Family foundation cleared to move most of its assets, including a large bequest, to two related foundations without triggering private-foundation excise taxes

Plain-English summary

A family controls three private foundations: an existing family foundation, a company foundation, and a newly created foundation. The family foundation expects a large bequest from a donor who died several years ago and left his assets to charity. It asked the IRS to bless a plan to move at least 80 percent of its assets (including that bequest) to the other two foundations as capital endowment grants, so each can run its own grant-making program. The IRS ruled the moves are "section 507(b)(2) transfers": the two receiving foundations are not treated as brand-new organizations, and the transferring foundation is not treated as terminating its private-foundation status and owes no termination tax under section 507(c). The IRS also ruled the transfers will not trigger the private-foundation excise taxes on net investment income (section 4940), self-dealing (section 4941), or jeopardizing investments (section 4944), and will not be taxable expenditures under section 4945 as long as the family foundation exercises expenditure responsibility over the grants. Because the grants are capital endowment grants (the principal stays put and only the income is spent) and the foundation will not collect corpus-distribution records from the recipients, the transfers do not count as qualifying distributions under section 4942, so the family foundation still must meet its own annual payout on its own. It also keeps its excess distribution carryover. Anyone running a family of related foundations would care: the ruling maps out how to reshuffle assets among commonly controlled foundations without tripping any chapter 42 tax.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Will a family private foundation's transfer of at least 80 percent of its assets (including an incoming bequest) to two commonly controlled private foundations qualify as a section 507(b)(2) transfer, avoid termination tax, and avoid the chapter 42 excise taxes?
• Outcome: approved (all nine requested rulings granted, subject to the stated conditions)
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 507(b)(2), 507(a), 507(c), 4940, 4941, 4942, 4944, 4945(h); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.507-3, 1.507-4(b), 53.4945-5(c)(2), 53.4946-1(a)(8); Rev. Rul. 2002-28

Full text (IRS public release)

```
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202231005                                              Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/5/2022                                         Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 507.00-00, 4940.00-00,
              4941.00-00, 4942.00-00,                          Person To Contact:
              4944.00-00, 4945.00-00                           ------------------, ID No. -----------------
                                                               Telephone Number:
-----------------------------------------                      --------------------
---------------------------------------------                  Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------                              CC:EEE:EOET:EO3
                                                               PLR-116646-21
                                                               Date:
                                                               February 04, 2022

Legend:
Family Foundation = ------------------------------------------
Trustee = -----------------------------------------
Company = -------------------------------
Company Foundation = -------------------------------------------
New Foundation = --------------------------------------
Bequest = ------------------------------------
A = -----------------------
x = -----------------
y = --------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------

Dear -----------------------------------------:

This letter responds to the letter, dated July 27, 2021, as supplemented by a letter
dated November 23, 2021, requesting certain rulings under sections 507, 4940, 4941,
4942, 4944, and 4945 of the Internal Revenue Code1.

Facts

1
The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to which all subsequent “section” references are
made unless otherwise indicated.
PLR-116646-21 2

According to representations made by the Taxpayer, Family Foundation is a grant-
making charitable trust recognized as an exempt organization described in section
501(c)(3) and classified as a private non-operating foundation under section 509(a).
Family Foundation’s sole trustee is Trustee, a family trust company that provides
fiduciary, financial, and personal services to family members and their designated
charitable entities. Family members2 comprise a majority of the board of Trustee.
Family members are donors to Family Foundation. As of the end of Year 1, Family
Foundation had assets of approximately x and had excess distributions of over y.
Family Foundation is a calendar year taxpayer.

Company, a business corporation and public company, is controlled by family
members through their ownership of all of the control shares of Company while
unrelated persons own some of the non-controlling shares.

Company Foundation is a non-profit corporation recognized as an exempt
organization described in section 501(c)(3) and classified as a non-operating private
foundation under section 509(a). Company Foundation makes grants and supports
educational programs in geographic areas in which Company has a business
presence. In addition, Company Foundation makes grants to support college
programs training students in the industry in which Company does business.
Company Foundation is funded through annual investment income from its current
endowment assets, as well as from gifts from family members and other donors.

New Foundation is a grant-making charitable trust that has been recognized as an
exempt organization described in section 501(c)(3) and classified as a non-operating
private foundation under section 509(a). The dispositive terms of the trust agreement
creating New Foundation are substantially identical to those of the trust agreement
creating Family Foundation.

Family members own all of the control shares of Company. Company controls
Company Foundation. Family members also comprise a majority of the persons
serving on the board of Trustee. Trustee is the sole trustee of both Family
Foundation and New Foundation. Taxpayer represents that Family Foundation,
Company Foundation, and New Foundation are all effectively controlled by the same
persons within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.507-3(a)(2)(ii).

Family Foundation expects to receive a large bequest (Bequest) from A who died
several years ago and left all of his assets for charitable purposes to Family
Foundation under his estate plan. Family Foundation expects to receive the Bequest
through multiple distributions from A’s estate in Year 2 based on the anticipated
estate settlement timeline. In anticipation of the settlement of the estate and receipt
of the Bequest, New Foundation was established.

2 The term “family members” throughout this document denotes the members of the same family.
PLR-116646-21 3

After the receipt of the Bequest, Family Foundation anticipates a series of transfers
(Proposed Transfers) that will collectively transfer at least 80 percent of the assets of
Family Foundation to Company Foundation and New Foundation in the subsequent
calendar year, Year 3. The Proposed Transfers would better facilitate separate and
distinct programmatic grantmaking between the two transferee foundations, increase
transparency of the foundations’ respective charitable activities, and allow a separate
annual financial statement audit for New Foundation that covers the Bequest.

