🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202118003 Released May 7, 2021 Approved

State liquor stores need not report large cash sales

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A state operated a liquor-sales monopoly through an entity represented to be an integral part of the state. Store managers sometimes accepted more than $10,000 in cash for liquor purchases and filed Forms 8300 for those transactions. The IRS concluded that governmental units are not persons subject to Section 6050I reporting, except where Congress specifically provides otherwise. For this purpose, governmental units include federal, state, and local governments and their integral parts, but not government instrumentalities. Based on the integral-part representation, the stores were not required to report the cash sales, and their Form 8300 filings were voluntary.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Must an integral part of a state report liquor sales involving more than $10,000 in cash on Form 8300?
  • Outcome: Approved: no reporting is required under Section 6050I.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6050I and 7701(a)(1); Treas. Reg. § 1.6050I-1

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202118003 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/7/2021 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 6050I.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------- ----------------------------, ID No. --------------
----------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------------- --------------------
-------------------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------- CC:PA:01
-------------------------------------- PLR-112182-20
Date:
November 18, 2020

Taxpayers = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
Entity 1 = --------------------------------
Entity 2 = --------------------------------------------------------
State = ---------------------
Date = -------

Dear ---------------:

This is in response to your request for a ruling on behalf of Taxpayers. The ruling
contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by your
authorized representatives and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by an appropriate party, as specified in Rev. Proc. 2020-1, 2020-1 I.R.B. 1.

You have requested a ruling regarding whether the entity controlled by Entity 1, Entity 2,
is required to report sales of liquor over $10,000 in cash pursuant to I.R.C. § 6050I.
Your office represents that Entity 2 is an integral part of Entity 1. The Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for
ruling, and such material is subject to verification on examination. This letter does not
constitute a ruling that Entity 2 is an integral part of Entity 1.

                                                 FACTS

Your office also represents the following: Since Date, State has operated a monopoly
over liquor sales and operates state owned liquor stores through Entity 2. On occasion,
persons enter a store operated by Entity 2 and seek to purchase liquor using cash in an
amount exceeding $10,000. Pursuant to standing instructions issued by Entity 2, store
managers, rather than regular employees, complete these transactions. The store
manager signs Form 8300 on behalf of Entity 2 as the recipient of the cash and Entity 2
files a suspicious activity report of the transaction with IRS. See Publication 1544.
PLR-112182-20 2

                                    LAW AND ANALYSIS

Under I.R.C. § 6050I, a person engaged in a trade or business who, in the course of
that trade or business, receives more than $10,000 in cash in one transaction (or two or
more related transactions), must file an information return with the IRS, Treas. Reg. §
1.6050I-1(a)(1)(i), and furnish the payor with a statement. Treas. Reg. § 6050I-1(f)(1).
A report required by I.R.C. § 6050I and 31 U.S.C. § 5331 must be made on a Form
8300, Report of Cash Payments Over $10,000 Received in a Trade or Business. Treas.
Reg. § 1.6050I-1(e)(2).

With certain exceptions, reporting is required under I.R.C. § 6050I by “any ‘person’ (as
defined in I.R.C. § 7701(a)(1)) who, in the course of a trade or business in which such
person is engaged receives cash in excess of $10,000 in one transaction (or two or
more related transactions).” See Treas. Reg. § 1.6050-1(a). I.R.C. § 7701(a)(1)
provides that: “[w]hen used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or
manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof, … the term person shall be construed to
mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company, or
corporation.” I.R.C. § 7701(a)(1), Treas. Reg. § 1.6050I-1(a)(1)(i).

In determining whether governmental units1 are “persons” subject to the reporting
requirements of I.R.C. § 6050I, we note that the list of entities in I.R.C. § 7701(a)(1) does
not include governmental units. Although the list of entities explicitly included in section
7701(a)(1) cannot be construed as exhaustive, we look to I.R.C. § 6050I and its objective
to determine whether “governmental units” should be considered “persons” for purposes
of the Form 8300 reporting requirements. I.R.C. § 6050I(g), which was added in 1994,
specifically subjects criminal court clerks to its filing requirements. If governmental units
were not already excluded from the reporting requirements, I.R.C. § 6050I(g)’s
amendment subjecting criminal court clerks to the Form 8300 reporting requirement
would not be necessary. The fact that Congress left “governmental units” out of the
definition of “person” in I.R.C. § 6050I, but included it in other information reporting
Internal Revenue Code sections, implies that the omission should be understood here as
an exclusion. Therefore, we conclude that “governmental units” are exempt from the
reporting requirements under I.R.C. § 6050I.

It is further our view that the term “governmental unit” for purposes of determining the
exclusion from reporting on the Form 8300 under I.R.C. § 6050I should be interpreted as
including only the United States government, states, political subdivisions of states,
integral parts of states, and integral parts of political subdivisions of states and not
including instrumentalities of government.

1 Although the term “governmental unit” is not used in § 6050I, the term is used in other information

reporting sections, including I.R.C. §§ 6041A, 6045, 6049, 6050H, 6050J and 6050S.
PLR-112182-20 3

                                   CONCLUSION

Based on your office’s representations, including that Entity 2 is an integral part of Entity
1, we conclude that Entity 2 is not required to report sales of liquor for cash over
$10,000 pursuant to section 6050I and that any Form 8300 filings made on behalf of
Entity 2 by store managers are voluntary.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

                                   Sincerely,



                                   Pamela Wilson Fuller
                                   Senior Technician Reviewer
                                   (Procedure & Administration)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.