Post-annuity trust distributions and expense reimbursement are not self-dealing
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2020, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A charitable lead annuity trust paid an increasing annuity to a charity whose interest was later divided equally between two foundations. After the final annuity payments, the surviving-spouse trustee planned to distribute the remaining principal to the grantor's children and, with court approval, reimburse herself for legal, accounting, and related expenses she had paid for the trust. While the trust held the charitable annuity interest, the split-interest trust rules treated it like a private foundation and the trustee was a disqualified person. But after the charities received all guaranteed annuity amounts, no charitable-deduction property remained and section 4947(a)(2) ceased to apply. The IRS therefore ruled that neither the remainder distribution nor the later court-approved reimbursement would be an act of self-dealing.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Do distributions to remainder beneficiaries and court-approved trustee expense reimbursement after all charitable annuity payments constitute self-dealing?
- Outcome: approved (neither transaction constitutes self-dealing under section 4941)
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 4941, 4946, and 4947(a)(2); Treas. Reg. § 53.4947-1(e)(2), Example 2
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202021001 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/22/2020 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 4941.04-00, 4947.02-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------ --------------------------, ID No.-----------------
----------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:EEE:EOET:EO3
PLR-117168-19
Date:
December 10, 2019
Trustee = ------------------------
Trust = -----------------------------------------
Grantor = ------------------------
Date 1 = -------------------
Date 2 = ----------------
Date 3 = --------------------------
Date 4 = ----------------------
Date 5 = ------------------
Charity A = ---------------------------------------------
Charity B = --------------------------------------------
Charity C = ----------------------------------------
X = ---
Dear -----------------:
This letter responds to a July 9, 2019, request for rulings from your authorized
representative regarding whether certain transactions will constitute acts of self-dealing
by you under section 4941 of the Internal Revenue Code.
FACTS
Grantor died on Date 1. Pursuant to Grantor’s will, Grantor’s interests in several
specified grantor retained annuity trusts were distributed to Trustee to hold, administer,
and distribute in accordance with the terms of Trust, as amended and restated by
Trustee on Date 2. Trustee is the surviving spouse of Grantor.
Trust was established as a charitable lead annuity trust with the annuity payable to
Charity C. On Date 3, Charity C was divided, as authorized by court order, into two
separate foundations, Charity A and Charity B. Charity A and Charity B each received
one-half of Charity C’s guaranteed annuity interest in Trust.
Trust provides for an initial annuity amount to be paid in equal quarterly installments that
increases by a set percentage each year until Trust terminates and the remaining trust
PLR-117168-19 2
principal is distributed to the children of Trustee and Grantor. Trust is to have a term,
computed with respect to the date of Grantor’s death, just sufficient to make the income
interest in the trust for which a deduction would be allowed under section 2055 have an
aggregate value of X percent of the aggregate fair market value of all amounts in the
trust at its commencement. Upon expiration of this term, Trustee is to distribute all trust
principal to the children of Trustee and Grantor, the remainder beneficiaries.
Pursuant to an estate tax closing document, Grantor’s estate was allowed a deduction
under section 2055 equal to X percent of the aggregate fair market value of all amounts
in trust at Trust’s inception. On Date 5, we ruled that Trust will terminate on Date 4.
Trustee represents that, before any distribution to the remainder beneficiaries, all
annuity payments will be made to Charity A and Charity B in accordance with the terms
of Trust and consistent with the schedule of amounts attached to the ruling request.
Trustee also represents that, in discharge of Trustee’s fiduciary duties, she paid certain
accounting, legal, and related expenses on behalf of Trust. After Date 4, and in the
course of winding up the affairs of Trust, Trustee intends to seek approval from a court
of competent jurisdiction for reimbursement of these expenses. To the extent Trustee
obtains such approval, Trustee intends to make this reimbursement and remit to the
remainder beneficiaries the trust assets net of this reimbursement. The reimbursements
will only be made after Charity A and Charity B have received their entire guaranteed
annuity amounts due under Trust.
RULINGS REQUESTED
You have requested the following rulings:
1) Trustee’s distribution after Date 4 of the remaining trust principal of Trust to the
remainder beneficiaries will not constitute an act of self-dealing under section
4941 by Trustee.
2) The reimbursement from Trust after Date 4 and after obtaining approval by a
court of competent jurisdiction of certain legal, accounting, and related expenses
incurred by Trustee on behalf of Trust will not constitute an act of self-dealing
under section 4941 by Trustee.