Family Foundation will transfer the Bequest to New Foundation as capital endowment
grants. Trustee believes the transfers are necessary to better serve A’s charitable
intent, because transfers to New Foundation will allow the Bequest to be
administered and invested within New Foundation, with its activities separated from
the smaller-in-scale grant-making activities of Family Foundation. This will allow
more flexibility in charitable programming and would not subject Family Foundation to
additional costs likely to be incurred in managing the Bequest. New Foundation
expects to have dedicated resources to enable it to more effectively carry out the
charitable intentions of A by engaging in larger-scale programmatic grant-making,
developing grantee outcome measurements, building partnerships with secondary
educational institutions, and defining programs that meet A’s charitable intentions.

Family Foundation also plans to provide capital endowment grants to Company
Foundation from its existing assets which would be restricted so that only the annual
income from the endowment may be expended in furtherance of Company
Foundation’s charitable purposes. Company Foundation has announced a new
capital campaign to expand Company Foundation’s mission to geographic areas
Company has recently entered. This campaign is designed to build an endowment
that will generate annual income, which income will in turn be used to fund increased
grant-making.

Thus, Family Foundation’s Proposed Transfers will provide New Foundation and
Company Foundation with additions to their respective endowments, the income of
which will be used for their respective charitable purposes. Family Foundation will
exercise expenditure responsibility over all the capital endowment grants to New
Foundation and Company Foundation for the taxable year in which they are made
and for the immediately succeeding two taxable years. Family Foundation will enter
into grant agreements with New Foundation and Company Foundation. These
agreements will specify the permitted uses of the Proposed Transfers and require
annual reporting on the use of the transfers and any income generated therefrom.
The reporting will be for the year in which the Proposed Transfers are made and for a
minimum of the two succeeding years on how the funds are being used. For each
Proposed Transfer, Family Foundation will then review the reports received from the
grant recipient as well as its overall operations and make a determination that neither
the principal nor the income from the transfers has been used for any purpose which
would result in liability for tax under section 4945(d). Family Foundation intends to
PLR-116646-21 4

make this determination for each Proposed Transfer after receiving the report
covering the second subsequent year after that transfer.

Because Family Foundation intends to treat the Proposed Transfers to New
Foundation and Company Foundation as capital endowment grants rather than as
qualifying distributions, Family Foundation represents that it will not seek to obtain
records from New Foundation or Company Foundation showing that either foundation
has made distributions out of corpus in connection with the transfers.

At no time during the proposed transactions will Family Foundation distribute all of its
net assets. Transfers from Family Foundation to New Foundation will be made only
after Family Foundation receives distributions of the Bequest from A’s estate. Family
Foundation has not and will not notify the IRS of an intent to terminate its status as a
private foundation pursuant to section 507(a)(1). Family Foundation also represents
that it has not engaged in willfully repeated acts (or failures to act) or committed a
willful and flagrant act (or failure to act) which would give rise to tax under chapter 42,
nor will it commit any such acts at the time of distribution.

Rulings Requested, Law, and Analysis

Requested Rulings 1, 2, 3, and 4:

1. The Proposed Transfers from Family Foundation to Company Foundation and
   New Foundation of at least 80 percent of the assets of Family Foundation will
   constitute a significant disposition of assets described in section 507(b)(2).
2. The Proposed Transfers constitute transfers described in section 507(b)(2).
3. Company Foundation will not be treated as a newly created organization
   following the Proposed Transfers.
4. New Foundation will not be treated as a newly created organization following
   the Proposed Transfers.

Law:

Section 507(b)(2) states that when one private foundation transfers assets to another
private foundation pursuant to any liquidation, merger, redemption, recapitalization, or
other adjustment, organization, or reorganization, the transferee private foundation
shall not be treated as a newly created organization. A transfer described in section
507(b)(2) is referred to as a “section 507(b)(2) transfer.”

Treas. Reg. § 1.507-3(a)(1) states that, in the case of a significant disposition of
assets to one or more private foundations pursuant to a transfer described in section
507(b)(2) and § 1.507-3(c), the transferee organization shall not be treated as a
newly created organization, but shall succeed to those attributes and characteristics
of the transferor organization which are described in § 1.507-3(a)(2), (3) and (4),
PLR-116646-21 5

which includes its aggregate tax benefit, substantial contributors, and Chapter 42 tax
and penalty liabilities.

Section 1.507-3(c)(1) states that for purposes of section 507(b)(2), the terms “other
adjustment, organization, or reorganization” shall include any partial liquidation or any
other significant disposition of assets to one or more private foundations, other than
transfers for full and adequate consideration or distributions out of current income.”

A significant disposition of assets may occur in a single taxable year or over the
course of two or more taxable years. The determination whether a significant
disposition has occurred through a series of related distributions will be made on the
basis of all the facts and circumstances of the particular case.

Section 1.507-3(c)(2)(ii) defines “significant disposition of assets to one or more
private foundations” to mean any disposition or series of dispositions where the
cumulative total of dispositions is twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the fair market
value of the net assets of the foundation at the beginning of the taxable year.

Section 1.507-3(c)(5) illustrates the above paragraph by the following examples:

Example (1).
