🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Determination Letter 201750019 Released December 15, 2017 Revocation Transcribed from scan

Veterans post loses exemption over public bar and gambling operations

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A veterans post held section 501(c)(4) status but operated a bar and gambling business that was open to the public six days a week. Although the post reported some community projects, the IRS found that it spent far more time on the bar and gaming activities and received nearly all of its income from those operations. The IRS concluded that running those public commercial activities was the post's primary activity and did not promote social welfare under section 501(c)(4). The post also could not treat itself as exempt under section 501(c)(19) because it had not received an IRS determination recognizing that status and did not separate member income from nonmember income. The IRS therefore revoked the post's section 501(c)(4) exemption effective July 1 of the redacted year.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Was the veterans post operated primarily to promote social welfare despite its public bar and gambling operations?
  • Outcome: revocation
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(c)(4), 501(c)(7), 501(c)(19), 7428; Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(4); Rev. Rul. 66-150; Rev. Rul. 68-46

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
TE/GE EO Examinations -

1100 Commerce Street, MC 4920DAL
Dallas, TX 75242

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Date: MAY 30 2017

Taxpayer Identification Number:

Release Number: 201750019
Release Date: 12/15/2017

Person to Contact:
UIL Code: 501.04-00

Employee Identification Number:

Employee Telephone Number:

CERTIFIED MAIL - Return Receipt Requested

Dear

operating under the name

and/or

This is a Final Adverse Determination Letter as to your exempt status under section
501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. Your exemption from Federal income tax under
section 501(c)(4) of the Code is hereby revoked effective July 1, 20xx.

Our adverse determination was made for the following reasons:

Organizations described in Section 501 (c)(4) of the Code must be organized
and operated exclusively for the promotion of the common good and general
welfare of the people of the community. The operations of these
organizations bring about civic betterment and social improvements that affect
a whole community rather than a private group of citizens. Our examination
of your activities and finances revealed that your operations are not conducted
exclusively for the common good and social welfare of the community as a
whole. Therefore, you are not operated for an exempt purpose as described in
Section 501 (c)(4) of the Code.

Contributions to your organization are no longer deductible under section 170 of the
Internal Revenue Code.

You are required to file Federal income tax returns on Form 1120. If you have not
already filed these returns and the agent has not provided you instructions for converting
your previously filed Form 990 to Form 1120, you should file these income tax returns
with the appropriate Service Center for the tax year ending June 30, 20xx and for all tax
years thereafter in accordance with the instructions of the return.

Processing of income tax returns and assessments of any taxes due will not be delayed
should a petition for declaratory judgment be filed under section 7428 of the Internal
Revenue Code.

If you decide to contest this determination, you may file an action for declaratory
judgment under the provisions of section 7428 of the Code in one of the following three
venues: United States Tax Court, the United States Court of Federal Claims, or the
United States District Court for the District of Columbia. A petition or complaint in one
of these three courts must be filed before the 91st day after the date this determination
was mailed to you if you wish to seek review of our determination. Please contact the
clerk of the respective court for rules and the appropriate forms regarding filing petitions
for declaratory judgment by referring to the enclosed Publication 892. Please note that the
United States Tax Court is the only one of these courts where a declaratory judgment
action can be pursued without the services of a lawyer. You may write to the courts at the
following addresses:

United States Tax Court
400 Second Street, N W
Washington, DC 20217

US Court of Federal Claims
717 Madison Place, NW
Washington, DC 20005

U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia
333 Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, DC 20001

The Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) is an independent organization within the IRS
that can help protect your taxpayer rights. TAS can offer you help if your tax problem is
causing a hardship, or you've tried but haven't been able to resolve your problem with
the IRS. If you qualify for TAS assistance, which is always free, TAS will do everything
possible to help you. Visit taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov or call 1-877-777-4778.

