🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201814005 Released April 6, 2018 Approved

Trust modifications preserve GST status without gifts or gain

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An irrevocable trust with a zero generation-skipping transfer tax inclusion ratio was modified to protect two beneficiaries with medical or capacity concerns. The changes replaced a grandchild's mandatory income and withdrawal rights with trustee discretion, separate accounting for accumulated income, and corresponding testamentary general powers of appointment. A contingent remainder for another incapacitated beneficiary would instead pass through a special-needs trust, with the remainder going to a foundation. The IRS concluded that the changes did not shift beneficial interests to a lower generation or extend vesting, so the trust kept its GST tax status. It also ruled that no beneficiary made a taxable gift and that neither the trust nor any beneficiary recognized gain or loss.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would the court-approved trust modifications change GST tax status, create gifts, or trigger gain or loss?
  • Outcome: Approved; none of those tax consequences resulted.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 61, 1001, 2501, 2601, 2611, and 2651; Treas. Reg. § 26.2601-1(b)(4).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201814005 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/6/2018 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1001.00-00, 2501.00-00,
2601.00-00 Person To Contact:
----------------, ID No. ------------------
----------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------ ----------------------
------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------------------------- CC:PSI:04
----------------------------- PLR-121371-17
Date:
Re: ------------------------------------------------------- December 13, 2017


LEGEND

Grantor = ------------------------
Trust = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
-------------------------
Date 1 = -------------------
Date 2 = --------------------
Date 3 = -----------------------
Date 4 = --------------------
State = ----------
Spouse = ---------------------------
Child 1 = ---------------------------
Child 2 = ----------------------------
Child 3 = --------------------------
Child 4 = ---------------------------
Grandchild = ----------------------------
Court = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Foundation = ---------------------------------------------
Statute 1 = -----------------------------------------------------
Statute 2 = -------------------------------------------------
Statute 3 = ------------------------------------------------

Dear -------------------:

   This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated July 7, 2017,

requesting income, gift, and generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax rulings with respect
to the proposed modification of Trust.

FACTS

   The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:

   Grantor established an irrevocable trust, Trust, on Date 1 (a date after

September 25, 1985). Grantor made an initial transfer of cash to Trust on Date 1. No
transfers have been made to Trust since Date 1. Trust is administered under the laws
of State. Child 2 is the current trustee (Trustee) of Trust.

    It is represented that sufficient generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exemption

was allocated to Trust so that Trust has an inclusion ratio of zero. No assets have been
directly or constructively added to Trust since the allocation of Grantor’s GST exemption
to Trust. It is also represented that Grantor has retained no ownership interest in Trust
or its assets and no aspects of ownership over Trust or its assets.

    Under Article I of Trust, the Trustee is to pay income and principal of Trust to or

for the benefit of Spouse for her maintenance in health and reasonable comfort, and to
pay income and principal to or for the benefit of Child 1 or Child 1’s descendants for
their maintenance in health and reasonable comfort and education. Under Paragraph
1.6 of Article I, upon the death of survivor of Spouse and Child 1, Trust assets are to be
distributed pursuant to a limited power of appointment held by Child 1 to or for the
benefit of any of Grantor’s descendants (excluding Child 1) or the spouses of such
descendants. Under Paragraph 1.7 of Article I, any part of Trust not effectively
appointed is to be distributed to the then living descendants of Child 1 or, if none, then
per stirpes to Grantor’s descendants. Any assets to be distributed to either Child 2 or
Child 4 are to be distributed to the separate trusts created contemporaneously for their
respective benefit by Grantor with terms nearly identical to Trust. Any assets distributed
to Child 3 are to be held in further trust under the same terms as for Child 1.

   Article II directs the Trustee to administer assets held in trust for a grandchild of

Grantor as a separate trust. Under Paragraph 2.1 of Article II, the Trustee is to pay
income to the grandchild not less frequently than annually, except while the grandchild
is under age 21, the Trustee is to pay income to or for the benefit of the grandchild for
the grandchild’s maintenance in health and reasonable comfort and education, and any
income not so paid will be added to principal. Under Paragraph 2.2 of Article II, the
Trustee also is to pay principal to or for the benefit of the grandchild as the Trustee
deems necessary for the grandchild’s maintenance in health and reasonable comfort
and education.

