🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Chief Counsel Advice 201902031 Released January 11, 2019 Advice

Appeals may decline cases raising only constitutional and non-tax issues

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2019, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2019
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised that the IRS Independent Office of Appeals may interpret its procedures to decline cases presenting only constitutional and non-tax issues. Publication 5 states that Appeals cannot consider reasons for disagreement that fall outside the tax laws, including arguments based solely on constitutional grounds. The advice also cites Internal Revenue Manual provisions and 26 C.F.R. § 601.106(b) as supporting that reading. The general Appeals delegation order neither specifically requires nor excludes consideration of constitutional issues. The ultimate choice of which cases to accept remains with Appeals.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May Appeals decline a case that raises only constitutional and non-tax issues?
  • Outcome: Advice given, published procedures allow Appeals to decline such a case
  • Key authorities: 26 C.F.R. § 601.106(b); Publication 5; IRM §§ 4.23.22.5(2)c, 8.1.1.3.1, 1.2.47.9

Full text (IRS public release)

ID:      CCA_2018112110072398
UILC:    7803.00-00

Number: 201902031
Release Date: 1/11/2019
From:
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:07:23 AM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: FW: Domestic Crude Export - Guidance Requested




This responds to your request for advice concerning whether cases raising solely
constitutional and non-tax issues are eligible for Appeals consideration. While it is
ultimately up to Appeals to interpret its provisions on criteria for case consideration, we
agree that Appeals may determine that its procedures allow it to decline to accept cases
with no tax issues.

A fair reading of Appeals published guidance and procedures would allow Appeals to
decline to consider all non-tax issues that do not fall within the scope of the tax laws,
including arguments based only on constitutional grounds. In particular, Publication 5,
Your Appeal Rights and How to Prepare a Protest If You Don’t Agree (Rev. 01-1999),
provides “Appeals can not consider your reasons for not agreeing if they don’t come
within the scope of the tax laws (for example, if you disagree solely on …
constitutional… grounds.” (Emphasis added). See also IRM 4.23.22.5(2)c.; 8.1.1.3.1;
26 CFR 601.106(b). The general Appeals Delegation Order 8-8, IRM 1.2.47.9, does
not make any specific provision for either consideration or exclusion of constitutional
issues.

To sum, it is ultimately up to Appeals to decide which cases to take and which to
decline. Current published Appeals procedures do appear to allow Appeals to decline
to accept a case which raises solely constitutional and non-tax issues.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2019, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.