🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201845006 Released November 9, 2018 Approved

Adding a way to appoint an independent trustee will not trigger gift, estate, or GST tax

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An old irrevocable family trust gave certain sensitive powers (including the power to narrow or cancel a beneficiary's future control over where trust assets go) only to a trustee who was not also a beneficiary. The problem: the person the grantors expected to fill that "non-beneficiary trustee" seat declined to serve, so the only people actually serving as trustees were beneficiaries, and the trust document gave no method for appointing an independent trustee to hold those powers. A state court approved a modification adding a mechanism to appoint an independent bank as a limited "special trustee," conditioned on the IRS blessing the tax results. The trustee asked the IRS to confirm the fix would not backfire under three transfer taxes. The IRS agreed on all three: the change would not spoil the trust's grandfathered generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax status (its inclusion ratio), because it shifts no benefit to a younger generation; appointing the independent special trustee is not a taxable gift by the son beneficiary under § 2514; and later using those trustee powers to limit or eliminate the son's testamentary power of appointment would not count as the son exercising or releasing a general power of appointment under § 2041, so the trust assets stay out of his estate. In short, a purely administrative repair to the trust's governance carries no transfer-tax cost.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Will modifying the trust to add a method for appointing an independent special trustee (and appointing a bank to that role) affect the trust's GST inclusion ratio, cause a gift under § 2514, or pull the trust into the son's estate under § 2041?
  • Outcome: Approved (all three rulings favorable: no GST impact, no gift, no estate inclusion)
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. § 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i); IRC §§ 2041(a)(2), 2514, 2501, 2601; Treas. Reg. § 20.2041-1(b)(1)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                      Department of the Treasury
                                                              Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201845006                                             Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/9/2018                                       Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2501.00-00, 2601.00-00,
              2041.00-00                                      Person To Contact:
                                                              ---------------, ID No. -----------------
--------------------------                                    Telephone Number:
---------------------                                         --------------------
-----------------------------------------                     Refer Reply To:
                                                              CC:PSI:04
                                                              PLR-102752-18
Re: ---------------------------                               Date:
                                                               July 27, 2018




LEGEND

Date 1                            =    --------------------------
Grantor 1                         =    ---------------------------
Grantor 2                         =    -----------------------------------------------------------------
Trust                             =    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       ----------------------
Son                               =    -----------------------------------------------------------------
State                             =    ------------
Child 1                           =    -------------------------
Child 2                           =    ----------------
Daughter                          =    --------------------------------------------------
Bank 1                            =    -------------------------------------------
Bank 2                            =    ----------------------
Date 2                            =    -------------------
Court                             =    ---------------------------------------------------------
Statute 1                         =    -----------------------------------------------
Statute 2                         =    ---------------------------------------
Statute 3                         =    -------------------------------------------
Date 3                            =    ---------------------

Dear -------------:

       This letter responds to your authorized representative's letter dated
December 19, 2017, and subsequent correspondence, requesting estate, gift, and
generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax rulings with respect to the proposed modification
of Trust.

FACTS
PLR-102752-18                                  2

       The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:

       On Date 1, a date after September 25, 1985, Grantor 1 and Grantor 2
(collectively, Grantors) established an irrevocable trust, Trust, for the primary benefit of
Son. Trust is administered under the laws of State.

       Under Article II of Trust, during Son's lifetime, the Trustee shall pay or expend
and apply for the benefit of Son such sums from the principal and income of Trust as
the Trustee considers necessary or desirable from time to time for Son's medical care,
education, support or maintenance, in its sole and absolute discretion.

       Section 2.013 of Article II provides as follows:

              Any part, or all, of the then remaining principal of the Trust Estate,
       together with any accrued and undistributed income therefrom, shall be
       paid over, conveyed and distributed to [Son's] creditors or the creditors of
       his estate or such appointee or appointees among those of [Son's] lineal
       descendants who are living at the death of [Son] in such manner and in
       such proportions as he may appoint in and by his Last Will and
       Testament, . . .

       Under Section 2.015, in the event Son does not effectively appoint the remaining
trust estate under Section 2.013, then the Trustee shall divide the remainder into equal
but separate shares to existing trusts for Son's two children, Child 1 and Child 2.

