Single-asset investment vehicle classified as a trust
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A state-law trust issued one class of units representing proportional interests in a single type of asset. Authorized participants could create or redeem baskets only through in-kind deposits or deliveries of that asset, using formulas that preserved the same asset quantity per unit. The trust could not accept cash for new units, hold other investments, or reinvest proceeds, although it could temporarily hold cash after selling assets to pay expenses or during liquidation. The IRS concluded that the trustee had no power to vary the unit holders' investments to profit from market changes. Because the trust had a single class of interests and no power to vary investments, it qualified as an investment trust classified as a trust under Treasury Regulation section 301.7701-4(c)(1).
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did the single-asset vehicle qualify as an investment trust rather than a business entity?
- Outcome: approved
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.7701-2, 301.7701-4; Rev. Rul. 75-192; Rev. Rul. 78-149; Rev. Rul. 90-63
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201750009 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/15/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 7701.03-11
Person To Contact:
---------------------- ------------------, ID No. ------------------
--------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------- ----------------------
------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------- CC:FIP:B02
PLR-109228-17
Date:
September 11, 2017
LEGEND
Taxpayer = ---------------------------------
----------------------------
Date 1 = ----------------------------
Assets = ------------
State law trust = ---------------------------------
State law = ---------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
-----------
Sponsor = ---------------------------------------
Trustee = -----------------------------------
Trust Agreement = -------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
--------------------------
a = -----
b = --
Dear ----------------:
This letter is in response to a letter from the Taxpayer dated March 16, 2017,
requesting a ruling that the Taxpayer qualifies as an investment trust that is classified as
a trust under §301.7701-4 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.
FACTS
PLR-109228-17 2
The Taxpayer represents the facts described below. The Taxpayer is a State law
trust, organized under State law, that was established on Date 1 by Sponsor with
Trustee as the trustee. The Taxpayer’s taxable year is a calendar year.
The beneficial interests of the Taxpayer are represented by a single class of units
(Units). Each Unit represents the same proportional beneficial interest in the assets of
the Taxpayer. In the event of a distribution, each Unit is entitled to a pro rata share of
the distribution.
The Taxpayer has and will continue to enter into agreements with certain
participating financial institutions (Authorized Participants). Under the Trust Agreement
and its agreement with the Taxpayer, an Authorized Participant submits a Creation
Order to the Taxpayer requesting new Units. Each Creation Order must be for 1 or
more baskets, each representing a Units.
Payment for a Creation Order must be made by an in-kind deposit of the Assets.
To determine the quantity of the Assets to be deposited, a per-Unit quantity of the
Assets will be determined by dividing the total quantity of the Assets held by the
Taxpayer prior to the issuance of the new Units, after adjusting for accrued but unpaid
fees and expenses of the Taxpayer, by the number of Units then outstanding. The per-
Unit quantity will then be multiplied by a and the number of baskets requested to
determine the total quantity of the Assets to be deposited. Under the Trust Agreement,
the Taxpayer may only accept a Creation Order and an in-kind deposit from an
Authorized Participant.
Under the Trust Agreement and its agreement with the Taxpayer, an Authorized
Participant may submit a Redemption Order to the Taxpayer requesting the Taxpayer to
redeem Units. Each Redemption Order must be for 1 or more baskets.
Payment by the Taxpayer for a Redemption Order must be made by an in-kind
delivery of the Assets to an Authorized Participant. To determine the quantity of the
Assets to be delivered, a per-Unit quantity of the Assets will be determined by dividing
the total quantity of the Assets held by the Taxpayer, after adjusting for accrued but
unpaid fees and expenses of the Taxpayer, by the number of outstanding Units. The
per-Unit quantity will then be multiplied by a and the number of baskets redeemed to
determine the total quantity of the Assets to be delivered. Under the Trust Agreement,
the Taxpayer will only accept a Redemption Order from an Authorized Participant and
will only deliver the Assets to an Authorized Participant.
