🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202340006 Released October 6, 2023 Approved

Partnership received 60 days to elect out of bonus depreciation

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership intended to elect out of additional first-year depreciation for every class of qualified property it placed in service during the relevant year. Its timely filed return and Form 4562 consistently claimed no bonus depreciation, but its accountant inadvertently omitted the required election statement. An independent audit team discovered the omission after the return deadline. The IRS found that the partnership met the regulatory relief standards and granted 60 days to file the statement with the appropriate service center, either for association with the original Form 1065 or with an appropriate administrative adjustment filing. The ruling did not decide whether any of the partnership's property otherwise qualified for bonus depreciation.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the partnership make a late election under section 168(k)(7) not to claim bonus depreciation for all property classes placed in service that year?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to file the election statement
  • Key authorities: IRC § 168(k)(7); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.168(k)-2(f), 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202340006 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/6/2023 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.04-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------------- --------------------------, ID No.
--------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------ ---------------------
------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------ CC:ITA:7
PLR-100843-23
Date: July 11, 2023

Re: Request for Extension of Time to Make the Election Not to Deduct the Additional First
Year Depreciation

Legend

Taxpayer = -------------------------------
--------------------------
Taxable Year = -------
Date1 =
Date2 = ----------------------
Date3 =
Firm1 = -------------------------
Accountant =
Firm2 = ---------------

Dear Taxpayer:

   This letter responds to a letter dated December 21, 2022, and subsequent

correspondence submitted on behalf of Taxpayer by Taxpayer’s authorized representative,
requesting an extension of time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations to make the election under § 168(k)(7) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code) not to deduct additional first year depreciation under §
168(k) for all classes of property placed in service by Taxpayer during the Taxable Year.
This letter ruling is being issued electronically, as permissible under section 7.02(5) of
Rev. Proc. 2022-1, 2022-1 I.R.B. 1, 35.

PLR-100843-23 2

   Unless provided otherwise, all references in this letter ruling to § 168(k) are treated

as a reference to § 168(k) as in effect after amendment by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Pub.
L. 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054 (December 22, 2017). Further, all references to § 1.168(k)-2 of
the Income Tax Regulations are treated as a reference to the final regulations
under§ 1.168(k)-2 published in the Federal Register on November 10, 2020 (85 FR 71734).

                                       FACTS

   Taxpayer represents that the facts are as follows:

   Taxpayer, a limited liability company, is treated as a partnership for Federal income

tax purposes and files a Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, on a calendar
year basis (Form 1065). Taxpayer’s overall method of accounting is the accrual method.
The due date of Taxpayer’s Form 1065 (including extensions) for the Taxable Year was
Date1.

   Taxpayer engaged Firm1 to prepare and file its federal income tax return for

Taxable Year. Accountant was employed by Firm1 and was aware that Taxpayer
intended to make the election under § 168(k)(7) not to claim the additional first year
depreciation for certain property that Taxpayer placed in service during Taxable Year.

   Accountant prepared Taxpayer’s federal return which included Form 4562,

Depreciation and Amortization, showing Taxpayer did not claim the additional first year
depreciation deduction for any qualified property placed in service during Taxable Year.
Taxpayer reviewed the prepared federal income tax return for Taxable Year which was
timely filed on Date2.

    However, due to Accountant’s error, the election statement not to deduct additional

first year depreciation was not attached to Taxpayer’s federal income tax return for
Taxable Year. An independent audit team from Firm2 discovered the missing election
statement on Date3, during a review of Taxpayer’s Taxable Year financial statements and
accompanying documents, after Date1.

     Taxpayer relied on the assistance and advice of Accountant and Firm1 in complying

with its federal income tax reporting obligations for Taxable Year. Accountant and Firm1
were aware of the requirement to include an attachment reflecting the election not to
deduct the additional first year depreciation on Taxpayer’s federal income tax return for
Taxable Year. However, Accountant inadvertently omitted the required election statement.
Taxpayer now seeks to correct the omission through this ruling request for late election
relief to ensure that Taxpayer is in full compliance with its federal tax reporting obligations.

