🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202432001 Released August 9, 2024 Approved

Late election out of bonus depreciation allowed

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2024, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership claimed additional first-year depreciation on land improvements, building improvements, machinery, and equipment placed in service during a taxable year. Its accounting firm did not advise it to elect out, then also omitted the required state-law addback because the state did not allow federal bonus depreciation. The firm later discovered the state-return error and the detrimental effect the addback would have had on the partners' state returns. The IRS found that the partnership satisfied the discretionary filing-relief standards. It granted 60 days to elect out of bonus depreciation for all classes of qualified property placed in service that year, without deciding whether any asset otherwise qualified for the deduction.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the partnership make a late election not to deduct bonus depreciation for all qualified property classes placed in service that year?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to file the election statement
  • Key authorities: IRC § 168(k)(7); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.168(k)-2(f), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202432001 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/9/2024 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.04-00
Person To Contact:
------------------ -----------------, ID No. -----------------
------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------------- --------------------
---------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------- CC:ITA:B07
------------------------------------------ PLR-102312-24
Date:
May 06, 2024

Re: Request for Extension of Time to Make the Election Not to Deduct Additional First
Year Depreciation

Legend

Taxpayer = -----------------------------------
-----------------------------
Taxable Year = -------------------------------------------------------
Date1 = ---------------------
Date2 = ---------------------------
Firm = ---------------------------------------------------
State = -------------
Year1 = -------

Dear -------------:

    This letter refers to a letter dated January 16, 2024, submitted on behalf of

Taxpayer by Taxpayer’s authorized representative, requesting an extension of time
pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations to make the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation
under § 168(k)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code for all classes of qualified property
placed in service by Taxpayer during the Taxable Year. This letter ruling is being
issued electronically, as permissible under sections 7.02(2) and 7.02(5) of Rev. Proc.
2024-1, 2024-1 I.R.B. 1, 32, 34.
PLR-102312-24 2

    Unless provided otherwise, all references in this letter ruling to § 168(k) are treated

as a reference to § 168(k) as in effect after amendment by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,
Pub. L. 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054 (December 22, 2017). Further, all references to
§ 1.168(k)-2 of the Income Tax Regulations are treated as a reference to the final
regulations under § 1.168(k)-2 published in the Federal Register on November 10, 2020
(85 FR 71734).

                                        FACTS

    Taxpayer represents the following:

    Taxpayer, a limited liability company, is treated as a partnership for Federal

income tax purposes and files a Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, on a
calendar year basis. Taxpayer’s overall method of accounting is the cash receipts and
disbursements method. The due date of Taxpayer’s Form 1065 for Taxable Year was
Date1.

     During the Taxable Year, Taxpayer placed in service assets that are classified as

land improvement, building improvement, and machinery and equipment. Such assets
are qualified property under § 168(k)(2) of the Code. Taxpayer engaged Firm to
prepare and file its Form 1065 and State income tax returns for the Taxable Year.
Taxpayer timely filed a request for a six-month extension to file its Form 1065.
Taxpayer timely filed its Form 1065 for Taxable Year on Date2. On its timely filed Form
1065 for the Taxable Year, Taxpayer deducted the additional first year depreciation for
the classes of property of the assets placed in service during Taxable Year. Firm did
not recommend to Taxpayer to not deduct the additional first year depreciation for the
qualified property placed in service during Taxable Year. Taxpayer relied on Firm to
advise it regarding the election to deduct additional first year depreciation, and Firm was
aware of all relevant facts regarding that issue at the time Firm was advising Taxpayer
regarding its Form 1065 for the Taxable Year.

    State does not allow for the claiming of additional first year depreciation, and

requires that any additional first year depreciation be added back to adjusted gross
income for State income tax purposes. When Firm prepared and filed Taxpayer’s State
income tax return, Firm inadvertently did not report this required modification on its
State income tax return.

