IRS rules that swaps of product distribution rights are like-kind under pre-TCJA Section 1031
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A wholesale distributor (an S corporation) holds franchise-style distribution
rights that let it sell certain branded products in defined territories. To move in
and out of markets, it sold some of those distribution rights and bought replacement
distribution rights, plus did one simultaneous swap, using a qualified intermediary,
and it wanted to defer the gain as a like-kind exchange under Code Section 1031.
Because all the deals closed before 2018, the pre-Tax Cuts and Jobs Act version of
Section 1031 applies, which allowed like-kind exchanges of personal and intangible
property, not just real estate. The IRS ruled that the relinquished distribution
rights are like-kind to the replacement distribution rights: both the rights and the
underlying products share the same nature and character, and the differences (brand,
territory, grade, or quality) do not change that. As a result, no gain or loss is
recognized except to the extent the multiple-property exchange rules require. The
ruling is narrow: it does not cover goodwill, inventory, customer lists, or any boot
received, and the examiner may still verify those on audit. This matters to
distributors and franchisees who reshuffled intangible rights before the 2018 law
change limited Section 1031 to real property.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Are the taxpayer's exchanges of product distribution rights for other distribution rights like-kind exchanges qualifying for gain deferral under (pre-TCJA) Section 1031?
- Outcome: Approved (rights ruled like-kind; no gain or loss recognized except as required by the multiple-property rules)
- Key authorities: IRC § 1031 (pre-TCJA); Treas. Reg. § 1.1031(a)-2(c)(1); Treas. Reg. § 1.1031(j)-1; Treas. Reg. § 1.1031(k)-1
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201850014 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/14/2018 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1031.02-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------- ----------------------------, ID No. -------------
-------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------ ----------------------
------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------ CC:ITA:B05
PLR-110246-18
Date:
September 13, 2018
TY: -------
Legend
Taxpayer = -----------------------------------------------------------
State C = --------------
State C Act = ---------------------------------------------------
Product A = -------
Product B = --------
NAICS Code D = -----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
X years = -----------
E Distribution Agreement = -----------------------------------------------------------
F Distribution Agreement = -----------------------------------------------------------
----------------
Relinquished Distribution Rights #1 = -----------------------------------------------------------
Relinquished Distribution Rights #2 = -----------------------------------------------------------
-Relinquished Distribution Rights #3 = -----------------------------------------------------------
Replacement Distribution Rights #1 = ---------------------------------------------------
Replacement Distribution Rights #2 = -----------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
Replacement Distribution Rights #3 = -----------------------------------------------------------
Date 1 = ------------------------
Date 2 = ------------------------
Date 3 = ---------------------------
Date 4 = --------------------
Simultaneous Exchange Transferee = --------------------------------------------
Simultaneous Exchange Value = ----------------
Value of Relinquished Property = -----------------------------------
Value of Replacement Property = -------------------------------------
Debt = -----------------------------------
Qualified Intermediary = ------------------------------------------------
PLR-110246-18 2
Dear -----------------:
This is in response to a request for a private letter ruling dated March 23, 2018, and
submitted on behalf of Taxpayer by your authorized representative. Specifically,
Taxpayer is requesting a ruling on whether the exchange of certain distribution rights to
Products A and B for other distribution rights to Products A and B qualifies for the
deferral of gain under § 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.1
FACTS
Taxpayer is a Subchapter S corporation that uses a calendar year taxable year and the
accrual method as its overall method of accounting. Taxpayer is incorporated in State
C.
Taxpayer is in the business of wholesale distribution of Product A, Product B, and
related products. Taxpayer's occupation principally falls under NAICS Code D. To
conduct its business activities, Taxpayer is required to hold specific distribution rights
(aka "franchise rights") issued by the companies that produce Product A and Product B.
These distribution rights allow Taxpayer to distribute the companies' brands of such
products according to the companies' guidelines and in a defined geographical area.
To maintain a competitive edge, Taxpayer occasionally enters and exits from specific
markets, both geographically and with respect to certain brands, which requires the
disposition and replacement of their related distribution rights. The transactions at issue
in this ruling request primarily involve Products A and B distributed by Taxpayer under E
Distribution Agreement and F Distribution Agreement.
During the period between Date 1 and Date 3, the Taxpayer engaged in a series of
exchange transactions intended to meet the requirements of § 1031, all of which
involved the relinquishment, replacement, or simultaneous exchange of distribution
rights addressed under the occupation code in NAICS Code D. Three of the
transactions, which are specified in three separate purchase and sale and closing
documents (Relinquished Distribution Rights #1, Relinquished Distribution Rights #2,
and Relinquished Distribution Rights #3) involve the sale of distribution rights under E
Distribution Agreement and F Distribution Agreement used by Taxpayer in its trade or
business to three unrelated parties.
