IRS grants inadvertent S corporation termination relief
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An S corporation owned two qualified subchapter S subsidiaries, and its shares were held by a grantor trust. When one deemed owner died, part of the trust remained an eligible shareholder for two years, after which the shares were meant to pass to two successor trusts. One successor was an eligible grantor trust, but the other failed to make the required electing small business trust election and became an ineligible shareholder. That failure terminated both the corporation's S election and its subsidiaries' QSub elections. The IRS found the terminations inadvertent because there was no tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning and the parties agreed to corrective adjustments. It allowed S corporation and QSub treatment to continue, conditioned on a specified payment within 45 days and the successor trust filing an ESBT election within 120 days.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Were the S corporation and QSub election terminations inadvertent after a successor trust failed to elect ESBT status?
- Outcome: Approved, subject to a payment within 45 days and an ESBT election within 120 days
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361 and 1362(f); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1361-1(m) and 1.1361-3(a)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202101001 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/8/2021 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 1361.00-00, 1361.00-01,
1361.01-05, 1361.03-03, Person To Contact:
1362.02-00, 1362.04-00 ----------------------, ID No. ------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------------ -------------------
----------------------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------ CC:PSI:B3
------------------------ PLR-107693-20
Date:
September 17, 2020
Legend:
X = ------------------------------
Y = -----------------------------------------------
Z = ----------------------
A = ------------------------------
B = -------------------------
Trust = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trust 1 = -------------------------------
Trust 2 = -----------------
State = --------
Date 1 = --------------------------
Date 2 = ----------------------
Date 3 = ---------------------------
Date 4 = ---------------------------
Date 5 = --------------------------
PLR-107693-20 2
n = ---------------
Dear -----------------:
This letter responds to your letter dated March 10, 2020, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under §1362(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code.
Facts
The information submitted states that X was incorporated under the laws of State
on Date 1. X elected to be an S corporation effective Date 2. X, as the parent S
corporation, filed Form 8869, Qualified Subchapter S Subsidiary Election, intending for
Y and Z to be treated as qualified subchapter S subsidiaries (“QSubs”) effective Date 2.
Shares of X were owned by Trust which X represents was a grantor trust
described in §1361(c)(2)(A)(i) of which A and B were deemed owners. On Date 3 A
died, causing Trust to cease being a grantor trust as to A’s share. Under
§1361(c)(2)(A)(ii), Trust remained an eligible shareholder as to A’s share until Date 4,
two years after A’s death.
The terms of the Trust agreement provide that upon the death of A, the assets of
Trust were to be distributed to Trust 1 and Trust 2. X represents that Trust 1 qualified
as a wholly-owned grantor trust with respect to B under § 677(a), which is an eligible S
corporation shareholder under § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i). X also represents that Trust 2 was
qualified to be an Electing Small Business Trust (ESBT), within the meaning of
§ 1361(e), however, the trustee of Trust 2 failed to make an election under § 1361(e)(3)
to treat Trust 2 as an ESBT. Consequently, Trust 2 was an ineligible shareholder, and,
as a result, X’s S corporation election terminated on Date 5, which also caused the
termination of the QSub elections of Y and Z on Date 5.
X represents that there was no tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning
involved in the failure of Trust to distribute shares of X stock to eligible shareholders on
or before Date 4 or in the failure of Trust 2 to file an ESBT election. X and its
shareholders agree to make any adjustments consistent with the treatment of X as an S
corporation, and Y and Z as QSubs, as may be required by the Secretary
Law and Analysis
Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to
any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under §1362(a) is
in effect for such year.
PLR-107693-20 3
Section 1361(b)(1)(B) provides that the term “small business corporation” means
a domestic corporation that is not an ineligible corporation and which does not, among
other requirements, have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust
described in §1361(c)(2), or an organization described in §1361(c)(6)) who is not an
individual.
Section 1361(b)(3)(A) provides that, except as provided in regulations prescribed
by the Secretary, for purposes of this title (i) a corporation which is a qualified
subchapter S subsidiary shall not be treated as a separate corporation, and (ii) all
assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of a qualified subchapter S
subsidiary shall be treated as assets, liabilities, and such items (as the case may be) of
the S corporation.
Section 1361(b)(3)(B) provides that, for purposes of § 1361(b)(3)(B), the term
“qualified subchapter S subsidiary” means any domestic corporation which is not an
ineligible corporation (as defined in § 1361(b)(2)) if (i) 100 percent of the stock of such
corporation is held by the S corporation, and (ii) the S corporation elects to treat such
corporation as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary.