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number
are shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely yours,

Maria Hooke
Director, Exempt Organizations Examinations

Enclosures:
Publication 892

Date: December 30, 2016

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Taxpayer Identification Number:

Exempt Organizations Examinations
Form:

Tax Year(s) Ended:
June 30, 20xx
Person to Contact/ID Number:

Contact Numbers:
Manager’s Name/ID Number:

Manager’s Contact Number:

Response due date:

Certified Mail — Return Receipt Requested
Dear

Why you are receiving this letter

We propose to revoke your status as an organization described in section 501(c)(4) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code). Enclosed is our report of examination explaining the proposed
action.

What you need to do if you agree

If you agree with our proposal, please sign the enclosed Form 6018, Consent to Proposed
Action — Section 7428, and return it to the contact person at the address listed above (unless
you have already provided us a signed Form 6018). We'll issue a final revocation letter
determining that you aren't an organization described in section 501(c)(4).

If we don't hear from you

If you don’t respond to this proposal within 30 calendar days from the date of this letter, we'll
issue a final revocation letter. Failing to respond to this proposal will adversely impact your legal
standing to seek a declaratory judgment because you failed to exhaust your administrative
remedies.

Effect of revocation status
If you receive a final revocation letter, you'll be required to file federal income tax returns for the
tax year(s) shown above as well as for subsequent tax years.

What you need to do if you disagree with the proposed revocation
If you disagree with our proposed revocation, you may request a meeting or telephone

conference with the supervisor of the IRS contact identified in the heading of this letter. You also

Letter 3618 (Rev. 6-2012)
Catalog Number 34809F

may file a protest with the IRS Appeals office by submitting a written request to the contact
person at the address listed above within 30 calendar days from the date of this letter.

The Appeals office is independent of the Exempt Organizations division and resolves most
disputes informally.

For your protest to be valid, it must contain certain specific information including a statement of
the facts, the applicable law, and arguments in support of your position. For specific information
needed for a valid protest, please refer to page one of the enclosed Publication 892, How to
Appeal an IRS Decision on Tax-Exempt Status, and page six of the enclosed Publication 3498,
The Examination Process. Publication 3498 also includes information on your rights as a
taxpayer and the IRS collection process. Please note that Fast Track Mediation referred to in
Publication 3498 generally doesn’t apply after we issue this letter.

You also may request that we refer this matter for technical advice as explained in Publication

892. Please contact the individual identified on the first page of this letter if you are considering
requesting technical advice. If we issue a determination letter to you based on a technical
advice memorandum issued by the Exempt Organizations Rulings and Agreements office, no
further IRS administrative appeal will be available to you.

Contacting the Taxpayer Advocate Office is a taxpayer right

You have the right to contact the office of the Taxpayer Advocate. Their assistance isn't a
substitute for established IRS procedures, such as the formal appeals process. The Taxpayer
Advocate can't reverse a legally correct tax determination or extend the time you have (fixed by
law) to file a petition in a United States court. They can, however, see that a tax matter that
hasn't been resolved through normal channels gets prompt and proper handling. You may call
toll-free 1-877-777-4778 and ask for Taxpayer Advocate assistance. If you prefer, you may
contact your local Taxpayer Advocate at:

Internal Revenue Service
Office of the Taxpayer Advocate

2 Letter 3618 (Rev. 6-2012)
Catalog Number 34809F


For additional information

If you have any questions, please call the contact person at the telephone number shown in the
heading of this letter. If you write, please provide a telephone number and the most convenient
time to call if we need to contact you.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

Mary A. Epps

Director, EO Examinations
Enclosures:
Report of Examination
Form 6018

Publication 892
Publication 3498

3 Letter 3618 (Rev. 6-2012)
Catalog Number 34809F

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

06/30/20xx

ISSUE

1. Whether the tax-exempt status of
(The “Post”) should be revoked because it is not operated

exclusively for social welfare purposes

FACTS

Exempt Status
The Post received an exemption letter dated July 5, 19xx from

that indicated it was part of a group exemption under Section
501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. The group number was xxxx.