Three other transactions also specified in three separate purchase and sale and closing
documents (Replacement Distribution Rights #1, Replacement Distribution Rights #2,
and Replacement Distribution Rights #3) were purchases by Taxpayer of replacement
1
Because Taxpayer's transactions occurred prior to December 31, 2017, all references to § 1031 of the
Internal Revenue Code are to that section as it read prior to amendments made to § 1031 by § 13303 of
the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Pub. L. No. 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054 (2017).
PLR-110246-18 3
distribution rights in certain geographic areas to certain brands under E Distribution
Agreement and F Distribution Agreement for use by Taxpayer in its trade or business.
One additional transaction was a simultaneous exchange of Taxpayer's distribution
rights used in its trade or business for the distribution rights of an unrelated party for use
in Taxpayer's trade or business. This exchange occurred on Date 2 and was entered
into between Taxpayer and Simultaneous Exchange Transferee. The value of the
exchanged property was Simultaneous Exchange Value and there was no boot in that
particular exchange.
Taxpayer represents that the distribution rights that have been sold and are subject to
this ruling request have been held for at least X years and used in Taxpayer's trade or
business, and that all replacement distribution rights have been acquired for use in
Taxpayer's trade or business and are intended to be held for multiple years.
E Distribution Agreement is concerned with clarifying the brands and territories covered
in addition to specifying the rights and obligations of the parties. The obligations of the
producer in that Agreement to Taxpayer ("Distributor") include timely providing a certain
quantity of each product to Taxpayer, providing Taxpayer with details of advertising
undertaken by the producer regarding products subject to E Distribution Agreement,
providing the Taxpayer with written standards for handling and storage of the products
and assuring proper labeling of its products according to state and federal law. As
wholesale distributor, Taxpayer is obligated to comply with producer's best practices
including following concise directions for the storage of its products to assure their
freshness, maintenance of a fully staffed sales team trained to producer's standards,
retention of sufficient inventories, prompt delivery services to retailers, undergoing steps
to maintain the reputation and competitive position of the producer's brands, and
providing the regular submission of specific retail sales and retail account
documentation to producer.
The purpose of F Distribution Agreement is to expand the geographical territories to
which Taxpayer can distribute this producer's products. Taxpayer had previously
acquired distribution rights to this producer's products for different geographic territories
under a distribution agreement dated Date 4. The Purchase and Sales Agreement for
Replacement Distribution Rights #1 incorporated the distribution agreement dated Date
4 to address the rights and obligations of the Taxpayer and the producer under those
agreements for the expanded territory. This Distribution Agreement addressed the
applicable brands and territories covered by the earlier distribution agreement now
supplemented with newly acquired territories. This agreement spells out the obligations
of the "Distributor" (Taxpayer) and the producer, such as marketing, quality control, and
inventory maintenance.
PLR-110246-18 4
Taxpayer's submission includes documentation regarding the transactions including
purchase agreements, assignments to Qualified Intermediary of the purchase
agreements, brand and territory specifications and the closing statements.
Upon completing the final steps of the transactions, Taxpayer had relinquished a total
investment in the distribution rights which it had previously held approximately equal to
the Value of Relinquished Property, including the Simultaneous Exchange Value, which
is reflected in the selling prices of the relinquished distribution rights. Taxpayer received
in exchange a total investment in replacement distribution rights of approximately Value
of Replacement Property, including the Simultaneous Exchange Value, which difference
between the purchase price of the relinquished and replacement properties was paid
with a combination of the sales proceeds from the relinquished distribution rights plus
loans incurred from banks equal to Debt to pay the additional purchase price for the
replacement distribution rights.
In all cases where the subject exchanges of relinquished and replacement distribution
rights were deferred, the purchases and sales were accomplished by Taxpayer's
assignment of all purchase agreements, both for the relinquished and replacement
distribution rights, to Qualified Intermediary, a qualified intermediary, which conducted
the purchase and sales transactions for these exchanges.
Taxpayer represents that all exchanges were completed within 180 days and with the
relinquished and replacement distribution rights, where applicable, properly identified
within 45 days of Taxpayer's initial sale or purchase, whichever came first, of the
exchanged property.
Further, according to the submission, all the transactions occurred between Taxpayer
and various unrelated parties who acquired the distribution rights to be used in their
occupation likewise covered by NAICS Code D.
