🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202229004 Released July 22, 2022 Approved

Late-election relief lets a corporation file Form 4876-A and be treated as an IC-DISC for its first year

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2022, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A newly formed corporation, wholly owned by an S corporation, was set up to
operate as an interest charge domestic international sales corporation
(IC-DISC), a structure that lets exporters defer some tax on export income. To
get IC-DISC treatment, the corporation had to file Form 4876-A within 90 days
of the start of its first tax year. It signed the form on time, but the IRS
later refused to process it (the form left off the exact date the tax year
ended, and the company did not answer follow-up requests during COVID-19 staff
turnover and medical leave). More than two years passed before the problem was
fully sorted out. The corporation asked for relief under Treas. Reg.
§§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3, the general rules that let the IRS grant more
time for a missed regulatory election. The IRS agreed: because the taxpayer
reasonably relied on qualified tax professionals and acted in good faith, it
gets 90 days from the date of the ruling to file Form 4876-A, which will then
count as a timely IC-DISC election for its first year. The relief only fixes
the timing; it does not decide whether the company actually qualifies as an
IC-DISC.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the corporation get an extension of time to file
    Form 4876-A and be treated as electing IC-DISC status for its first taxable
    year?
  • Outcome: approved (90-day extension granted)
  • Key authorities: IRC § 992(b)(1); Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.921-1T(b)(1);
    Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202229004 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/22/2022 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 992.02-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------- -----------------------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------------------ -----------------
------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:6
PLR-100397-22
Date:
April 19, 2022

Legend

Date 1 = --------------------------
Date 2 = -------------------------
Date 3 = ----------------------
Date 4 = -------------------------
Date 5 = ----------------------
Date 6 = ---------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Taxpayer = -----------------------
Parent = --------------------------
Accounting Firm = ---------------------
Individual A = ---------------------
Individual B = -------------------

Dear -----------------------:

This responds to your letter dated December 23, 2021 requesting that the Internal
Revenue Service (“Service”) grant Taxpayer an extension of time under Treas. Reg. §§
301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to file Form 4876-A (“Election To Be Treated as an Interest
Charge DISC”) for Taxpayer's first taxable year.

Facts

On Date 1, Taxpayer was incorporated to operate as an interest charge domestic
international sales corporation (“IC-DISC”). Taxpayer is a corporation wholly owned by
Parent.
PLR-100397-22 2

Parent is an S corporation. Parent manufactures dust suppression systems for a wide
array of industries.

Individual A is the president of both Taxpayer and Parent. Parent engaged Individual B,
a qualified tax professional, to incorporate the Taxpayer and make the necessary
election to qualify Taxpayer as an IC-DISC. Individual B prepared Form 4876-A, and
Individual A signed Form 4876-A on Date 2, which was within 90 days of the beginning
of Taxpayer’s first taxable year.

Taxpayer and Parent engaged Accounting Firm to discharge their federal tax
compliance responsibilities for all taxable years since Year 1, but Accounting Firm did
not review Form 4876-A before it was filed. Based on representations by
representatives of Taxpayer that Taxpayer’s Form 4876-A had been accepted by the
Service, Accounting Firm prepared Taxpayer’s Year 1 federal income tax return on
Form 1120-IC-DISC and Parent’s 2018 Form 1120-S, which were filed on or about Date

  1. Accounting Firm also prepared and timely filed Taxpayer’s Form 1120-IC-DISC for
    Taxpayer’s Year 2 and Year 3 taxable years.

In correspondence dated Date 4, more than two years after Form 4876-A had been
filed, the Service wrote to Taxpayer and advised that its election on Form 4876-A could
not be processed because Taxpayer had not replied to previous correspondence
requesting information needed to process the form. Individual B represents that he
believed the Form 4876-A to have been properly completed, and that his understanding
is that the sole reason for the rejection of the form is the failure to include the exact date
on which the Taxpayer’s taxable year ended, rather than just the month.

On Date 5, Taxpayer received a letter from the Service stating that Taxpayer’s Year 3
return could not be processed because there was no record of a Form 4876-A having
been filed. In correspondence dated Date 6, the Service notified the Taxpayer that
Taxpayer’s Year 1 return could not be processed for the same reason. Individual A
represents that Taxpayer’s failure to respond to the Service’s requests for additional
information necessary to process its original Form 4876-A was due to staff turnover and
medical leave associated with the COVID-19 crisis.

Over the next several months, Taxpayer, Individual B, and Accounting Firm discussed
the problem, and had Accounting Firm prepare this request for an extension of time
under Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to file Form 4876-A. In conjunction
with this request, Taxpayer executed a Form 872, Consent to Extend the Time to
Assess Tax for Year 1.

Law and Analysis

Section 992(b)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) provides that an
election by a corporation to be treated as a DISC shall be made by such corporation for
a taxable year at any time during the 90-day period immediately preceding the
PLR-100397-22 3

beginning of the taxable year, except that the Secretary may give his consent to the
making of an election at such other times as he may designate.

Section 992(b)(1)(B) of the Code provides that such election shall be made in such
manner as the Secretary shall prescribe and shall be valid only if all persons who are
shareholders in such corporation on such first day of the first taxable year for which
such election is effective consent to such election.

Temporary Treasury Regulation § 1.921-1T(b)(1) provides, in part, that a corporation
electing IC-DISC status must file Form 4876-A and that a corporation electing to be
treated as an IC-DISC for its first taxable year shall make its election within 90 days
after the beginning of that year.

Treasury Regulation § 301.9100-1(c) provides, in part, that the Commissioner, in
exercising the Commissioner's discretion, may grant a reasonable extension of time
under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a
regulatory election under all subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Treasury Regulation § 301.9100-1(b) provides that a regulatory election is an election
whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register, or a
revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin. For this purpose, an election includes an application for relief in
respect of tax.

Treasury Regulation § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for
regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-2
(automatic extensions) must be made under the rules of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3.
Requests for relief subject to Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the
taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in Treas. Reg. § 301.
9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted
reasonably and in good faith, and that the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests
of the Government.

Treasury Regulation § 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is generally deemed
to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a
qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and
the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Conclusion

Based on the facts and representations submitted with Taxpayer's ruling request, we
conclude that Taxpayer satisfies Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is
granted an extension of time of 90 days from the date of this ruling letter to file Form
4876-A. Such filing will be treated as a timely election to be treated as an IC-DISC for
Taxpayer's first taxable year.
PLR-100397-22 4

The granting of an extension in this ruling letter is not a determination that Taxpayer is
otherwise eligible to make the election or to claim IC-DISC status or benefits. See
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a). Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is
expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction
or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In particular, no opinion is expressed or
implied as to whether the commissions (or portions thereof) paid to Taxpayer by Parent
may constitute taxable gifts. See, e.g., Rev. Rul. 81-54, 1981-1 C.B. 476.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to each of your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                   Sincerely,



                                   Frank W. Dunham III
                                   Branch Chief
                                   (International)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2022, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.