On February 1, 20xx, the Post received Letter 4901 from the Internal Revenue Service (the
“Service”). Letter 4901 stated that the Post was no longer a subordinate in a revoked group ruling.
Letter 4901 also informed the Post that it could hold itself out as exempt if it met the requirements
of the Internal Revenue Code. The Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax,
for fiscal years ending June 30, 20xx, June 30, 20xx and June 30, 20xx showed the Post checked
that it’s tax exempt status is 501 (c)(19).

The Post’s Quartermaster filed the Form 990 returns. The Quartermaster is a licensed Public
Accountant in the state of and an Enrolled Agent with the Service. The Quartermaster
contacted the Service in 20xx regarding the group ruling revocation notice. The Quartermaster
was advised by the Service to continue to file the Form 990. The Quartermaster reported the
Post’s exempt status as 501 (c)(19) in error due to a misunderstanding between the state of
and federal rules.

Operations and Activities
The Post facility consists of the “ ,” (the, “Club”), which the Post also calls the

“ ” The Club is located at and operates a bar and
gaming operation that is open to the public. The Post also offers regular bingo twice a month from
October through May at the Club. The Post members volunteer for the bingo activity. The Post
also offers raffles, live poker and sports betting. All proceeds are distributed back to the winners.

The Post bar and gaming operations are open to the public six (6) days a week from 9:00 a.m. to
11:00 p.m. The operating hours may extend to 2:00 a.m. if patrons are present. The Service
toured the Post on Wednesday, December 14, 20xx. The Service observed the outside of the
Post has a sign painted on the building that says, “Public Welcome.” (See Attachments 1 and 2.)

The Service observed the Post meeting room, the bar manager's office, storage areas, a bar that
served alcohol, soft drinks and snacks, a pool table, betting board, ATM machine, juke box, and

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 1 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS
(Rev. January 1994)

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

06/30/20xx

seven (7) gaming machines. The gaming machines offered many games under Keno, Poker and
Reel, which is similar to a slot machine.

A patron chooses a game to play and inserts money directly into the machine. If the player wins a
cash prize, the machine issues the player a credit that he or she can redeem at the bar. The
machine payouts do not exceed $xxx per play per the state of regulations. The Post was
not required to issue Forms W2-G, pay back-up withholding or excise taxes.

Prior to the year 20xx, the Post limited access to the public through a sign- in sheet. However, the
Post discontinued using the sign-in sheet when it learned that it owned its state fraternal license.
Since the Post was not required to have a sign-in sheet for its state license, the Post assumed it
was not required to have a sign-in sheet for federal purposes.

The Post regularly prepares a National Program’s Report to declare its community activities.
The Service reviewed the report for the period of December 1, 20xx through November 30, 20xx.
The Post reported xxx community hours during this period and that it spent $x,xxx on community
projects. The report showed the Post completed xx community projects. The projects consisted
of ; , Bingo games and free meals, aiding others through the

, farmers and churches. The Post also assisted home and youth programs. During this
same period, the Post performed over x,xxx hours in its bar and gaming activities.

The Post is in compliance with all state and local license regulations for alcohol and gaming.

Profit Sharing
The Post had a profit sharing contract with and leased its gaming
machines from them. performed weekly audits of the gaming

operations and produced weekly Gaming Activity Reports that reconciled to the Post's financial
records. The Post received xx percent of the gross revenue before applicable taxes.

The Post employs only bartenders which includes a bar manager. During the years 20xx and
20xx, the Post employed xx bartenders. The Post had high turnover and had to refill positions. The
Post attempts to retain bartenders and encourages employees to help the Post become profitable
through its profit sharing arrangement. The Profit Sharing Plan is directed to the Post's
employees and states, “

.” The higher the bar’s profit, the higher the employee’s share of
the profit. Profit sharing was included on the employees’ Form W2. Applicable taxes were paid.