PLR-100843-23 3

                                RULING REQUESTED

  Accordingly, Taxpayer requests an extension of time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1

and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make the election
under § 168(k)(7) not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) for all
classes of qualified property placed in service by Taxpayer during the Taxable Year.

                                 LAW AND ANALYSIS

   Section 168(k)(1) allows, for the taxable year in which qualified property is placed in

service, an additional first year depreciation deduction equal to the applicable percentage
of the adjusted basis of that qualified property.

    For qualified property acquired by a taxpayer after September 27, 2017,

§§ 168(k)(6)(A)(i) and (B)(i) provide that the applicable percentage is 100 percent for
qualified property placed in service by the taxpayer after September 27, 2017, and before
January 1, 2023 (before January 1, 2024, for qualified property described in
§ 168(k)(2)(B) and (C)).

    Section 168(k)(7) provides that a taxpayer may elect not to deduct the additional

first year depreciation for any class of property placed in service during the taxable year.
Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(i) provides that if this election is made, the election applies to all
qualified property that is in the same class of property and placed in service in the same
taxable year, and no additional first year depreciation deduction is allowable for the
property placed in service during the taxable year in the class of property, except as
provided in § 1.743-1(j)(4)(i)(B)(1). The term "class of property" is defined in § 1.168(k)-
2(f)(1)(ii) as meaning, among other things, each class of property described in § 168(e)
(for example, 5-year property).

   Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(A) provides that the election not to deduct additional first

year depreciation must be made by the due date (including extensions) of the federal tax
return for the taxable year in which the qualified property is placed in service by the
taxpayer.

   Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(B) provides that the election not to deduct additional first

year depreciation must be made in the manner prescribed on Form 4562, Depreciation
and Amortization, and its instructions. The instructions to Form 4562 for the taxable year
provide that the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation is made by
attaching a statement to the taxpayer's timely filed tax return indicating that the taxpayer is
electing not to deduct the additional first year depreciation and the class of property for
which the taxpayer is making the election.

   Under § 301.9100-1(a), the Commissioner of Internal Revenue has discretion to

grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and
301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election.

PLR-100843-23 4

    Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner

will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election.
Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections.
Section 301.9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions of time for making regulatory
elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100- 2.

    Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be

granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief
will not prejudice the interests of the government.

                                      CONCLUSION

    Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the

requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly,
Taxpayer is granted an extension of 60 calendar days from the date of this letter ruling to
make the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) for all
classes of qualified property placed in service by Taxpayer during the Taxable Year. The
election should be made in a written statement filed with the appropriate service center
either: (1) to be associated with Taxpayer’s Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership
Income, for the Taxable Year, or (2) accompanying Form 8082, Notice of Inconsistent
Treatment of Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR), and any related filings as
instructed on Form 8082, as appropriate.

   A copy of this letter should be attached to the relevant filing. A taxpayer filing its

federal return electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their
return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

   Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the federal

income tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provisions of the
Code (including other subsections of § 168). Specifically, no opinion is expressed or
implied on whether any item of depreciable property placed in service by Taxpayer during
the Taxable Year, is eligible for the additional first year depreciation deduction
under§ 168(k).

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations

submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.

   This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

PLR-100843-23 5

In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of
this letter ruling to Taxpayer’s authorized representatives. We are also sending a copy of
this letter ruling to the appropriate IRS operating division director.

                                                         Sincerely,




                                                         DEENA M. DEVEREUX
                                                         Branch Chief, Branch 7
                                                         Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                                         (Income Tax & Accounting)

Enclosures (2):

copy of this letter
copy for section 6110 purposes

cc: -------------------
------------------------------
--------------------------------
-------------
--------------------------

  ---------------------
  ------------------------------
  ---------------------
  --------------
  ----------------------------------

  ---------------------------------------------------------------
  ----------------------------------------------------------------
  -------------------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2023, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.