  Under Paragraph 2.3 of Article II, the grandchild has the right to withdraw up to

one-half of the principal upon written request after reaching age 25, and all of the
remaining Trust assets after reaching age 30.

    Under Paragraph 2.4 of Article II, upon the death of the grandchild, any

remaining Trust assets subject to the grandchild’s right of withdrawal are to be
distributed pursuant to the grandchild’s testamentary general power of appointment.
Any remaining Trust assets not subject to the grandchild’s right of withdrawal are to be
distributed pursuant to the grandchild’s testamentary limited power of appointment to or
for the benefit of any of Grantor’s descendants (excluding the grandchild) or the
spouses of such descendants. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any portion of the Trust
assets is otherwise subject to GST tax, then such portion of the Trust assets is to be
distributed pursuant to the grandchild’s testamentary power of appointment to or for the
benefit of any of Grantor’s descendants (excluding the grandchild), the spouses of such
descendants, and the creditors of the grandchild’s estate.

    Under Paragraph 2.5 of Article II, any part of Trust not effectively appointed is to

be distributed per stirpes to the then living descendants of the grandchild or, if none,
then per stirpes to the descendants of the grandchild’s parent who is also a descendant
of Grantor, or if none, then per stirpes to Grantor’s descendants. Any assets to be
distributed to either Child 2 or Child 4 are to be distributed to the separate trusts created
contemporaneously for their respective benefit by Grantor with terms nearly identical to
Trust. Any assets distributable to Child 3 are held in further trust under the same terms
as for Child 1.

    Pursuant to Paragraph 6.8 of Article VI, Trust shall not continue for more than the

limited period permitted by the applicable rule against perpetuities. Any property still
held in trust at the expiration of that period shall immediately be distributed to the
income beneficiaries in the proportions to which they are entitled. On the date of Trust’s
formation, Date 1, the applicable State law regarding the rule against perpetuities
provided that a nonvested property interest was invalid unless, at the time the interest
was created, it was certain to vest or terminate no later than 21 years after the death of
an individual then alive, or the interest either vests or terminates within 90 years after its
creation. Statute 1. Thus, as of Date 1, the termination date of Trust, if not terminated
earlier by the death of all of Grantor’s descendants, was 90 years from the date of
creation, or Date 2.

   Spouse and Child 1 predeceased Grantor. Child 1 was survived by one child,

Grandchild. Grandchild’s mother is also deceased. Grandchild recently attained 18
years of age and until Grandchild’s 18th birthday, Child 4 served as guardian of the
person and property of Grandchild. Grandchild has no descendants. Grandchild was
diagnosed with a medical condition which makes Grandchild not capable of managing
specific financial matters, such as managing money, budgeting, or tracking expenses,
without assistance.

  Child 3 is an incapacitated adult and is a resident at a medical facility. Grantor

and Child 4 serve as the guardians of the person and property of Child 3. Child 3 has
no descendants.

   On Date 3, the Trustee submitted a petition to Court, seeking modification of

certain terms of Trust to ensure that Trust serves Grantor’s primary purpose of
preserving Trust assets for Grantor’s descendants and protecting trust assets from the
claims of creditors. A guardian ad litem was appointed by Court to represent
Grandchild.

    The petition seeks to modify the terms of Trust (Reformed Trust) as follows:

(1) convert Grandchild’s mandatory income distribution beginning at age 21 to a
discretionary distribution of income standard; (2) provide that the Trustee will set aside
any income not distributed to Grandchild beginning at the age of 21 years in a separate
account and distribute the entire amount remaining in such separate account to
Grandchild’s estate at the death of Grandchild; (3) remove Grandchild’s unilateral right
to withdraw up to one-half of the value of the Trust principal after reaching the age of 25
years but prior to reaching age 30 years; (4) grant Grandchild a testamentary general
power of appointment to appoint up to one-half the value of Trust principal to the
creditors of Grandchild’s estate if Grandchild dies after reaching the age of 25 years but
prior to reaching age 30 years; (5) remove Grandchild’s unilateral right to withdraw up to
the entire value of the Trust principal after reaching the age of 30 years; and (6) grant
Grandchild a testamentary general power of appointment to appoint up to the entire
value of the Trust principal after reaching the age of 30 years.