Net Operating Loss

The Post verified a net operating loss (NOL) of ($xx,xxx) that is available against its net profit
related to operations. The net profit for the examination year ending June 30, 20xx is $xx,xxx.
The Post used all of its prior NOLs and does not need to carry back. The following chart shows
when the NOL’s became available, how they were used, and the amount currently available.

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 2 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994)

EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer

Tax Identification Number

Year/Period ended

06/30/20xx

Unabsorbed Net Operating Loss
Date Amount | Balance
6/30/20xx (xx,xxx) | (xx,xxx)
6/30/20xx x,xxx | (xx,xxx)
6/30/20xx (x,xxx) | (xx,xxx)
6/30/20xx (x,xxx) | (xx,xxx)
6/30/20xx (x,xxx) | (xx,xxx)
NOL Available 6/30/20xx (xx,xxx)
20xx Operations Profit xx,xxx
Available NOL 6/30/20xx (xx,xxx)

Income and Expenses

The charts below show the sources of income for the current year. Income sources are similar for

at least xx prior years.

Current Year Operations Income

Beer Sales xx,xxx.xx
Mixed Drinks/Liquor Sales xx,xxx.xx
Miscellaneous Income x,xxx.xx
Sales- Video Gambling xxx,xxx.xx
Sales - Live Poker Fundraiser xxx.xx
Jukebox, Pool, Boards x,xxx.xx
Funeral Detail xxx.xx
ATM Fee Income xxx.xx
Total Operations Income xxx,xxx.xx

Current Year Non Operations Income

Donations Received xx.xx
Interest Income xx.xx
State, Nat'l Dues Income xxx.xx
Total Non-Operations Income xxx.xx

Form 886-A (1-1994)

Catalog Number 20810W Page 3

publish.no.irs.gov

Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

06/30/20xx

The charts below show the expenditures for the current year. Expense types are similar for at
least xx prior years.

Current Year Operations Expenditures

Type of Expense Amount
Beer/Wine xx,xxx.xx
Mixed Drinks/ Liquor xx,xxx.xx
Gambling/Payouts/Fees xxx,xxx.xx
Jukebox/Pool Table x,xxx.xx
Payroll Expense xx,xxx.xx
Miscellaneous Operations xx,xxx.xx
Total Operations Expense xxx,xxx.xx

Current Year Non-Operations Expenses
State, Nat'l Dues Expense xxx.xx
Total Non-Operations Expenses xxx.xx

LAW

Section 501(c)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, (the “Code”) provides for exemption from
federal income tax for civic leagues or organizations not organized for profit but operated
exclusively for the promotion of social welfare.

Section 1.501(c)(4) of the Federal Tax Regulations, (the “Regulations”) provides that an
organization may be exempt as an organization described in section 501(c)(4) if it is not organized
for profit and it is operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare.

Section 1.501(c)(4) of the Regulations provides that being operated exclusively for social welfare
means that an organization is primarily engaged in promoting in some way the common good and
general welfare of the people of the community.

In Revenue Ruling 66-150, 1966-1 C.B. 147, a subsidiary of a veterans organization whose
primary purpose was operating social facilities for members and bona fide guests including a bar,
restaurant, and game room was denied exemption under section 501(c)(4) of the Code. That
revenue ruling reasoned that for an organization to be exempt under section 501(c)(4) of the
Code, it must be operated primarily for the purpose of bringing about civic betterments and social
improvements. Revenue Ruling 66-150 concluded that: (a)n organization is not operated primarily

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W —Page__4 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS
(Rev. January 1994)

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

06/30/20xx

for the promotion of social welfare if its primary activity is operating a social club for the benefit,
pleasure, or recreation of its members.

In Revenue Ruling 68-46, 1968-1 C.B. 260 , a war veterans’ organization did not qualify for
exemption from federal income tax under section 501(c)(4) of the Code because it was primarily
engaged in renting a commercial building and operating a public banquet and meeting hall having
bar and dining facilities.