M is a private foundation on the calendar year basis. It has net assets worth
$100,000 as of January 1, 1971. In 1971, in addition to distributions out of current
income, M transfers $10,000 to N, $10,000 to O, and $10,000 to P. N, O, and P are
all private foundations. Under subparagraph (2)(i) of this paragraph, M has made a
significant disposition of its assets in 1971 since M has disposed of more than 25
percent of its net assets (with respect to the fair market value of such assets as of
January 1, 1971). M has therefore made section 507(b)(2) transfers within the
meaning of this paragraph, and section 507(b)(2) applies to the transfers made to N,
O, and P.

Example (2).
U, a tax-exempt private foundation on the calendar year basis, has net assets worth
$100,000 as of January 1, 1971. As part of a series of related dispositions in 1971
and 1972, U transfers in 1971, in addition to distributions out of current income,
$10,000 to private foundation X and $10,000 to private foundation Y, and in 1972, in
addition to distributions out of current income, U transfers $10,000 to private
foundation Z. Under subparagraph (2)(ii) of this paragraph, U is treated as having
made a series of related dispositions in 1971 and 1972. The aggregate of the 1972
disposition (under subparagraph (2)(i) of this paragraph) and the series of related
dispositions (under subparagraph (2)(ii) of this paragraph) is $30,000, which is more
than 25 percent of the fair market value of U's net assets as of the beginning of 1971
($100,000), the first year in which any such disposition was made. Thus, U has made
a significant disposition of its assets and has made transfers described in section
PLR-116646-21 6

507(b)(2). The provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section apply to each of
the transferees as of the date on which it received assets from U.

Analysis:

Family Foundation had assets in Year 1 of approximately x. In Year 2, Family
Foundation will receive the Bequest in a series of transactions from A. In Year 3, the
year subsequent to Year 2, Family Foundation proposes to transfer at least eighty
percent (80%) of its assets to two separate foundations, New Foundation and
Company Foundation. Section 1.507-3(c)(2)(ii), as illustrated by the examples in §
1.507-3(c)(5), provides that the amount of the transfers is measured against a
foundation’s net assets at the beginning of the first taxable year in which any of the
series of related dispositions is made. The Proposed Transfers will be made in Year

3. Because the Proposed Transfers to New Foundation and Company Foundation
   will occur in Year 3, and because Family Foundation is a calendar year taxpayer, the
   measure of the amount of the disposition can be taken with respect to Family
   Foundation’s assets at the beginning of Year 3. Section 1.507-3(c)(2)(ii). Family
   Foundation’s assets at the beginning of Year 3 will include the Bequest and (because
   at no time will Family Foundation distribute all of its assets) some or all of its assets,
   approximately x, as of Year 1. Because the Proposed Transfers will be at least
   eighty percent of Family Foundation’s assets, including the Bequest, the Proposed
   Transfers will exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of Family Foundation’s assets and
   thus will constitute a significant disposition of assets. Section 1.507-3(c)(1); § 1.507-
   3(c)(2)(ii). Thus, the Proposed Transfers are described in section 507(b)(2).

Transferee foundations are not treated as newly created foundations as a result of a
section 507(b)(2) transfer of assets. Section 507(b)(2); § 1.507-3(a)(1). Because
Family Foundation will be making section 507(b)(2) transfers to Company
Foundation, Company Foundation will not be treated as a newly created organization
following the Proposed Transfers. Also, because Family Foundation will be making
section 507(b)(2) transfers to New Foundation, New Foundation will not be treated as
a newly created organization following the Proposed Transfers.

Requested Ruling 5:

5. The Proposed Transfers will not cause Family Foundation’s termination as a
   private foundation under section 507(a) and will not result in the imposition of
   any termination tax under section 507(c).

Law:

Section 507(a) provides that, except as provided in subsection (b), the status of any
organization as a private foundation shall be terminated only if (1) it notifies the
Secretary of its intent to accomplish such a termination, or (2) with respect to such
organization, there have been either willful repeated acts (or failures to act), or a
PLR-116646-21 7

willful and flagrant act (or failure to act), giving rise to liability for tax under chapter 42,
and the Secretary notifies such organization that it is liable for the tax imposed by
section 507(c), and either such organization pays the tax (or any portion not abated
under section 507(g)) or the entire amount of such tax is abated under section
507(g).

Section 507(c) imposes an excise tax on an organization that voluntarily terminates
its private foundation status equal to the lower of: (1) the aggregate tax benefit that
has resulted from the private foundation’s tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3),
or (2) the value of the net assets of the foundation.

Section 1.507-3(d) states that unless a private foundation voluntarily gives notice
pursuant to section 507(a)(1), a transfer of assets described in section 507(b)(2) will
not constitute a termination of the transferor’s private foundation status under section
507(a)(1). Such transfer must, nevertheless, satisfy the requirements of any
pertinent provisions of chapter 42.

Treas. Reg. § 1.507-4(b) states that private foundations that make transfers
described in section 507(b)(2) are not subject to the tax imposed under section
507(c) with respect to such transfers unless the provisions of section 507(a) become
applicable.

Analysis:

Family Foundation has not and represents that it will not notify the IRS of an intent to
terminate its status as a private foundation pursuant to section 507(a)(1). Family
Foundation also represents that it has not willfully engaged in repeated acts (or
failures to act) or committed a willful and flagrant act (or failure to act) which would
give rise to tax under chapter 42, nor will it commit any such acts at the time of
distribution. See section 507(a)(2). The Proposed Transfers themselves, as
described above, will not constitute such acts. Therefore, the Proposed Transfers will
not cause Family Foundation’s termination as a private foundation under section
507(a) and will not result in the imposition of any termination tax under section
507(c). Section 1.507-3(d); § 1.507-4(b).

