered in § 301.9100-2, will be granted when the taxpayer
provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably
and in good faith and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the
Government.

Under § 301.9100-3(b) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations, a taxpayer is
deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if, among other circumstances not
relevant here, the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election. § 301.9100-
3(b)(1)(v).

A taxpayer is deemed not to have acted reasonably and in good faith pursuant to the
provision in § 301.9100-3(b)(3) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations if the
taxpayer—

   (i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been
   or could be imposed under § 6662 of the Code at the time the taxpayer requests
   relief, and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which
   relief is requested;

   (ii) was informed in all material respects of the required election and related tax
   consequences but chose not to make the election; or

   (iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the
   original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the Service
   will not ordinarily grant relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides that
the Commissioner will grant a reasonable extension of time to make the regulatory
election only when the interests of the Government will not be prejudiced by the
granting of relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides
that the interests of the Government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in a
taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the
election than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking
into account the time value of money).

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides
that the interests of the Government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which
the regulatory election should have been made or any taxable year that would have
been affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the period of
limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) before the taxpayer's receipt of a ruling
granting relief under this section.

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government. Accordingly, based solely on
the facts and information submitted, and the representations made in the ruling request,
we grant Taxpayer an extension of 60 days from the date of this letter ruling to file a
Form 8996 to make the election to self-certify as a QOF under § 1400Z-2 of the Code
and § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations. The election must be
made on a completed Form 8996 attached to Taxpayer's return. This letter ruling
grants an extension of time to file a Form 8996. This letter ruling does not grant an
extension of time to file Taxpayer's Form 1065.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, we express no opinion, either express or implied, concerning
whether any investments made into Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in
§ 1.1400Z2(a)-1(b)(34) of the Income Tax Regulations or whether Taxpayer meets the
requirements under § 1400Z-2 of the Code and the regulations thereunder to be a QOF.
We express no opinion regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the
provisions of any other sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable, or
regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting
from, the instant transaction.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney forms on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

                                                     Sincerely,



                                                     Christina M. Glendening
                                                     Senior Counsel, Branch 5
                                                     Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax
                                                     and Accounting)

cc: [redacted]

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2024, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.