       Article III, Section 3.09 provides the Trustee (other than any beneficiary) with
certain powers, including, but not limited to the following:

       Section 3.091 to create in a lineal descendant of the Grantor a testamentary
       general power of appointment within the meaning of IRC § 2041 [including the
       power the exercise of which requires the consent of the Trustee (other than any
       beneficiary)];

       Section 3.092 to limit a general power of appointment of a lineal descendant of
       the Grantor, as to all or part of such principal at any time prior to the death of
       such lineal descendant by narrowing the class to whom the powerholder may
       appoint the property subject to such appointment, so as to convert such power
       into a special power of appointment;

       Section 3.093 to eliminate such power for all or any part of such principal as to
       which such power was previously created;

              *      *      *       *      *
PLR-102752-18                                3



      Son and Daughter were named in the Trust agreement as the initial Co-Trustees.
However, Daughter declined to serve as Co-Trustee, never having signed the Trust
agreement and never having accepted such appointment.

        Article VIII, Section 8.01 provides that in the event Son or Daughter is removed,
dies, or for any reason is unwilling or unable to serve as Trustee, then Child 1 shall
serve as Successor Trustee with the surviving Co-Trustee. If Child 1 is removed, dies,
or for any reason is unwilling or unable to serve as Successor Trustee, then Bank 1, or
its successors in interest, shall serve as Co-Trustee with the remaining Trustee, or as
sole Trustee. After a series of acquisitions, Bank 2 is currently the successor in interest
of Bank 1.

       Although Grantors contemplated that Daughter would serve as a non-beneficiary
trustee of Trust at the time Trust was created, Daughter declined to accept such
appointment. As a result, Son and Child 1, who are both beneficiaries of Trust, are the
current Co-Trustees of Trust. Accordingly, there are no non-beneficiaries serving as a
trustee of Trust. The Trust agreement does not specifically provide a method for the
appointment of a non-beneficiary trustee (i.e., Special Trustee) for purposes of
Section 3.09 in the event both Son and Child 1 are serving despite the fact that the
provision expressly states that the powers set forth therein shall be exercised only by a
non-beneficiary trustee.

         Grantor 1 and Grantor 2 predeceased Son. It is represented that upon the death
of Grantor 1 and Grantor 2, a portion of each Grantor's estate was distributed to Trust.
It is also represented that each Grantor allocated his or her remaining GST exemption
to Trust so that Trust has an inclusion ratio of between one and zero.

      On Date 2, Son and Child 1, as the Co-Trustees of Trust, petitioned Court
seeking modification of Trust to add new Section 8.06 of Trust to provide a method for
appointing an independent special trustee who may exercise the powers set forth in
Section 3.09 of Trust, and to appoint Bank 2 as the independent special trustee under
new Section 8.06.

       Trust, as modified, provides as follows:

       Section 8.06 For any trust created herein, the person listed below shall
       serve as Special Trustee. The Special Trustee's duties shall be limited to
       the exercise of discretion given to a Trustee who is not a beneficiary under
       this trust, included, but not limited to, those powers set forth in
       Section 3.09 herein. The Special Trustee may receive reasonable
       compensation. Any Special Trustee may resign in the same manner set
       forth in ARTICLE VIII for other trustees. The initial Special Trustee shall
PLR-102752-18                                 4

       be [Bank 2], or its successor. If there is no successor Special Trustee
       appointed pursuant to the provisions hereof, a majority in number of the
       income beneficiaries, or during any period that such a beneficiary lacks
       legal capacity, the guardian of such beneficiary's estate, shall appoint as
       the successor Special Trustee any bank or trust company that shall have
       been licensed to engage in trust business for at least five (5) years
       immediately prior to such appointments and which shall then have capital
       and surplus of at least Twenty Million Dollars ($20,000,000).

      It is represented that Bank 2 is not related or subordinate to Grantor 1, Grantor 2,
Son, or Child 1.

       Statute 1 provides that a noncharitable irrevocable trust may be modified upon
consent of all the beneficiaries if a court concludes that modification is not inconsistent
with a material purpose of the trust.

       Statute 2 provides that a court may modify the terms of a trust in a manner that is
not contrary to the settlor's probable intention in order to achieve the settlor's tax
objectives. The court may provide that the modification has retroactive effect.

        Statute 3 provides that a court may appoint an additional trustee or special
fiduciary whenever the court considers the appointment necessary for the administration
of the trust.