    In Year1, after Taxpayer filed its Form 1065 and its State income tax return for

Taxable Year, an accountant at Firm became aware that the modification to adjusted
gross income required by State tax law was inadvertently not included on the tax return.
Firm also became aware of the detrimental effect that the additional first year
depreciation modification would have had on the State income tax returns of Taxpayer’s
partners.
PLR-102312-24 3

                                RULING REQUESTED

      Accordingly, Taxpayer requests a ruling providing the consent of the

Commissioner to grant an extension of time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3
to make the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k)
for all classes of qualified property placed in service by Taxpayer during the Taxable
Year.

                                LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Section 168(k)(1) allows, for the taxable year in which qualified property is placed

in service, an additional first year depreciation deduction equal to the applicable
percentage of the adjusted basis of that qualified property.

     For qualified property acquired by a taxpayer after September 27, 2017,

§§ 168(k)(6)(A)(i) and (B)(i) provide that the applicable percentage is 100 percent for
qualified property placed in service by the taxpayer after September 27, 2017, and
before January 1, 2023 (before January 1, 2024, for qualified property described in
§ 168(k)(2)(B) and (C)).

     Section 168(k)(7) provides that a taxpayer may elect not to deduct the additional

first year depreciation for any class of property placed in service during the taxable year.
Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(i) provides that if this election is made, the election applies to all
qualified property that is in the same class of property and placed in service in the same
taxable year, and no additional first year depreciation deduction is allowable for the
property placed in service during the taxable year in the class of property, except as
provided in § 1.743-1(j)(4)(i)(B)(1). The term “class of property” is defined in § 1.168(k)-
2(f)(1)(ii) as meaning, among other things, each class of property described in § 168(e)
(for example, 5-year property).

     Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(A) provides that the election not to deduct additional

first year depreciation must be made by the due date (including extensions) of the
federal tax return for the taxable year in which the qualified property is placed in service
by the taxpayer.

     Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(B) provides that the election not to deduct additional

first year depreciation must be made in the manner prescribed on Form 4562,
Depreciation and Amortization, and its instructions. The Instructions to Form 4562 for
the Taxable Year provide that the election not to deduct the additional first year
depreciation is made by attaching a statement to the taxpayer's timely filed Federal tax
return indicating that the taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional first year
depreciation and the class of property for which the taxpayer is making the election.
PLR-102312-24 4

     Under § 301.9100-1(a), the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the

Commissioner) has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules
set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election.

    Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a
regulatory election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for
making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions
of time for making regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-
2.

    Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a

reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3
to make certain regulatory elections. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a "regulatory
election" as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the
Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice or announcement
published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

     Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be

granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

                                 CONCLUSION

      Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the

requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly,
Taxpayer is granted an extension of 60 calendar days from the date of this letter ruling
to make the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k)
for all classes of qualified property placed in service by Taxpayer during the Taxable
Year. The election should be made in a written statement filed with the appropriate IRS
Service Center either: (1) to be associated with Taxpayer’s Form 1065, or (2)
accompanying Form 8082, Notice of Inconsistent Treatment of Administrative
Adjustment Request (AAR), and any related filings as instructed on Form 8082, as
appropriate.

     A copy of this letter should be attached to the relevant filing. A taxpayer filing its

Federal return electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to
their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

    Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the

Federal income tax consequences of the facts described above under any other
provisions of the Code (including other subsections of § 168). Specifically, no opinion is
expressed or implied on whether any item of depreciable property placed in service by
PLR-102312-24 5

Taxpayer during the Taxable Year, is eligible for the additional first year depreciation
deduction under § 168(k).

   The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for ruling, it is subject to verification on
examination.

    This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

   In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a

copy of this letter ruling to Taxpayer’s authorized representatives. We are also sending
a copy of this letter ruling to the appropriate IRS operating division director.

                                              Sincerely,




                                              AMY S. WEI
                                              Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 7
                                              Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                              (Income Tax & Accounting)

Enclosure:
copy of this letter for section 6110 purposes

cc: ------------------------------------


      --------------------
      -------------------------------

      -------------------------------
      ------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2024, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.