IRS treats an animal-care bequest as an unusual grant
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A publicly supported animal-welfare charity was named as a trust beneficiary for annual grants supporting medical care and adoption of uncared-for animals. Litigation delayed the payments, leaving a substantial accumulated amount plus interest due to the charity. The donor was not a founder, major prior supporter, manager, or controlling person, and the cash bequest was attracted by the charity's publicly supported nature. The charity had an active solicitation program, significant public support, a representative governing body, and no material restrictions beyond using the funds for its core animal-care work. The IRS ruled that the contribution qualified as an unusual grant, allowing it to be excluded when applying the public-support calculation.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the charity exclude the large trust bequest as an unusual grant when measuring its public support?
- Outcome: Approved.
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii), 1.509(a)-3(c)(4), 1.509(a)-3(d)(3)(i), and 1.507-2(a)(7)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
P. O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201
Number: 202126029
Release Date: 7/2/2021
Employer Identification Number:
Person to Contact - ID#:
Date: April 6, 2021
Contact Telephone Numbers:
UIL: 509.02-01
LEGEND:
B = Name of Trust
C = Date
D = Date
x dollars = Dollar amount
y dollars = Dollar amount
Dear [redacted]:
We have considered your August 13, 2020, request for recognition of an unusual grant under
Treasury Regulations Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and related provisions.
Based on the information provided, we have concluded that the proposed grant constitutes an
unusual grant under Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and related provisions of the regulations. The
basis for our conclusion is set forth below.
Facts:
You currently have exemption from federal income tax under IRC Section 501(c)(3). You are a
public charity under Section 509(a)(2).
You were notified on C that you were named as a beneficiary of B. Beginning in [redacted], B was to
begin granting x dollars per year for the medical care and adoption of uncared for animals.
Granting was delayed due to litigation, and x dollars were disbursed in [redacted]. The total amount
due as of D is y dollars plus interest.
The contribution was not made by any person who created you, previously contributed a
substantial part of your support or endowment or stood in a position of authority over you. You
have a representative governing body.
The contribution is a cash bequest that was attracted by reason of your publicly supported
nature. You have carried on an actual program of public solicitation and exempt activities since
your inception. You have continued your efforts to attract significant amounts of public support.
Letter 4787 (2-2012)
Catalog Number 58230Y
The only restriction imposed on the funds are that they must be used for the medical care and
the adoption of uncared for animals, which is the primary function of your organization.
Law:
Treasury Regulations Sections 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and 1.509(a)-3(c)(4) set forth the criteria for an
unusual grant.
Treasury Regulations Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) states that, for purposes of applying the 2-percent
limitation to determine whether the 33 1/3 percent-of-support test is satisfied, one or more
contributions may be excluded from both the numerator and the denominator of the applicable
percent-of-support fraction. The exclusion is generally intended to apply to substantial contributions
or bequests from disinterested parties which:
- are attracted by reason of the publicly supported nature of the organization;
- are unusual or unexpected with respect to the amount thereof; and
- would, by reason of their size, adversely affect the status of the organization as
normally being publicly supported.
Treasury Regulations Section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4) states that all pertinent facts and circumstances
will be taken into consideration to determine whether a particular contribution may be excluded.
No single factor will necessarily be determinative. Such factors may include:
- Whether the contribution was made by a person who
a. created the organization
b. previously contributed a substantial part of its support or endowment
c. stood in a position of authority with respect to the organization, such as a
foundation manager within the meaning of Section 4946(b)
d. directly or indirectly exercised control over the organization, or
e. was in a relationship described in Internal Revenue Code Section 4946(a)(1)(C)
through 4946(a)(1)(G) with someone listed in bullets a, b, c, or d above.
A contribution made by a person described in a. - e. is ordinarily
given less favorable consideration than a contribution made by
others not described above.
-
Whether the contribution was a bequest or an inter vivos transfer. A bequest will
ordinarily be given more favorable consideration than an inter vivos transfer. -
Whether the contribution was in the form of cash, readily marketable securities, or
assets which further the exempt purposes of the organization, such as a gift of a
painting to a museum. -
Whether (except in the case of a new organization) prior to the receipt of the
particular contribution, the organization (a) has carried on an actual program of
public solicitation and exempt activities and (b) has been able to attract a significant
amount of public support.
Letter 4787 (2-2012)
Catalog Number 58230Y
-
Whether the organization may reasonably be expected to attract a significant amount
of public support after the particular contribution. Continued reliance on unusual
grants to fund an organization's current operating expenses (as opposed to providing
new endowment funds) may be evidence that the organization cannot reasonably be
expected to attract future public support. -
Whether, prior to the year in which the particular contribution was received, the
organization met the one-third support test described in Section 1.509(a)-3(a)(2)
without the benefit of any exclusions of unusual grants pursuant to Section 1.509-
3(c)(3); -
Whether the organization has a representative governing body as described in
Treasury Regulations Section 1.509(a)-3(d)(3)(i); and -
Whether material restrictions or conditions within the meaning of Treasury
Regulations Section 1.507-2(a)(7) have been imposed by the transferor upon the
transferee in connection with such transfer.
Application of Law:
These grants meet the requirements of Treas. Reg. Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) because the
grants are from a disinterested party, were attracted by reason of your publicly supported
nature, are considered unusual, and would, by reason of their size, adversely affect your status
as normally being publicly supported.
Treasury Regulations Section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4) states that all pertinent facts and circumstances
will be taken into consideration to determine whether a particular contribution may be excluded.
Factors considered include:
-
The contribution is not made by any person who created you, previously contributed
a substantial part of your support, or stood in a position of authority over you. -
The contribution is a cash bequest that will be used to further fund your programs
and further your exempt purposes. -
You have carried on an actual program of public solicitation and exempt activities and
have been able to attract a significant amount of public support. -
You can reasonably be expected to attract a significant amount of public support after
this contribution. -
You have a representative governing body as described in Treasury Regulations
Section 1.509(a)-3(d)(3)(i). -
There are no material restrictions or conditions within the meaning of Treasury
Regulations Section 1.507-2(a)(7) imposed by the transferor in connection with such
transfer.
Letter 4787 (2-2012)
Catalog Number 58230Y
If you have any questions, please contact the person listed in the heading of this letter.
Sincerely,
Stephen A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements
Letter 4787 (2-2012)
Catalog Number 58230Y
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.