🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Chief Counsel Advice 202121011 Released May 28, 2021 Advice

Tax matters partner authority does not extend to a Section 6707A penalty

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An IRS email addressed who may sign a limitations extension involving a Section 6707A penalty. The response stated that a tax matters partner signs only TEFRA statute extensions. A Section 6707A penalty would not fall under TEFRA, so tax matters partner status would not supply signing authority for that extension. The adviser added that a tax matters partner must be a general partner, so the same individual might have authority in another capacity.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does a tax matters partner's authority to sign TEFRA statute extensions cover a Section 6707A penalty?
  • Outcome: Advice given: no, although the same person might separately be a general partner.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6707A; TEFRA partnership procedures

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2020081908321943
UILC: 6221.00-00, 6231.03-00

Number: 202121011
Release Date: 5/28/2021
From: --------------------
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 8:32:19 AM
To: ----------------------
Cc: -------------------------------------------------------------------
Bcc:
Subject: RE: -------F872 for 6707A Penalty

Hi --------

The TMP only signs TEFRA statute extensions. The section 6707A penalty wouldn’t be
under TEFRA. I note that a TMP must be a general partner so it could be the same
person anyways.

Happy to discuss.

Thanks --

----------------

--------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.