Revised nuclear decommissioning funding schedule is approved
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A utility requested a revised schedule of deductible contributions to its qualified nuclear decommissioning fund after regulators adjusted the amounts collected for decommissioning. The proposed schedule used cost, timing, inflation, investment-return, and ownership assumptions reflected in an independent study and a public utility commission order. The IRS found that the utility was an eligible taxpayer with a qualifying interest in the plant and that its assumptions and allocation of decommissioning costs were reasonable. It approved the revised annual ruling amounts, subject to the regulatory cap on fund payments. The utility must request another revision when specified events occur and otherwise after the prescribed ten-year period.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Does the utility's proposed revised schedule of nuclear decommissioning fund contributions satisfy section 468A?
- Outcome: approved
- Key authorities: IRC § 468A; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.468A-1 through 1.468A-3, 1.468A-7
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201742014 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/20/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 468A.04-02
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------- --------------------------, ID No. ----------------
---------------- -----------------
------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------------- ----------------------
-------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B06
Re: Revised Schedule of Ruling Amounts PLR-108706-17
------------------------------------------------------ Date:
--------------------------------------- July 24, 2017
LEGEND:
Taxpayer = ---------------------------------------------------------
Parent = -----------------------------------------------------
State = --------------
Plant = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location = -------------------------------
Method = ------------
Commission A = --------------------------------------------------------------
Commission B = -----------------------------------------------------
Commission C = ------------------------------------------------------------------
Order = -----------------------------------------------------------
Independent Study = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date = ---------------------------
a = -----
b = ------------
c = ----------
d = ------
e = ------------------
f = --------------------
g = ------
h = ------
i = ------
j = --------------
k = -----
l = ------------
m = --------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Year 4 = -------
PLR-108706-17 2
Fund = --------------------------------------------
Director = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear -------------------:
This letter responds to your request, dated March 8, 2017, for a revised schedule
of ruling amounts under § 468A(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 1.468A-
3(f)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations. As the result of a recent adjustment to its
decommissioning collections, Taxpayer now requests an elective review of the most
recent revised schedule of ruling amounts. Supplemental information was submitted on
July 10, 2017 and July 18, 2017, pursuant to § 1.468A-3(e)(1)(vii).
Taxpayer represents the facts and information relating to its request for a revised
schedule of ruling amounts as follows:
Taxpayer is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent. Taxpayer is a member of
Parent’s consolidated group that files a consolidated federal income tax return on a
calendar year basis using an accrual method of accounting.
Taxpayer owns a a percent undivided qualifying interest in the Plant. The Plant
is situated at Location and the proposed method of decommissioning the Plant is
Method.
Taxpayer is subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of Commission A (b percent),
Commission B (c percent), and Commission C (d percent). Since the last amended
schedule of ruling amounts, Commission A issued Order effective Date, in which it
approved the estimated decommissioning costs for the Plant to be included in
Taxpayer’s cost of service for ratemaking purposes based on the assumptions derived
in the Independent Study.
Based on the assumptions used by Commission A, the estimated cost of $e (in
Year 1 dollars) was used as a base cost for decommissioning the Plant. The estimated
cost of decommissioning the Plant in future dollars is $f (in Year 3 dollars). Substantial
decommissioning costs will be first incurred in Year 3 and it is estimated that
decommissioning will be substantially complete at the end of Year 4. The methodology
used to convert the Year 1 dollars to Year 3 dollars was by escalating the estimated
costs at an inflation rate of g percent to the year of estimated expenditure. The
assumed after-tax rate of return to be earned by the amount in the Fund ranges from h
to i percent. The funding period begins in the first taxable year in which a deductible
payment was made to the Fund and ends in the taxable year that includes the date the
Plant will no longer be included in Taxpayer’s rate base for ratemaking purposes.
PLR-108706-17 3
Section 468A(a), as amended by the Energy Tax Incentives Act of 2005 (the
Act), Pub. L. 109-58, 119 Stat. 594, allows an electing taxpayer to deduct payments
made to a nuclear decommissioning reserve fund.
Section 468A(b) limits the amount that may be paid into the nuclear
decommissioning fund in any year to the ruling amount applicable to that year. Prior to
the changes made by the Act, the deduction was limited to the lesser of the amount
included in the utility’s cost of service for ratemaking purposes or the ruling amount.
Generally, as a result, only regulated utilities could take advantage of § 468A. The Act
amendment of § 468A eliminated the cost-of-service limitation. Accordingly,
decommissioning costs of an unregulated nuclear power plant may now be funded by
deductible contributions to a qualified nuclear decommissioning fund.
