Trust allowed to revise dividend investment-income election

Plain-English summary

A trust elected to treat a specified amount of qualified dividend income as investment income when calculating its investment interest deduction. It based the election on a Schedule K-1, but the issuer later provided an amended K-1 showing lower ordinary and qualified dividends, materially changing the trust's tax calculations. The trust asked to revoke the original election and make a new election for a smaller amount. The IRS found that the trust acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government. It consented to the revocation and granted 60 days to make the replacement election.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Could the trust revoke its original qualified-dividend investment-income election and timely elect a smaller amount after receiving an amended Schedule K-1?
• Outcome: Approved, with the replacement election due within 60 days.
• Key authorities: IRC § 163(d)(4)(B); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.163(d)-1 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201947012 [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 11/22/2019 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------------- -----------------------, ID No. -------------------
----------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B02
In Re: ----------------- PLR-106587-19
Date:
August 5, 2019

TY: Taxable year ending ---------------------------

Legend

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------

A = --------------------------------------------------

Date1 = ----------------------------

Dear -------------------

   This is in response to a letter dated March 25, 2019, in which Taxpayer is

requesting consent to revoke its election under section 163(d)(4)(B) of the Internal
Revenue Code to treat a certain amount of qualified dividend income as investment
income for TY. In addition, Taxpayer is requesting an extension of time to make a late
election to treat a lesser amount of qualified dividends as investment income under
section 163(d)(4)(B) for TY. This request is made in accordance with §§ 301.9100-1
and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.

FACTS AND REPRESENTATIONS

Taxpayer represents the following:

   Taxpayer is a trust that files Form 1041 (U.S. Income Tax Return for Estates and

Trusts). Taxpayer uses the calendar year as its taxable year.
PLR-106587-19 2

   Taxpayer filed Form 1041 for TY. On Form 4952, attached to Form 1041,

Taxpayer elected to treat a certain amount of qualified dividend income as investment
income for purposes of the investment interest expense deduction. Taxpayer made the
decision to elect to include that certain amount of qualified dividend income as
investment income based upon information received on a Schedule K-1 from A.

   On Date1, A issued an amended Schedule K-1 to Taxpayer for TY showing a

decrease in the amount of ordinary and qualified dividends. The revisions in the
Schedule K-1 have a substantial impact on Taxpayer’s tax calculations. Therefore,
Taxpayer is requesting consent to revoke its election under section 163(d)(4)(B) to treat
a certain amount of qualified dividend income as investment income for TY. In addition,
Taxpayer is requesting an extension of time to make a late election to treat a lesser
amount of qualified dividends as investment income under section 163(d)(4)(B) for TY.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Section 163(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that in the case of a

taxpayer other than a corporation, the amount allowed as a deduction for investment
interest for any taxable year shall not exceed the net investment income of the taxpayer
for the taxable year. Section 163(d)(4)(A) provides that net investment income means
the excess of investment income over investment expenses.

   Section 163(d)(4)(B) defines investment income. Section 163(d)(4)(B) states that

investment income shall include qualified dividend income only to the extent the
taxpayer elects to treat such income as investment income for purposes of this
subsection. Section 1.163(d)-1(a) provides that, as a consequence, the qualified
dividend income taken into account as investment income is not eligible to be taxed at
the favorable capital gain rate.

   Section 1.163(d)-1(b) provides that the election to treat qualified dividend income

as investment income must be made on or before the due date (including extensions) of
the income tax return for the taxable year in which the income is recognized.

   Section 1.163(d)-1(c) provides that the election to treat qualified dividend income

as investment income is revocable with the consent of the Commissioner.

   Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

  Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a

reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3
PLR-106587-19 3

to make certain regulatory elections. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a “regulatory
election” as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the
Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement
published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

   Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory

elections under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to
establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably
and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the
Government.

    Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides that, in general, a taxpayer is deemed to have

acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer: (i) requests relief before the failure to
make the regulatory election is discovered by the Service; (ii) failed to make the election
because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer’s control; (iii) failed to make the
election because, after exercising reasonable diligence, the taxpayer was unaware of
the necessity for the election; (iv) reasonably relied on the written advice of the Service;
or (v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the tax professional failed to
make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

   Section 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have not acted

reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer: (i) seeks to alter a return position for which
an accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed under section 6662 at the
time the taxpayer requests relief and the new position requires or permits a regulatory
election for which relief is requested; (ii) was informed in all material respects of the
required election and related tax consequences but chose not to file the election; or (iii)
uses hindsight in requesting relief.

    Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the interests of the Government are

prejudiced if granting relief would result in the taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the
aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have
had if the election had been timely made. The interests of the Government are
ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have
been made, or any taxable years that would have been affected by the election had it
been timely made, are closed by the period of limitations on assessment under
§ 6501(a) before the taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting relief under this section.

   Section 301.9100-3(c)(2) provides special rules for accounting method regulatory

elections. Section 301.9100-3(c)(2) provides that the interests of the Government are
deemed prejudiced, except in unusual or compelling circumstances, if the accounting
method regulatory election for which relief is requested is subject to the advance
consent procedures for method changes, requires a § 481(a) adjustment, would permit
a change from an impermissible method of accounting that is an issue under
PLR-106587-19 4

consideration by examination or any other setting, or provides a more favorable method
of accounting if the election is made by a certain date or taxable year.

     Taxpayer’s election is a regulatory election as defined in § 301.9100-1(b)

because the due date of the election is prescribed in § 1.63(d)-1(b) of the Income Tax
Regulations. The Commissioner has the authority under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-
3 to permit Taxpayer to revoke a regulatory election and to grant an extension of time to
file a late regulatory election.

CONCLUSION

   Based upon our analysis of the facts and representations provided, Taxpayer

acted reasonably and in good faith, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of
the Government. Therefore, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have
been met.

    Pursuant to § 1.163(d)-1(c), Taxpayer is granted consent to revoke its election

under section 163(d)(4)(B) to treat a certain amount of qualified dividend income as
investment income for TY. Taxpayer is granted an extension of 60 days from the date
of this letter to make a late election to treat a lesser amount of qualified dividends as
investment income for TY.

CAVEATS

  The rulings contained in this letter are based on information and representations

submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
appropriate parties. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

   Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.

   A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is

relevant. Alternatively, a taxpayer filing its return electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to its return that provides the date and control
number of the letter ruling.

    In accordance with the provisions of the power of attorney currently on file with

this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative. We are
also sending a copy of this letter to the appropriate operating division director.
Enclosed is a copy of the letter ruling showing the deletions proposed to be made in the
letter when it is disclosed under § 6110.
PLR-106587-19 5

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the

Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

                                             Sincerely yours,



                                             _______________________________
                                             David B. Silber
                                             Acting Senior Technician Reviewer,
                                             Branch 2
                                             Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                             (Income Tax & Accounting)

Enclosure:

Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc: