🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202031003 Released July 31, 2020 Approved

IRS excludes a municipal-utility service organization's income under IRC § 115

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2020, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2020
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A nonprofit corporation was formed to help municipally owned utilities provide reliable and economical utility service. Its members were public utilities that were political subdivisions or entities whose income was already excluded under IRC § 115. The organization pooled purchasing power, provided shared subject-matter experts, and offered metering infrastructure and support at reduced cost. Its governing documents required net assets on dissolution to pass only to members through their capital accounts, while a nonmember trade organization could not share in income or assets. The IRS ruled that the services performed an essential governmental function and that the income accrued to qualifying governmental entities, so the organization's described income was excluded from gross income under IRC § 115(1).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Was the nonprofit's income from shared services for municipally owned utilities excluded from gross income under IRC § 115(1)?
  • Outcome: approved (the described income was excluded as income from an essential governmental function accruing to public entities)
  • Key authorities: IRC § 115(1); Rev. Rul. 77-261; Rev. Rul. 90-74

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202031003 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/31/2020 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 115.00-00, 115.03-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------- ------------------, ID No. -----------------
---------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------- --------------------
--------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:EEE:EOET:EO2
PLR-124150-19
Date:
May 01, 2020

Legend

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------
State 1 = -------------
State 2 = --------------------------
Organizations A = -----------------------------------------------
Energy = -------------
Utility = -----------------
Municipally-Owned
Utilit(y)(ies) = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Members = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------

Dear ----------------:

This letter responds to a ruling letter request from your authorized representatives dated
October 2, 2019 and subsequent correspondence requesting a ruling that Taxpayer’s
income is excluded from gross income under section 115(1) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code).1 The Taxpayer represents the facts as follows.

1 The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to which all subsequent “section” references are

made unless otherwise indicated.

PLR-124150-19 2

Facts and Representations

Taxpayer is a nonprofit corporation organized under the laws of State 1. Taxpayer’s
articles of incorporation provide that Taxpayer shall only serve such purposes and
functions and shall engage in such activities as are consistent with the requirements for
an organization, the income of which is excluded from gross income under section 115
of the Code. Taxpayer was created for the purposes of maximizing the efficient
provision and use of Energy resources, reducing operating costs, and increasing the
operating revenues of the Members without affecting the safety and reliability of the
Energy system of each Member.

Taxpayer currently has six members: Members. Taxpayer represents that each Member
of Taxpayer is a public utility entity and either a political subdivision within the meaning
of the Code or an entity whose income is excluded from gross income under section
115 of the Code. Taxpayer’s mission is to assist Municipally-Owned Utilities in
furtherance of their governmental function of providing utility service to the residents of
their jurisdictions. The Municipally Owned Utilities served by Taxpayer are political
subdivisions within the meaning of the Code and entities whose income is excluded
from gross income under section 115 of the Code. Any future member of Taxpayer must
be a public Utility and either a political subdivision within the meaning of the Code or an
entity whose income is excluded from gross income under section 115 of the Code.

Taxpayer is governed by a board of directors. The board of directors shall consist of a
total number equal to the number of Taxpayer’s members, in addition, Organization A 2
(a not-for-profit corporation described in section 501(c)(6) of the Code organized under
the laws of State 2, created to promote public utilities and help community-owned
utilities deliver superior services through joint advocacy, education and collaboration)
shall have the right to appoint one director.3 Taxpayer’s bylaws also provide that the
president/CEO and the General Counsel of Taxpayer will serve as ex-officio non-voting
directors of Taxpayer.

The Municipally-Owned Utilities served by Taxpayer vary in size and scope of their
enterprise, e.g., some of these Municipally-Owned Utilities may own and operate a
complete system that generates, transmits and distributes Energy to their service areas
and some may only own and operate distribution systems and purchase the Energy that
they need to provide power to their service areas. Regardless of their size and scope,
each Municipally-Owned Utility is engaged in a complicated and multifaceted operation
in managing their energy supply, providing energy to their customers in a reliable
fashion, managing the budget for such operations, and protecting their facilities and

2 Organization A is a national trade organization representing public utilities advocating on behalf of

municipally-owned utilities throughout the United States. Under a service agreement, Taxpayer receives
enhanced membership benefits from Organization A.
3 If Taxpayer has more than thirteen directors, then the Taxpayer’s board of directors may grant
Organization A an additional director.

PLR-124150-19 3

operations from threats, physical, cyber, or otherwise. Taxpayer’s primary purpose is to
help Municipally-Owned Utilities obtain the information, products and services they need
to accomplish their function of providing Energy service to the public efficiently,
economically, and reliably.

Taxpayer’s current business plan consists of three general business lines. Taxpayer’s
business lines focus on pooling the purchasing power of government entities, reducing
costs by performing joint analysis, consolidating bidding and contracting, and serving as
a products and resource guide. The services provided by Taxpayer (which are services
that each Member could perform on their own behalf) allow Members and Municipally-
Owned Utilities to take advantage of economies of scale, promote efficient operation,
and ultimately reduce costs.