The Taxpayer was established to facilitate investment in the Assets. The
Taxpayer represents that the Assets are not stock or securities, so the Taxpayer is not
required to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Other
than $b contributed by Sponsor at the time the Taxpayer was established, the
Taxpayer's assets have consisted solely of the Assets. Under the Trust Agreement, the
PLR-109228-17 3
Taxpayer may not accept cash as payment for a Creation Order. The Taxpayer is
prohibited from owning or holding any assets other than the Assets, except that the
Taxpayer may sell the Assets and hold cash temporarily for the payment of expenses
or, if the Taxpayer is liquidated, to redeem Units.
Under the Trust Agreement, the Taxpayer pays the Sponsor a fee (the Combined
Fee) based upon the daily net asset value of the Assets. The Combined Fee is paid in
arrears, usually on a monthly basis. The Taxpayer makes an in-kind distribution to the
Sponsor in an amount equal to the Combined Fee. In partial consideration for the
Combined Fee, the Sponsor has assumed the obligation to pay the Taxpayer's ordinary
expenses, including trustee fees, custodian fees, accounting expenses, and marketing
expenses. The Sponsor retains the portion of the Combined Fee that exceeds the
assumed expenses. If the Taxpayer incurs extraordinary expenses which are not
assumed by the Sponsor, the Taxpayer will sell an appropriate amount of the Assets to
provide cash to pay the extraordinary expenses.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 301.7701–2(a) defines the term “business entity” as any entity
recognized for federal tax purposes (including an entity with a single owner that may be
disregarded as an entity separate from its owner under § 301.7701–3) that is not
properly classified as a trust under § 301.7701–4 or otherwise subject to special
treatment under the Code. A business entity with two or more owners is classified for
federal tax purposes as either a corporation or a partnership. A business entity with
only one owner is classified as a corporation or is disregarded.
Section 301.7701–4(a) provides that the term “trust” refers to an arrangement
created either by will or by an inter vivos declaration whereby trustees take title to
property for the purpose of protecting and conserving it for the beneficiaries. Section
301.7701–4(b) provides that there are other arrangements known as trusts because the
legal title to property is conveyed to trustees for the benefit of beneficiaries, but that are
not classified as trusts for federal tax purposes because they are not simply
arrangements to protect or conserve the property for the beneficiaries. These trusts,
which are often known as business or commercial trusts, generally are created by the
beneficiaries simply as a device to carry on a profit-making business that normally
would have been carried on through business organizations that are classified as
corporations or partnerships.
Section 301.7701–4(c)(1) provides that an “investment” trust will not be classified
as a trust if there is a power under the trust agreement to vary the investment of the
certificate holders. See Commissioner v. North American Bond Trust, 122 F.2d 545 (2d
Cir. 1941), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 701 (1942). An investment trust with a single class of
ownership interests, representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the
PLR-109228-17 4
trust, will be classified as a trust if there is no power to vary the investment of the
certificate holders.
A power to vary the investment of the certificate holders is one that enables the
trustee to manage the assets held in the purported “trust” to take advantage of market
variations to improve the investment of all beneficiaries. See Commissioner v. North
American Bond Trust, 122 F.2d at 546. In Rev. Rul. 78-149, 1978-1 C.B. 448, a trust
that invested in municipal obligations would sometimes have the obligations held by the
trust redeemed early. Under the trust agreement, the trust was authorized to reinvest
the proceeds from an early redemption in additional municipal obligations that matured
no later than the maturity date of the trust and which bore an investment grade similar to
the instrument that was redeemed early. Rev. Rul. 78-149 holds that the ability to
reinvest the early redemption proceeds is a power to vary. Rev. Rul. 78-149 further
notes that "[t]he existence of a power to sell trust assets does not give rise to a power to
vary the investment. Rather, it is the ability to substitute new investments, the power to
reinvest, that requires an investment to be classified as an association," citing
Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives and Granting Annuities v. United States, 146
F.2d 392 (3rd Cir. 1944).