Requested Rulings 6 and 7:

6. Because the Proposed Transfers do not constitute a transfer of all of Family
   Foundation’s net assets, § 1.507-3(a)(9)(i) will not apply and Company
   Foundation will not be treated as if it is Family Foundation with respect to the
   Proposed Transfers.
7. Because the Proposed Transfers do not constitute a transfer of all of Family
   Foundation’s net assets, § 1.507-3(a)(9)(i) will not apply and New Foundation
   will not be treated as if it is Family Foundation with respect to the Proposed
   Transfers.
   PLR-116646-21 8

Law:

Section 1.507-3(a)(9)(i) states that if a private foundation transfers all of its net assets
to one or more private foundations that are effectively controlled by the same person
or persons that effectively controlled the transferor private foundation, for purposes of
chapter 42 (section 4940 et. seq.) and part II of subchapter F of chapter 1 of the
Code (sections 507 through 509) such a transferee private foundation shall be
treated as if it were the transferor.

Aggregate Tax Benefit:

Section 507(d)(1) defines “aggregate tax benefit” as the sum of the following
amounts:
(i) the aggregate increases in tax under chapters 1,11 and 12 of the Internal Revenue
Code that would have been imposed on the substantial contributors to the private
foundation if the charitable income, estate and gift tax deductions were disallowed
for contributions made after February 28, 1913;
(ii) the aggregate increases in tax under chapter 1 that would have been imposed on
the private foundation's income for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1912
if the foundation had not been exempt under section 501(c)(3) or if deductions under
section 642(c) had been limited to 20 percent of taxable income (in the case of a
trust); and
(iii) interest on the amounts described in items (i) and (ii) above from the first date
each amount would have been due and payable until the date when the organization
ceases to be a private foundation.

Section 1.507-3(a)(1) states that, in the case of a significant disposition of assets to
one or more private foundations pursuant to a transfer described in section 507(b)(2)
and § 1.507-3(c), the transferee organization shall not be treated as a newly created
organization, but shall succeed to those attributes and characteristics of the
transferor organization which are described in § 1.507-3(a)(2), (3) and (4), which
includes its aggregate tax benefit, substantial contributors, and chapter 42 tax and
penalty liabilities.

However, § 1.507-3(a)(2)(ii) provides that a transferee organization which is not
effectively controlled (within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.482-1(a)(3)), directly or
indirectly, by the same person or persons who effectively control the transferor
organization shall not succeed to an aggregate tax benefit in excess of the fair market
value of the assets transferred at the time of transfer.

The examples in Treas. Reg. § 1.507-3(a)(2)(iii) illustrate that when the transferee
and transferor organizations are effectively controlled by the same persons, the
transferee organization succeeds to the aggregate tax benefit of the transferor in an
amount equal to the amount of such aggregate tax benefit (within the meaning of
PLR-116646-21 9

section 507(d)(1)), multiplied by a fraction the numerator of which is the fair market
value of the assets (less encumbrances) transferred and the denominator of which is
the fair market value of the assets of the transferor (less encumbrances) immediately
before the transfer.

Section 1.507-3(a)(8)(ii) provides that certain provisions enumerated in that section
(including section 4940(c)(4)(B) with respect to the basis of property and section
4942(f)(4) with respect to distributions of income) shall apply to the transferee
foundation with respect to the assets transferred to the same extent and in the same
manner that they would have applied to the transferor foundation had the transfer
described in section 507(b)(2) not been effected.

Treas. Reg. § 1.507-7(d) provides that for purposes of section 507 and the
regulations thereunder, the term “net assets” shall mean the gross assets of a private
foundation reduced by all liabilities of the foundation, including appropriate estimated
and contingent liabilities.

Analysis:

Company Foundation, Family Foundation, and New Foundation are all effectively
controlled by family members who control Company and Trustee. Trustee, Family
Foundation, Company Foundation, and New Foundation stipulate that Family
Foundation, Company Foundation, and New Foundation are all effectively controlled
within the meaning of § 1.507-3(a)(2)(i) (and thus also § 1.507-3(a)(9)(i)).

Family Foundation anticipates a series of transfers (Proposed Transfers) that will
collectively transfer at least 80 percent of the assets of Family Foundation to
Company Foundation and New Foundation, as opposed to all of Family Foundation’s
assets. At no time during the proposed transactions will Family Foundation distribute
all of its net assets. Transfers from Family Foundation to New Foundation will be
made only after Family Foundation receives distributions of the Bequest from A’s
estate.

Despite the fact that the foundations are all effectively controlled, since Family
Foundation is not transferring all of its net assets as part of the Proposed Transfers,
but rather only a part of its net assets, neither Company Foundation nor New
Foundation will be treated as Family Foundation and § 1.507-3(a)(9)(i) will not apply.

Aggregate Tax Benefit:

Under Treas. Reg. § 1.507-3(a)(1), in the case of a transfer of assets from one
private foundation to another private foundation described in section 507(b)(2), the
transferee organization is treated as possessing those attributes and characteristics
of the transferor organization that are described in § 1.507-3(a)(2), (3), and (4). As
discussed above, the Proposed Transfers are described in section 507(b)(2).
