🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202052003 Released December 24, 2020 Approved

Inadvertent S-corp termination excused where an LLC operating agreement created a second class of stock

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2020, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2020
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An LLC that had elected to be taxed as an S corporation later signed an operating agreement containing partnership-style allocation and liquidation provisions. Those provisions tied distributions and liquidation payouts to members' capital account balances rather than strictly to ownership percentages, which meant the shares no longer conferred identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds. That inadvertently created a prohibited second class of stock under § 1361(b)(1)(D) and terminated the S election. Once the problem was found, the company replaced the operating agreement to remove the offending provisions, and all shareholders consented to any required adjustments. The IRS ruled the termination was inadvertent under § 1362(f), so the company is treated as having remained an S corporation from its original effective date, provided the election was otherwise valid and had not otherwise terminated.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Was the loss of S-corporation status inadvertent under § 1362(f) when an operating agreement created a second class of stock?
  • Outcome: Approved (relief granted; S status treated as continuous)
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b)(1)(D), 1362(d)(2), and 1362(f); Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(l)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202052003
Release Date: 12/24/2020
Index Numbers: 1361.01-04, 1362.00-00, 1362.02-00, 1362.04-00

Third Party Communication: None
Date of Communication: Not Applicable

Person To Contact:
ID No.
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To: CC:PSI:03
PLR-106295-20

Date: September 30, 2020

Legend

Company =
State =
Date 1 =
Date 2 =
Date 3 =
Date 4 =
Agreement 1 =
Agreement 2 =

Dear ---------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated February 18, 2020 submitted on behalf of
Company by its authorized representative, requesting a ruling under §1362(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code).

                                       Facts

The information submitted states Company was organized on Date 1 as a limited
liability company under the laws of State and elected to be an S corporation effective
Date 2. On Date 3, an operating agreement, Agreement 1, was executed and included
provisions in contemplation of Company being treated as a partnership for federal
income tax purposes; however, the applicability of those provisions was not limited to
such a situation. Agreement 1 included the following partnership provisions:

  Section 4.2 providing,

  Distribution of Capital Proceeds and Allocation of Profit or Loss from Capital
  Transactions.

  (A) Profit. After giving effect to the regulatory allocations set forth in Section 4.3,
      Profit from a Capital Transaction shall be allocated as follows: (i) If one or
      more Interest Holders has a Negative Capital Account, to those Interest
      Holders, in proportion to their Negative Capital Accounts, until all of those
      Negative Capital Accounts have been reduced to zero. (ii) Any Profit not
      allocated pursuant to Section 4.2(A)(i) shall be allocated to the Interest
      Holders in proportion to, and to the extent of, the amounts distributable to
      them pursuant to Section 4.2(C)(iv)(a) and (c). (iii) Any Profit in excess of the
      foregoing allocations shall be allocated to the Interest Holders in proportion to
      their Percentages.
  (B) Loss. After giving effect to the regulatory allocations set forth in Section 4.3,
      Loss from a Capital Transaction shall be allocated as follows: (i) If one or
      more Interest Holders has a Positive Capital Account, to those Interest
      Holders, in proportion to their Positive Capital Accounts, until all Positive
      Capital Accounts have been reduced to zero. (ii) Any Loss not allocated to
      reduce Positive Capital Accounts to zero pursuant to Section 4.2(B)(i) shall
      be allocated to the Interest Holders in proportion to their Percentages.
  (C) Capital Proceeds. Capital Proceeds shall be distributed and applied by the
      Company in the following order and priority: (i) To the payment of all
      expenses of the Company incident to the Capital Transaction; then (ii) To the
      payment of debts and liabilities of the Company then due and outstanding
      (including all debts due to any Interest Holder); then (iii) To the establishment
      of any reserves which the General Manager, if appointed, otherwise the
      Members, deems necessary for liabilities or obligations of the Company; then
      (iv) The balance shall be distributed as follows: (a) To the Interest Holders in
      proportion to their Adjusted Capital Balances, until their remaining Adjusted
      Capital Balances have been paid in full; (b) If any Interest Holder has a
      Positive Capital Account after the distributions made pursuant to Section
      4.2(C)(iv)(a) and before any further allocation of Profit pursuant to Section
      4.2(A)(iii), to those Interest Holders in proportion to their Positive Capital
      Accounts; then (c) The balance, to Interest Holders in proportion to their
      Percentages.