Taxpayer has requested a ruling that the relinquished distribution rights transferred by
Taxpayer in these transactions are like kind, within the meaning of § 1031 and the
regulations thereunder, including § 1.1031(a)-2(c)(1), to the replacement distribution
rights.2
LAW AND ANALYSIS
2
To the extent that the agreements involving the Relinquished Distribution Rights #1, #2, #3, the
Simultaneous Exchange, and the Replacement Distribution Rights #1, #2, #3 also involve the sale or
purchase of customer lists, goodwill, inventory and other property that is either excepted out from
§ 1031(a)(1) by § 1031(a)(2) (such as stock in trade or other property held primarily for sale) or by
§1.1031(a)-2(c)(2) (such as goodwill), Taxpayer will have to recognize gain or loss. This ruling is limited
to the distribution rights at issue in this request and does not purport to address the taxation of other
property covered by these agreements.
PLR-110246-18 5
Section 1031(a)(1) provides generally that no gain or loss shall be recognized on the
exchange of property held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment if
such property is exchanged solely for property of a like kind which is to be held either
for productive use in a trade or business or for investment.
Section 1031(a)(2)(A) provides that § 1031(a) nonrecognition does not apply to any
exchange of stock in trade or any other property held primarily for sale.
Section 1.1031(a)-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that as used in
§ 1031(a), the words "like kind" have reference to the nature or character of the property
and not to its grade or quality, and that an exchange of one kind or class of property for
a different kind or class is not a like-kind exchange.
Section 1.1031(a)-2(a) provides, in part, that personal properties of a like class are
considered to be of a "like kind" for purposes of § 1031, and an exchange of properties
of a like kind may qualify under § 1031 regardless of whether the properties are also of
a like class. In determining whether exchanged properties are of a like kind, no
inference is to be drawn from the fact that the properties are not of a like class. Further,
under § 1.1031(a)-2(b), depreciable tangible personal property is of a like class if they
are either within the same General Asset Class (as defined in § 1.1031(a)-2(b)(2)) or
within the same Product Class (as defined in § 1.1031(a)-2(b)(3)).
Section 1.1031(a)-2(c)(1) provides that an exchange of intangible personal property
qualifies for nonrecognition of gain or loss under § 1031 only if the exchanged intangible
properties are of a like kind. No like classes are provided for intangible properties.
Whether intangible personal property is of a like kind to other intangible personal
property generally depends on (i) the nature or character of the rights involved (e.g., a
patent or a copyright) and (ii) the nature or character of the underlying property to which
the intangible personal property relates.
Section 1.1031(a)-2(c)(2) provides that the goodwill or going concern value of a
business is not of a like kind to the goodwill or going concern value of another business.
Section 1.1031(a)-2(c)(3) illustrates the application of this paragraph (c) with the
following examples:
Example (1). Taxpayer K exchanges a copyright on a novel for a copyright on a different
novel. The properties exchanged are of a like kind.
Example (2). Taxpayer J exchanges a copyright on a novel for a copyright on a song.
The properties exchanged are not of a like kind.
Section 1.1031(j)-1(b) provides the rules for computing gain with respect to exchanges
of multiple properties qualifying for nonrecognition of gain or loss under § 1031. Section
1.1031(j)-1(b)(2) provides that to the extent possible the properties transferred and the
PLR-110246-18 6
properties received by the taxpayer in the exchange are separated into exchange
groups and a residual group. Each exchange group consists of the properties
transferred and received in the exchange, all of which are of a like kind or a like class.
A residual group is created if the aggregate fair market value of the properties
transferred in all of the exchange groups differs from the aggregate fair market value of
the properties received in all of the exchange groups. Section 1.1031(j)-1(b)(2)(iii).
Section 1.1031(j)-1(b)(3) provides that the amount of gain or loss realized with respect
of each exchange group and the residual group is the difference between the aggregate
fair market value of the properties transferred in that exchange group or residual group
and the properties' aggregate adjusted basis. The gain realized with respect to each
exchange group is recognized to the extent of the lesser of the gain realized and the
amount of the exchange group deficiency, if any. An exchange group deficiency is the
excess aggregate fair market value of the properties transferred in an exchange group
over the aggregate fair market value of the properties received (less the amount of any
excess assumed liabilities). The amount of gain or loss realized and recognized with
respect to property not within any exchange group or the residual group is determined
under § 1001 and other applicable provisions of the Code.
Although our office is unable to verify the correctness of the representations made by
Taxpayer concerning identification and receipt of the subject properties, we note that
§1.1031(k)-1(b)(2)(iii) provides that if, as part of the same deferred exchange, the
taxpayer transfers more than one relinquished property and the relinquished properties
are transferred on different dates, the identification period and the exchange period are
determined by reference to the earliest date on which any of the properties are
transferred. Section 1.1031(k)-1(c)(1) provides, in part, that any replacement property
that is received by the taxpayer before the end of the identification period will in all
events be treated as identified before the end of the identification period.
