🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201807008 Released February 16, 2018 Approved

Court-required debt write-offs do not trigger Forms 1099-C

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A financial institution financed consumer purchases and sometimes pursued deficiency balances after defaults. A court found that its collection notices violated state law and barred collection from a class of debtors, after which a settlement required the institution to write off the balances. The IRS explained that Form 1099-C reporting is tied to specified identifiable events. The court order meant the parties had not agreed to discharge the debt for less than full consideration, and the institution itself had not decided to discontinue collection and discharge the debt. Because no listed event occurred, the institution did not have to report the write-offs on Forms 1099-C.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Must the financial institution file Forms 1099-C for deficiency balances written off after a court barred collection and a settlement required the write-offs?
  • Outcome: Approved, no Forms 1099-C are required for these write-offs.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6050P; Treas. Reg. § 1.6050P-1

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201807008 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/16/2018 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 6050P.00-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------- ----------------------, ID No. ------------------
------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------- ----------------------
------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PA:02
PLR-123598-17
In Re: ------------------------------------- Date:
November 14, 2017

Legend

Entity = -------------------------------------

State X = -------------

Asset = -------------------

Collection Action = ----------------------------------------------------------

Notices = ---------------------

Plaintiff = -------------------------

Court = ---------------------------------------------------------

Date 1 = -----------------------

Dear ------------------:

This letter responds to the letter dated July 17, 2017, submitted on behalf of Entity
requesting a ruling that Entity is not required by I.R.C. § 6050P and Treasury
Regulations § 1.6050P-1 to file Forms 1099-C to report the write-off of certain
balances under an order from the Court and subsequent settlement agreement. For the
reasons set forth below, we conclude that Entity is not required to report the discharge
PLR-123598-17 2

of indebtedness because none of the identifiable events listed in § 1.6050P-1 has
occurred.

                                       Facts

Entity is a financial institution operating in State X and engaged in, among other things,
financing consumer Asset purchases. When consumers defaulted on these loans,
Entity took Collection Action and, pursuant to State X law, sent Notices to the
consumers. Pursuant to State X law, Collection Action would sometimes result in a
deficiency balance. Plaintiff filed a class action lawsuit against Entity, alleging Entity’s
Notices were deficient under State X law, and seeking, amongst other things, an
injunction prohibiting Entity from collecting the outstanding deficiency balances from the
class of debtors who received similar Notices.

On Date 1, Court ruled that the Notices were deficient under State X law and that Entity
was barred from collecting any deficiency balance pursuant to the Notices that it sent to
Plaintiff and the class. Subsequently, Entity and the class entered into a settlement
agreement which included, inter alia, a provision requiring Entity to write-off deficiency
balances owed by the class.

                                 Law & Analysis

Section 6050P of the Internal Revenue Code requires that an applicable entity report
any discharges (in whole or in part) of indebtedness of any person in excess of $600 on
a Form 1099-C. Section 1.6050P-1(a)(1) of the Treasury Regulations provides that, for
information reporting purposes, a discharge of indebtedness is deemed to have
occurred upon the occurrence of an “identifiable event,” whether or not an actual
discharge of indebtedness has occurred on or before the date on which the identifiable
event has occurred. Section 1.6050P-1(b)(2) provides a list of identifiable events. Of
the listed identifiable events, two are potentially relevant to the requested ruling:
agreement by the parties to discharge the debt for less than full consideration and a
decision by the creditor to discontinue collection activity and discharge the debt.

In this case, the Court’s order barred Entity from collecting the deficiency balances.
Entity and the class did not arrive at an agreement to discharge the indebtedness, nor
did Entity decide to discharge the indebtedness, within the meaning of section 1.6050P-
1(b)(2). Because none of the identifiable events listed in section 1.6050P-1(b)(2)
occurred, Entity is not required to report these write-offs.

                                   Conclusion

Based solely on the information provided and representations made, we conclude that
Entity is not required to file Forms 1099-C with respect to the write-offs of the class
PLR-123598-17 3

members’ deficiency balances because none of the identifiable events listed in section
1.6050P-1(b)(2) has occurred.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, copies of this letter are
being sent to your authorized representatives.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                   Sincerely,




                                   Blaise Dusenberry
                                   Senior Technician Reviewer
                                   (Procedure & Administration)

Enclosures: (1) Copy of letter for section 6110 purposes
(2) Notice of Intention to Disclose, Notice 437

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.