In Revenue Ruling 60-324, 1960-2 C.B. 173, the Service stated that:[w]hile [the] Regulations
indicate that a club may lose its exempt status if it makes its facilities available to the general
public, [it] does not mean that any dealings with outsiders will automatically cause a club to lose its
exemption. A club will not lose its exemption merely because it receives some income from the
general public, that is, persons other than members and their bona fide guests, or because the
general public may occasionally be permitted to participate in its affairs, provided such
participation is incidental to and in furtherance of its general club purposes and the income
therefrom does not inure to members.

Revenue Procedure 71-17, 1971-1 C.B. 683, provides the impact of an organization's nonmember
gross receipts on its exempt status under section 501(c)(7) of the Code. The revenue procedure
provides that "[a] significant factor reflecting the existence of a nonexempt purpose is the amount
of gross receipts derived from use of a club's facilities by the general public." The revenue
procedure went on to provide a safe harbor for organizations serving the general public:

As an audit standard, [the gross receipts derived from the general public] alone will not be relied
upon by the Service if annual gross receipts from the general public for [use of the club's facility] is
$2,500 or less or, if more than $2,500, where gross receipts from the general public for use is five
percent or less of total gross receipts of the organization.

Revenue Procedure 71-17, 1971-1 C.B. 683 defines the term “general public" as persons other
than members or their dependents or guests for an organization exempt under section 501 (c)(19)
of the Code. Section 3.03 of Revenue Procedure 71-17 provides four instances in which
nonmembers are assumed to be the guests of the members. The assumptions include:

1) Where a group of eight or fewer individuals, at least one of whom is a member, uses club
facilities, it will be assumed for audit purposes that the nonmembers are the guests of the
member, provided payment for such use is received by the club directly from the member or the
member's employer.

2) Where 75 percent or more of a group using club facilities are members, it will likewise be
assumed for audit purposes that the nonmembers in the group are guests of members, provided
payment for such use is received by the club directly from one or more of the members or the
member's employer.

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W — Page_5 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service


Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

06/30/20xx

3) Payment by a member's employer will be assumed to be for a use that serves a direct
business objective of the employee-member.

4) In all other situations, a host-guest relationship will not be assumed but must be substantiated.

Court Cases

In West Side Tennis Club v. Commissioner, 111 F.2d 6 (2nd Cir. 1940), cert. denied, 311 U.S.
674, 61 S. Ct. 40, 85 L. Ed. 434 (1940), the Second Circuit upheld the board of tax appeals
determination that a social club was not exempt because a substantial amount of its income was
received from the general public. West Side Tennis Club was organized to provide tennis facilities
for the use and enjoyment of its members. The facilities were only available to members for most
of the year; the club hosted annual national championship tennis matches, however, that were
open to the general public. The club shared in the ticket proceeds from these matches. The
Second Circuit upheld the board of tax appeals determination that the national championship
matches were a substantial and profitable business which jeopardized the club's exemption.

In Pittsburgh Press Club v. United States, 615 F.2d 600 (3rd Cir. 1980), the Third Circuit upheld
the Commissioner's determination that a social club failed to qualify for exemption from income tax
as exempt under section 501(c)(7) of the Code because it was operated for business and not for
the pleasure and recreation of its members. The Pittsburgh Press Club was organized for the
purpose of providing a professional and social meeting place for its members. During the years
under exam, however, the Pittsburgh Press Club hosted several functions for nonmember outside
groups, although each such group had been member sponsored. Based on the amount of
nonmember revenues ($281,000 of nonmember receipts), as well as the percentage of those
revenues (11 to 17 percent of gross receipts), the Third Circuit upheld the revocation stating that
the exemption from Federal income tax for section 501(c)(7) exempt organizations "is to be strictly
construed." The Court stated that such strict construction cannot be reconciled with the fact that a
substantial amount of the Club's activities and income consisted of nonmember functions and
nonmember income. Therefore, the Court held "revocation of its exemption was proper."

