Pension plan received substitute annuitant mortality table approval
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2019, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A taxpayer requested plan-specific substitute mortality tables for the male and female annuitants of one pension plan, including disabled participants. The IRS approved the tables for ten plan years after finding that the submitted rates were developed under Treasury Regulation section 1.430(h)(3)-2 and Revenue Procedure 2017-55. The plan's nonannuitants and the nonannuitants of two controlled-group plans lacked credible mortality experience and had to continue using standard tables, while a separate ruling would address annuitants in the other plans. The approved rates had to be applied generationally and remained subject to the letter's early-termination rules. The taxpayer also had to monitor the first plan's nonannuitants because they had experienced 94 deaths, close to the 100-death credibility threshold for a five-year period.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the pension plan use substitute mortality tables for its male and female annuitants, including disabled participants?
- Outcome: Approved for ten plan years, with nonannuitants kept on standard tables and monitored.
- Key authorities: IRC § 430(h)(3); ERISA § 303(h)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.430(h)(3)-1 and 1.430(h)(3)-2; Rev. Proc. 2017-55
Full text (IRS public release)
Significant Index No. 0430.00-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
APR 16 2019
T:EP:RA:A2
Re: Substitute Mortality Table Ruling
Taxpayer = [redacted]
Plans for which substitute mortality tables are requested:
Plan G = [redacted]
Other plans in controlled group:
Plan S = [redacted]
Plan H = [redacted]
Dear [redacted]:
This letter is to inform you that your request to use substitute mortality tables for making
computations under section 430 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) for Plan G
has been granted with respect to the populations specified in this letter. This ruling is
effective for a period of 10 plan years beginning with the plan year commencing
January 1, [redacted]. Your request has been granted in accordance with section 430(h)(3)
of the Code and section 303(h)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974.
This approval applies to the following specific populations:
• Plan G — Male annuitants, including disabled participants
• Plan G — Female annuitants, including disabled participants
Based on the information provided by the Taxpayer, the following populations do not
have credible mortality experience, and therefore the standard mortality tables will be
used for calculations under section 430 of the Code:
• Plan G, male and female nonannuitants
• Plans S and H, male and female nonannuitants
The Taxpayer is also requesting approval for substitute mortality tables for annuitants in
Plans S and H, which will be addressed in a separate ruling letter.
In granting this approval, we have only considered whether the substitute mortality rates
were developed in accordance with section 1.430(h)(3)-2 of the Treasury Regulations
(“Regulations”) and Revenue Procedure 2017-55. Accordingly, we are not expressing
any opinion as to the accuracy or acceptability of any calculations or other material
submitted with your request.
Permission is hereby granted to use the substitute mortality rates shown in the table
below for the Included Group:
Substitute Mortality Tables
Approved for use beginning with the plan year commencing January 1, [redacted]
Base year [redacted]
Age Male Annuitants Female Annuitants
[The scanned table lists ages 15 through 120. All male and female annuitant mortality-rate values were redacted in the IRS release. -- transcriber]
The above rates were developed based on an experience study period from January 1,
[redacted] through December 31, [redacted], with a base year of [redacted]. The rates were calculated
by adjusting the applicable standard mortality tables in section 1.430(h)(3)-1(d) of the
Regulations using the mortality ratio and credibility weighting factor determined by
aggregating male and female experience, as shown in the table below.
Male and Female Annuitants
Mortality ratio [redacted]
Credibility Weighting Factor [redacted]
The Internal Revenue Service has reviewed the substitute mortality rates and
supporting information, and has determined that based on the information submitted,
the rates were developed in accordance with section 1.430(h)(3)-2 of the Regulations
and Revenue Procedure 2017-55.
The above rates must be applied on a generational basis, as provided in section
1.430(h)(3)-2(c)(3) of the Regulations.
Your attention is called to section 430(h)(3)(C)(ii) of the Code and section 1.430(h)(3)-
2(d)(6) of the Regulations, which describe the circumstances in which the use of the
substitute mortality table will terminate before the end of the 10-year period described
above. In general, the substitute mortality tables can no longer be used as of the
earliest of:
(1) For a plan using a substitute mortality table for only one gender, the first plan
year for which there is full or partial credible mortality information with respect to
the other gender that had lacked credible mortality information (unless an
approved substitute mortality table is used for that gender),
(2) The first plan year in which the plan fails to satisfy the requirements of section
1.430(h)(3)-2(c)(1) of the Regulations, regarding the requirement that other
plans and populations in the controlled group must also use substitute mortality
tables unless it can be demonstrated that they do not have credible mortality
information (taking into account the transition period for newly affiliated
companies in section 1.430(h)(3)-2(f)(3) of the Regulations),
(3) The second plan year following the plan year for which there is a significant
change in individuals covered by the plan as described in section
1.430(h)(3)-2(c)(6)(iii) of the Regulations,
(4) The plan year following the plan year in which a substitute mortality table used
for a plan population is no longer accurately predictive of future mortality of that
population, as determined by the Commissioner or as certified by the plan’s
actuary to the satisfaction of the Commissioner, or
(5) The date specified in guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
pursuant to a replacement of mortality tables specified under section
430(h)(3)(A) of the Code and section 1.430(h)(3)-1 of the Regulations, other
than annual updates to the static mortality tables issued pursuant to section
1.430(h)(3)-1(a)(3) of the Regulations or changes to the mortality improvement
rates pursuant to section 1.430(h)(3)-1(a)(2)(i)(C) of the Regulations.
In particular, section 1.430(h)(3)-2(c)(6)(iii) provides that the use of substitute mortality
tables must be discontinued after a significant change in coverage unless the plan’s
actuary certifies in writing to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the substitute
mortality tables used for the population continue to be accurately predictive of future
mortality of the population (taking into account the effect of the change in the
population). For this purpose, a significant change in coverage occurs if the number of
individuals covered by the substitute mortality table for a plan year is less than 80
percent or more than 120 percent of either (1) the average number of individuals in that
population over the years covered by the experience study on which the substitute
mortality table is based, or (2) the number of individuals covered by the substitute
mortality table in a plan year for which a certification described in section 1.430(h)(3)-
2(6)(c)(iii)(A) of the Regulations was made.
We draw your attention to the fact that the combined male and female nonannuitants of
Plan G experienced 94 deaths during the experience study period (using the simplified
rule described in section 1.430(h)(3)-2(c)(2)(ii)(B) of the Regulations). Note that this
population will have credible mortality experience if it experiences at least 100 deaths
during a 5-year period (corresponding to the length of the experience study used to
construct the substitute mortality tables for the annuitant population). It is important to
monitor this population to ensure that appropriate action is taken should this occur, to
avoid violating paragraph (2) above.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.
When filing Form 5500 for the plan years for which the substitute mortality tables are
used, please note the information that is required to be attached to Schedule SB
(Actuarial Information) in accordance with the instructions to that form.
We have sent a copy of this letter to your authorized representative pursuant to a power
of attorney on file in this office and to the Manager, EP Classification in Columbus, Ohio
and to the Manager, EP Compliance Unit in Chicago, Illinois.
If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact [redacted].
Sincerely,
David M. Ziegler, Manager
Employee Plans Actuarial Group 2
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2019, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.