🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202349002 Released December 8, 2023 Approved

Opportunity fund received 60 days after its Form 8996 was filed with the wrong entity

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership was formed to operate as a qualified opportunity fund and received capital from multiple investors in its first year. Its accounting firm prepared returns for the partnership and another limited liability company managed by the same manager. The firm's error put Form 8996 on the other company's return, while the intended opportunity fund's Form 1065 incorrectly said no Form 8996 was attached. The firm discovered the problem while preparing the next year's return and advised the manager to request regulatory relief. The IRS found reasonable reliance on a qualified tax professional and granted 60 days to file Form 8996 with an amended return or administrative-adjustment request for the first year. The ruling did not decide whether the partnership or its investments otherwise met the qualified opportunity fund rules.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the partnership receive extra time to self-certify as a qualified opportunity fund after its Form 8996 was mistakenly attached to another entity's return?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to file Form 8996 with an amended return or administrative-adjustment request
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1400Z-2; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2), 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202349002 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/8/2023 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 1400Z.02-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------------------------- ----------------------, ID No. -----------------
-------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------- ---------------------
--------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------------------ CC:ITA:B05
PLR-105324-23
Date:
September 08, 2023

    TY: -------

Legend

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------
LLC 2 = -----------------------
Manager = -------------------------------------
Accounting Firm = -----------------
State = -------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Date 1 = -------------------
Date 2 = -------------------------
Date 3 = -----------------------
Date 4 = ---------------------
Date 5 = ---------------------
Date 6 = -----------------------
N1 = ---------
N2 = -------------

Dear ------------:

This responds to the request by Taxpayer, dated Date 1 for relief under §§ 301.9100-1
through 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file Form 8996,
Qualified Opportunity Fund. Specifically, Taxpayer requests that the Internal Revenue
Service (Service) grant to Taxpayer an extension of time to make an election under
§ 1400Z-2 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2) of the
Income Tax Regulations to self-certify Taxpayer as a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF),
effective as of Year 1.
PLR-105324-23 2

                                      FACTS

The information and affidavits submitted reflect the following facts.

Taxpayer is a limited liability company, classified as a partnership for federal income tax
purposes, which was formed under the laws of State on Date 2. The limited liability
operating agreement of Taxpayer indicates that Taxpayer was organized to be a QOF
under relevant Code provisions and invest in qualified opportunity zone property.
During Year 1, Taxpayer received capital contributions from N1 investors totaling $N2.

Manager, also a limited liability company formed under the laws of State, serves as the
manager of Taxpayer and LLC 2. On Date 3, Manager retained Accounting Firm to
provide tax compliance services for Taxpayer for Year 1. Accounting Firm prepared a
tax return, Form 1065, U.S. Partnership Return of Income, for Year 1 for Taxpayer,
which was filed with the Service on Date 4. Concurrently, Accounting Firm prepared a
Year 1 tax return for LLC 2, and it was filed with the Service on Date 5.

The following year, Manager retained Accounting Firm to provide tax compliance
services for Taxpayer for Year 2. While in the course of preparing Taxpayer’s return for
Year 2, Accounting Firm discovered that Taxpayer’s Form 1065 for Year 1 was
prepared incorrectly. More specifically, Taxpayer answered “no” to question 25
(Schedule B) on the Form 1065, which inquires whether the partnership attached a
Form 8996 to the return to certify as a QOF. Taxpayer failed to include a completed
Form 8996 with its return for Year 1. Accounting Firm’s investigation of the matter
determined that a Form 8996 was erroneously included with the Year 1 return of LLC 2.
Accounting Firm notified Manager of the error on Date 6 and conferred with experts on
the opportunity zone law about a way to rectify Taxpayer’s situation. Accounting Firm
thereafter advised Manager that Taxpayer would need to request that the Service allow
an extension of time, pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration regulations, to make an election under § 1.1400Z-2(d)-1(a)(2) of the
Income Tax Regulations for Taxpayer to self-certify as a QOF.

Manager represents that Taxpayer relied upon the advice and counsel of Accounting
Firm and has always intended that Taxpayer satisfy the Code’s requirements to be a
QOF. Taxpayer accordingly requests that the Service rule that Taxpayer qualifies under
§ 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations for an extension of time
to make an election pursuant to § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations to
be certified as a QOF and accept Taxpayer’s Year 1 amended Form 1065 with a Form
8996 attached.

                              LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(A) of the Code directs the Secretary to prescribe regulations to
carry out the statute’s purposes, including rules for the certification of QOFs. Section
1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations provides the rules for an entity to
PLR-105324-23 3

self-certify as a QOF. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) provides that the entity electing to
be certified as a QOF must do so annually on a timely filed return in such form and
manner as may be prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the forms or
instructions, or in publications or guidance of the Service, published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin.

To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996 with its tax return for the year
to which the certification applies. The Form 8996 must be filed by the due date of the
tax return (including extensions).

Because § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) sets forth the manner and timing for an entity to self-
certify as a QOF, these elections are regulatory elections, as defined in § 301.9100-1(b)
of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations provide the standards that the Commissioner will use to determine whether
to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-3(a)
provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections, other than
automatic extensions covered in § 301.9100-2, will be granted when the taxpayer
provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably
and in good faith and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the
Government.

Under § 301.9100-3(b) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations, a taxpayer is
deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if, among other circumstances not
relevant here, the taxpayer requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory
election is discovered by the Service, or although exercising reasonable diligence
(taking into account the taxpayer’s experience and the complexity of the return or
issue), the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for an election. A taxpayer may
alternatively demonstrate good faith actions if he reasonably relies on a qualified tax
professional and the professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the
election.

A taxpayer is deemed not to have acted reasonably and in good faith pursuant to the
provision in § 301.9100-3(b)(3) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations if the
taxpayer—

(i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or
could be imposed under § 6662 of the Code at the time the taxpayer requests relief,
and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is
requested;

(ii) was informed in all material respects of the required election and related tax
consequences but chose not to make the election; or
PLR-105324-23 4

(iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the
original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the Service will
not ordinarily grant relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides that
the Commissioner will grant a reasonable extension of time to make the regulatory
election only when the interests of the Government will not be prejudiced by the
granting of relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides
that the interests of the Government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in a
taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the
election than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking
into account the time value of money).

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides
that the interests of the Government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which
the regulatory election should have been made or any taxable year that would have
been affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the period of
limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) before the taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling
granting relief under this section.

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government. Manager reasonably relied on
a qualified tax professional and the professional failed to make, or advise Taxpayer to
make, the election. Accordingly, based solely on the facts and information submitted,
and the representations made in the ruling request, we grant Taxpayer an extension of
60 days from the date of this letter ruling to file a Form 8996 to make the election to self-
certify as a QOF under section 1400Z-2 and section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i). The
election must be made on a completed Form 8996 attached to the Taxpayer’s amended
tax return or administrative-adjustment request for Year 1 (as applicable).

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, we express no opinion, either express or implied, concerning
whether any investments made into Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in
§ 1.1400Z2(a)-1(b)(34) of the Income Tax Regulations or whether Taxpayer meets the
requirements under § 1400Z-2 of the Code and the regulations thereunder to be a QOF.
We express no opinion regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the
provisions of any other sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable, or
regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting
from, the instant transaction.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-105324-23 5

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter
ruling.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                       Sincerely,



                                       Amy J. Pfalzgraf
                                       Branch Chief, Branch 5
                                       Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                       (Income Tax & Accounting)

cc ----------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2023, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.