A new gain recognition agreement prevents a shareholder's death from triggering deferred gain
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A U.S. shareholder had transferred domestic-company stock to a foreign corporation and entered into a gain recognition agreement (GRA) under the § 367 regulations. The shareholder later died while the GRA remained in force, leaving foreign-corporation stock to an heir, a domestic non-grantor trust, and a U.S. successor. Death ordinarily can trigger the deferred gain, but Treas. Reg. § 1.367(a)-8(k)(9)(iii) allows an IRS-approved successor to continue the agreement. The IRS ruled that the U.S. successor would qualify if the successor entered into a replacement GRA and extended the limitations period for assessing tax on the original outbound transfer. With those conditions met, the death and the described stock transfers would not trigger gain under the existing agreement.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can a person receiving foreign-corporation stock become the deceased U.S. shareholder's successor under an existing gain recognition agreement?
- Outcome: Approved, subject to a replacement agreement and limitations-period extension
- Key authorities: IRC § 367; Treas. Reg. § 1.367(a)-8(c)(5), (f)(2), (j)(7), and (k)(9)(iii)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202110014 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 3/12/2021 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 367.03-10
Person To Contact:
------------------------------- ---------------------------, ID No. ---------------
----------------------- -----------------
------------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------- --------------------
---------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:B04
PLR-118082-20
Date:
December 16, 2020
Legend ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Taxpayer =
Shareholder = ------------------
Successor = -----------------
Heir = -----------------
Date 1 = ----------------------
Date 2 = ---------------------
Date 3 = -------------------------
Date 4 = -------------
a = --------------
b = -------------
c = -----------
d = -------------
e = -----------
f = --------------
g = --------------
h = ---------------
i = --------------
PLR-118082-20 2
Dear -----------:
This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated August 19, 2020,
requesting a ruling under Treas. Reg. § 1.367(a)-8(k)(9)(iii). The material information
submitted in that request is summarized below.
The ruling contained in this letter is based on facts and representations submitted by
you and your representatives and accompanied by a penalties of perjury statement
executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the materials
submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the information,
representations, and other data may be required as part of the audit process.
Summary of Facts and Applicable Law
On Date 1, Shareholder, a United States person, transferred stock of a domestic
corporation to a foreign corporation (“Transferee Foreign Corporation”) in exchange
solely for a shares of Transferee Foreign Corporation (“TFC Stock”) in a transfer
described in section 354 (“Outbound Transfer”), and timely entered into a gain
recognition agreement pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.367(a)-8 with respect to the
Outbound Transfer (“Existing GRA”).
On Date 2, Shareholder transferred b shares of TFC Stock to a grantor trust (“Trust”).
For federal income tax purposes, the transfer of TFC Stock to Trust did not constitute a
disposition and Shareholder continued to be the owner of such TFC Stock.
On Date 3, Shareholder died, resulting in, for federal income tax purposes:
(i) Trust becoming a domestic non-grantor trust (“NGT”), and
(ii) A deemed transfer of the TFC Stock that was held by Trust to NGT.
Successor is the current trustee of NGT. The beneficiaries of NGT are Shareholder’s
descendants.
Pursuant to Shareholder’s will, and with respect to the shares of TFC Stock held directly
by Shareholder (that is, not taking into account the TFC Stock held by NGT):
(i) Heir, a non-resident alien individual, will receive c shares of TFC Stock, and
(ii) Successor, a United States citizen, will receive the remaining d shares of TFC
Stock.
If Successor were to recognize an amount of capital gain equal to the gain realized but
not recognized by Shareholder on the Outbound Transfer, such gain would be subject
PLR-118082-20 3
to the 20 percent maximum capital gain tax rate, plus the 3.8 percent tax on net
investment income under section 1411, for a total federal income tax of $e.
The value of the TFC Stock that would be transferred to Successor in accordance with
Shareholder’s will is estimated to be approximately $f as of Date 3. The estimated fair
market value of Successor’s assets (other than the TFC Stock that will be transferred to
Successor pursuant to Shareholder’s will) net of liabilities is approximately $g as of Date
4. Thus, the total estimated fair market value of Successor’s assets is approximately $h;
of that amount, approximately $i consists of liquid assets.
In general, gain subject to a gain recognition agreement is triggered under Treas. Reg.
§ 1.367(a)-8(j)(7), such that gain is recognized, if a U.S. transferor who is an individual
dies. However, the death of a U.S. transferor will not constitute a triggering event if the
person winding up the affairs of the U.S. transferor obtains a ruling from the Internal
Revenue Service providing for one or more successors to the U.S. transferor under the
gain recognition agreement. Treas. Reg. § 1.367(a)-8(k)(9)(iii). Thus, in order to avoid a
triggering event with respect to the Existing GRA, a ruling is sought to provide for a
successor to Shareholder under the Existing GRA pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.367(a)-
8(k)(9)(iii).
Representations
Taxpayer makes the following representations with respect to its ruling request:
1. The Outbound Transfer satisfied all the requirements of Treas. Reg.
§ 1.367(a)-3(c)(1).
2. The Existing GRA has satisfied the requirements of Treas. Reg. § 1.367(a)-8
and any filings related to the Existing GRA, including Form 8838 and
certifications under Treas. Reg. § 1.367(a)-8(g), have been timely filed.
3. Prior to Shareholder’s death, no triggering event (within the meaning of Treas.
Reg. § 1.367(a)-8(j)) has occurred with respect to the Existing GRA.
Ruling
Based solely on the information submitted and the representations set forth above, if
Successor enters into a new gain recognition agreement that replaces the Existing GRA
pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in Treas. Reg. § 1.367(a)-8(c)(5), and
extends the period of limitations on assessments of tax on the Outbound Transfer
pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.367(a)-8(f)(2), Successor will be treated, under Treas. Reg.
§ 1.367(a)-8(k)(9)(iii), as a successor to Shareholder under the Existing GRA. As a
result, the death of Shareholder, and the transfers of TFC Stock to Heir, NGT, and
Successor described herein, will not constitute triggering events (within the meaning of
Treas. Reg. § 1.367(a)-8(j)) with respect to the Existing GRA.
PLR-118082-20 4
Procedural Statements
This ruling letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
No opinion is expressed or implied about the federal income tax consequences of any
other aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter, or the
federal income tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting
from, the Outbound Transfer that are not specifically covered by this ruling. In
particular, no opinion is expressed or implied as to whether the Outbound Transfer
satisfied the requirements of Treas. Reg. §§ 1.367(a)-3(c)(1) and 1.367(a)-8.
In accordance with the power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representatives.
A copy of this ruling letter must be attached to the federal income tax return of each
taxpayer involved for the taxable year in which the transactions described herein are
completed. Alternatively, a taxpayer filing its return electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to its federal income tax return that sets forth the
date and control number of this ruling.
Sincerely,
Robert B. Williams, Jr.
Senior Counsel, Branch 4
(International)
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.