New parent received 60 days to waive a consolidated NOL carryback
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A newly formed corporation acquired the old common parent of a consolidated group in a reverse acquisition and became the group's new common parent. The group later sustained a consolidated net operating loss and timely filed its return consistently with an intended election to relinquish the entire carryback period, but the required election statement was omitted. The new parent relied on a qualified tax professional and requested relief before the IRS discovered the failure. The group represented that none of the loss had been or would be carried back. The IRS granted 60 days to file the election and amend the return, subject to aggregate tax liability not being lower than under a timely election. Any otherwise applicable penalties and interest remained in effect.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the new parent file a late election to waive the group's entire consolidated NOL carryback period?
- Outcome: Approved, with a 60-day filing period and a no-lower-tax condition.
- Key authorities: IRC § 172(b)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i), 1.1502-75(d)(3), 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201825002 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/22/2018 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1502.21-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------ -------------------------, ID No. -----------------
------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------------- ----------------------
------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:3
PLR-103789-18
Date:
March 28, 2018
Legend
Old Parent = --------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
New Parent = -------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
State A = --------------
Date 1 = ----------------------
Date 2 = --------------------------
Date 3 = ------------------
Date 4 = ---------------------------
Company Official = ------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax Professional = ---------------
-----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLR-103789-18 2
Dear -------------:
We respond to a letter dated February 2, 2018, submitted on behalf of New Parent,
requesting an extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an election. The extension is being
requested for New Parent to make an election under § 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) to relinquish
the entire carryback period for the consolidated net operating loss (“CNOL”), for the tax
year ending Date 3, of the consolidated group of which Old Parent was the common
parent through Date 2 and of which New Parent was the common parent after Date 2
(the “Election”). Additional information was submitted in a letter dated March 15, 2018.
The material information submitted for consideration is summarized below.
New Parent was formed on Date 1 under the laws of State A. Prior to Date 1, Old
Parent was the common parent of a consolidated group (“the Group”). On Date 2, New
Parent acquired 100 percent of the outstanding stock of Old Parent (the “Stock
Transfer”). The Stock Transfer qualified as a reverse acquisition pursuant to § 1.1502-
75(d)(3). Accordingly, pursuant to § 1.1502-75(d)(3)(i)(b), New Parent became the new
common parent of the Group, and pursuant to § 1.1502-75(d)(3)(v), New Parent’s tax
year closed on Date 2 and New Parent adopted the tax year of Old Parent.
The Group sustained a CNOL in the tax year ended on Date 3. New Parent intended to
relinquish the carryback period for the Group’s CNOL for the tax year ended on Date 3.
The return was timely filed, consistent with a valid election having been made.
However, for various reasons, a valid election was not filed. After Date 4, the date the
Election was due, it was discovered that a valid election had not been filed.
Subsequently, this request was submitted for an extension of time to file a valid election.
New Parent has represented that the Group is not seeking to alter a return position for
which an accuracy related penalty has been or could be imposed under § 6662 at the
time New Parent requested relief (taking into account any qualified amended return filed
within the meaning of § 1.6664-2(c)(3)) and for which the new return position requires or
permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested.
We have received representations from appropriate parties that none of the Group's
CNOL for the tax year ended on Date 3 has been carried back, nor will be carried back,
to a prior consolidated return of the Group nor to a separate return, if any, of any
member of the Group.
Section 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) provides that a consolidated group may make an irrevocable
election under § 172(b)(3) to relinquish the entire carryback period with respect to a
CNOL for any consolidated return year. The election is made in a separate statement
entitled “THIS IS AN ELECTION UNDER § 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) TO WAIVE THE ENTIRE
CARRYBACK PERIOD PURSUANT TO SECTION 172(b)(3) FOR THE [insert
consolidated return year] CNOLs OF THE CONOLIDATED GROUP OF WHICH [insert
PLR-103789-18 3
name and employer identification number of common parent] IS THE COMMON
PARENT.” Section 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) also provides that the statement must be filed
with the group’s income tax return for the consolidated return year in which the loss
arises.
Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H and I.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will
use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election.
Section 301.9100-1(a). Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for
making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making
regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2. Requests for
relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to
establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably
and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the
government. Section 301.9100-3(a).
In this case, the time for filing the Election is fixed by the regulations (i.e., § 1.1502-
21(b)(3)(i)). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-
1 to grant an extension of time for New Parent to file the Election, provided New Parent
establishes it acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1
and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the
government.
Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by New Parent, Company Official,
and Tax Professional explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to timely file
a valid election. The information establishes that New Parent reasonably relied on a
qualified tax professional who failed to make, or advise New Parent to make, the
Election, and that the request for relief was filed before the failure to timely make the
Election was discovered by the Internal Revenue Service. See §§ 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i)
and (v).
Based on the facts and circumstances, including the representations made, we
conclude that New Parent has shown it acted reasonably and in good faith, the
requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not
prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, an extension of time is granted
under § 301.9100-1, until 60 days from the date on this letter, for New Parent to file the
Election with respect to the relinquishment of the entire carryback period for the CNOL
for the tax year ending on Date 3, as described above.
The above extension of time is conditioned on the taxpayers’ (New Parent’s and the
members of its consolidated group) tax liability (if any) being not lower, in the aggregate,
PLR-103789-18 4
for all years to which the Election applies, than it would have been if the Election had
been timely made (taking into account the time value of money). No opinion is
expressed as to the taxpayers’ tax liability for the years involved. A determination
thereof will be made by the Director’s office upon audit of the Federal income tax
returns involved.
New Parent must file the Election in accordance with § 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i). The Group’s
return for the tax year ending Date 3, having been filed consistent with a valid election
having been made, must be amended to attach the election statement required by
§ 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i). A copy of this letter must be attached to the election statement.
Alternatively, if the Group files its returns electronically, New Parent may satisfy this
latter requirement by attaching a statement to its return that provides the date on and
control number of this letter ruling.
We express no opinion as to the tax effects or consequences of filing the election late
under the provisions of any other section of the Code and regulations, or as to the tax
treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or resulting from, filing the election
late that are not specifically set forth in the above ruling.
For purposes of granting relief under § 301.9100-1, we relied on certain statements and
representations made by New Parent, Old Parent, Company Official, and Tax
Professional. However, the Director should verify all essential facts. Moreover,
notwithstanding that an extension is granted under § 301.9100-1 to file the election,
penalties and interest that would otherwise be applicable if any, continue to apply.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to the power of attorney on file in this office, copies of this letter are being sent
to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Ken Cohen
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.