🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201836001 Released September 7, 2018 Approved

Tax-free spin-off rulings for a foreign-parented group separating two businesses via a §355/§368(a)(1)(D) restructuring

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A privately held foreign parent company, sitting atop a worldwide group of subsidiaries, wanted to separate one line of business (the "Controlled Business") from another (the "Distributing Business") through a chain of internal distributions and transfers among its subsidiaries. It asked the IRS to confirm the restructuring would be a tax-free corporate division under IRC Section 355 and a tax-free "Type D" reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(D). The IRS recharacterized the multi-step deal as a distribution, a contribution, and a second distribution, then issued 16 rulings holding that no gain or loss is recognized at the key steps, with carryover basis, tacked holding periods, and earnings-and-profits allocations under the related Code and regulation provisions. The IRS expressly did not rule on the business-purpose, device, or 50-percent-acquisition (Section 355(e)) questions, leaving those to audit. For the group, the payoff is confirmation it can reshuffle these businesses without triggering corporate-level tax.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Do the proposed internal distributions and transfers qualify as tax-free under §§ 355 and 368(a)(1)(D), with the associated nonrecognition, basis, holding-period, and E&P consequences?
  • Outcome: Approved (16 favorable rulings; business-purpose, device, and § 355(e) issues expressly not addressed)
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 355, 368(a)(1)(D), 361, 362(b), 1032(a), 358, 312(h), 1223; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.358-1, 1.358-2, 1.312-10; Rev. Proc. 2017-52

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201836001 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/7/2018 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 355.01-00, 368.04-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------, ID No. ---------------
--------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------- -------------------
------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:B3
PLR-103863-18
Date:
May 31, 2018

Legend

Foreign Parent = ----------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------

FSub = -------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------

Distributing 2 = ------------------------------------------


Distributing 1 = -------------------------------------------


Controlled 2 = ----------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------

Controlled 1 = ---------------------------------------------


Country = ------------

State = ------------

FDE = --------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

DE -------------------------------------------

a = -------

b = ----

Distributing Business = -------------------------------------------------------------------


Controlled Business = -------------------------------------------------------------------


Continuing Relationships = ------------------------------------------------------------------


     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear ----------------:

This letter responds to your letter dated January 17, 2018, as supplemented by subsequent
submissions, requesting rulings on certain federal income tax consequences of a series of
proposed transactions described below. The information submitted in that letter and in
subsequent correspondence is summarized below.

This letter is issued pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2017-52, 2017-41 I.R.B. 283, regarding one or
more "Covered Transactions" as defined in § 2.03(1)(a) of Rev. Proc. 2017-52. This office
expresses no opinion as to any issue not specifically addressed by the rulings below.

The rulings contained in this letter are based on information submitted by the taxpayer and
accompanied by a penalties of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This
office has not verified any of the information submitted in support of the request for rulings.
Verification of the information may be required as part of the audit process.

This office has made no determination regarding whether Distribution 1, Contribution 1, and
Distribution 2 (each, defined in Ruling 1, below): (i) satisfies the business purpose
requirement of Treas. Reg. § 1.355-2(b); (ii) is used principally as a device for the
distribution of the earnings and profits of the distributing corporation or the controlled
corporation or both (see § 355(a)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code and Treas. Reg.
§ 1.355-2(d)); or (iii) is part of a plan (or series of related transactions) pursuant to which
one or more persons will acquire directly or indirectly stock representing a 50-percent or
greater interest in the distributing corporation or the controlled corporation, or any
predecessor or successor of the distributing corporation or the controlled corporation,
within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.355-8T (see § 355(e)(2)(A)(ii) and Treas. Reg.
§ 1.355-7).

                                         Facts

Foreign Parent is a privately held entity organized under the laws of Country and
classified as a corporation for federal tax purposes. Foreign Parent is the parent
corporation of a worldwide group of foreign and domestic affiliates (the Foreign Parent
Group). The following describes the relevant corporate structure of the Foreign Parent
Group immediately before the Proposed Transactions (defined below).

Foreign Parent directly owns all of the issued and outstanding stock of FSub, an entity
organized under the laws of Country and classified as a corporation for federal tax
purposes.

