🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Chief Counsel Advice 202044007 Released October 30, 2020 Advice

Statute of limitations does not bar a § 6676 penalty on a fraudulent refund claim

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2020, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2020
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

This short internal Chief Counsel advice answers a timing question about the Section 6676 penalty, which applies to erroneous claims for tax refunds or credits. A taxpayer had filed a return more than three years earlier claiming a large amount of false withholding, producing an erroneous refund, and the false withholding was shown to be fraudulent. The question was whether the ordinary limitations period barred the IRS from assessing the § 6676 penalty now. Chief Counsel concluded that the statute of limitations does not bar assessment of the § 6676 penalty in this situation. The advice states the conclusion without elaborating the full reasoning.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does the statute of limitations bar assessing the § 6676 penalty on a fraudulent, erroneous refund claim filed more than three years ago?
  • Outcome: advice (limitations does not bar the penalty)
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6676; IRC § 6501

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2019111509251413
UILC: 6501.00-00, 6676.00-00

Number: 202044007
Release Date: 10/30/2020
From:
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 9:25:14 AM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Question about statute of limitations and section 6676 penalty

This advice responds to your request for assistance.

Issue: Whether the statute of limitations bars assessment of the section 6676 penalty in
the following situation.

Facts: More than three years ago, a taxpayer filed an income tax return claiming a
substantial amount of false withholdings, resulting in an erroneous refund for which a
section 6676 penalty is warranted. The claiming of the withholdings has been shown to
be fraudulent.

Conclusion: The statute of limitations does not bar assessment of the section 6676
penalty in this situation.

Please let us know if you have any follow-up questions.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2020, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.