🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202339003 Released September 29, 2023 Approved

IRS grants a late election for an LLC to self-certify as a Qualified Opportunity Fund after its advisor missed the filing deadline

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An entity becomes a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF), a vehicle for deferring and reducing tax on capital gains reinvested in low-income "opportunity zones," by self-certifying on Form 8996 attached to a timely filed tax return. Here the taxpayer was an LLC taxed as a partnership, formed by three members to operate as a QOF. Its advisor was engaged to prepare the returns and was supposed to file an automatic extension (Form 7004), but the advisor never entered the taxpayer into its filing-tracking system, so no extension was requested and the partnership return was not filed by the deadline. The taxpayer did file its return with Form 8996 attached before the date the return would have been due had the extension been filed. After the IRS sent a late-filing notice, the taxpayer asked for "9100 relief" (an extension of time to make a missed regulatory election under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3). The IRS granted it, finding the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional and that relief would not lower its tax or prejudice the government. The Form 8996 is treated as timely, so the QOF election for that year stands. As usual, the IRS did not decide whether the taxpayer actually qualifies as a QOF. It matters to opportunity-zone investors whose self-certification was filed late because their preparer missed an extension.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the IRS grant an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 for an LLC to make a late Form 8996 election to self-certify as a Qualified Opportunity Fund after its advisor failed to file an extension?
  • Outcome: approved (the Form 8996 filed before Date 5 is treated as timely filed)
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1400Z-2(d); Treas. Reg. § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3; IRC §§ 6662, 6501

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                            Department of the Treasury
                                                                    Washington, DC 20224

 Number: 202339003                                                  Third Party Communication: None
 Release Date: 9/29/2023                                            Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 1400Z.02-00
                                                                    Person To Contact:
                                                                    --------------------------, ID No. ----------------
----------------                                                    -----------------
--------------------------                                          Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------                             --------------------
-----------------------------                                       Refer Reply To:
                                                                    CC:ITA:B04
                                                                    PLR-101321-23
                                                                    Date:
                                                                    June 28, 2023

                                                     LEGEND

Taxpayer                        =         ---------------------------------------------------

Date 1                          =         --------------------

Date 2                          =         -------------------------

Date 3                          =         -----------------------

Date 4                          =         ---------------------

Date 5                          =         ---------------------------

Date 6                          =         ----------------------

Date 7                          =         -----------------------

Year 1                          =         -------

X                               =         --------

Y                               =         --------

Z                               =         --------

Member A                        =         --------------------------------------------

Member B                        =         ---------------------------------------------------------------
PLR-101321-23                                         2

Member C                     =       -----------------------------------------------------

Advisor                      =       --------------------------



Dear ------------:

This letter responds to Taxpayer's request dated Date 7. Specifically, Taxpayer
requests relief under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-31 for Taxpayer’s Form 8996,
Qualified Opportunity Fund, as filed before Date 5, to be treated as timely for purposes
of the election: (1) to self-certify the Taxpayer as a qualified opportunity fund (QOF), as
defined in § 1400Z-2(d); and (2) for the Taxpayer to be treated as a QOF, effective as of
Date 2, as provided under § 1400Z-2 and § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a).


                                                 FACTS

According to the information and representations provided, Member A, Member B, and
Member C (collectively, Members) formed Taxpayer, a limited liability company
classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes, on Date 1 for the purposes of being
a QOF and to make investments in qualified opportunity zone property. At the end of
Year 1, Member A owned a X percent interest, Member B owned a Y percent interest,
and Member C owned a Z percent interest in Taxpayer.

Taxpayer represents that it intended to self-certify as a QOF by filing Form 8996 with its
first tax return for the Year 1 tax year. Taxpayer, a calendar year taxpayer, was
required to file its Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, for the Year 1 tax
year on Date 4. On Date 3, Members engaged Advisor to provide services related to
the structure of Taxpayer as a QOF and to handle the tax filings for Taxpayer. Based
on previous communications between Members and Advisor, Member A relied on
Advisor to file a Form 7004, Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File Certain
Business Income Tax, Information and Other Returns, for its Year 1 tax year. However,
Advisor failed to input Taxpayer into Advisor’s internal system used to track all tax
return filings. As such, Advisor did not file Taxpayer’s Year 1 return, nor did it request
an extension to file, by Date 4. Despite this, Taxpayer filed its Year 1 return with Form
8996 attached before Date 5, the date that Taxpayer’s Year 1 return would have been
due if a Form 7004 had been properly filed.

