🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202435010 Released August 30, 2024 Approved

Late GST exemption allocations approved for child trusts

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2024, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Before 2001, a grantor transferred corporate stock to two trusts for the grantor's children. The trustee could support the child and the grantor's spouse, and after the grantor and spouse died, each child had a limited appointment power with the remaining property otherwise passing to descendants. The grantor timely reported the gifts, but professional advisers did not explain that GST exemption had to be affirmatively allocated. The IRS granted 120 days to allocate remaining GST exemption to the original transfers on an amended Form 709. The allocation must account for exemption already allocated to later transfers and will use the original gift tax values.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the grantor make late GST exemption allocations to pre-2001 transfers to two family trusts?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 120 days to file an amended Form 709
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2631, 2632(a), 2642(b), 2642(g); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202435010 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/30/2024 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 2632.00-00,
2642.00-00 Person To Contact:
-------------------------- ID No. -----------------
------------------------ -----------------------------------------------------
------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------------- --------------------
---------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B04
-------------------------------------- PLR-123993-23
Date:
June 04, 2024

Legend

Grantor = -------------------------------------------------------
Spouse = --------------------------------------------------
Date = ----------------------
Child 1 = ----------------------
Child 2 = ---------------------
Accounting Firm = ----------------------------------------------
Trust 1 = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
Trust 2 = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
a = ---
Corporation = --------------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Year 4 = -------
Attorney = ----------------------
Accountant = ---------------------------------

Dear -----------------:

  This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated December 7,

2023, and subsequent correspondence, requesting an extension of time under
§ 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to allocate Grantor’s generation-skipping transfer (GST)
exemption to trusts.

PLR-123993-23 2

   The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:

   Grantor created a trust agreement on Date in Year 1 (a date before 2001). The

trust agreement established two trusts, Trust 1 for the benefit of Grantor’s child, Child 1,
and Trust 2 for the benefit of Grantor’s child, Child 2. Each trust provides that the
trustee has discretion to distribute trust income to that child or to Grantor’s spouse,
Spouse, for support, education, and medical care. After the child reaches the age of a,
the trustee may distribute all or any part of the net income and/or principal to the child
beneficiary as the trustee deems desirable for the best interests of the child beneficiary.

   Each trust further provides that after the death of Grantor and Spouse, the child

beneficiary has a limited power of appointment to appoint to anyone other than the child
beneficiary, the child beneficiary’s estate, or the creditors of either. To the extent that
the child beneficiary does not exercise the limited power of appointment, at the child
beneficiary’s death, the trust property is to be divided per stirpes among the child
beneficiary’s then living descendants.

   On Date, Grantor made a gift of common stock of Corporation to Trust 1 and

Trust 2. Grantor hired Accounting Firm to prepare Form 709, United States Gift (and
Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return for Year 1. The value of each gift was
reported on Grantor’s Form 709. However, none of Grantor’s professional advisors
advised him that he needed to affirmatively allocate GST exemption to Trust 1 or Trust
2 on Form 709.

   In Year 2 (a year before 2001) and Year 3, Grantor made additional transfers and

allocated GST exemption to those transfers.

   In Year 4, in the course of estate planning for Grantor, Grantor’s attorney,

Attorney, and current accountant, Accountant, discovered that GST exemption was
never allocated on Grantor’s Year 1 Form 709.

   You have requested an extension of time under § 2642(g) and § 301.9100-3 to

allocate Grantor’s remaining available GST exemption to the Year 1 transfers to Trust 1
and Trust 2.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. A

generation-skipping transfer is defined under § 2611(a) as, (1) a taxable distribution,
(2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

   Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax imposed by § 2601 is the

taxable amount multiplied by the applicable rate.

PLR-123993-23 3

    Section 2631(a), as in effect for the years at issue in the present case, provided

that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a
GST exemption of $ 1,000,000 which may be allocated by such individual (or his
executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is the transferor. Section
2631(b) provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable.

   Section 2632(a)(1) provides that an individual's GST exemption may be allocated

at any time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such
individual's estate (determined with regard to extensions), regardless of whether such
return is required to be filed. Section 2632(a)(2) provides that the manner in which
allocations are to be made shall be prescribed by forms or regulations issued by the
Secretary.

    Section 2642(b)(1)(A) provides that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the

allocation of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a gift tax return
filed on or before the date prescribed by § 6075(b) for such transfer or is deemed to be
made under § 2632(b)(1) or (c)(1) the value of such property for purposes of § 2642(a)
shall be its value as finally determined for purposes of chapter 12 (within the meaning of
§ 2001(f)(2)), or, in the case of an allocation deemed to have been made at the close of
an estate tax inclusion period, its value at the time of the close of the estate tax
inclusion period.

  Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe

such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to
make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election
under § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting
comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of
§ 2642(g).

   Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under

this paragraph, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances,
including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer
and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining
whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the time for making the allocation (or
election) shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

    Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a

reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3
to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months
except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except
subtitles E, G, H, and I.

  Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant

an extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation
(and not expressly provided by statute). Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be

PLR-123993-23 4

granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

  Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted

reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

   Under § 301.9100-3(g)(1), the procedures set forth in § 301.9100-3 do not apply

to requests for relief under § 2642(g)(1) that are filed on or after May 6, 2024,
regardless of the date of the transfer. Since this ruling request was filed with the
Internal Revenue Service prior to May 6, 2024, the procedures set forth in § 301.9100-3
may still be applied to grant relief under § 2642(g)(1). For requests for relief under
§ 2642(g)(1), see § 26.2642-7 of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations.

   Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that

the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, Grantor is granted an
extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to allocate Grantor’s available
GST exemption to the Year 1 transfers to Trust 1 and Trust 2, after taking into account
any GST exemption already allocated by Grantor to the transfers in Year 2 and Year 3.
The allocation will be effective as of Date, the date of Grantor’s transfer to the trusts,
and the value of the transfer as determined for federal gift tax purposes will be used in
determining the amount of GST exemption to be allocated to Trust 1 and Trust 2.

    The allocation should be made on an amended Form 709. The Form 709 should

be filed with the Internal Revenue Service at the following address: Internal Revenue
Service Center, ATTN: E&G, Stop 824G, 7940 Kentucky Drive, Florence, KY 41042-
2915.

  In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, we have sent a

copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.

   Except as expressly provided herein, we neither express nor imply any opinion

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

PLR-123993-23 5

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

                                             Sincerely,

                                             Associate Chief Counsel
                                             Passthroughs and Special Industries

                                             Melissa C. Liquerman
                                             _________________________
                                    By:      [Melissa C. Liquerman]
                                             Senior Counsel, Branch 4
                                             Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                             (Passthroughs and Special Industries)


  Enclosure
        Copy for § 6110 purposes

         cc:       ----------------------
         ---------------------------------
         ---------------------------------------------
         --------------------------------
         --------------------------

         cc:      --------------
         ---------------------------------
         ---------------------------------------------
         --------------------------------
         --------------------------

         cc:       -------------------------------------------
         -----------------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2024, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.