FSub directly owns all of the issued and outstanding stock of Distributing 2, an entity
organized under the laws of Country and classified as a corporation for federal tax
purposes.

Distributing 2 directly owns a percent of the issued and outstanding stock of
Distributing 1, a State limited liability company that is classified as a corporation for
federal tax purposes. The remaining b percent of the issued and outstanding stock of
Distributing 1 is directly owned by FDE, an entity organized under the laws of Country
and classified as an entity that is disregarded as separate from its owner for federal tax
purposes, and is wholly owned by Distributing 2. Distributing 1 is the common parent of
a group of affiliated corporations that join in filing a consolidated federal income tax
return which includes Controlled 1 (described below).

Distributing 1 directly owns a percent of the issued and outstanding stock of
Controlled 1, a State limited liability company that is classified as a corporation for
federal tax purposes. The remaining b percent of the issued and outstanding stock of
Controlled 1 is directly owned by DE, a State limited liability company classified as an
entity that is disregarded as separate from its owner for federal tax purposes, and is
wholly owned by Distributing 1. At all times relevant to the Proposed Transactions, DE
has no liabilities and its sole asset is the Controlled 1 stock.

Distributing 2 also directly owns all of the issued and outstanding stock of Controlled 2,
an entity organized under the laws of Country and classified as a corporation for federal
tax purposes.

For purposes of satisfying the active trade or business requirements of § 355,
Distributing 1 and Distributing 2 will rely on the Distributing Business, and Controlled 1
and Controlled 2 will rely on the Controlled Business. Financial information has been
submitted indicating that each of the Distributing Business and the Controlled Business
has had gross receipts and operating expenses representing the active conduct of a
trade or business for each of the past five years.

The Foreign Parent Group has engaged in Continuing Relationships.

                              Proposed Transactions

The following transactions will occur to separate the Controlled Business from the
Distributing Business (such steps, the "Proposed Transactions"):

(i) Distributing 2 distributes all its stock in Controlled 2 to FSub;

(ii) Distributing 1 distributes all its stock in Controlled 1 and ownership interests in
DE to Distributing 2 and FDE, respectively;

(iii) FDE distributes all its ownership interests in DE to Distributing 2; and

(iv) Pursuant to Country law, Distributing 2 transfers all its stock in Controlled 1
and ownership interests in DE to Controlled 2 in exchange for no
consideration.

Following the Proposed Transactions, the Foreign Parent Group will engage in
Continuing Relationships. Distributing 1 represents that these agreements will reflect
arm's length terms and conditions and will not be inconsistent with the overall
separation of the Distributing Business and the Controlled Business.

                                  Representations

With respect to Distribution 1, Contribution 1, and Distribution 2 (each, as defined in
Ruling 1, below), except as set forth below, Distributing 1 has made all of the
representations in § 3 of the Appendix to Rev. Proc. 2017-52:

  (1) Distributing 1 has made the following alternative representations set forth in
  § 3 of the Appendix to Rev. Proc. 2017-52:

          Representations 3(a), 8(a), 11(a), 15(a), 22(a), 31(a), and 41(a).

  (2) Distributing 1 has not made the following representations, which do not apply
  to the Proposed Transactions:

          (a) Representations 7, 17, 19, 20, 24, 25, and 35;

          (b) Representation 18 (with respect to Distribution 1); and

          (c) Representations 36, 37, 38, and 39 (each, with respect to
          Distribution 2).

  (3) Distributing 1 has made the following modified representations:

          All representations include the language "deemed" where applicable (with
          respect to Distribution 2).

                                      Rulings

Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we rule as follows
with respect to the Proposed Transactions:

   1.      For federal income tax purposes, the Proposed Transactions will be

treated as if:

  (i)     Distributing 1 distributes all of the Controlled 1 stock to Distributing 2
          ("Distribution 1");

  (ii)    Distributing 2 contributes all of the Controlled 1 stock to Controlled 2 in
          exchange for Controlled 2 stock ("Contribution 1"); and

  (iii)   Distributing 2 distributes all of the Controlled 2 stock to FSub
          ("Distribution 2").