PLR-116646-21 10

Therefore, § 1.507-3(a)(1) applies. At the time of the Proposed Transfers, Family
Foundation, Company Foundation, and New Foundation will be controlled by the
same persons. Therefore, Company Foundation and New Foundation will succeed to
a fraction of Family Foundation's aggregate tax benefit, calculated as described in
§ 1.507-3(a)(2)(iii). As Family Foundation is not terminating under section 507 and
will continue as a private non-operating foundation after the Proposed Transfers,
Family Foundation will retain the portion of its aggregate tax benefit that is not
passing to Company Foundation and New Foundation. See § 1.507-3(a)(2)(iii).

Furthermore, in the event of a transfer of assets described in section 507(b)(2),
§ 1.507-3(a)(3) provides that any person who is a “substantial contributor” (within the
meaning of section 507(d)(2)) with respect to the transferor foundation will be treated
as a “substantial contributor” with respect to the transferee foundation. Therefore,
any person who is a disqualified person with respect Family Foundation at the time of
the Transfer will be considered a “substantial contributor” with respect to Company
Foundation and New Foundation as a result of the Transfer.

Finally, if a private foundation incurs liability for one or more of the taxes imposed
under chapter 42 (or any penalty resulting therefrom) prior to, or as a result of,
making a transfer of assets described in section 507(b)(2), in any case where
transferee liability applies § 1.507-3(a)(4) provides that the transferee foundation will
be treated as receiving the transferred assets subject to such liability to the extent the
transferor foundation does not satisfy such liability. Therefore, should Family
Foundation have incurred liability for any chapter 42 tax prior to, or as a result of, the
Transfer, Company Foundation and New Foundation will be treated as receiving the
Proposed Transfers subject to such liability to the extent that Family Foundation does
not satisfy the liability where transferee liability applies.

Thus, each of Company Foundation and New Foundation will be treated as
possessing Family Foundation’s attributes and characteristics described in § 1.507-
3(a)(2), (3), (4), and, to the extent applicable, (8)(ii). Given Family Foundation’s
representation that it is effectively controlled by the same persons that control
Company Foundation and New Foundation, each will succeed to a portion of Family
Foundation’s aggregate tax benefit in proportion to the assets received. Section
1.507-3(a)(1) and (2)(ii) and (iii).

Requested Ruling 8(a):

8. The Proposed Transfers, whether or not constituting transfers described in
   section 507(b)(2), will not result in:
   a. Gross investment income or capital gain income within the meaning of
   section 4940 and the excise tax on net investment income;
   PLR-116646-21 11

Law:

Section 4940(a) imposes an excise tax on a private foundation’s net investment
income for the taxable year.

Section 4940(c)(1) defines net investment income as the amount by which the sum of
the gross investment income and the capital gain net income exceeds the deductions
allowed by section 4940(c)(3).

Section 4940(c)(2) provides, in part, that for purposes of section 4940, the term
“gross investment income” means the gross amount of income from interest,
dividends, rents, payments with respect to securities loans, and royalties.

Rev. Rul. 2002-28, 2002-1 C.B. 941, presents situations where a private foundation
transfers all of its assets to transferee private foundations that are effectively
controlled (within the meaning of the regulations under section 507), directly or
indirectly by the same person who effectively controlled the transferor private
foundations. The ruling concludes that the transfers do not constitute investments of
the transferor for purposes of section 4940; therefore, the transfers do not give rise to
net investment income subject to tax under section 4940(a).

Analysis:

Family Foundation expects to receive the Bequest through multiple distributions from
A’s estate in Year 2 based on the anticipated estate settlement timeline. After the
receipt of the Bequest, Family Foundation will transfer the Bequest to New
Foundation in the subsequent calendar year, Year 3. Family Foundation also plans
to provide capital endowment grants to Company Foundation from its existing assets.
The Proposed Transfers by Family Foundation to New Foundation and Company
Foundation will lack consideration and, therefore, will not otherwise generate net
investment income (including capital gains from the taxable sale or disposition of
property) to Family Foundation subject to excise tax under section 4940. Sections
4940(a), (c)(1), and (c)(2). Similar to the transfers described in Rev. Rul. 2002-28,
the transfers do not constitute investments of the transferor for purposes of section
4940. Even though the transfers in Rev. Rul. 2002-28 were complete transfers, the
concept that a section 507(b)(2) transfer, even though partial, is not an investment
remains applicable. Accordingly, none of the Proposed Transfers will result in the
imposition of tax under section 4940(a) on Family Foundation.

Requested Ruling 8(b):

   8. The Proposed Transfers, whether or not constituting transfers described in
   section 507(b)(2) will not result in:

PLR-116646-21 12

          b. An act of self-dealing under section 4941 and the excise tax
          imposed on self-dealing.

Law:

Section 4941(a) imposes an excise tax on each act of self-dealing between a private
foundation and a disqualified person, as defined in section 4946. Taxes are imposed
on both the self-dealers involved in an act of self-dealing and on any foundation
managers who knowingly participate in an act of self-dealing.

Section 4941(d)(1)(E) provides that the term “self-dealing” includes any direct or
indirect transfer to, or use by or for the benefit of, a disqualified person of the income
or assets of a private foundation.

Treas. Reg. § 53.4946-1(a)(8) states that, for purposes of section 4941 only,
“disqualified person” shall not include any organization that is described in section
501(c)(3) (other than an organization described in section 509(a)(4)).

