🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201924006 Released June 14, 2019 Approved

S corporation received relief for missed QSST elections

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2019, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2019
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation shareholder placed shares in a grantor trust that was to divide into separate trusts for three beneficiaries after the shareholder's death. The beneficiaries failed to make timely qualified subchapter S trust elections, causing the corporation's S election to terminate after the trust's two-year post-death eligibility period. The IRS found the termination inadvertent because the failure was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive planning and the parties had consistently reported the corporation as an S corporation. It ruled that S status would continue through the corporation's later sale to an ineligible shareholder, provided the beneficiaries filed corrective QSST elections within 120 days.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation retain S status after its trust beneficiaries missed their QSST elections?
  • Outcome: Yes, if the beneficiaries file corrective elections effective on the termination date within 120 days.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(c)(2), 1361(d), and 1362(f); Rev. Rul. 64-250.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201924006 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/14/2019 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00, 1361.03-02
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------------------------- -------------------, ID No. ------------------
-------------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------------- ----------------------
---------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-120601-18
Date:
January 28, 2019

LEGEND

X = -----------------------------------------------------------


Y = --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Z = -----------------------

A = ---------------

B = -------------------------

C = ------------------------------------

D = ----------------------------

Trust1 = ------------------------------------------

Trust2= ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Trust3= ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trust4= ------------------------------------------------------------------------

PLR-120601-18 2

Date1 = ------------------

Date2 = --------------------

Date3 = -----------------------

Date4 = ---------------------------

Date5 = ---------------------------

Date6= -------------------

Date7 = --------------------

Date8 = -------------------

Year = -------

State1 = -----------

State2 = ---------------------------

Dear ---------------:

This responds to a letter dated June 21, 2018, submitted on behalf of X by X’s
authorized representative, requesting relief under section 1362(f) of the Internal
Revenue Code.

FACTS

According to the information submitted, X was incorporated on Date1 under the laws of
State2. Effective Date2, X elected to be taxed as an S corporation.

On Date3, A, a shareholder of X, transferred his shares in X to Trust1, a grantor trust.
On Date4, A died. Trust1 was an eligible shareholder of X until Date 5. Trust1 provided
that, upon A’s death, Trust1 was to be split into separate trusts for the benefit of B, C,
and D, each separate trust qualifying as a qualified subchapter S trust (QSST).
However, B, C, and D, the beneficiaries of Trust1, did not file a timely election to treat
their separate shares of Trust1 as QSSTs, thereby causing X’s S corporation election to
terminate as of Date5.

PLR-120601-18 3

In Year, Y was formed under the laws of State1. X merged into Y in a § 368(a)(1)(F)
reorganization with Y surviving the merger. Y then changed its name to X. X
represents that the § 368(a)(1)(F) reorganization was a mere change in the place of
organization from State2 to State1 for which the S election effective Date2 would have
remained in effect under Rev. Rul. 64-250, 1964-2 C.B. 333. X represents that it
nevertheless made another timely S election, effective Date6. On Date7, X was sold to
Z, an ineligible shareholder, terminating X’s S election.

On Date8, Trust1 was divided into Trust2, Trust3, and Trust4 for the benefit of B, C, and
D, respectively.

X represents that the circumstances resulting in the failure to file a QSST election for
Trust1 and later Trust2, Trust3, and Trust4 were inadvertent and were not motivated by
tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X represents that it has filed its tax returns
consistent with a valid S election being in place from Date2 through Date7. X
represents that it treated Trust1 as if a valid QSST election were in place for each of B,
C, and D’s separate shares. X and its shareholders have agreed to make such
adjustments (consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation) as may be required
by the Secretary.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to any
taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in
effect for such year.

Section 1361(b)(1) defines a “small business corporation” as a domestic corporation
which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not (A) have more than 100
shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust
described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an
individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than 1
class of stock.

Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) provides that for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), a trust all of
which is treated (under subpart E) as owned by an individual who is a citizen or resident
of the United States may be a shareholder of an S corporation.

Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) provides that a trust may be an S corporation shareholder if it
was described in section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) immediately before the death of the deemed
owner and it continues in existence after such death, but only for the 2-year period
beginning on the day of the deemed owner’s death.

Section 1361(d)(1) provides that in the case of a QSST with respect to which a
beneficiary makes an election under § 1361(d)(2) the trust is treated as a trust

PLR-120601-18 4

described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) and, for purposes of § 678(a), the beneficiary of the trust
is treated as the owner of that portion of the trust which consists of stock in a S
corporation with respect to which the election under § 1361(d)(2) is made.

Section 1362(f) provides, in relevant part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any
corporation was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3) or § 1361(b)(3)(C); (2) the
Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such termination were
inadvertent; (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the
circumstances resulting in such termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for
which the termination occurred is a small business corporation; and (4) the corporation
for which the termination occurred, and each person who was a shareholder in such
corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to
make the adjustments (consistent with the treatment of such corporation as an S
corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then,
notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such termination, such corporation shall
be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Revenue Ruling 64-250, provides that, when an S corporation merges into a newly
formed corporation in a transaction qualifying as a reorganization under § 368(a)(1)(F),
and the newly formed surviving corporation also meets the requirements of an S
corporation, the reorganization does not terminate the S election. Thus, the S election
remains in effect for the new corporation.

CONCLUSION

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that
X’s S corporation election terminated on Date5 as a result of the failure to make a timely
QSST election for Trust1. We further conclude that the termination of X’s S election on
Date5 was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Pursuant to the provisions of
§1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from Date5 through
Date7, provided that B C, and D file QSST elections for Trust 2, Trust3 and Trust4 with
an effective date of Date5 with the appropriate service center within 120 days from the
date of this letter, and provided X's S corporation election is not otherwise terminated
under § 1362(d). A copy of this letter must be attached to the QSST election.

Except as specifically ruled upon above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the
federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the
Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding X’s eligibility to be an S
corporation. Further, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning whether Trust1,
Trust2, Trust3 or Trust4 meet the requirements of a QSST under § 1361(d)(3). We also
express no opinion on whether X’s merger into Y qualifies as a § 368(a)(1)(F)
reorganization.

PLR-120601-18 5

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

                                   Sincerely,


                                   Joy C. Spies
                                   Joy C. Spies
                                   Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
                                   Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy of this letter for section 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2019, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.