🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201820014 Released May 18, 2018 Approved

Taxpayer received extra time for mixed straddle election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A limited liability company intended to make its customary election to establish mixed straddle accounts for foreign currency contracts held through a foreign partnership. Confusion among the company's finance officer, accounting firm, and adviser caused Form 7004 to be filed electronically without the required Form 6781 election. The IRS found reasonable cause for the missed deadline under Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1). It granted 30 days from the ruling date to make the election in the prescribed manner with the IRS official having audit jurisdiction.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the taxpayer have reasonable cause to receive a late mixed straddle account election?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 30 days to make the election.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1092(b); Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.1092(b)-4T.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201820014 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/18/2018 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1092.05-02, 1092.05-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------------- ------------------------, ID No. -----------------
------------------------------------------------ -----------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------- ----------------------
------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:FIP:B02
PLR-128469-17
Date:
January 25, 2018

Taxpayer = -----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Entity 1 = ----------------------
Entity 2 = ---------------------------------------
Entity 3 = --------------------------------------
Accounting Firm = -----------------------------------------
Advisor = ---------------------------
Year 1 = -----------------------------------------------------------
Year 2 = -----------------------------------------------------------
Date 1 = ----------------------
Date 2 = ----------------------
Month = -------
State = --------------
Services = -----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
Foreign Currency Contracts = -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------

Dear ---------------:

    This is in reply to a letter dated September 15, 2017, submitted on behalf of

Taxpayer by its authorized representative. Taxpayer requests an extension of time to
file an election under section 1092(b) of the Internal Revenue Code and section
1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) of the Temporary Income Tax Regulations to establish one or more
mixed straddle accounts for Year 2.

PLR-128469-17 2

                                        FACTS

   Taxpayer is a State limited liability corporation and is affiliated with Entity 1, a

firm providing Services. Taxpayer makes foreign investments through Entities 2 and 3.
Entity 2 is wholly owned by Taxpayer and is classified as a foreign corporation for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. Entity 3 is 99 percent owned by Taxpayer and one
percent owned by Entity 2, and is classified as a foreign partnership for U.S. federal
income tax purposes.

    Taxpayer has historically made elections to establish mixed straddle accounts by

filing Form 6781, Gains and Losses from Section 1256 Contracts and Straddles
(“Form 6781”), with its timely filed Form 7004, Application for Automatic Extension of
Time to File Certain Business Income Tax, Information and Other Returns (“Form
7004”) for its immediately preceding tax year. The election is made by Taxpayer as the
owner of Entity 3, the entity entering into Foreign Currency Contracts, with respect to
which the mixed straddle account elections are made, and which does not file its own
U.S. federal income tax return.

   Entity 1 has an internal tax department that provides tax and related services to

Taxpayer. In connection with their activities, Entity 1 engaged Accounting Firm and
Advisor to provide tax compliance services as well as tax advice. Among Accounting
Firm’s responsibilities under its engagement was the preparation of requests for
extensions of time to file tax returns for various entities affiliated with Entity 1, including
Taxpayer, and Taxpayer’s mixed straddle account election. Accounting Firm’s normal
procedure was to prepare Form 7004, Form 6781, and the election statement required
by Form 6781 and forward them to Taxpayer for signature and paper filing. With
respect to Taxpayer, Advisor reviews the extension request and election, coordinates
signatures, and assists with filing.

    For Year 2, Taxpayer, as it had in prior years, intended to make an election to

establish one or more mixed straddle accounts associated with the Foreign Currency
Contracts held by Entity 3. The Form 7004 extension for Taxpayer’s Year 1 federal
income tax return (“Year 1 Form 7004”) and Form 6781 mixed straddle account election
with required election statement for Year 2 (“Year 2 Form 6781”) were both due to be
filed no later than Date 2. In contrast to prior years, however, Accounting Firm
determined it was feasible to file Year 1 Form 7004 and Year 2 Form 6781
electronically. As such, Accounting Firm prepared Year 1 Form 7004 and Year 2 Form
6781 and emailed them along with filing instructions to Advisor and Entity 1’s Vice
President of Finance (“VP Finance”) for review and signature.

   The filing instructions that Accounting Firm sent to Advisor and VP Finance

indicated that Accounting Firm would file Year 1 Form 7004 and Year 2 Form 6781
electronically. VP Finance, however, stated to both Accounting Firm and Advisor in an
email on Date 1 that Year 1 Form 7004 had already been paper filed by Entity 1.

PLR-128469-17 3

Although VP Finance indicated that Year 1 Form 7004 had already been paper filed, in
the midst of filing multiple Forms 7004 for other Entity 1 affiliates, Accounting Firm
inadvertently filed an electronic Year 1 Form 7004 for Taxpayer that did not include
Year 2 Form 6781. When Advisor tried to obtain a copy of the confirmation that Year 1
Form 7004 and Year 2 Form 6781 had been timely filed in Month of Year 2, it was
discovered that an error had been made. The Year 1 Form 7004 and accompanying
Year 2 Form 6781 had not been paper filed by Entity 1 as VP Finance believed. Rather,
Year 1 Form 7004 had been electronically filed by Accounting Firm, but without Year 2
Form 6781.

                              LAW AND ANALYSIS

  Section 1.1092(b)-4T(a) generally permits a taxpayer to elect (in accordance with

paragraph (f) of section 1.1092(b)-4T) to establish one or more “mixed straddle
accounts.” Section 1.1092(b)-4T(b) defines a mixed straddle account to mean an
account for determining gains and losses from all positions held as capital assets in a
designated class of activities by the taxpayer at the time the taxpayer elects to establish
a mixed straddle account.

    Section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) generally provides that, except as otherwise provided,

the election to establish one or more mixed straddle accounts for a taxable year must
be made by the due date (without regard to any extensions) of the taxpayer's income
tax return for the immediately preceding taxable year (or part thereof). Section
1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) further provides that if a taxpayer begins trading or investing in
positions in a new class of activities during a taxable year, the election with respect to
the new class of activities must be made by the taxpayer by the later of the due date of
the taxpayer’s income tax return for the immediately preceding taxable year (without
regard to any extensions), or 60 days after the first mixed straddle in the new class of
activities is entered into.

   Section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) also provides that if an election is made after the time

specified above, the election will be permitted only if the Commissioner concludes that
the taxpayer had reasonable cause for failing to make a timely election. Because
section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) provides specific guidance about making a late mixed
straddle account election, the rules generally applicable to late elections described in
section 301.9100-3 do not apply to this late mixed straddle account election.

                                 CONCLUSION

   Based on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that Taxpayer

has shown reasonable cause for failing to make a timely election under
section 1.1092(b)-4T(f). Therefore, we grant Taxpayer’s request for an extension of
time to make the election under section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) for Year 2. This extension
will expire 30 days from the date of this letter. The election must be made in the

PLR-128469-17 4

manner prescribed in section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(2) and filed with the Director having audit
jurisdiction over Taxpayer’s U.S. Federal income tax return.

   Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed or implied as to

the tax treatment of any transactions under the provisions of any other sections of the
Code or Regulations which may be applicable thereto, or the tax treatment of any
conditions existing at the time of or effects resulting from the transaction. Specifically,
no opinion is expressed concerning whether the positions designated by Taxpayer as
mixed straddle accounts are permissible designations under section 1.1092(b)-4T(b)(2).

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of

the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

     In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

                                   Sincerely,



                                   John W. Rogers III
                                   Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 2
                                   Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Financial Institutions & Products)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.