Rev. Rul. 2002-28, 2002-1 C.B. 941, presents situations where a private foundation
transfers all of its assets to transferee private foundations that are effectively
controlled (within the meaning of the regulations under section 507), directly or
indirectly by the same person who effectively controlled the transferor private
foundations. The ruling states that the transfers are to section 501(c)(3)
organizations, which are not treated as disqualified persons for purposes of section
4941. See section 53.4946-1(a)(8). Thus, the transfers do not constitute self-dealing
transactions and are not subject to tax under section 4941(a).

Analysis:

Company Foundation is recognized as tax exempt under section 501(c)(3). New
Foundation also is recognized by the IRS as an organization exempt from tax under
section 501(c)(3). Therefore, under § 53.4946-1(a)(8), the Proposed Transfers from
Family Foundation to Company Foundation and New Foundation do not constitute
transfers to disqualified persons because both Company Foundation and New
Foundation are described in section 501(c)(3), and are not organizations described in
section 509(a)(4). See sections 4941(a); 4941(d)(1)(E); and Rev. Rul. 2002-28.
None of the Proposed Transfers to Company Foundation and New Foundation are
acts of self-dealing with respect to Company Foundation or New Foundation,
provided Company Foundation and New Foundation maintain their tax-exempt status
under section 501(c)(3) and are recognized by the IRS as organizations exempt from
tax under section 501(c)(3) at the dates of the Proposed Transfers. See § 53.4946-
1(a)(8).

Requested Ruling 8(c):
PLR-116646-21 13

   8. The Proposed Transfers, whether or not constituting transfers described in
   section 507(b)(2) will not result in:
          c. a qualifying distribution under section 4942.

Law:

Section 4942(a) generally imposes a tax on the undistributed income of a private
non-operating foundation for any taxable year.

Section 4942(c) defines “undistributed income” for any taxable year as the amount by
which the distributable amount for such taxable year exceeds the qualifying
distributions made out of such distributable amount for such taxable year.

Section 4942(g)(1)(A) and § 53.4942(a)-3(a)(2)(i) provide, in part, that the term
“qualifying distribution” means any amount paid to accomplish one or more purposes
described in section 170(c)(1) or (2)(B), other than any contribution to (i) a private
non-operating foundation, unless the amount paid satisfies the requirements of
section 4942(g)(3); (ii) an organization controlled (directly or indirectly) by the private
foundation or one or more disqualified persons (as defined in section 4946) with
respect to the foundation; or (iii) a supporting organization described in section
4942(g)(4)(A)(i) or (ii), including a Type III functionally integrated supporting
organization if a disqualified person of the private foundation directly or indirectly
controls such organization or a supported organization (as defined in section
509(f)(3)) of such organization.

Section 4942(g)(3) and § 53.4942(a)-3(c)(1) provides that the term “qualifying
distribution” includes a contribution to (i) another charitable organization controlled
directly or indirectly by the transferor foundation or one or more disqualified persons
with respect to the transferor or (ii) a private non-operating foundation if two
requirements are satisfied. The first such requirement is that the transferee
organization satisfy certain distribution requirements described in section
4942(g)(3)(A). The second requirement is that the transferor obtains adequate
records or other sufficient evidence from the transferee organization(s) showing that
the required pass-through distributions were made as described in section
4942(g)(3)(B). The distributions must be made no later than the close of the first
taxable year after its taxable year in which such contribution is received and must be
equal to the amount of the contribution.

Section 1.507-3(a)(5) states that, except as provided in § 1.507-3(a)(9), a private
foundation is required to meet the distribution requirements of section 4942 for any
taxable year in which it makes a section 507(b)(2) transfer of all or part of its net
assets to another private foundation.

Analysis:
PLR-116646-21 14

A private foundation must meet the distribution requirements of section 4942 for any
taxable year in which it makes a section 507(b)(2) transfer of all or part of its net
assets to another private foundation; thus, Family Foundation is required to meet the
distribution requirements of section 4942. Section 1.507-3(a)(5). Under section
4942(g)(3) and § 53.4942(a)-3(c)(1), a grant by a private non-operating foundation to
another private non-operating foundation (or to another organization controlled by
disqualified persons with respect to the transferor) is not treated as a qualifying
distribution by the transferor foundation for purposes of section 4942 except to the
extent that the transferee makes one or more distributions that would be qualifying
distributions under section 4942(g) prior to the close of the transferee's first taxable
year following the taxable year in which it received the transfer and the distributions
are treated as being made out of corpus. Thus, under section 4942(g)(3), a transfer
to another private foundation shall count toward an organization’s distribution
requirements only if the redistribution requirements are met. However, the Proposed
Transfers are meant to be capital endowment grants, meaning that the corpus will
remain undistributed and that only income from the grants will be used by New
Foundation and Company Foundation for charitable purposes. Additionally, because
Family Foundation does not intend to obtain records from New Foundation or
Company Foundation showing that either foundation has made distributions out of
corpus in connection with the transfers, the Proposed Transfers will not satisfy the
requirements for qualifying distributions under section 4942(g)(3).

Requested Ruling 8(d):

   8. The Proposed Transfers, whether or not constituting transfers described in
   section 507(b)(2), will not result in:
          d. an investment that jeopardizes charitable purposes under section
          4944 and the excise tax imposed on jeopardizing investments.

Law:

Section 4944(a)(1) imposes a tax on any investments by a private foundation that
jeopardize the carrying out of any of a private foundation’s exempt purposes.

Section 4944(c) provides an exception for investments where the primary purpose of
the investment is to accomplish exempt purposes and no significant purpose of which
is the production of income or appreciation of property.

