🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201926003 Released June 28, 2019 Approved

Partnership received late section 754 election relief

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2019, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2019
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership timely filed its return for a year in which partnership interests had been transferred but inadvertently omitted a section 754 election. The IRS granted 120 days to file the election for that year and later years. The relief was conditioned on the partnership and its partners making all basis and depreciation adjustments that would have applied had the election been timely, including allowable depreciation and partner-basis reductions for affected years even if the assessment or refund-claim limitation period had expired.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could a partnership obtain extra time to make a section 754 election that was inadvertently omitted from its timely filed return?
  • Outcome: Approved for the transfer year and thereafter, subject to retroactive property-basis, depreciation, and partner-basis adjustments.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 734, 743, and 754; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b)(1), 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

 Internal Revenue Service                                    Department of the Treasury
                                                             Washington, DC 20224

 Number: 201926003                                           Third Party Communication: None
 Release Date: 6/28/2019                                     Date of Communication: Not Applicable
 Index Numbers: 754.02-00, 9100.00-00,
               9100.15-00                                    Person To Contact:
                                                             ---------------------, ID No. ------------------
 ------------------------------------                        Telephone Number:
 -------------------------------------------                 ----------------------
 -----------------------------------                         Refer Reply To:
 ---------------------------------                           CC:PSI:B03
                                                             PLR-127623-18
                                                             Date:
                                                             March 28, 2019


LEGEND

X:          --------------------------------------
            ------------------------

Date:-------------

State:------------------


 Dear --------------------:

       This letter responds to a letter dated September 13, 2018, and subsequent
 correspondence, submitted on behalf of X requesting an extension of time under
 § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election under
 § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).

                                                     Facts

         The information submitted states that X is a State limited liability company that is
 classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes. Interests in X were transferred in
 Date. X's tax return for its Date taxable year was timely filed, but a § 754 election to
 adjust the basis of partnership property was inadvertently not filed with the return. X
 represents that it has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not
 prejudice the interests of the Government.

                                               Law and Analysis

        Section 754 provides, in part, that if a partnership files an election, in accordance
 with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of partnership property is
 adjusted, in the case of a distribution of property, in the manner provided in § 734, and,
PLR-127623-18                                  2

in the case of a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in § 743. Such
an election shall apply with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and
to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year with respect to
which the election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.

        Section 1.754-1(b)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that an
election under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and
743(b) with respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in
a partnership, shall be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for
the taxable year during which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be
valid, the return must be filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e)
(including extensions thereof) for filing the return for the taxable year.

       Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term "regulatory
election" as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the
Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement
published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

       Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time
for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory
elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

        Under § 301.9100-3, a request for relief will be granted when the taxpayer
provides the evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to
the satisfaction of the Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good
faith, and (2) the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

                                         Conclusion

       Based solely upon the facts submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied.
As a result, X is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to
make a § 754 election for its Date taxable year and thereafter. The election should be
made in a written statement filed with the applicable service center for association with
X's return for its Date taxable year. A copy of this letter should be attached to the
statement filed.
PLR-127623-18                                  3

       This ruling is contingent on X adjusting the basis of its properties to reflect any
§ 734(b) or § 743(b) adjustments that would have been made if the § 754 election had
been timely made. These basis adjustments must reflect any additional depreciation
that would have been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless
of whether the statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund
has expired for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Any depreciation deduction
allowable for an open year is to be computed based on the remaining useful life and
using property basis as adjusted by the greater of any depreciation deduction allowed or
allowable in any prior year had the § 754 election been timely made.

        Additionally, the partners of X must adjust the basis of their interests in X to
reflect what that basis would be if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless
of whether the statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund
has expired for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Specifically, the partners of X
must reduce the basis of their interests in X in the amount of any additional depreciation
that would have been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made.

       Except for the specific ruling above, we express or imply no opinion concerning
the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the
Code. In addition, § 301.9100-1(a) provides that the granting of an extension of time for
making an election is not a determination that the taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make
the election.

       The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-127623-18                               4

      In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a
copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.


                                     Sincerely,

                                     Associate Chief Counsel
                                     (Passthroughs & Special Industries)




                                  By:_________________________
                                     Mary Beth Carchia
                                     Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
                                     Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                     (Passthroughs & Special Industries)


Enclosures (2):

      Copy of this letter
      Copy of this letter for § 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2019, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.