Section 468A(d)(1) provides that no deduction shall be allowed for any payment
to the nuclear decommissioning fund unless the taxpayer requests and receives from
the Secretary a schedule of ruling amounts. The “ruling amount” for any tax year is
defined under § 468A(d)(2) as the amount which the Secretary determines to be
necessary to fund the total nuclear decommissioning cost of that nuclear power plant
over the estimated useful life of the plant. This term is further defined to include the
amount necessary to prevent excessive funding of nuclear decommissioning costs or
funding of these costs at a rate more rapid than level funding, taking into account such
discount rates as the Secretary deems appropriate.
Section 468A(h) provides that a taxpayer shall be deemed to have made a
payment to the nuclear decommissioning fund on the last day of a taxable year if the
payment is made on account of such taxable year and is made within 2½ months after
the close of the tax year. This section applies to payments made pursuant to either a
schedule of ruling amounts or a schedule of deduction amounts.
Section 1.468A-1(a) provides that an eligible taxpayer may elect to deduct
nuclear decommissioning costs under § 468A. An “eligible taxpayer,” as defined under
§ 1.468A-1(b)(1) of the regulations, is a taxpayer that has a “qualifying interest” in any
portion of a nuclear power plant. A qualifying interest is, among other things, a direct
ownership interest.
Section 1.468A-2(b)(1) provides that the maximum amount of cash payments
made (or deemed made) to a nuclear decommissioning fund during any tax year shall
not exceed the ruling amount applicable to the nuclear decommissioning fund for such
taxable year. The limitation on the amount of cash payments for purposes of § 1.468A-
2(b)(1) does not apply to any “special transfer” permitted under § 1.468A-8.
Section 1.468A-3(a)(1) provides that, in general, a schedule of ruling amounts for
a nuclear decommissioning fund is a ruling specifying annual payments that, over the
tax years remaining in the “funding period” as of the date the schedule first applies, will
PLR-108706-17 4
result in a projected balance of the nuclear decommissioning fund as of the last day of
the funding period equal to (and in no event more than) the “amount of
decommissioning costs allocable to the fund.”
Section 1.468A-3(a)(2) provides that, to the extent consistent with the principles
and provisions of this section, each schedule of ruling amounts shall be based on
reasonable assumptions concerning the after-tax rate of return to be earned by the
amounts collected for decommissioning, the total estimated cost of decommissioning
the nuclear plant, and the frequency of contributions to a nuclear decommissioning fund
for a taxable year. Under § 1.468A-3(a)(3), the Internal Revenue Service (Service) shall
provide a schedule of ruling amounts identical to the schedule proposed by the
taxpayer, but no such schedule shall be provided by the Service unless the taxpayer’s
proposed schedule is consistent with the principles and provisions of that section.
Section 1.468A-3(a)(4) provides that the taxpayer bears the burden of
demonstrating that the proposed schedule of ruling amounts is consistent with the
principles of the regulations and that it is based on reasonable assumptions. That
section also provides additional guidance regarding how the Service will determine
whether a proposed schedule of ruling amounts is based on reasonable assumptions.
For example, if a public utility commission established or approved the currently
applicable rates for the furnishing or sale by the taxpayer of electricity from the plant,
the taxpayer can generally satisfy this burden of proof by demonstrating that the
schedule of ruling amounts is calculated using the assumptions used by the public utility
commission in its most recent order. In addition, a taxpayer that owns an interest in a
deregulated nuclear plant may submit assumptions used by a public utility commission
that formerly had regulatory jurisdiction over the plant as support for the assumptions
used in calculating the taxpayer’s proposed schedule of ruling amounts, with the
understanding that the assumptions used by the public utility commission may be given
less weight if they are out of date or were developed in a proceeding for a different
taxpayer. The use of other industry standards, such as the assumptions underlying the
taxpayer’s most recent financial assurance filing with the NRC, are described by the
regulations as an alternative means of demonstrating that the taxpayer has calculated
its proposed schedule of ruling amounts on a reasonable basis. Section 1.468A-3(a)(4)
further provides that consistency with financial accounting statements is not sufficient, in
the absence of other supporting evidence, to meet the taxpayer’s burden of proof.
Section 1.468A-3(b)(1) provides that, in general, the ruling amount for any tax
year in the funding period shall not be less than the ruling amount for any earlier tax
year. Under § 1.468A-3(c)(1), the funding period begins on the first day of the first tax
year for which a deductible payment is made to the nuclear decommissioning fund and
ends on the last day of the taxable year that includes the last day of the estimated
useful life of the nuclear power plant to which the fund relates.
Section 1.468A-3(c)(2) provides rules for determining the estimated useful life of
PLR-108706-17 5
a nuclear plant for purposes of § 468A. In general, under § 1.468A-3(c)(2)(i)(A), if the
plant was included in rate base for ratemaking purposes for a period prior to
January 1, 2006, the date used in the first such ratemaking proceeding as the estimated
date on which the nuclear plant will no longer be included in the taxpayer’s rate base is
the end of the estimated useful life of the nuclear plant. Section 1.468A-3(c)(2)(i)(B)
provides that, if the nuclear plant is not described in § 1.468A-3(c)(2)(i)(A), the last day
of the estimated useful life of the nuclear plant is determined as of the date the plant is
placed in service. Under § 1.468A-3(c)(2)(i)(C), any reasonable method may be used in
determining the estimated useful life of a nuclear power plant that is not described in
§ 1.468A-3(c)(2)(i)(A).