   Section 4.4 providing,

   Liquidation and Dissolution.

   (A) If the Company is liquidated, the assets of the Company shall be distributed
       to the Interest Holders in accordance with the balances in their respective
       Capital Accounts, after taking into account the allocations of Profit or Loss
       pursuant to Sections 4.1 or 4.2, if any, and distributions of cash or property, if
       any, pursuant to Sections 4.1 and 4.2(C).
   (B) An Interest Holder shall be obligated to restore a Negative Capital

Company represents that since Date 2, Company and its shareholders have filed all tax
returns consistent with Company having a valid S corporation in effect as of Date 2.
Company also represents that since Date 2, all distributions were made to the
shareholders based on their pro rata shares of ownership of Company. Company
represents that entering into Agreement 1 created a second class of stock, causing its
S corporation status to terminate. Company represents that, on Date 4, Agreement 2
replaced Agreement 1, in part, to eliminate the potential for a second class of stock
under §1361(b)(1)(D). Company represents that the termination of Company's S
corporation election was inadvertent and not motivated by tax avoidance. Company
and each person who has been a shareholder of Company at any time on or after Date
1 through the date of this request have consented to any adjustments as may be
required by the Secretary.

Company requests relief pursuant to § 1362(f) due to Agreement 1 having governing
provisions that created more than one class of stock.

                                  Law and Analysis

Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term "S corporation" means, with respect to any
taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under §1362(a) is in
effect for such year.

Section 1361(b)(1) provides that for purposes of subchapter S, the term "small business
corporation" means a domestic corporation, which is not an ineligible corporation and
does not have (A) more than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person
(other than an estate, a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in
subsection § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a
shareholder, and (D) have more than 1 class of stock.

Section 1.1361-1(l)(1) provides, in part, that a corporation is generally treated as having
only one class of stock if all outstanding shares of stock of the corporation confer
identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds.

Section 1.1361-1(l)(2)(i) provides that the determination of whether all outstanding
shares of stock confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds is made
based on the corporate charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws, applicable state laws,
and binding agreements relating to distribution and liquidation proceeds (collectively,
governing provisions).

Section 1362(a)(1) provides that, except as provided in §1362(g), a small business
corporation may elect, in accordance with the provisions of §1362, to be an S
corporation.

Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated
whenever (at any time on or after the 1st day of the 1st taxable year for which the
corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation.

Section 1362(f) provides, in part, that if (1) an election under §1362(a) by any
corporation (i) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without
regard to §1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of §1361(b), or
(ii) was terminated under §1362(d)(2) or (3); (2) the Secretary determines that the
circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent; (3) no
later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in
such ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which
the election was made or the termination occurred is a small business corporation; and
(4) the corporation for which the election was made or the termination occurred, and
each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period
specified pursuant to §1362(f), agree to make the adjustments (consistent with the
treatment of the corporation as an S corporation as may be required by the Secretary
with respect to this period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such
ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation shall be treated as an S corporation
during the period specified by the Secretary.

                                     Conclusion

Based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that the
termination of Company's S election as a result of Agreement 1 creating a second class
of stock was inadvertent within the meaning of §1362(f). Accordingly, under §1362(f),
Company will be treated as an S corporation from Date 2, and thereafter, provided the S
election for Company is otherwise valid on Date 2 and has not otherwise terminated
under §1362(d).

Except as specifically ruled above, we express or imply no opinion as to the federal
income tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the
Code, including Company's eligibility to be a valid S corporation.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                  Sincerely,

                                  Adrienne M. Mikolashek
                                  Branch Chief, Branch 3
                                  Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                  (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for §6110 purposes

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2020, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.