In contrast, in Rev. Rul. 90-63, 1990-2 C.B. 270, the trustee had the power to
consent to changes in the credit support of debt held by a trust, but only to the extent
that the trustee reasonably believed that the change was advisable to maintain the
value of the trust’s assets. Rev. Rul. 90-63 concludes that the trustee did not possess a
power to vary the investment of the beneficiaries. The ruling noted that, although the
trustee’s actions could result in an increase in the value of a trust asset, any increase
would arise due to the maintenance of the trust’s asset value, not because of trading in
securities and profiting from market fluctuations.
In Rev. Rul. 75–192, 1975–1 C.B. 384, the trust was required to make quarterly
distributions. The trust agreement required the trustee to invest cash on hand between
the quarterly distribution dates in short-term obligations of (or guaranteed by) the United
States, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, and in certificates of deposit of any
bank or trust company having a minimum stated surplus and capital. The trustee was
permitted to invest only in obligations maturing prior to the next distribution date and
was required to hold such obligations until maturity. Rev. Rul. 75–192 concludes that,
because the restrictions on the types of permitted investments limit the trustee to a fixed
return similar to that earned on a bank account and eliminate any opportunity to profit
from market fluctuations, the power to invest in the specified kinds of short-term
investments is not a power to vary the trust’s investment.
Based upon the information provided by the Taxpayer, ownership of the
Taxpayer is represented by a single class of Units. Therefore, under § 301.7701–
4(c)(1), the Taxpayer will be classified as a trust if there is no power to vary the
investment of the Unit holders.
PLR-109228-17 5
Under the Trust Agreement, the Taxpayer is limited to holding the Assets and,
temporarily, cash from the sale of the Assets prior to payment of expenses or, if
necessary, distributions in liquidation of the Trust. The Taxpayer is not authorized to
accept cash or other assets, and the Taxpayer may only acquire additional quantities of
the Assets through deposits by Authorized Participants in exchange for the creation of
new Units. Under the formulas described in the Trust Agreement, the quantity of the
Assets that is represented by one Unit will not be altered either by the creation of new
Units or redemption of existing Units.
Thus, the Taxpayer is required to be invested in either the Assets or in cash. To
the extent that the Taxpayer accepts additional deposits, it may only do so by accepting
the Assets in-kind in quantities that are carefully calculated to ensure that the additions
do not alter the quantity of the Assets underlying each Unit, and, in particular, do not
increase the quantity of the Assets underlying each Unit. The Taxpayer is therefore
unable to trade in securities and profit from market fluctuations. If there is a change in a
Unit’s value, the change occurs because the value of the Assets has gone up or down
and not because each Unit is entitled to a larger quantity of the Assets.
In addition, although the Taxpayer is authorized to dispose of the Assets to pay
expenses, the Taxpayer is not permitted to substitute new investments for the Assets.
Further, like the situation described in Rev. Rul. 75-192, the Taxpayer has limited its
non-Asset holdings to cash, which, at most, limits the Taxpayer to a fixed return similar
to that earned on a bank account and eliminates any opportunity to profit from market
fluctuations.
Accordingly, based upon the Taxpayer’s representations and the analysis above,
we conclude that, for purposes of § 301.7701-4(c)(1), the Taxpayer does not have a
power to vary the investment of the Trust’s certificate holders. Therefore, because
ownership in the Taxpayer is represented by a single class of Units and the Trustee
does not have a power to vary the investments of the Taxpayer, we conclude that the
Taxpayer qualifies as an investment trust that is classified as a trust under §301.7701–
4(c)(1).
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representative.
PLR-109228-17 6
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is
relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control
number of the letter ruling.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey T. Rodrick
Jeffrey T. Rodrick
Special Counsel
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.