   Specifically, Paragraph A of Article III of Reformed Trust provides:

   The Trustee, at any time and from time to time, in the exercise of the
   Trustee’s discretion, may pay or distribute to or for the benefit of
   [Grandchild], so much, if any, of the income, and so much, if any, of the
   principal of the trust as the Trustee deems necessary or advisable to
   provide for [Grandchild]’s proper health, education, maintenance and
   support. In addition, the Trustee (excluding, however, [Grandchild], if he is
   serving as a Trustee), at any time and from time to time, may pay or
   distribute to or for the benefit of [Grandchild] as much of the net income
   and/or principal of the trust as the Trustee, in the Trustee’s sole and
   absolute discretion, deems advisable in [Grandchild]’s best interest.

   Paragraph B of Article III of Reformed Trust provides:

   Any undistributed income of the trust at the end of each calendar year
   shall be retained in a separate account together with the earnings thereon
   (such separate account and the earnings thereon shall hereafter be
   referred to as the “Accumulated Net Income Account”). The Trustee shall
   retain the right to make distributions from the Accumulated Net Income
   Account to or for the benefit of [Grandchild] in such amounts, as the
   Trustee deems necessary or advisable, to provide for [Grandchild]’s
   proper health, education, maintenance and support. In addition, the
   Trustee (excluding, however, [Grandchild], if he is serving as a Trustee),
   at any time and from time to time, may make distributions from the
   Accumulated Net Income Account to or for the benefit of [Grandchild] in
   such amounts as the Trustee, in the Trustee’s sole and absolute
   discretion, deems advisable in [Grandchild]’s best interest. The Trustee is
   prohibited from commingling any of the assets in the Accumulated Net
   Income Account with any other Trust assets.

   The petition also seeks to modify Child 3’s contingent remainder interest in Trust

from being held in a trust under the same terms that would apply to Child 1, to being
held in a separate special needs trust for Child 3’s primary benefit to allow Child 3 to
qualify for government and private benefits.

   Specifically, Article IV of Reformed Trust provides:

   Subject to the restrictions in subsections 1 through 3 below, during the life
   of [Child 3], the Trustee may, at any time and from time to time, pay to, or
   apply for the benefit of [Child 3], so much, if any, of the income and
   principal of the trust as the Trustee, in the Trustee’s sole discretion,
   deems necessary to provide for those needs of [Child 3] that are not
   satisfied through any government or private program of financial
   entitlements, services, or other benefits. All distributions from the trust
   shall be paid directly to the provider of the services and not directly to
   [Child 3]. Any income not distributed shall be added to the principal of the
   trust. No part of the principal or undistributed income of the trust shall be
   considered available to [Child 3].

    The petition also seeks to change the distribution of the Trust assets upon the

death of Child 3 to provide that “the remaining undistributed income and principal of [the
special needs trust for the benefit of Child 3] shall be distributed outright and free of
trust to Foundation.”

    The termination date under Paragraph E of Reformed Trust is the same as Trust

and any remaining undistributed income and principal shall be distributed outright and
free of trust to the primary beneficiary of such trust.

    Statute 2 provides that upon the application of a trustee of the trust or any

qualified beneficiary, a court at any time may modify the terms of a trust that is not then
revocable if: (a) the purposes of the trust have been fulfilled or have become illegal,
impossible, wasteful, or impracticable to fulfill; (b) because of circumstances not
anticipated by the settlor, compliance with the terms of the trust would defeat or
substantially impair the accomplishment of a material purpose of the trust; or (c) a
material purpose of the trust no longer exists, then, in modifying a trust under this
section, a court may amend or change the terms of the trust, including terms governing
distribution of the trust income or principal or terms governing administration of the trust.

    Statute 3 provides that upon application of any interested person, to achieve the

settlor’s tax objectives the court may modify the terms of a trust in a manner that is not
contrary to the settlor’s probable intent. The court may provide that the modification has
retroactive effect.

   On Date 4, Court issued an order modifying the terms of Trust in accordance with

the terms of Reformed Trust pursuant to State law, contingent upon the receipt of a
favorable letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service.