Taxpayer represents that it receives income from fees for: (1) providing subject matter
experts to Members and Municipally-Owned Utilities and their governing officials.
Taxpayer provides onsite facilitation, workshops, and follow-up consultations for
Members and Municipally-Owned Utilities. Taxpayer staff works in-depth with the utility
board and staff to develop a realistic, step-by-step blueprint for adapting to specific
market conditions, regulatory changes, and the complex expectations of customers.
Taxpayer staff briefs governing officials on industry conditions and offers training on
how to work with, and guide, the utility staff. Taxpayer also provides experts in human
resources, financial analysis, transitions to renewable energy and cybersecurity. Many
Municipally-Owned Utilities may lack the resources to have an expert in every area on
staff, or simply do not need a full-time equivalent employee in a certain area or areas;
(2) providing a group purchasing program in which Taxpayer negotiates to obtain
volume discounts and also to provide access to purchase products and services that
are not otherwise available to the Members and Municipally-Owned Utilities with smaller
customer bases; and (3) providing a metering program, in which Taxpayer provides
infrastructure (meters, wireless network communications, applications, and systems
integration) at a reduced cost through wholesale pricing on meters, network equipment
and applications. By aggregating Members and Municipally-Owned Utilities in a single
large-scale program, Taxpayer is able to attract high quality vendors with competitive
pricing that individual Members and Municipally-Owned Utilities would not attract.
Taxpayer’s program also provides back office applications, IT infrastructure and
supporting staff as a shared service.

Taxpayer’s bylaws provide that a separate capital account is to be maintained for each
Member of Taxpayer. The initial capital account of each such Member shall be equal to
the dollar amount of the initial capital contribution of such Member and (1) shall be
increased for any additional capital contributions and for such Member's periodic share
of net income, and (2) shall be decreased for such Member's periodic share of losses
and any distributions or for failure to meet capital calls. Upon dissolution of Taxpayer,
after making payment for all liabilities, the Taxpayer’s board of directors is to dispose of
all assets by distributing the net assets (assets less liabilities) to the Taxpayer’s
Members in proportion to their respective capital account balances. Since Organization

PLR-124150-19 4

A is not a Member4, no capital account will be established for Organization A and
Organization A does not and will not share in any of the net income, or receive any net
assets upon dissolution, of Taxpayer.

Law and Analysis

Section 115(1) of the Code provides that gross income does not include income derived
from any public utility or the exercise of any essential government function and accruing
to a state or any political subdivision thereof.

Rev. Rul. 77-261, 1977-2 C.B. 45, holds that income generated by an investment fund
that is established by a state to hold revenues in excess of the amounts needed to meet
current expenses is excludable from gross income under section 115(1) of the Code,
because such investment constitutes an essential governmental function. The ruling
explains that the statutory exclusion is intended to extend not to the income of a state or
municipality resulting from its own participation in activities, but rather to the income of
an entity engaged in the operation of a public utility or the performance of some
governmental function that accrues to either a state or political subdivision of a State.
The ruling points out that it may be assumed that Congress did not desire in any way to
restrict a state’s participation in enterprises that might be useful in carrying out projects
that are desirable from the standpoint of a State government and that are within the
ambit of a sovereign to conduct.

Rev. Rul. 90-74, 1990-2 C.B. 34, holds that the income of an organization formed,
funded, and operated by political subdivisions to pool various risks (e.g., casualty, public
liability, workers’ compensation, and employees’ health) is excludable from gross
income under section 115(1) of the Code because the organization is performing an
essential governmental function. The revenue ruling states that the income of such an
organization is excludable from gross income so long as private interests do not
participate in the organization or benefit more than incidentally from the organization.
The benefits to the employees of the insurance coverage obtained by the member
political subdivisions are deemed incidental to the public benefit.

Taxpayer’s provision of the services as described above constitutes performance of an
essential governmental function within the meaning of section 115 of the Code. See
Rev. Rul. 90-74 and Rev. Rul. 77-261.

In no event, including dissolution, will the Taxpayer’s assets be distributed or revert to
any entity that is not a state, a political subdivision of a state, or another entity the
income of which is excludable from its gross income by application of section 115 of the
Code. No private interests will participate in, or benefit from, the operation of the
Taxpayer other than as providers of goods or services. See Rev. Rul. 90-74.

4 No capital account will be established for any Municipally-Owned Utility unless that entity is also a

Member of Taxpayer.

PLR-124150-19 5

Ruling

Based solely on the facts and representations submitted by Taxpayer, we conclude that
the income of Taxpayer is derived from the exercise of an essential governmental
function and will accrue to a state or a political subdivision thereof, or to an entity the
income of which is excluded under section 115(1) of the Code. Consequently, we rule
that Taxpayer’s income as described above is excluded from gross income under
section 115(1) of the Code.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by or on behalf of Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an individual with authority to bind Taxpayer and upon the
understanding that there will be no material changes in the facts. While this office has
not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for this ruling, it is
subject to verification on examination. The Associate office will revoke or modify a letter
ruling and apply the revocation retroactively if there has been a misstatement or
omission of controlling facts; the facts at the time of the transaction are materially
different from the controlling facts on which the ruling was based; or, in the case of a
transaction involving a continuing action or series of actions, the controlling facts
change during the course of the transaction. See Rev. Proc. 2020-1, section 11.05.

This letter does not address the applicability of any section of the Code or Regulations to
the facts submitted, other than those sections specifically described. Except as expressly
provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of
any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. Specifically,
no opinion is expressed as to whether any Member of Taxpayer or Municipally-Owned
Utility is a political subdivision within the meaning of the Code or an entity whose
income is excluded from gross income under section 115 of the Code. Additionally, no
opinion is expressed as to whether Organization A is an entity described in section
501(c)(6) of the Code. Further, no opinion is expressed as to whether income from
services from any of Taxpayer’s future lines of business that are not expressly described
above are excluded from gross income under section 115 of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

PLR-124150-19 6

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

                                   Sincerely,




                                   James Zelasko
                                   Chief, Branch 2
                                   (CC:EEE:EOET:EO2)
                                   Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Employee
                                   Benefits, Exempt Organizations, and Employment
                                   Taxes)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2020, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.