ISSUE # 1
Whether the tax-exempt status of
(The “Post”) should be revoked because it is not operated exclusively for

social welfare purposes

TAXPAYER’S POSITION
The Post agrees that it no longer qualifies for exempt status under section 501 (c)(4) of the Code
and is considering whether it will sign Form 6018.

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 6 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS
(Rev. January 1994)

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

06/30/20xx

GOVERNMENT’S POSITION

Veterans’ organizations can be described under section 501(c)(4) of the Code not because of the
composition of their membership, but because they are engaged primarily in activities which
promote social welfare purposes. This is in contrast to war veteran’s organization exempt under
section 501(c)(19) of the Code, which are required to meet specific requirements concerning the
composition of their membership. Unlike section 501(c)(19) exempt status veterans' organizations,
the provision of social and recreational activities for members of an section 501(c)(4) exempt
status veterans’ organization is not an exempt purpose activity even if such members are
veterans.

There are no membership requirements under section 501(c)(4) of the Code. Exemption is based
solely on the type of activities conducted. Membership requirements can be set by the post or its
central organization and include any category of members that is allowed by its charter.

Social Welfare Activities

Social welfare activities include promoting; sponsoring and participating in patriotic activities such
as Fourth of July parades, school Flag Day ceremonies and Junior ROTC groups. Assisting needy
and disabled veterans, widows, or orphans of deceased veterans as well as conducting hospital
visits, driving the sick and disabled to the hospital or to medical facilities, recycling, adopting a
road for clean up purposes, and sponsoring a youth baseball team, or other youth groups, are also
social welfare activities.

The social welfare activities listed above are not exclusive. The Post demonstrated that it was
involved in social welfare activities; however, the hours spent on community activities were
minimal.

Bar and gambling activities conducted by veterans organizations exempt under section 501(c)(4)
do not promote the social welfare of the community regardless of whether members or
nonmembers participate in them because they do not promote the general welfare of the
community as required under section 501(c)(4).

There is nothing inherently beneficial to the community from having gambling activities available.
In fact, many sectors of the community might consider it detrimental as is evidenced by the fact
that in most jurisdictions gambling activities are either illegal or severely limited.

Revenue Ruling 66-150, 1966-1 C.B. 147, provides that a subsidiary of a veterans organization
whose primary purpose was operating social facilities for members and bona fide guests including
a bar, restaurant, and game room was denied exemption under section 501(c)(4). That revenue
ruling reasoned that for an organization to be exempt under section 501(c)(4), it must be operated
primarily for the purpose of bringing about civic betterments and social improvements. Operation
of a bar, restaurant, and game room are not social welfare activities under section 501 (c)(4).

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W —Page_7 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

06/30/20xx

Public Use of Facilities

In Revenue Ruling 68-46, 1968-1 C.B. 260 , a war veterans’ organization did not qualify for
exemption from Federal income tax under I.R.C. § 501(c)(4) because it was primarily engaged in
renting a commercial building and operating a public banquet and meeting hall having bar and
dining facilities. Likewise, the Post is operating a public bar that also includes public gaming
operations.

In Revenue Ruling 60-324, 1960-2 C.B. 173, the Service stated that a club would not lose its
exemption for receiving some income from the public as long as the involvement with the general
public was occasional and incidental. Conversely, the Post’s involvement with the public is daily
with the exception of Sundays and its income from the public is the basically 100% of its revenue.

In West Side Tennis Club v. Commissioner, 111 F.2d 6 (2nd Cir. 1940), the Second Circuit upheld
the board of tax appeals determination that a social club was not exempt because a substantial
amount of its income was received from the general public. Likewise, a substantial amount of the
Post’s income was received from the general public. Less than x%( percent) of the Post's
income is from member dues and other non-operations income.