       On Date 3, pursuant to State law, Court issued an Order granting the
modification of Section 8.06, as described in the petition, contingent upon the receipt of
a favorable letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service.

       The Trustee requests the following rulings:

        1. The proposed modification of Trust as set forth in the Order will not adversely
affect the GST inclusion ratio of Trust.

      2. Bank 2's acceptance and appointment to the office of Special Trustee of Trust
pursuant to the Order will not constitute the exercise or release of a general power of
appointment under § 2514 so as to constitute a gift by Son for federal gift tax purposes.

      3. The exercise of trustee powers, including those delineated in Sections 3.092
and 3.093 of Trust by Bank 2, or a successor Special Trustee, to limit or eliminate Son's
testamentary general power of appointment granted under Section 2.013 of Trust will
not constitute the exercise or release of a general power of appointment under
§ 2041(a)(2), and, as a result, the Trust assets will not be included in Son's gross estate
under § 2041(a)(2).
PLR-102752-18                                 5



LAW AND ANALYSIS

Ruling 1

      Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. The term
"generation-skipping transfer" is defined in § 2611 as a taxable distribution, a taxable
termination, and a direct skip.

       Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i) of the Generation Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations
provides rules for determining when a modification, judicial construction, settlement
agreement, or trustee action with respect to a trust that is exempt from the GST tax
under § 26.2601-1(b) will not cause the trust to lose its exempt status. Unless
specifically provided otherwise, the rules contained in this paragraph are applicable only
for purposes of determining whether an exempt trust retains its exempt status for GST
tax purposes. Thus, the rules do not apply in determining, for example, whether the
transaction results in a gift subject to gift tax, or may cause the trust to be included in
the gross estate of a beneficiary, or may result in the realization of gain for purposes of
§ 1001.

       Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i)(D)(1) provides that a modification of the governing
instrument of an exempt trust (including a trustee distribution, settlement, or
construction that does not satisfy § 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i)(A), (B), or (C)), by judicial
reformation, or nonjudicial reformation that is valid under applicable state law, will not
cause an exempt trust to be subject to the provisions of chapter 13, if the modification
does not shift a beneficial interest in the trust to any beneficiary who occupies a lower
generation (as defined in § 2651) than the person or persons who held the beneficial
interest prior to the modification, and the modification does not extend the time for
vesting of any beneficial interest in the trust beyond the period provided for in the
original trust.

       Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i)(D)(2) provides that for purposes of § 26.2601-1, a
modification of an exempt trust will result in a shift in beneficial interest to a lower
generation beneficiary if the modification can result in either an increase in the amount
of a GST transfer or the creation of a new GST transfer. To determine whether a
modification of an irrevocable trust will shift a beneficial interest in a trust to a
beneficiary who occupies a lower generation, the effect of the instrument on the date of
the modification is measured against the effect of the instrument in existence
immediately before the modification. If the effect of the modification cannot be
immediately determined, it is deemed to shift a beneficial interest in the trust to a
beneficiary who occupies a lower generation (as defined in § 2651) than the person or
persons who held the beneficial interest prior to the modification. A modification that is
administrative in nature that only indirectly increases the amount transferred (for
PLR-102752-18                                 6

example, by lowering administrative costs or income taxes) will not be considered to
shift a beneficial interest in the trust.

        No guidance has been issued concerning the modification of a trust that may
affect the status of a trust that is exempt from GST tax because sufficient GST
exemption was allocated to the trust to result in an inclusion ratio of zero. At a
minimum, a modification that would not affect the GST status of a grandfathered trust
should similarly not affect the exempt status of such a trust.

      In the instant case, it is represented that Grantor 1 and Grantor 2 allocated GST
exemption to Trust upon the distribution of their respective estates upon each
respective death. Accordingly, Trust has an inclusion ratio between one and zero.

       Pursuant to the Court's Order, under new Section 8.06, Bank 2 is named as
special trustee for the limited purpose of exercising the powers given to a non-
beneficiary trustee, including, but not limited to, powers set forth in Section 3.09 of
Trust. The proposed modification of Trust will not result in a shift of any beneficial
interest in the trust to any beneficiary who occupies a generation lower than the persons
holding the beneficial interests. Further, the proposed modification of Trust will not
extend the time for vesting of any beneficial interest in the modified Trust beyond the
period provided for in Trust. Accordingly, based on the facts submitted and the
representations made, we conclude that the proposed modification of Trust will not
adversely affect Trust's GST inclusion ratio.

