🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201850015 Released December 14, 2018 Approved

IRS grants an estate extra time to make a late portability election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

When a married person dies without using up their full federal estate-tax
exclusion, the unused portion (the deceased spousal unused exclusion, or DSUE,
amount) can be passed to the surviving spouse to shelter future transfers. But this
"portability" benefit is available only if the deceased spouse's estate makes an
election on a timely filed estate tax return (Form 706). Here the decedent's estate
was small enough that it was not otherwise required to file an estate tax return,
and for various reasons it never filed the return or made the election on time. The
estate asked for relief under the "9100" rules. The IRS found the estate met the
§ 301.9100-3 standard (it acted reasonably and in good faith, and relief would not
prejudice the government) and granted 120 days to file a complete Form 706 and make
the portability election. The IRS added two cautions: if it later turns out the estate
was actually required to file a return under § 6018(a), this relief is void, and the
IRS expressed no opinion on the DSUE amount the surviving spouse may ultimately
claim. This is common late-portability relief that preserves a surviving spouse's
ability to use a late spouse's leftover exclusion.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the estate get an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to make a late portability election under Code Section 2010(c)(5)(A)?
  • Outcome: Approved (120-day extension granted; void if a return was actually required under § 6018(a))
  • Key authorities: IRC § 2010(c)(5)(A); IRC § 2001; IRC § 6018(a); Treas. Reg. § 20.2010-2; Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201850015 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/14/2018 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.35-00, 2010.04-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------------- --------------------------, ID No.-----------------
----------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B04
PLR-112166-18
Date:
--------------------------------------- September 05, 2018

Legend

Decedent ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spouse ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date ------------------------

Dear ---- --------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated April 4, 2018, submitted on behalf of Decedent's
estate, requesting an extension of time pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to make an election. Decedent's estate is requesting to
make an election under § 2010(c)(5)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code (a "portability"
election) to allow a decedent's surviving spouse to take into account that decedent's
deceased spousal unused exclusion (DSUE) amount.

The information submitted for consideration is summarized below.

Decedent died on Date, survived by Spouse. It is represented that based on the value
of Decedent's gross estate and taking into account any taxable gifts, Decedent's estate
is not required under § 6018(a) to file an estate tax return (Form 706, United States
Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return). It is further represented that
there is an unused portion of Decedent's applicable exclusion amount and that a
portability election is required to allow Spouse to take into account that amount (the
"DSUE" amount). A portability election is made upon the timely filing of a complete and
properly prepared estate tax return, unless the requirements for opting out are satisfied.
See § 20.2010-2(a)(2) of the Estate Tax Regulations. For various reasons, an estate
tax return was not timely filed and a portability election was not made. After discovery
of this, Decedent's estate submitted this request for an extension of time under
§ 301.9100-3 to make a portability election.
PLR-112166-18 2

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 2001(a) imposes a tax on the transfer of the taxable estate of every decedent
who is a citizen or resident of the United States.

Section 2010(a) provides that a credit of the applicable credit amount shall be allowed
to the estate of every decedent against the tax imposed by § 2001.

Section 2010(c)(1) provides that the applicable credit amount is the amount of the
tentative tax that would be determined under § 2001(c) if the amount with respect to
which such tentative tax is to be computed were equal to the applicable exclusion
amount.

On December 17, 2010, Congress amended § 2010(c), effective for estates of
decedents dying and gifts made after December 31, 2010, to allow portability of a
decedent's unused applicable exclusion amount between spouses. Tax Relief,
Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010,
Pub. L. No. 111-312, § 303, 124 Stat. 3296, 3302 (2010).

Section 2010(c)(2) provides that the applicable exclusion amount is the sum of the basic
exclusion amount, and, in the case of a surviving spouse, the DSUE amount.

Section 2010(c)(3) provides the basic exclusion amount available to the estate of every
decedent, an amount to be adjusted for inflation annually after calendar year 2011.

Section 2010(c)(4) defines the DSUE amount to mean the lesser of (A) the basic
exclusion amount, or (B) the excess of -- (i) the applicable exclusion amount of the last
deceased spouse of the surviving spouse, over (ii) the amount with respect to which the
tentative tax is determined under § 2001(b)(1) on the estate of such deceased spouse.

Section 2010(c)(5)(A) provides that a DSUE amount may not be taken into account by a
surviving spouse under § 2010(c)(2) unless the executor of the estate of the deceased
spouse files an estate tax return on which such amount is computed and makes an
election on such return that such amount may be so taken into account. The election,
once made, shall be irrevocable. No election may be made if such return is filed after
the time prescribed by law (including extensions) for filing such return.

Section 20.2010-2(a)(1) provides that the due date of an estate tax return required to
elect portability is nine months after the decedent's date of death or the last day of the
period covered by an extension (if an extension of time for filing has been obtained).
Under § 20.2010-2(a)(1), an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 to make a portability
election may be granted in the case of an estate that is not required to file an estate tax
PLR-112166-18 3

return under § 6018(a), as determined solely based on the value of the gross estate and
any adjusted taxable gifts (and without regard to § 20.2010-2(a)).

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable
extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a
regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the
case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code
except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the Commissioner will use to determine
whether to grant an extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed
by a regulation (and not expressly provided by statute). Requests for relief under
§ 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith,
and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

In this case, based on the representation as to the value of the gross estate and any
adjusted taxable gifts, the time for filing the portability election is fixed by the
regulations. Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under
§ 301.9100-3 to grant an extension of time for Decedent's estate to elect portability,
provided Decedent's estate establishes it acted reasonably and in good faith, the
requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not
prejudice the interests of the government.

Information, affidavits, and representations submitted on behalf of Decedent's estate
explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to timely file a valid election.
Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore,
we grant an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter in which to make
the portability election. The election should be made by filing a complete and properly
prepared Form 706 and a copy of this letter, within 120 days from the date of this letter,
with the Cincinnati Service Center, at the following address: Internal Revenue Service,
Cincinnati Service Center, Stop 82, Cincinnati, OH 45999. For purposes of electing
portability, a Form 706 filed by Decedent's estate within 120 days from the date of this
letter will be considered to be timely filed.

If it is later determined that, based on the value of the gross estate and taking into
account any taxable gifts, Decedent's estate is required to file an estate tax return
pursuant to § 6018(a), the Commissioner is without authority under § 301.9100-3 to
grant an extension of time to elect portability and the grant of the extension referred to
in this letter is deemed null and void. See § 20.2010-2(a)(1).
PLR-112166-18 4

We neither express nor imply any opinion concerning the tax consequences of any
aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In particular, we
express no opinion as to the DSUE amount to be potentially taken into account by
Spouse. Any claimed DSUE amount will be included in the applicable exclusion amount
of Spouse only to the extent that Spouse can substantiate such amount and will be
subject to determination by the Director's office upon audit of relevant Federal gift or
estate tax returns. See § 20.2010-3(c)(1) and (d).

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material
submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

This ruling is directed only to the Taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, we have sent a copy of
this letter to your authorized representatives.

                                      Sincerely,

                                      Associate Chief Counsel
                                      Passthroughs and Special Industries



                                      Karlene M. Lesho
                                      _________________________
                               By:    Karlene M. Lesho
                                      Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 4
                                      Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                      (Passthroughs and Special Industries)



   Enclosures
         Copy for § 6110 purposes
         Copy of this letter


   CC:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.