Here, Relinquished Distribution Rights #1, #2, and #3, and the Simultaneous Exchange
transaction were all completed within a couple of days of each other. Similarly,
Replacement Distribution Rights #1 and #3 were received by Taxpayer within a few
days of the relinquishment of the Relinquished Distribution Rights and within 45 days of
the earliest date on which any distribution rights were transferred. Pursuant to
§ 1.1031(k)-1(c)(1), the distribution rights under Replacement Distribution Rights #1 and
3 received by Taxpayer before the end of the identification period will be treated as
identified before the end of the identification period.
The distribution rights provided for under E Distribution Agreement and F Distribution
Agreement, which are the subject of the agreements in Relinquished Distribution Rights
1, #2, and #3 and the agreements in Replacement Distribution Rights #1, #2, and #3
are intangible property that grant rights to the distribution of Product A or Product B and
related products. Because Taxpayer has entered into a series of purchase and sales
agreements with counterparties pursuant to which Taxpayer relinquished or acquired
PLR-110246-18 7
certain distribution rights to Product A, Product B, and related products pursuant to E
Distribution Agreement and F Distribution Agreement, the only issue is whether the
agreements for Relinquished Distribution Rights #1, #2, and #3 and the agreements for
Replacement Distribution Rights #1, #2, and #3 are of a like kind. This depends on (i)
the nature or character of the rights involved and (ii) the nature or character of the
underlying property to which the agreements relate. Section 1.1031(a)-2(c)(1).
The agreements for Relinquished Distribution Rights #1, #2, and #3 and the
agreements for Replacement Distribution Rights #1, #2, and #3 are all in the nature of
Product A and Product B and related product distribution agreements. Distribution of
Product A and Product B is a single business activity. The terms of the agreements are
substantially similar, and any difference among them is a difference in grade or quality
(such as different brands or geographic localities). Accordingly, the nature or character
of the agreements for Relinquished Distribution Rights #1, #2, and #3 and the
agreements for Replacement Distribution Rights #1, #2, and #3 are of a like kind.
The second requirement for the agreements to be of a like kind under § 1.1031(a)-
2(c)(1) is that the underlying properties subject to these agreements must itself be of a
like kind. The underlying properties to which the intangible rights relate are Product A,
Product B, and related products, which are covered by NAICS Code D. Product A and
Product B and related products may be of different grade or quality, with different brand
names, appearances, ingredients, packaging, manufacturing processes, marketing
strategies, and sold in potentially different geographic areas. However, Product A and
Product B, and related products share a substantially similar distribution process to a
largely common set of customers (retailers of Product A, Product B and related
products) and which the retailers resell to their end customers who consume Product A,
Product B, and related products for a substantially similar purpose. Any differences
among Product A or Product B or the related products that are relevant to distribution
are differences in grade or quality, and not differences in nature or character.
Accordingly, the underlying property subject to the agreements for Relinquished
Distribution Rights #1, #2, and #3 and the agreements for Replacement Distribution
Rights #1, #2, and #3 is of a like kind.
RULING
The distribution rights transferred by Taxpayer in the agreements for Relinquished
Distribution Rights #1, #2, and #3 are of a like kind, within the meaning of § 1031, to the
distribution rights received by the Taxpayer under the agreements for Replacement
Distribution Rights #1, #2, and #3, and no gain or loss will be recognized by Taxpayer
on the exchange of rights under the agreements for Relinquished Distribution #1, #2,
and #3, and Replacement Distribution Rights #1, #2, and #3, except to the extent of
any gain required to be recognized under § 1.1031(j)-1(b)(3)(i).
CAVEATS
PLR-110246-18 8
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
Taxpayer should apply and the examiner should verify the correct application of
§ 1031(a)(2) and § 1.1031(a)-2(c)(2) concerning property that is excluded from the like-
kind property rules of § 1031. In addition, Taxpayer should apply and the examiner
should verify the matching of replacement property distribution rights with relinquished
property distribution rights for each transaction as well as the correct application of the
gain recognition provisions of § 1031(b) and § 1.1031(j)-1, and especially the extent of
any gain required to be recognized under § 1.1031(j)-1(b)(3)(i). This ruling will not
prevent assessments based on the taxability of boot received by Taxpayer.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.
Sincerely,
Shareen S. Pflanz
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 5
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)
Enclosure (1)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.