On Date 6, Member A received notice from the Internal Revenue Service that
Taxpayer’s Form 1065 for its Year 1 tax year had not been filed on time. Member A
then contacted Advisor to inquire about the status of its Year 1 return. Advisor


1 Unless otherwise specified, all “section” or “§” references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code

(Code) or the Treasury Regulations (26 CFR Part 1) or (26 CFR Part 301).
PLR-101321-23                                 3

discovered that it had not filed an extension to file Taxpayer’s Year 1 return. Member A
proceeded to engage Advisor to prepare this private letter ruling request.


                                  LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(A) directs the Secretary to prescribe regulations for rules for the
certification of QOFs. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) provides that the self-certification
of a QOF must be timely-filed and effectuated annually in such form and manner as
may be prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the Internal Revenue
Service forms or instructions, or in publications or guidance published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin.

To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996 with its tax return for the year
to which the certification applies. The Form 8996 must be filed by the due date of the
tax return (including extensions). The information provided indicates that the Taxpayer
did not file its Form 8996 by the due date of its Year 1 income tax return due to Member
A’s reliance on and Advisor’s failure to request an automatic extension.

Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) sets forth the manner and timing for electing to be a QOF
and electing to self-certify as a QOF. As such, these elections are regulatory elections,
as defined in § 301.9100-1(b).

Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory
elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2 (automatic extensions)
must be made under the rules of § 301.9100-3.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory
election. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for
regulatory elections (other than automatic extensions covered in § 301.9100-2) will be
granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and the grant of relief will not
prejudice the interests of the Government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably
and in good faith if the taxpayer—

       (i) requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered
       by the Service;

       (ii) failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the
       taxpayer's control;
PLR-101321-23                                 4

       (iii) failed to make the election because, after exercising reasonable diligence,
       the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election;

       (iv) reasonably relied on the written advice of the Service; or

       (v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the professional failed to
       make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

In addition, § 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer is deemed not to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer—

       (i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been
       or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief, and
       the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is
       requested;

       (ii) was fully informed in all material respects of the required election and related
       tax consequences but chose not to make the election; or

       (iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the
       original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the Service
       will not ordinarily grant relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the Commissioner will grant a reasonable
extension of time to make the regulatory election only when the interests of the
Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief. Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i)
provides that the interests of the Government are prejudiced if granting relief would
result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years
affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been
timely made (taking into account the time value of money). Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii)
provides that the interests of the government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year
in which the regulatory election should have been made or any taxable year that would
have been affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the period of
limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) before the taxpayer's receipt of a ruling
granting relief under this section.
PLR-101321-23                                 5

                                      CONCLUSION

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that Taxpayer's request for an extension of time to elect to be a QOF and to
self-certify as a QOF is a regulatory election governed by § 301.9100-3. We further
conclude that, based on the facts and information submitted in connection with this
request, Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief
would not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, Taxpayer has
satisfied the requirements of the regulations for the granting of relief, and Taxpayer's
Form 8996, filed before Date 5, certifying the Taxpayer as a QOF as of Date 2 is
considered timely filed. Taxpayer has thereby made the election under § 1400Z-2 and
§ 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) to self-certify as a QOF for Year 1. Taxpayer should submit a
copy of this letter ruling to the Service Center where Taxpayer files its returns along with
a cover letter requesting that the Service associate this ruling with the Year 1 return.

                                         CAVEATS

This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by the Taxpayer and
accompanied by penalty of perjury statements executed by the appropriate parties.
This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a
ruling. However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual
information, representations, and other data submitted.

This ruling addresses the granting of § 301.9100-3 relief as applied to the election to
self-certify the Taxpayer as a QOF by filing Form 8996 for Year 1. Specifically, we have
no opinion, either express or implied, concerning whether any investments made into
Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in § 1.1400Z2 (a)-1(b)(34) or whether
Taxpayer meets the requirements and structure under § 1400Z-2 and the regulations
thereunder to be a QOF. In addition, we also express no opinion on whether any
interest owned in any entity by Taxpayer qualifies as qualified opportunity zone
property, as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(2), or whether such entity would be treated as a
qualified opportunity zone business, as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(3). We express no
opinion regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any
other sections of the Internal Revenue Code or regulations that may be applicable, or
regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting
from, the instant transaction.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Enclosed is a copy of the letter ruling
showing the deletions proposed to be made when it is disclosed under § 6110.
PLR-101321-23                                            6


Pursuant to the Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representation, on
file, we are sending a copy of this letter to Taxpayer's authorized representatives.


                                                             Sincerely,




                                                             ______________________________
                                                             James Yu
                                                             Senior Counsel, Branch 4
                                                             Office of Chief Counsel
                                                             (Income Tax & Accounting)


 cc:   -----------------------------------------------
       -------------------------------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2023, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.