🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Chief Counsel Advice 202346027 Released November 17, 2023 Advice

Partnership representative files Tax Court petition for partnership

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel addressed whether the partnership representative or the partnership is the petitioner in a case challenging a final partnership adjustment. Section 6234 says the partnership may file the petition, while section 6223 gives the partnership representative sole authority to act for the partnership. The representative is the person who physically files the petition because a partnership cannot act on its own. Legally, however, the representative acts on behalf of the partnership, and procedural court rules cannot change that statutory allocation.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Is the partnership representative personally the petitioner when challenging a final partnership adjustment?
  • Outcome: Advice given, the partnership is the petitioner and the representative acts for it
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6223, 6231, and 6234

Full text (IRS public release)

 ID:       CCA_2023100314535143                 [Third Party Communication:

 UILC:     6221B.00-00                          Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]

Number: 202346027
Release Date: 11/17/2023
From: --------------------
Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2023 2:53:51 PM
To: ----------------
Cc: -----------------------------------------
Bcc:
Subject: RE: petition in Tax Crt


They may think that but it’s not supported by the statute. Are they actually pushing back
against the statutory language? The Tax Court rules can’t change the statute and while
they may be confusing they do not actually say the PR is the petitioner. The PR is the
petitioner in the sense of they are the live human being that files the petition but they
are doing it on behalf of the partnership because a partnership cannot take actions.

I.R.C. section 6234

         (a)IN GENERALWithin 90 days after the date on which a notice of a
         final partnership adjustment is mailed under section 6231 with respect to
         any partnership taxable year, the partnership may file a petition for a
         readjustment for such taxable year with—

I.R.C. section 6223

         (a)DESIGNATION OF PARTNERSHIP REPRESENTATIVE
         Each partnership shall designate (in the manner prescribed by the Secretary)
         a partner (or other person) with a substantial presence in the United States
         as the partnership representative who shall have the sole authority to act on
         behalf of the partnership under this subchapter. In any case in which such
         a designation is not in effect, the Secretary may select any person as
         the partnership representative.
These are probably the same people who kept calling the TEFRA partnership the
petitioner even though section 6226 clearly says the partner may file a petition.

Jenni Black (she/her)
Senior Counsel
CC:PA:06
Phone: (202) 317-5216

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2023, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.