The Post spends most of its time operating the bar and gaming activities. The Post spent xxx
hours performing community activities in comparison to over x,xxx hours operating the bar and
gaming. Similarly, the Post’s income is exclusively from the bar and gaming activities. Income
from Club related operations was over $xxx,xxx. Conversely, the amount of income received from
dues is less than $xxx. Less than x% of the Post's income is from activities that are not related to
the bar and gaming business.

Likewise, the Post’s expenditures are exclusively related to the bar and gaming operations.
Expenditures related to the Club operations were over $xxx,xxx. However, expenditures on
operations not related to the Club are less than $xxx. Although the business operations show a
net loss for (x) of the past (xx) years, the Post operates the Club in a business-like
manner and is working towards making the activity profitable. The Post also shows its intention to
operate a for profit business by the type of income and expenditures it has, its contractual profit
split with , and its employee profit sharing arrangement.
Additionally, the Post is open to the public for at least xx hours a day days a week and has
paid employees performing the operations.

In Pittsburgh Press Club v. United States, 615 F.2d 600 (3rd Cir. 1980), the Third Circuit upheld
the Commissioner's determination that a social club failed to qualify for exemption from income tax
as an organization exempt under section 501(c)(7) of the Code because it was operated for
business and not for the pleasure and recreation of its members. The determining factor was the
amount of non-member receipts from the public not the number of years with or without a net
profit.

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W —- Page_8 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

06/30/20xx

The conduct of business with the general public in a manner similar to for-profit organizations
does not promote the accomplishment of social welfare purposes. However, such conduct of
business with the general public on a for profit basis, does not preclude exemption under section
501(c)(4) of the Code so long as such business with the general public, along with any other
activities that do not promote social welfare purposes, are not the primary activities of the
organization. However, the Post is conducting business with the public as its primary activity.

Unfair Business Competition

The Post showed a profit for its gaming activities for the years 20xx through 20xx. The Post also
received income from liquor, non-alcoholic drinks, snacks, jukebox, pool and boards play, but did
not show a profit during the same years from these activities. The Post determined that the
gaming activity subsidized the bar activity.

has a population of approximately xxx persons. An internet search showed

there is at least one for-profit corporation called the in . Additionally,
other businesses operate bar drink services in . Gaming is also allowable as a
legal for-profit business in the state of . An internet search showed there are over xx
gaming operations within xx miles of . The Club is in unfair competition with any

local bar and gaming businesses that are required to pay income tax.

Not Exempt under section 501 (c)(19) of the Code

The Post ceased being included in the group ruling under group xxxx in the year 20xx.
Afterwards, the Post self-declared its exempt status on Form 990. The Post did not self-declare
as a section 501 (c)(4) exempt organization on any of the Post's prior returns the Service
reviewed. An organization cannot self-declare as a section 501 (c)(19) organization. It must
obtain a determination from the Service that it is recognized under the 501 (c)(19) exempt status.

Additionally, the Post failed to maintain records to delineate between income derived from
members and non-members. The bar and gaming activities were conducted in a commercial
manner. Public operations were not irregular. The Post is not exempt under section (c)(19) of the
Code.

CONCLUSION

The tax exempt status of the Post should be revoked since the Post is not exclusively operated for
social welfare purposes. Operating a bar or gaming operation for members or for the public does
not promote social welfare as required under section 501 (c)(4) of the Code.

Additionally, the Post does not have a valid exempt status under Section 501(c)(19). The Post did
not account separately for member and non-member income and it did not receive a determination
that it was recognized under the section 501(c)(19) of the Code. The Post cannot self-declare it is
exempt under section 501 (c)(19). The Post may apply for any Veteran’s exempt status for which

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 9 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit
Form 886-A EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS
(Rev. January 1994)
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended
06/30/20xx
it qualifies once it is no longer operating the activities by filing Form 1024,

Application for Recognition of Exemption Under 501(a).

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 10 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.