Late opportunity fund certifications allowed for two years
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2024, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A partnership was organized to qualify as a qualified opportunity fund and indirectly invest in opportunity-zone property. Its federal partnership returns and Forms 8996 were not filed for two consecutive years. The IRS accepted the partnership's representations that it acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government. It granted 45 days to file Form 8996 with the applicable income tax return for each year. The ruling does not address late-return penalties or whether the partnership and its investments otherwise satisfied the opportunity-zone requirements.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the partnership file late Forms 8996 to self-certify as a qualified opportunity fund for two years?
- Outcome: Approved, with 45 days to file both certifications
- Key authorities: IRC § 1400Z-2; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1400Z2(d)-1, 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202433006 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/16/2024 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 1400Z.01-00,
1400Z.02-00 Person To Contact:
-----------------, ID No. -----------------
---------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------ --------------------
------------------------ Refer Reply To:
------------------------------ CC:ITA:B04
PLR-122956-23
Date:
May 20, 2024
LEGEND
Taxpayer = -------------------------------
-------------------------
State Z = -----------
Tax Year = ---------------------
Individual 1 = --------------------------
Individual 2 = ------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Date 1 = -------------------------
Date 2 = --------------------------
Dear --------------------:
This letter responds to Taxpayer’s request, dated Date 2. Specifically, Taxpayer
requests an extension of time, under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure
and Administration Regulations, to file Taxpayer’s Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity
Fund, for purposes of making the election for Year 1 and Year 2, under § 1.1400Z2(d)-
1(a)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations, to: (1) self-certify Taxpayer as a qualified
opportunity fund (“QOF”), as defined in § 1400Z-2(d) of the Internal Revenue Code; and
(2) be treated as a QOF, effective as of the month Taxpayer was formed, as provided
under § 1400Z-2(d) and § 1.1400Z(d)-1(a).1
This letter ruling is being issued electronically in accordance with Rev. Proc. 2023-1,
2023-1 I.R.B. 1. A paper copy will not be mailed to Taxpayer.
1
Unless otherwise specified, all “section” or “§” references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code
or the Treasury Regulations (26 CFR Part 1) or (26 CFR Part 301) as applicable.
PLR-122956-23 2
FACTS
Based on the provided information and representations, we understand the following
facts. Taxpayer was organized, on Date 1, as a limited liability company, under the
laws of State Z and is classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.
According to Taxpayer’s operating agreement, Taxpayer was organized for the purpose
of qualifying as a QOF and investing indirectly in qualified opportunity zone property as
defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(2). Taxpayer represents that it is eligible to make an election to
be recognized as a QOF for Year 1 and Year 2. Taxpayer uses the cash method of
accounting and has a taxable year end of Tax Year.
Early in Year 1, Individual 1 and Individual 2, sold property and intended to defer a
portion of the gain by investing those gains in Taxpayer. Individual 1 is Taxpayer’s
partnership representative.
Due to a set of circumstances, Taxpayer’s Year 1 Form 1065, U.S. Return of
Partnership Income was not filed. Consequently, Taxpayer’s Form 8996 was not timely
filed for Year 1. In seeking advice on tax compliance, Taxpayer was advised that
Taxpayer’s Year 2 Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income was not filed.
Consequently, Taxpayer’s Form 8996 was not timely filed for Year 2.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(A) directs the Secretary to prescribe regulations for rules for the
certification of QOFs. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) of the regulations provides that the
self-certification of a QOF must be timely filed and effectuated annually in such form
and manner as may be prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the
Internal Revenue Service forms or instructions, or in publications or guidance published
in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996 with its tax return for the year
to which the certification applies. The Form 8996 must be filed by the due date of the
tax return (including extensions) for the year to which the certification applies.
Taxpayer failed to file the Form 8996 by the due date of its Year 1 and Year 2 federal
income tax return.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory
election. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for
regulatory elections (other than automatic extensions covered in § 301.9100-2) will be
granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and the grant of relief will not prejudice the
interests of the Government.
PLR-122956-23 3
Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory election” as including any election
whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register. Section
1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) sets forth the manner and timing for electing to be a QOF and
electing to self-certify as a QOF. As such, these elections are regulatory elections, as
defined in § 301.9100-1(b).
Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably
and in good faith if the taxpayer—
(i) requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered
by the Service;
(ii) failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the
taxpayer's control;
(iii) failed to make the election because, after exercising reasonable diligence,
the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election;
(iv) reasonably relied on the written advice of the Service; or
(v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the professional failed to
make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides a taxpayer will not be considered to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer—
(i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been
or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief, and
the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is
requested;
(ii) was fully informed in all material respects of the required election and related
tax consequences but chose not to make the election; or
(iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the
original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the Service
will not ordinarily grant relief.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the Commissioner will grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election only when the interests of the
Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief. Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i)
provides that the interests of the Government are prejudiced if granting relief would
result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years
affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been
timely made (taking into account the time value of money). Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii)
PLR-122956-23 4
provides that the interests of the Government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable
year in which the regulatory election should have been made or any taxable year that
would have been affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the
period of limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) before the taxpayer's receipt of a
ruling granting relief under this section.
Taxpayer represents that Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith.
Additionally, Taxpayer also represents that none of the circumstances listed in
§ 301.9100-3(b)(3) apply.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts and information submitted and the representations made in
connection with this ruling request, we conclude that Taxpayer has acted reasonably
and in good faith, and that the granting of relief would not prejudice the interests of the
Government. Accordingly, we grant Taxpayer an extension of 45 days from the date of
this letter ruling to file a Form 8996, for Year 1 and Year 2, to make the election to self-
certify as a QOF under § 1400Z-2 and § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i). The election must be
made on a completed Form 8996 attached to the Taxpayer’s applicable income tax
return for Year 1 and Year 2.
CAVEATS
This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by Taxpayer and
accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by the appropriate parties.
This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a
ruling. However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual
information, representations, and other data submitted.
This ruling addresses the granting of § 301.9100-3 relief as applied to the election to
self-certify Taxpayer as an QOF by filing Form 8996 for Year 1 and Year 2 and does not
address any penalty or related issues due to Taxpayer’s failure to timely file an income
tax return for Year 1 and Year 2. Specifically, we have no opinion, either express nor
implied, concerning whether any investments made into Taxpayer are qualifying
investments as defined in § 1.1400Z-2(a)-1(b)(34), or whether Taxpayer met or meets
the requirements under § 1400Z-2 and the regulations thereunder to be a QOF.
Further, we express no opinion on whether any interest indirectly owned by Taxpayer
qualifies as qualified opportunity zone property, as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(2), or
whether the indirect interest would be treated as a qualified opportunity zone business,
as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(3). Nor do we express any opinion regarding the tax
treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the
Internal Revenue Code or Treasury Regulations that may be applicable, or regarding
the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the
instant transaction.
PLR-122956-23 5
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Enclosed is a copy of the letter ruling
showing the deletions proposed to be made when it is disclosed under § 6110.
In accordance with the Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of
Representative, on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to Taxpayer’s
authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Lisa Mojiri-Azad
Senior Technician Reviewer
Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)
cc: ----------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2024, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.