LAW
Section 4941 imposes an excise tax on each act of self-dealing between a disqualified
person and a private foundation.
Section 4946(a)(1)(A), (B), and (D) provide, in part, that the term “disqualified person”
includes a substantial contributor to a private foundation, a foundation manager, and a
member of the family, as defined in section 4946(d), of any substantial contributor to or
PLR-117168-19 3
foundation manager of a foundation. Section 4946(a)(2) provides that the term
“substantial contributor” means any person who is described in section 507(d)(2), which
includes the creator of a trust.
Section 4946(b) provides that a “foundation manager” includes an officer, director, or
trustee of a foundation.
Section 4947(a)(2) provides, in part, that in the case of a trust which is not exempt from
tax under section 501(a), not all of the unexpired interests in which are devoted to one
or more of the purposes described in section 170(c)(2)(B), and which has amounts in
trust for which a deduction was allowed under certain specified sections of the Internal
Revenue Code, including section 2055 and section 2522, section 4941 shall apply as if
such trust were a private foundation.
Example 2 of Treas. Reg. § 53.4947-1(e)(2) describes a scenario in which H creates a
trust under which X, a section 501(c)(3) organization, receives $20,000 per year for a
period of 20 years, remainder to S, H’s son. H is allowed a deduction under section
2522 for the present value of X’s interest. Example 2 provides that when the final
payment to X has been made at the end of the 20-year period in accordance with the
terms of the trust, the provisions of section 4947(a)(2) will cease to apply to the trust
because the trust no longer retains any amounts for which the deduction under section
2522 was allowed.
ANALYSIS
Section 4941 imposes an excise tax on each act of self-dealing between a disqualified
person and a private foundation. Pursuant to section 4947(a)(2), section 4941 applies to
Trust as if it were a private foundation because it is not exempt from tax under section
501(a), not all of the unexpired interests are devoted to one or more of the purposes
described in section 170(c)(2)(B), and it has amounts in trust for which a deduction was
allowed under section 2055. Trustee is a disqualified person with respect to Trust
because she is a foundation manager and, as the surviving spouse, a member of the
family of a substantial contributor. See section 4946(a)(1)(B) and section 4946(b).
After Trustee distributes the final annuity payments to Charity A and Charity B in
accordance with the terms of Trust, Trust will no longer have any amounts in trust for
which a charitable deduction was allowed and therefore will cease to be described in
section 4947(a)(2). See Example 2 of Treas. Reg. § 53.4947-1(e)(2). At the time of the
distribution of remaining principal to the remainder beneficiaries, then, Trust will not be
treated as if it were a private foundation for purposes of section 4941. For the same
reason, Trust will not be treated as if it were a private foundation at the time of the
reimbursement of Trustee for expenses incurred in furtherance of her fiduciary duties,
which will occur after Charity A and Charity B have received their entire guaranteed
annuity amounts in accordance with the terms of Trust and the court has approved the
reimbursement of expenses.
PLR-117168-19 4
RULINGS
Based solely on the facts and representations submitted by Trustee, we rule as follows:
1) Trustee’s distribution after Date 4 of the remaining trust principal of Trust to the
remainder beneficiaries will not constitute an act of self-dealing under section
4941 by Trustee.
2) The reimbursement from Trust after Date 4 and after obtaining approval by a
court of competent jurisdiction of certain legal, accounting, and related expenses
incurred by Trustee on behalf of Trust will not constitute an act of self-dealing
under section 4941 by Trustee.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by or on behalf of Trustee and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by an appropriate party, as specified in Rev. Proc. 2019-1, 2019-1 I.R.B. 1,
§ 7.01(16)(b). This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the
request for ruling, and such material is subject to verification on examination. The
Associate Office will revoke or modify a letter ruling and apply the revocation
retroactively if: (1) there has been a misstatement or omission of controlling facts;
(2) the facts at the time of the transaction are materially different from the controlling
facts on which the ruling is based; or (3) the transaction involves a continuing action or
series of actions and the controlling facts change during the course of the transaction.
See Rev. Proc. 2019-1, § 11.05.
Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
federal tax consequences of the proposed transaction under any other provision of the
Code or regulations.
This letter is directed only to Trustee. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be
used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to Trustee’s authorized representatives.
PLR-117168-19 5
If you have any questions about this ruling, please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.
Sincerely,
Matthew Giuliano
Branch Chief
Exempt Organizations Branch 1
(Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations, and
Employment Taxes)
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2020, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.