   Distribution 1

  2.       No gain or loss will be recognized by Distributing 1 on Distribution 1

(§ 355(c)(1)).

   3.      No gain or loss will be recognized by (and no amount will be included in

the income of) Distributing 2 on its receipt of Controlled 1 stock in Distribution 1
(§ 355(a)(1)).

   4.      The aggregate basis of the Distributing 1 stock and the Controlled 1 stock

in the hands of Distributing 2 immediately after Distribution 1 will be the same as the
aggregate basis of the Distributing 1 stock held by Distributing 2 immediately before
Distribution 1 (§ 358(a) and Treas. Reg. § 1.358-1(a)). Such basis will be allocated
between the Distributing 1 stock and the Controlled 1 stock in proportion to the fair
market value of each in accordance with Treas. Reg. § 1.358-2(a)(2) (§§ 358(b)(2) and
(c)).

   5.      The holding period of the Controlled 1 stock received by Distributing 2 in

Distribution 1 will include the holding period of the Distributing 1 stock with respect to
which Distribution 1 is made, provided that such Distributing 1 stock is held as a capital
asset on the date of Distribution 1 (§ 1223(1)).

  6.      Earnings and profits will be allocated between Distributing 1 and

Controlled 1 in accordance with § 312(h), Treas. Reg. §§ 1.312-10(b) and Treas. Reg.
§ 1.1502-33(e)(3).

   Contribution 1 and Distribution 2

    7.    Contribution 1, followed by Distribution 2, will qualify as a reorganization

within the meaning of § 368(a)(1)(D). Distributing 2 and Controlled 2 will each be "a
party to a reorganization" within the meaning of § 368(b).

  8.      No gain or loss will be recognized by Distributing 2 on Contribution 1

(§ 361(a)).

  9.     No gain or loss will be recognized by Controlled 2 on Contribution 1

(§ 1032(a)).

   10.    The basis of the Controlled 1 stock received by Controlled 2 in

Contribution 1 will equal the basis of such stock in the hands of Distributing 2
immediately before Contribution 1 (§ 362(b)).

   11.    The holding period of the Controlled 1 stock received by Controlled 2 in

Contribution 1 will include the period during which Distributing 2 held such stock
(§ 1223(2)).

   12.   No gain or loss will be recognized by (and no amount will be included in

the income of) FSub on its receipt of Controlled 2 stock in Distribution 2 (§ 355(a)(1)).

  13.      No gain or loss will be recognized by Distributing 2 on Distribution 2

(§ 361(c)(1)).

   14.     The aggregate basis of the Distributing 2 stock and the Controlled 2 stock

in the hands of FSub immediately after Distribution 2 will be the same as the aggregate
basis of the Distributing 2 stock held by FSub immediately before Distribution 2
(§ 358(a) and Treas. Reg. § 1.358-1(a)). Such basis will be allocated between the
Distributing 2 stock and the Controlled 2 stock in proportion to the fair market value of
each in accordance with Treas. Reg. § 1.358-2(a)(2) (§§ 358(b)(2) and (c)).

   15.     The holding period of the Controlled 2 stock received by FSub in

Distribution 2 will include the holding period of the Distributing 2 stock with respect to
which Distribution 2 is made, provided that such Distributing 2 stock is held as a capital
asset on the date of Distribution 2 (§ 1223(1)).

   16.     As provided in § 312(h), proper allocation of earnings and profits between

Distributing 2 and Controlled 2 will be made under Treas. Reg. § 1.312-10(a).

                                    CAVEATS

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax treatment of the proposed transactions under any provision of the Code and
regulations or the tax treatment of any condition existing at the time of, or effects
resulting from, the Proposed Transactions that is not specifically addressed by this
letter.

                         PROCEDURAL STATEMENTS

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the federal income tax return of each
taxpayer involved for the taxable year in which the transaction covered by this ruling
letter is consummated. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may
satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date
and control number of the letter ruling.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representatives.

                                    Sincerely,


                                    Russell P. Subin
                                    Senior Counsel, Branch 3
                                    Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.