🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 201738007 Released September 22, 2017 Approved

Partnership received 120 days to make a late section 754 election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A limited liability company classified as a partnership timely filed its federal tax return but inadvertently omitted a section 754 election. That election permits basis adjustments to partnership property after certain property distributions or transfers of partnership interests. The partnership represented that it acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government. The IRS concluded that the discretionary-extension requirements were satisfied and gave the partnership 120 days to file a written election effective for the relevant tax year and later years. The IRS did not rule on whether the entity was in fact a partnership for federal tax purposes.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the partnership receive extra time to make a section 754 election omitted from its timely filed return?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 734, 743, 754; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b)(1), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-2, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                    Department of the Treasury
                                                            Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201738007                                           Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/22/2017                                     Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 754.00-00, 754.02-00,
              9100.00-00, 9100.15-00                        Person To Contact:
                                                            ----------------------, ID No. ------------------
--------------------------------------                      Telephone Number:
------------------------------------
-------------------------------------                       Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------------                    CC:PSI:B03
                                                            PLR-139216-16
                                                            Date: June 12, 2017




LEGEND

X        =        ---------------------------------------
-
State =           --------------

Date =            ---------------------------


Dear -----------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated December 16, 2016, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted on behalf of X requesting an extension of time under
§ 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election under
§ 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”).

FACTS

The information submitted states that X is a State limited liability company that is
classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes. X's tax return for the taxable year
ended Date was timely filed, but a § 754 election to adjust the basis of partnership
property was inadvertently not filed with the return. X represents that it has acted
reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of
the Government.

LAW

Section 754 provides, in part, that if a partnership files an election, in accordance with
the regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of partnership property is
adjusted, in the case of a distribution of property, in the manner provided in § 734, and,

PLR-139216-16                                 2

in the case of a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in § 743. Such
an election shall apply with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and
to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year with respect to
which the election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.

Section 1.754-1(b)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that an election
under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b) with
respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a
partnership, shall be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the
taxable year during which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be valid,
the return must be filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e) (including
extensions thereof) for filing the return for the taxable year.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term "regulatory
election" as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the
Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement
published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will
use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section
301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time for making
certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the Commissioner will use
to determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory elections that do not
meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Under § 301.9100-3, a request for relief will be granted when the taxpayer provides the
evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good
faith, and (2) the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

CONCLUSION

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a
result, X is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to make
an election under § 754 effective for its taxable year ended Date and thereafter. The
election should be made in a written statement filed with the appropriate service center
for association with X's return for its taxable year ended Date. A copy of this letter
should be attached to the statement filed.

PLR-139216-16                                3


Except as specifically ruled upon above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the
tax consequences of any facts discussed or referenced in this letter. Specifically, we
express no opinion as to whether X is a partnership for federal tax purposes.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of
this letter ruling to your authorized representatives.

                                             Sincerely,

                                             Associate Chief Counsel
                                             (Passthroughs & Special Industries)



                                         By:_____________________________
                                            Mary Beth Carchia
                                            Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
                                            Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                            (Passthroughs & Special Industries)



Enclosures: Copy of this letter
            Copy of this letter for § 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.