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) provides that, for purposes of §1361(b)(1)(B), a trust all
of which is treated (under subpart E of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1) as owned by
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States may be a shareholder.
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) provides that for purposes of §1361(b)(1)(B), a trust
which was described in §1361(c)(2)(A)(i) immediately before the death of the deemed
owner and which continues in existence after such death, is a permitted shareholder,
but only for the 2-year period beginning on the day of the deemed owner’s death.
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(v) provides that for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), an
electing small business trust is a permissible shareholder.
Section 1361(e)(1)(A) provides that, for purposes of § 1361, except as provided
in § 1361(e)(1)(B), the term “electing small business trust” means any trust if (i) such
trust does not have as a beneficiary any person other than (I) an individual, (II) an
estate, (III) an organization described in § 170(c)(2)-(5), or (IV) an organization
described in § 170(c)(1) which holds a contingent interest in such trust and is not a
potential current beneficiary, (ii) no interest in such trust was acquired by purchase, and
(iii) an election under § 1361(e) applies to such trust.
Section 1361(e)(3) provides that an election under § 1361(e) shall be made by
the trustee. Any such election shall apply to the taxable year of the trust for which made
and subsequent taxable years of such trust unless revoked with the consent of the
Secretary.
PLR-107693-20 4
Section 1.1361-1(m)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that
the trustee of an ESBT must make the ESBT election by signing and filing, with the
service center for which the S corporation files its income tax return, a statement that
meets the requirements of § 1.1361-1(m)(2)(ii).
Section 1.1361-1(m)(2)(iii) provides that the ESBT election must be filing within
the time requirements prescribed in § 1.1361-1(j)(6)(iii) for filing a qualified subchapter S
trust (QSST) election.
Section 1.1361-3(a)(1) provides that the corporation for which the QSub election
is made must meet all the requirements of § 1361(b)(3)(B) at the time the election is
made and for all periods for which the election is to be effective.
Section 1362(a) provides that, except as provided in § 1362(g), a small business
corporation may elect, in accordance with the provisions of § 1362, to be an S
corporation.
Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under §1362(a) shall be
terminated whenever (at any time on or after the 1st day of the 1st taxable year for which
the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation.
Section 1362(d)(2)(B) provides that any termination under §1362(d)(2)(A) is
effective on and after the date of cessation.
Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under §1362(a) by any corporation
was terminated under §1362(d)(2) or (3); (2) the Secretary determines that the
circumstances resulting in termination were inadvertent; (3) no later than a reasonable
period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in termination, steps were
taken so that the corporation for which the termination occurred is a small business
corporation; and (4) the corporation for which the termination occurred, and each
person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified
pursuant to §1362(f), agree to make the adjustments (consistent with the treatment of
the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect
to this period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in termination, the
corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the
Secretary.
Conclusion
Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that
X’s S corporation election, and Y and Z’s QSub elections, were terminated on Date 5
when Trust 2 became an ineligible shareholder. We also conclude that the terminations
were inadvertent within the meaning of §1362(f). Consequently, we conclude that X will
PLR-107693-20 5
continue to be treated as an S corporation from Date 5 and thereafter, provided that X’s
S corporation election was valid and was not otherwise terminated under §1362(d). In
addition, we conclude that Y and Z will continue to be treated as QSubs from Date 5
and thereafter, provided that Y and Z’s QSub elections were not otherwise terminated
under § 1362(b)(3)(B).
This ruling is subject to the following conditions: (1) as an adjustment under
§ 1362(f)(4), a payment of $n and a copy of this letter must be sent to the following
address within 45 days from the date of this letter: Internal Revenue Service, Kansas
City Submission Processing Campus, 333 W. Pershing Road, Kansas City, MO 64108,
Stop 7777, Attn: Manual Deposit; and (2) within 120 days from the date of this letter, the
trustee of Trust 2 must file an election to treat Trust 2 as an ESBT effective Date 5 with
the appropriate service center. A copy of this letter should be attached to the ESBT
election. If these conditions are not met, then this ruling is null and void. Furthermore,
if these conditions are not met, X must send notification that is S corporation election
has terminated to the service center with which X’s S election is filed.
Except for the specific ruling above, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other
provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied on whether X is
otherwise eligible to be an S corporation, whether Trust 2 qualifies as an ESBT, or
whether Y and Z qualify as QSubs.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. According to
§ 6110(k)(3), this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-107693-20 6
Under a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this
letter to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Adrienne M. Mikolashek
Chief, Branch 3
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for §6110 purposes
cc: ------------------------
---------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.