🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202206013 Released February 11, 2022 Approved

Late relief to revoke a 501(h) lobbying election, effective retroactively

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2022, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A public charity had earlier filed Form 5768 to make a section 501(h) election, which swaps the vague "no substantial part" limit on lobbying for a dollar-based expenditure test. It later decided the election was not worth keeping, but its tax advisor gave it the wrong impression about the timing: the organization thought it could revoke the election mid-year and have the revocation apply back to the start of that year. In fact a 501(h) revocation only takes effect for a tax year if it is filed before that year begins. By the time the charity understood the rule, the window to revoke for its intended year had passed. It asked the IRS for an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file the revocation retroactively. The IRS granted 30 days to file the revocation effective for the intended tax year, finding the charity acted reasonably and in good faith (it caught the problem before filing any return and before the IRS did, and it had relied on a qualified professional) and that granting relief would not cost the government any tax.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May a section 501(c)(3) organization get a discretionary extension of time under § 301.9100-3 to file a late revocation of its section 501(h) lobbying election, effective retroactively to the intended tax year?
  • Outcome: Approved (30 days from the letter date to file the revocation).
  • Key authorities: IRC § 501(h); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(h)-2(a), (d); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1 through -3; Rev. Rul. 83-74.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202206013 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/11/2022 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 501.38-00,
501.38-02 Person To Contact:
--------------------------, ID No. --------------
----------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------------ --------------------
------------------------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
------------------------------------------------- CC:EEE:EOET:EO3
PLR-112811-21
Date:
November 18, 2021

X = -----------------------------------------
Month 1 = --------------
Month 2 = --------------------
Month 3 = ---------------------
Month 4 = --------------
Date 1 = ----------------
Date 2 = ----------------
Date 3 = ----------------

Dear -------------:

This letter responds to a letter from X’s authorized representative, dated June 14, 2021,
and subsequent documentation dated August 3, 2021, requesting a ruling permitting an
extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations
to revoke an election that X made pursuant to section 501(h) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code).

Facts

X is an organization that is exempt from federal income tax pursuant to section 501(a)
as an organization described in section 501(c)(3). X is classified as other than a private
foundation pursuant to section 509(a).

In Month 1, X filed Form 5768 making an election under section 501(h), relating to
expenditures to influence legislation. The election was effective with the tax year
beginning Date 1. In Month 2, X sought professional advice regarding whether it should
revoke the section 501(h) election. After discussing the advantages and disadvantages
of revoking the section 501(h) election with a tax professional, X represents that it
misunderstood the rule involving the effective date of a revocation, erroneously thinking
that it could revoke the election at any time during a taxable year and have the
PLR-112811-21 2

revocation be effective at the beginning of the taxable year during which the revocation
is made. In an affidavit, the tax professional acknowledges that he may have
inadvertently misstated or unclearly stated the timing for the revocation, leading to X’s
misunderstanding.

In Month 3, X authorized the revocation of the section 501(h) election. In Month 4, X
asked a tax professional to prepare Form 5768 to revoke the section 501(h) election.
The tax professional promptly prepared the form, specifying that the revocation was to
be effective for X’s taxable year beginning Date 3, consistent with a note on the form
that explains that the revocation must be signed and postmarked before the first day of
the tax year to which it applies. Upon reviewing the form that the tax professional
prepared, X realized that it had misunderstood the rules regarding the effective date of
section 501(h) revocations and that the revocation would not apply to X’s current
taxable year, as desired. X thereafter sought professional advice for correcting its
failure to revoke the section 501(h) election such that the revocation would be effective
for X’s tax year beginning Date 2.

Ruling Requested

X requests a ruling granting it an extension of time to retroactively revoke its section
501(h) election effective for all tax years beginning on or after Date 2.

Law

Section 501(a) exempts certain organizations from federal income tax, including those
described in section 501(c)(3).

Section 501(c)(3) organizations are organized and operated exclusively for certain
enumerated purposes, and no substantial part of the activities of which is carrying on
propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation (except as otherwise
provided in section 501(h)).

Section 501(h) sets out an alternative to the “no substantial part” limitation on
expenditures made for the purposes of influencing legislation, based on expenditures
for lobbying during the taxable year.

Section 501(h)(3) provides that section 501(h) applies to certain organizations that elect
(in such manner and at such time as the Secretary may prescribe) to have the
provisions of section 501(h) apply.

Section 501(h)(6) provides that an organization’s section 501(h) election is effective for
all taxable years that end after the date the election is made, and begin before the date
the election is revoked by the organization (under regulations prescribed by the
Secretary).
PLR-112811-21 3

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(h)-2(a) provides that a section 501(h) election is made by filing a
completed Form 5768 with the appropriate Internal Revenue Service Center, and
remains in effect for each succeeding taxable year for which the organization is an
eligible organization and which begins before a notice of revocation is filed under
§ 1.501(h)-2(d).

