Partnership was allowed to correct a missed Section 754 election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2024, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A partnership failed to make a Section 754 election for the relevant taxable year after a partner died. The IRS concluded that the standards for late-election relief were met and gave the partnership 120 days to file the election using the appropriate amended-return or administrative-adjustment form. Property basis and basis-recovery deductions must be recomputed as though the election had been timely, even for affected closed years. Any required administrative adjustment request must reflect Section 6227(b), and the partners must make corresponding adjustments to the basis of their interests. The ruling does not determine that the partnership is otherwise eligible for the election.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the partnership correct its inadvertent failure to make a Section 754 election?
- Outcome: approved, subject to filings and basis adjustments within 120 days
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 734(b), 743(b), 754, and 6227(b); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b), 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202410013 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 3/8/2024 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.15-00, 754.00-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------------- -----------------------------------, ID No. -------
---------------------------- -----------------
---------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------------- -------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-123536-23
Date:
December 06, 2023
Legend
X= ---------------------------
----------------------
A= ----------------
------------------------
State = -------------
Date 1 = ----------------
Date 2 = ---------------------
Date 3 = --------------------------
Date 4 = ------------------------- --
Dear --------------:
This letter responds to communicated received on or about June 26, 2023, and
subsequent correspondence, submitted on behalf of X, requesting an extension of time
under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election
under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”).
PLR-123536-23 2
Facts
X was formed under the laws of State on Date1 and was treated as a partnership
for federal tax purposes. A, a partner in X, died on Date 2. X inadvertently failed to
make a § 754 election for its taxable year ended Date 3.
Law
Section 754 provides that if a partnership files an election, in accordance with the
regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of partnership property is adjusted, in
the case of a distribution of property, in the manner provided in § 734 and, in the case of
a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in § 743. Such an election
shall apply with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and to all
transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year with respect to which the
election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.
Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an election
under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b), with
respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a
partnership, shall be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the
taxable year during which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be
valid, the return must be filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e)
(including extensions thereof) for filing the return for that taxable year.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a
regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the
case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G,
H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) provides that the term “regulatory election” includes an
election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions of time for
regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Under § 301.9100-3, a request for relief will be granted when the taxpayer
provides the evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to
the satisfaction of the Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good
faith, and (2) the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
PLR-123536-23 3
Conclusion
Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied.
As a result, X is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to
make an election under § 754 effective for X's taxable year ended Date 4. The election
should be made in a written statement filed with the appropriate service center
accompanying Form 1065-X, Amended Return or Administrative Adjustment Request
(AAR), or Form 8082, Notice of Inconsistent Treatment or AAR, and for any related
filings as instructed in Form 1065-X or Form 8082, as appropriate. A copy of this letter
should be attached to the relevant filing.
This ruling is contingent on X's relevant filing(s) containing adjustments to the
basis of X's properties to reflect any § 734(b) or § 743(b) adjustments that would have
been made if the § 754 election had been timely made. These basis adjustments must
reflect any additional deductions for recovery of basis related to X's property that would
have been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of whether
the statutory period of limitations on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired
for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Any deductions for recovery of basis
allowable for an open year are to be computed based on the remaining useful life or
recovery period and using property basis adjusted by the greater of such deductions
allowed or allowable in any prior year had the § 754 election been timely made.
If the partnership is required to file an AAR to properly amend a partnership
return, then this ruling is also contingent on X filing Form 1065-X or Form 8082 and
accounting for the adjustments required by § 6227(b).
Additionally, the partners of X must adjust the basis of their interests in X to
reflect what the basis would be if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless
of whether the statutory period of limitations on assessment or filing a claim for refund
has expired for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Specifically, the partners of X
must reduce the basis of their interests in X in the amount of any additional deductions
for the recovery of basis related to X's property that would have been allowable if the
§ 754 election had been timely made.
Except for the specific ruling above, we express or imply no opinion concerning
the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the
Code. In addition, § 301.9100-1(a) provides that the granting of an extension of time for
making an election is not a determination that the taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make
the election.
The ruling contained in this letter is based on information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
PLR-123536-23 4
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a
copy of this letter to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
By: _______________________________
Richard T. Probst
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosure:
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc: ---------------------
--------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
-------------------------------
-------------------------
--------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
--------------------------------
------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2024, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.