Rulings 2 and 3

       Section 2041(a)(2) provides that the value of the gross estate shall include the
value of all property to the extent of any property with respect to which the decedent
has, at the time of death, a general power of appointment created after October 21,
1942, or with respect to which the decedent has at any time exercised or released a
power of appointment by a disposition that is of such nature that if it were a transfer of
property owned by the decedent the property would be includible in the decedent's
gross estate under §§ 2035 to 2038, inclusive.

        Section 2041(b)(1) defines the term "general power of appointment" as a power
that is exercisable in favor of the decedent, the decedent's estate, the decedent's
creditors, or the creditors of the decedent's estate.

       Section 20.2041-1(b)(1) provides, in part, if under the terms of the instrument, the
trustee or his successor has the power to appoint the principal of trust for the benefit of
individuals including himself, and the decedent has the unrestricted power to remove or
discharge the trustee at any time and appoint any other person including himself, the
decedent is considered as having a power of appointment. A power to amend only the
administrative provisions of a trust instrument, which cannot substantially affect the
PLR-102752-18                                 7

beneficial enjoyment of the trust property or income, is not a power of appointment.
However, the mere power of management, investment, custody of assets, or the power
to allocate receipts and disbursements as between income and principal, exercisable in
a fiduciary capacity, whereby the holder has no power to enlarge or shift any of the
beneficial interests therein except as an incidental consequence of the discharge of the
fiduciary duties is not a power of appointment.

      Section 2501(a)(1) imposes a tax, for each calendar year, on the transfer of
property by gift by any individual, resident or nonresident.

       Section 2511 provides that the tax imposed by § 2501 shall apply whether the
transfer is in trust or otherwise, whether the gift is direct or indirect, and whether the
property is real or personal, tangible or intangible.

       Section 2514(b) provides that the exercise or release of a general power of
appointment created after October 21, 1942, is deemed the transfer of property by the
individual possessing such power. Under § 2514(c), the term "general power of
appointment" is defined as a power which is exercisable in favor of the individual
possessing the power ("the possessor"), his estate, his creditors, or creditors of his
estate.

       In this case, Son and Child 1 have beneficial interests in Trust and are the
current Co-Trustees. Section 3.09 grants to a non-beneficiary trustee certain trustee
powers, including the power to limit or eliminate Son's testamentary general power of
appointment under Section 2.013. Prior to the modification, the terms of Trust did not
provide a method for appointing a non-beneficiary trustee who may exercise the powers
in Section 3.09 granted to only non-beneficiary trustees.

       The modification of Trust to add Section 8.06 to provide a method for appointing
an independent special trustee who may exercise the powers set forth in Section 3.09,
and to appoint Bank 2 as an independent special trustee with the authority to exercise
the powers set forth in Section 3.09 of Trust, does not change or transfer the interests of
Son during his lifetime, nor does it confer any new rights to any beneficiaries. Rather,
the modification provides a process for the powers set forth in Section 3.09 to be
administered by a non-beneficiary trustee (i.e., Special Trustee). The testamentary
power of appointment granted to Son in Section 2.013 occurs upon the death of Son,
and is not currently exercisable by Son. Son retains the same interest in Trust, both
before and after the modification.

       Accordingly, based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that Bank 2's acceptance and appointment to the office of Special Trustee of
Trust pursuant to the Order will not constitute the exercise or release of a general power
of appointment under § 2514 so as to constitute a gift by Son for federal gift tax
purposes. Further, we conclude that the exercise of trustee powers, including those
PLR-102752-18                                  8

delineated in Sections 3.092 and 3.093 of Trust by Bank 2, or a successor Special
Trustee, to limit or eliminate Son's testamentary general power of appointment granted
under Section 2.013 of Trust will not constitute the exercise or release of a general
power of appointment under § 2041(a)(2), and, as a result, the Trust assets will not be
included in Son's gross estate under § 2041(a)(2).

       Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.

      This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

         In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

      The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.



                                       Sincerely,

                                       Leslie H. Finlow

                                       Leslie H. Finlow
                                       Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 4
                                       Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                       (Passthroughs & Special Industries)



Enclosures (2)
      Copy for § 6110 purposes
      Copy of letter


cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.