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(h)-2(d)(1) provides that an organization may voluntarily revoke a
section 501(h) lobbying election by filing Form 5768.

Section 301.9100-1(a) provides that § 301.9100-1, -2, and -3 provide the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a
regulatory election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for
making certain regulatory elections when the deadline for making the election is the due
date of the return or the due date of the return including extensions. Section 301.9100-
3 provides extensions of time for making regulatory elections that do not meet the
requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and -3 to make a regulatory
election under all subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be
granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in §
301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer
acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests
of the government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i) provides generally that the taxpayer will be deemed to have
acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer requests relief before the failure to
make the regulatory election is discovered by the IRS. In addition, § 301.9100-
3(b)(1)(v) provides that the taxpayer will be deemed to have acted reasonably and in
good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(2) provides that the taxpayer will not be considered to have
reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional if the taxpayer knew or should have
known that the professional was not: (i) competent to render advice on the regulatory
election; or (ii) aware of all relevant facts.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer will not be considered to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer: (i) seeks to alter a return position for which
an accuracy related penalty could be imposed under section 6662 at the time the
taxpayer requests relief and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election
for which relief is requested; (ii) was informed in all material respects of the required
PLR-112811-21 4

election and related tax consequences, but chose not to file the election; or (iii) uses
hindsight in requesting relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the interests of the government are prejudiced
when granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the
aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have
had if the election had been timely made.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides that the interests of the government ordinarily are
prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been made,
or any taxable years that would have been affected by the election had it been timely
made, are closed by the period of limitations on assessment under section 6501(a)
before the taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting relief.

Section 301.9100-3(e)(1) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 must
provide evidence that meets the requirements in § 301.9100-3(b) and (c), and must
provide additional information as required by § 301.9100-3(e), including certain
affidavits.

Rev. Rul. 83-74, 1983-1 CB 112, granted relief under § 1.9100-1 to a homeowner’s
association seeking to revoke its section 528 election, reasoning that the situation of a
taxpayer seeking relief to revoke an election is analogous to one where a taxpayer is
seeking relief to make an election.

Analysis

A taxpayer may seek relief under § 301.9100-1 through -3 for an extension of time to file
an election. A taxpayer seeking relief to revoke an election is in a position analogous to
one seeking relief to make an election, as discussed in Rev. Rul. 83-74.

Under § 301.9100-3(a), requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be granted when
the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to
establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably
and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the
government.

X is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith as those terms are used in
§ 301.9100-3, based on representations made by X and affidavits submitted pursuant to
§ 301.9100-3(e). Specifically, X is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith
because X requested relief before the failure to revoke the election was discovered by
the IRS, and, in fact, before X filed a return for the relevant year. See § 301.9100-
3(b)(1)(i). In addition, X relied in good faith on a qualified tax professional in seeking
advice relating to the revocation. See § 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v).
PLR-112811-21 5

Further, X is not seeking to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty
could be imposed, as no return for the relevant year had been filed at the time of the
ruling request. X also was not informed in all material respects of the required
revocation, as it misunderstood the required timing for the election. Finally, X did not
use hindsight in requesting relief, as its intention from the onset was to revoke the
section 501(h) election for the tax year beginning Date 2, as evidenced by affidavits and
board meeting minutes.

The interests of the government will not be prejudiced by granting the requested relief.
X’s tax liability is the same as if X had filed the revocation to be effective when intended,
and the taxable year in which the election should have been made will not be closed by
the period of limitations on assessment under section 6501(a) before X’s receipt of a
ruling granting relief.

Ruling

Based solely on the facts and representations X submitted, we rule that X is granted an
extension of time of 30 days from the date of this letter ruling to file a revocation of its
section 501(h) lobbying election, to be effective for the tax year beginning Date 2 and all
subsequent tax years.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by X and accompanied by penalty of perjury statements executed by an
individual with authority to bind X. While this office has not verified any of the material
submitted in support of the ruling request, such material is subject to verification on
examination.

The Associate Office will revoke or modify a letter ruling and apply the revocation
retroactively if: (1) there has been a misstatement or omission of controlling facts; (2)
the facts at the time of the transaction are materially different from the controlling facts
on which the ruling is based; or (3) the transaction involves a continuing action or series
of actions and the controlling facts change during the transaction. See Rev. Proc. 2021-
1, 2021-1 IRB 1, § 11.05.

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This ruling is directed only to X. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not
be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to X’s authorized representatives.
PLR-112811-21 6

If you have any questions about this ruling, please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.

                                          Sincerely,



                                          Kenneth M. Griffin
                                          Branch Chief
                                          Exempt Organizations Branch 3
                                          (Employee Benefits, Exempt
                                          Organizations, and Employment Taxes)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2022, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.