Rev. Rul. 2002-28, 2002-1 C.B. 941, presents situations where a private foundation
transfers all of its assets to transferee private foundations that are effectively
controlled (within the meaning of the regulations under section 507), directly or
indirectly by the same person who effectively controlled the transferor private
foundations. The ruling holds that the transfers do not constitute investments for
purposes of section 4944. Therefore the transfers do not constitute investments
PLR-116646-21 15

jeopardizing the transferor foundation's exempt purposes and are not subject to tax
under section 4944(a)(1).

Analysis:

Under section 4944(c), a transfer is not considered a jeopardizing investment for
purposes of section 4944 if the transfer of assets was made for the purpose of
accomplishing a charitable purpose and not for the production of income or
appreciation of property. The Proposed Transfers are being made to Company
Foundation and New Foundation as grants for capital endowments to fulfill the
transferee foundations’ charitable purposes and for no consideration. The grants are
not investments, and Family Foundation expects no return on investment, nor a
return of principal. Therefore, the Proposed Transfers do not constitute investments
and will not result in the imposition of tax for a jeopardizing investment under section
4944. See also Rev. Rul. 2002-28.

Requested Ruling 8(e):

   8. The Proposed Transfers, whether or not constituting transfers described in
   section 507(b)(2) will not result in:
          e. taxable expenditures under section 4945 provided Family
          Foundation, New Foundation, and Company Foundation comply with
          the reporting and determination provisions of § 53.4945-5(c)(2).

Law:

Section 4945(a) imposes an excise tax on each taxable expenditure incurred by a
private foundation.

Section 4945(d)(4) provides that the term “taxable expenditure” includes a grant paid
to an organization unless (A) the grantee is either a public charity described in
section 509(a)(1), (2), or (3) (other than certain supporting organizations described in
section 4942(g)(4)(A)(i) or (ii)) or an exempt operating foundation described in section
4940(d)(2), or (B) unless the grantor exercises expenditure responsibility over the
grant pursuant to section 4945(h).

Section 4945(d)(5) provides that the term “taxable expenditure” also includes any
amount paid or incurred by a private foundation for any purpose other than one
specified in section 170(c)(2)(B).

Section 170(c)(2)(B) lists the following purposes: “religious, charitable, scientific,
literary, or educational purposes, or to foster national or international amateur sports
competition (but only if no part of its activities involve the provision of athletic facilities
or equipment), or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals.” The purposes
listed in section 170(c)(2)(B) generally are the same as the purposes listed in section
PLR-116646-21 16

501(c)(3). Thus, a grant by a private foundation to another organization described in
section 501(c)(3) ordinarily is an amount paid to accomplish a purpose described in
section 170(c)(2)(B).

Section 4945(h) defines “expenditure responsibility” to mean that the grantor private
foundation is responsible for exerting all reasonable efforts to establish adequate
procedures to see that the grant is spent solely for the purpose for which it was
made, obtain full and complete reports from the grantee on how the funds are spent,
and make full and detailed reports with respect to such expenditures to the Secretary.

Section 53.4945-5(c)(2) provides that, with regard to capital endowment grants made
to private foundations, if a private foundation makes a grant to another private
foundation for endowment or for other capital purposes, the grantor foundation must
require reports from the grantee foundation on the uses of the principal and income (if
any) from the grant funds. The grantee must make such reports annually for the
taxable year in which the grant was made and for the immediately succeeding two
taxable years. The grantor may allow the grantee’s reports to be discontinued only if
it is reasonably apparent to the grantor, before the end of such grantee’s second
succeeding taxable year, that neither the principal nor the income from the grant
funds has been used for any purpose that would result in liability for tax under section
4945(d).

Analysis:

Neither Company Foundation nor New Foundation is treated as Family Foundation
under § 1.507-3(a)(9)(i), as discussed in Requested Ruling 6 and 7. Thus, each of
the Proposed Transfers would be a taxable expenditure under section 4945(d)(4)
unless the grants are made for section 170(c)(2)(B) purposes and Family Foundation
exercises expenditure responsibility as required by section 4945(h). Family
Foundation’s Proposed Transfers will provide New Foundation and Company
Foundation with additions to their respective endowments, the income of which will
be used for their respective charitable purposes. However, because Family
Foundation is making capital expenditure grants to New Foundation and Company
Foundation, it is required to follow the rules of section 4945(h) and § 53.4945-5(c)(2).
Family Foundation represents that it will exercise expenditure responsibility over the
Proposed Transfers for the year of the transfer and for a minimum of the two
succeeding years until Family Foundation determines that neither the transferred
funds nor the income therefrom have been used for any purpose that would result in
liability for tax under section 4945(d). Thus, the Proposed Transfers will not be
considered taxable expenditures as long as Family Foundation exercises expenditure
responsibility over the transfers in accordance with section 4945(h) and § 53.4945-
5(c)(2).

Requested Ruling 9
PLR-116646-21 17

9. After the Proposed Transfers are completed, no part of Family Foundation’s
   excess qualifying distribution carryover will transfer to New Foundation or
   Company Foundation; Family Foundation will retain its excess qualifying
   distribution carryover.

Law:

Section 1.507-3(a)(5) states that, except as provided in § 1.507-3(a)(9), a private
foundation is required to meet the distribution requirements of section 4942 for any
taxable year in which it makes a section 507(b)(2) transfer of all or part of its net
assets to another private foundation.

