Restitution above the plea amount was a supervised-release condition
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The restitution ordered by the court exceeded the amount stated in the plea agreement. The IRS advised that the restitution therefore could only have been imposed as a condition of supervised release under the Westbrooks analysis, rather than as independently assessable restitution.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: How should restitution exceeding the plea-agreement amount be classified?
- Outcome: Advice given: it was a condition of supervised release.
- Key authorities: IRC § 6201(a)(4); Westbrooks restitution analysis
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2020022711350644
UILC: 6201.01-06
Number: 202125014
Release Date: 6/25/2021
From:
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 11:35:06 AM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: Possible Westbrooks case------
This is a Westbrooks case. The amount of restitution ordered exceeds the amount
shown in the plea agreement, so this can only have been ordered only as a condition of
supervised release. Please call if you have any further questions on this matter.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.