Section 1.468A-3(d)(1) provides that the amount of decommissioning costs
allocable to a nuclear decommissioning fund is the taxpayer’s share of the total
estimated cost of decommissioning the nuclear power plant. Section 1.468A-3(d)(3)
provides that a taxpayer’s share of the total estimated cost of decommissioning a
nuclear power plant equals the total estimated cost of decommissioning such plant
multiplied by the taxpayer’s qualifying interest in the plant.
Section 1.468A-3(e) provides the rules regarding the manner of requesting a
schedule of ruling amounts. Section 1.468A-3(e)(1)(v) provides that the Service will not
provide or revise a ruling amount applicable to a taxable year in response to a request
for a schedule of ruling amounts that is filed after the deemed payment date (as defined
in § 1.468A-2(c)(1)) for such taxable year.
Section 1.468A-3(e)(2) enumerates the information required to be contained in a
request for a schedule of ruling amounts filed by a taxpayer in order to receive a ruling
amount for any taxable year.
Section 1.468A-3(e)(3) provides that the Service may prescribe administrative
procedures that supplement the provisions of §§ 1.468A-3(e)(1) and (2). In addition,
that section provides that the Service may, in its discretion, waive the requirements of
§§ 1.468A-3(e)(1) and (2) under appropriate circumstances.
Section 1.468A-3(f)(2) provides that any taxpayer that has previously obtained a
schedule of ruling amounts may request a revised schedule of ruling amounts. Such a
request must be made in accordance with the rules of § 1.468A-3(e). The Internal
Revenue Service shall not provide a revised schedule of ruling amounts applicable to a
taxable year in response to a request for a schedule of ruling amounts that is filed after
the deemed payment deadline date for such taxable year.
We have examined the representations and information submitted by Taxpayer
in relation to the requirements set forth in § 468A and the regulations thereunder.
Based solely upon these representations of the facts, we reach the following
conclusions:
PLR-108706-17 6
1. Pursuant to § 1.468A-3(a)(4), Taxpayer has met its burden of demonstrating
that the proposed schedule of ruling amounts is consistent with the principles
of the Code and regulations and is based on reasonable assumptions.
2. Taxpayer has a qualifying interest in the Plant and is, therefore, an eligible
taxpayer under § 1.468A-1(b)(1) of the regulations.
3. Taxpayer, as an owner of the Plant, has calculated its decommissioning costs
under § 1.468A-3(d)(3) of the regulations.
4. The proposed schedule of ruling amounts was derived by following the
assumptions contained in the Independent Study and used by Commission A
to calculate the amount of decommissioning costs to be included in
Taxpayer’s cost of service for ratemaking purposes. Thus, Taxpayer has
demonstrated, pursuant to § 1.468A-3(a)(4), that the proposed schedule of
ruling amounts is based on reasonable assumptions and is consistent with
the principles of § 468A and the regulations thereunder.
5. The maximum amount of cash payments made (or deemed made) to the
Fund during any tax year is restricted to the ruling amount applicable to the
Fund, as set forth under § 1.468A-2(b)(1) of the regulations.
Based solely on the determinations above, we conclude that Taxpayer’s
proposed schedule of ruling amounts satisfies the requirements of § 468A. We have
approved the following revised schedule of ruling amounts.
APPROVED SCHEDULE OF RULING AMOUNTS
Year Commission A Commission B Commission C Total
Each Year, $j $k $l $m
Year 2 – Year 3
If any of the events described in § 1.468A-3(f)(1) occur in future years, Taxpayer
must request a review and revision of the schedule of ruling amounts. Generally,
Taxpayer is required to file such a request on or before the deemed payment deadline
date for the first taxable year in which the rates reflecting such action became effective.
When no such event occurs, Taxpayer must file a request for a revised schedule of
ruling amounts on or before the deemed payment deadline of the tenth taxable year
following the close of the tax year in which this schedule of ruling amounts is received.
Except as specifically determined above, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the Federal income tax consequences of the transaction described above.
PLR-108706-17 7
Specifically, no determination is made whether the Independent Study conforms to
industry standards and practices.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides it may not be used or cited as precedent. In accordance with the power
of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized
representatives. We are also sending a copy of this letter ruling to the Director.
Pursuant to § 1.468A-7(a), a copy of this letter must be attached (with the required
Election Statement) to Taxpayer’s federal income tax return for each tax year in which
Taxpayer claims a deduction for payments made to the Fund.
Sincerely yours,
Peter C. Friedman
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 6
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.