Section 1.507-3(a)(9)(i) states that if a private foundation transfers all of its net assets
to one or more private foundations that are effectively controlled by the same person
or persons that effectively controlled the transferor private foundation, for purposes of
chapter 42 and part II of subchapter F of chapter 1 of the Code such a transferee
private foundation shall be treated as if it were the transferor.

Rev. Rul. 78–387, 1978–2 C.B. 270, held that in a transfer described in § 1.507-
3(a)(9)(i) from one private foundation to another, the transferor’s excess qualifying
distributions carryover reduced the transferee’s distributable amount.

Analysis:

The Proposed Transfers do not satisfy the requirements for qualifying distributions
under section 4942(g)(3) and Family Foundation must satisfy the distribution
requirements of section 4942, without considering the Proposed Transfers. As
discussed in Rulings 6 and 7, Family Foundation is transferring less than all of its net
assets; therefore, § 1.507-3(a)(9)(i) and Rev. Rul. 78-387 do not apply, and neither
Company Foundation nor New Foundation is treated as Family Foundation for
purposes of Chapter 42. As of Year 1, Family Foundation had excess distributions of
y prior to the Proposed Transfers. Because neither Company Foundation nor New
Foundation is treated as Family Foundation, no part of Family Foundation’s excess
qualifying distribution carryover prior to the Proposed Transfers will transfer to
Company Foundation or New Foundation. Family Foundation will retain its excess
qualifying distribution carryover.

Rulings:

Based on the foregoing, and assuming the accuracy of the facts and
representations set forth herein, we rule as follows:

1) The Proposed Transfers from Family Foundation to Company Foundation and
New Foundation of at least 80 percent of the assets of Family Foundation will
constitute a significant disposition of assets described in section 507(b)(2).
PLR-116646-21 18

2) The Proposed Transfers constitute transfers described in section 507(b)(2).
3) Company Foundation will not be treated as a newly created organization
following the Proposed Transfers.
4) New Foundation will not be treated as a newly created organization following
the Proposed Transfers.
5) The Proposed Transfers will not cause Family Foundation’s termination as a
private foundation under section 507(a) and will not result in the imposition of
any termination tax under section 507(c).
6) Because the Proposed Transfers do not constitute a transfer of all of Family
Foundation’s net assets, section 1.507(a)(9)(i) will not apply and Company
Foundation will not be treated as if it is Family Foundation with respect to the
Proposed Transfers.
7) Because the Proposed Transfers do not constitute a transfer of all of Family
Foundation’s net assets, section 1.507(a)(9)(i) will not apply and New
Foundation will not be treated as if it is Family Foundation with respect to the
Proposed Transfers.
8) The Proposed Transfers will not result in:
a. Gross investment income or capital gain net income within the meaning
of section 4940 and the excise tax on net investment income;
b. An act of self-dealing under section 4941 and the excise tax imposed
on self-dealing;
c. A qualifying distribution under section 4942;
d. An investment that jeopardizes charitable purposes under section 4944
and the excise tax imposed on jeopardizing investments;
e. Taxable expenditures under section 4945 provided Family Foundation,
New Foundation, and Company Foundation comply with the
expenditure responsibility provisions of section 4945(h) and the
regulations thereunder with respect to the Proposed Transfers,
including the reporting and determination provisions of § 53.4945-
5(c)(2).
9) After the Proposed Transfers are complete, no part of Family Foundation’s
excess qualifying distribution carryover will transfer to New Foundation or
Company Foundation; Family Foundation will retain its excess qualifying
distribution carryover.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayers and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by an individual with authority to bind the taxpayers and upon the
understanding that there will be no material changes in the facts. This office has not
verified any of the materials submitted in support of the request for rulings, and such
material is subject to verification on examination.

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning
the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.
PLR-116646-21 19

This letter does not address the applicability of any section of the Code or
Regulations to the facts submitted other than with respect to the sections specifically
described and upon which rulings are granted. Neither does this letter constitute a
determination that Family Foundation, New Foundation, and Company Foundation
are exempt from tax under section 501(a) or are private foundations under section
509(a). Because it could help resolve questions concerning your federal income tax
status, this ruling should be kept in your permanent records.

This letter will be made available for public inspection under section 6110 of the Code
after certain deletions of identifying information are made. For details, see the
enclosed Notice 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose. A copy of this ruling with
deletions that we intend to make available for public inspection is attached to the
Notice 437. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, you should follow the
instructions in the Notice 437.

The Associate Office (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations, and Employment
Taxes) will revoke or modify a letter ruling and apply the revocation retroactively if: (1)
there has been a misstatement or omission of controlling facts; (2) the facts at the
time of the transaction are materially different from the controlling facts on which the
ruling is based; or (3) the transaction involves a continuing action or series of actions
and the controlling facts change during the course of the transaction. See Rev. Proc.
2022-1, 2022-1 IRB 1, § 11.05.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, if taxpayer files its returns electronically, it may satisfy this requirement
by attaching a statement to its return that provides the date and control number of
this letter.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

If you have any questions about this ruling, please contact the person whose name
and phone number are shown in the heading of this letter.
PLR-116646-21 20

                                          Sincerely,



                                          Virginia Richardson
                                          Senior Tax Law Specialist
                                          Office of the Chief Counsel
                                          (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations,
                                          and Employment Taxes)

Cc: -------------------------------

---------------------

     -------------------------

------------------------------------------

-------------------------

------------------------------------------

```