🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Determination Letter 202245012 Released November 11, 2022 Approved Transcribed from scan

IRS treats a foundation grant to a public charity as an "unusual grant" that will not undercut its public-support status

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2022, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A public charity that is tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) and classified as a
publicly supported charity under sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) was
about to receive a large grant from a related private foundation. The grant was
an interest in a related for-profit entity holding a facility lease the charity
uses for its exempt work. A single big gift can distort the "public support"
math and threaten a charity's public-charity status. The IRS agreed the grant
qualifies as an "unusual grant" under Treas. Reg. 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and
1.509(a)-3(c)(4), so it can be left out of the public-support calculation. That
lets the charity keep its publicly supported classification despite receiving
the grant, because it already draws broad public support and reasonably expects
to keep doing so.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does the proposed grant qualify as an "unusual grant" excludable from the charity's public-support fraction?
  • Outcome: Approved (grant treated as an unusual grant)
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii), 1.509(a)-3(c)(4); IRC §§ 501(c)(3), 509(a)(1), 170(b)(1)(A)(vi)

Full text (IRS public release)

202245012

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
Tax Exempt and Government Entities
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Date: 08/18/2022
Employer ID number:
Person to contact:
Name:
ID number:
Telephone:

LEGEND UIL: 509.02-01
B = Name
C = Name
x dollars = Amount

Dear

We have considered your request for recognition of an unusual grant under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and related provisions.

Based on the information provided, we concluded that the proposed grant constitutes an unusual grant under
Treas. Reg. Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and related provisions of the regulations. The basis for our conclusion
is discussed below.

Facts:

You are tax exempt under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(c)(3). You're currently classified as a
public charity described in Sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi).

You will receive a grant from the B, which is a related private foundation exempt under IRC Section 501(c)(3).
The grant is a % interest in C, a related for-profit entity, that holds a single asset of a lease agreement with a
construction use contract on a facility you will use to carry out your exempt activities. The grant is to be made
free of any material restrictions or conditions and has an appraised value of x dollars.

Since your inception, you have carried on an actual program of public solicitation and exempt activities and
have received a significant amount of public support. In previous years, you have met the one-third support test
described in Treas. Reg. Section 1.509(a)-3(a)(2) without the benefit of any exclusions of unusual grants
pursuant to Treas. Reg. Section 1.509-3(c)(3). In addition, you are actively soliciting contributions from the
general public and reasonably expect to attract a significant amount of public support after the particular grant
is received.

Law:

Two sections of the Treasury Regulations set forth the criteria for an unusual grant. They are:

Letter 4787 (Rev. 11-2021)
Catalog Number 58230Y

202245012

Treasury Regulation Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii)
This section states that, for purposes of applying the % limitation to determine whether the % of-support
test is satisfied or the % support limitation is met, one or more contributions may be excluded from both the
numerator and the denominator of the applicable percent-of-support fraction. The exclusion is generally intended
to apply to substantial contributions or bequests from disinterested parties which:

  • are attracted by reason of the publicly supported nature of the organization.

  • are unusual or unexpected with respect to the amount thereof; and

  • would, by reason of their size, adversely affect the status of the organization as normally being publicly
    supported.

Treasury Regulation Section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4)
This section states that all pertinent facts and circumstances will be taken into consideration to determine
whether a particular contribution may be excluded. No single factor will necessarily be determinative. Such
factors may include:

  • Whether the contribution was made by a person who;
    a. created the organization;
    b. previously contributed a substantial part of its support or endowment;
    c. stood in a position of authority with respect to the organization, such as a foundation manager within
    the meaning of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 4946(b);
    d. directly or indirectly exercised control over the organization, or;
    e. was in a relationship described in IRC Section 4946(a)(1)(C) through 4946(a)(1)(G) with someone
    listed in bullets a, b, c, or d above.

A contribution made by a person described in bullets a through e is ordinarily given less favorable consideration
than a contribution made by others not described above.

  • Whether the contribution was a bequest or an inter vivos transfer. A bequest will ordinarily be given more
    favorable consideration than an inter vivos transfer.

  • Whether the contribution was in the form of cash, readily marketable securities, or assets which further the
    exempt purposes of the organization, such as a gift of a painting to a museum.

  • Whether (except in the case of a new organization) prior to the receipt of the particular contribution, the
    organization (a) has carried on an actual program of public solicitation and exempt activities and
    (b) has been able to attract a significant amount of public support.

  • Whether the organization may reasonably be expected to attract a significant amount of public support after
    the particular contribution. Continued reliance on unusual grants to fund an organization's current operating
    expenses (as opposed to providing new endowment funds) may be evidence that the organization cannot
    reasonably be expected to attract future public support.

  • Whether, prior to the year in which the particular contribution was received, the organization met the
    one-third support test described in Treas. Reg. Section 1.509(a)-3(a)(2) without the benefit of any
    exclusions of unusual grants pursuant to Treas. Reg. Section 1.509-3(c)(3);

  • Whether the organization has a representative governing body as described in in Treas. Reg. Section
    1.509(a)-3(d)(3)(i); and

  • Whether material restrictions or conditions within the meaning of Treas. Reg. Section 1.507-2(a)(7) have
    been imposed by the transferor upon the transferee in connection with such transfer.

Letter 4787 (Rev. 11-2021)
Catalog Number 58230Y

Application of Law:
The grant meets the requirements of Treas. Reg. Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) because:

  • The grant is unusual with respect to the amount
  • The grant will adversely affect your status as normally being publicly supported

The grant meets the requirements of Treas. Reg. Section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4) based on the following facts and
circumstances:

  • The grantor has not previously contributed a substantial part of your support

  • The grant is in the form of assets which further your exempt purposes

  • You have carried on an actual program of public solicitation and exempt activities and have received a
    significant amount of public support

  • You expect to attract a significant amount of public support after the grant donation

  • Prior to the year in which the particular grant is to be received, you met the one-third support
    test described in Treas. Reg. Section 1.509(a)-3(a)(2) without the benefit of any exclusions of unusual grants
    pursuant to Treas. Reg. Section 1.509-3(c)(3)

  • You have a representative governing body as described in in Treas. Reg. Section 1.509(a)-3(d)(3)(i)

  • No material restrictions or conditions within the meaning of Treas. Reg. Section 1.507-2(a)(7) have been
    imposed by the transferor upon the transferee in connection with such transfer.

For all the forgoing reasons, the grant should be characterized as an unusual grant within the meaning of Treas.
Reg. Section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4).

We'll make this determination letter available for public inspection after deleting personally identifiable information,
as required by IRC Section 6110. We've enclosed Letter 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose - Rulings, and a
copy of the letter that shows our proposed deletions.

  • If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow the instructions in the Letter 437 on how to notify us.
  • If you agree with our deletions, you don't need to take any further action.
    We've sent a copy of this letter to your representative as indicated in your power of attorney.

If you have questions, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter.

Sincerely,

Stephen A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Enclosures:
Redacted Letter 4787
Letter 437

Letter 4787 (Rev. 11-2021)
Catalog Number 58230Y

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2022, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.