   The Trustee requests the following rulings:

 1. The modification of the terms of Trust will not cause Trust’s inclusion ratio to

change and will not adversely affect the exemption of Trust from GST tax.

  2. The modification of the terms of Trust will not cause any beneficiary of Trust

to have made a gift for gift tax purposes under § 2501.

   3. The modification of the terms of Trust will not cause any beneficiary of Trust

to recognize gain or loss from the sale or disposition of property under § 61 or 1001.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Ruling 1

  Section 2601 of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a tax on every

generation-skipping transfer. The term “generation-skipping transfer” is defined in
§ 2611 as a taxable distribution, a taxable termination, and a direct skip.

   Under § 1433(a) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (Act) and § 26.2601-1(a) of the

Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations, the GST tax is generally applicable to
generation-skipping transfers made after October 22, 1986. However, under
§ 1433(b)(2)(A) of the Act and § 26.2601-1(b)(1)(i), the GST tax does not apply to a
transfer under a trust that was irrevocable on September 25, 1985, but only to the
extent that such transfer is not made out of corpus added to the trust after
September 25, 1985 (or out of income attributable to corpus so added).

    Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i) provides rules for determining when a modification,

judicial construction, settlement agreement, or trustee action with respect to a trust that
is exempt from the GST tax under § 26.2601-1(b) will not cause the trust to lose its
exempt status.

   Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i)(D) provides that a modification of the governing

instrument of an exempt trust (including a trustee distribution, settlement, or
construction that does not satisfy § 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i)(A), (B), or (C)), by judicial
reformation, or nonjudicial reformation that is valid under applicable state law, will not
cause an exempt trust to be subject to the provisions of chapter 13, if the modification
does not shift a beneficial interest in the trust to any beneficiary who occupies a lower
generation (as defined in § 2651) than the person or persons who held the beneficial
interest prior to the modification, and the modification does not extend the time for
vesting of any beneficial interest in the trust beyond the period provided for in the
original trust. A modification of an exempt trust will result in a shift in beneficial interest
to a lower generation beneficiary if the modification can result in either an increase in
the amount of a GST transfer or the creation of a new GST transfer.

    No guidance has been issued concerning the modification of a trust that may

affect the status of a trust that is exempt from GST tax because sufficient GST
exemption was allocated to the trust to result in an inclusion ratio of zero. At a
minimum, a modification that would not affect the GST status of a grandfathered trust
should similarly not affect the exempt status of such a trust.

      In this case, before the modification, Grandchild is entitled to a mandatory

distribution of income beginning at age 21. As a result of the modification, Grandchild’s
income interest will be subject to a discretionary distribution of income standard.
However, the Trustee will set aside in a separate account any income not distributed to
Grandchild beginning at age 21 and distribute all assets remaining in such separate
account to Grandchild’s estate at the death of Grandchild. Thus, all of the income that
Grandchild would have received after age 21 under the mandatory distribution standard
will still be included in Grandchild’s gross estate for estate tax purposes, and Grandchild
will be treated as the transferor of that income for GST tax purposes upon his/her death.

   Moreover, before the modification, Grandchild has the unrestricted right to

withdraw up to one-half of the Trust assets after reaching age 25 and to withdraw the
entire value of the Trust assets after reaching age 30. As a result of the modification,
Grandchild will no longer have the right to withdraw the Trust assets, but Grandchild will
have a testamentary general power of appointment over one-half of the value of the
assets if Grandchild dies after reaching age 25 and over all of the Trust assets if
Grandchild dies after reaching age 30. Thus, the new general powers of appointment
will cause the value of the Trust assets (to the extent of one-half of the Trust assets if
Grandchild dies after age 25 and all of the Trust assets if Grandchild dies after age 30)
to be included in Grandchild’s gross estate, and Grandchild will be treated as the
transferor of the Trust assets for GST tax purposes upon Grandchild’s death.

     Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i)(E), Example 7, considers the following fact pattern: In

1980, Grantor established an irrevocable trust for the benefit of Grantor’s grandchildren,
A, B, and C. The trust provides that income is to be paid to A, B, and C, in equal shares
for life. The trust further provides that, upon the death of the first grandchild to die,
one-third of the principal is to be distributed to that grandchild’s issue, per stirpes. Upon
the death of the second grandchild to die, one-half of the remaining trust principal is to
be distributed to that grandchild’s issue, per stirpes, and upon the death of the last
grandchild to die, the remaining principal is to be distributed to that grandchild’s issue,
per stirpes. In 2002, A became disabled. Subsequently, the trustee, with the consent of
B and C, petitioned the appropriate local court and the court approved a modification of
the trust that increased A’s share of trust income. The modification does not shift a
beneficial interest to a lower generation beneficiary because the modification does not
increase the amount of a GST under the original trust or create the possibility that new
GSTs not contemplated in the original trust may be made. In this case, the modification
will increase the amount payable to A who is a member of the same generation as B
and C. In addition, the modification does not extend the time for vesting of any
beneficial interest in the trust beyond the period provided for in the original trust.
Therefore, the trust as modified will not be subject to the provisions of chapter 13.
However, the modification increasing A’s share of trust income is a transfer by B and C
to A for federal gift tax purposes.

    Before the modification, Child 3 has a contingent remainder interest in Trust.

Thereafter, Trust will be modified so that Child 3 will continue to have a contingent
remainder interest in Trust, which is to be held for Child 3 in a separate special needs
trust for Child 3’s benefit to allow Child 3 to continue to qualify for government and
private benefits. Under the terms of the special needs trust, the Trustee may make
distributions for the benefit of only Child 3. Upon Child 3’s death, the remainder of Trust
will be distributed to Foundation. As before the modification, Trust will terminate no
later than Date 2.

   The proposed modification of Trust will not result in a shift of any beneficial

interest in the trusts to any beneficiary who occupies a generation lower than the
persons holding the beneficial interests. Further, the proposed modification of Trust will
not extend the time for vesting of any beneficial interest in the modified Trust beyond
the period provided for in Trust. Accordingly, based on the facts submitted and the
representations made, we conclude that the proposed modification of Trust will not
cause Trust’s inclusion ratio to change and will not adversely affect the exemption of
Trust from GST tax.

Ruling 2

  Section 2501(a)(1) imposes a tax for each calendar year on the transfer of

property by gift during such calendar year by any individual.

   Section 2511(a) provides that the gift tax applies whether the transfer is in trust

or otherwise, whether the gift is direct or indirect, and whether the property is real or
personal, tangible or intangible.

   Section 2512(a) provides that if the gift is made in property, the value thereof at

the date of the gift is considered the amount of the gift.

   Section 2512(b) provides that where property is transferred for less than

adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth, then the amount by which
the value of the property exceeded the value of the consideration is deemed to be a gift,
and is included in computing the amount of gifts made during the calendar year.

   In this case, the modification to Grandchild’s income distribution provisions and

withdrawal provisions do not change or transfer the interests of Grandchild or any other
beneficiary of Trust, nor do they confer any new rights to any beneficiaries. Rather, the
modifications result in the increased discretion of the Trustee over distributions to
Grandchild. Grandchild retains the same interest in Trust and, in fact, could receive the
same distributions that Grandchild could have received before the modifications were
made under the Trustee’s discretion under the original Trust.

   Moreover, the modification to Child 3’s contingent remainder does not change or

transfer the interests of Child 3, nor do they confer any new rights to Child 3.

  Accordingly, based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we

conclude that the modification of Trust will not cause any beneficiary of Trust to have
made a gift for gift tax purposes under § 2501.

Ruling 3

   Section 61(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that gross income

includes gain derived from dealings in property.

   Section 1001(a) provides that the gain from the sale or other disposition of

property is the excess of the amount realized over the adjusted basis provided in § 1011
for determining gain, and the loss is the excess of the adjusted basis provided in § 1011
for determining loss over the amount realized. Under § 1001(c), the entire amount of
gain or loss must be recognized, except as otherwise provided.

    In this case, the Trust modification will result in increased trustee discretion and

will not confer new rights to the beneficiaries or result in any relative shifting of interests
between beneficiaries. Accordingly, based on the facts submitted and the
representations made, we conclude that the proposed modification of Trust will not
result in the realization of gain or loss under §§ 61 and 1001 to either Trust or any
beneficiary.

   Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of

the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

     In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   Leslie H. Finlow

                                   Leslie H. Finlow
                                   Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 4
                                   Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy for § 6110 purposes
Copy of letter

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.