Affiliate service arrangements do not defeat active-business spin-off rules

Plain-English summary

A consolidated group proposed separating one business through a contribution to a new corporation, two section 355 distributions, and a later liquidation into a disregarded entity. Both the retained and separated businesses used employees of affiliated companies under supervised service arrangements. The separated business also relied on intercompany contracts that mirrored contracts with outside parties. The IRS ruled that these service and intercompany arrangements would not prevent either business from satisfying the active trade or business requirement of section 355(b). It also ruled that the later merger would not affect qualification of the earlier Type D reorganization and section 355 distributions, assuming those transactions otherwise qualified.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Would affiliate-provided services, intercompany contracts, and a later merger disrupt the active-business or divisive-reorganization treatment of the proposed separation?
• Outcome: approved
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 332, 355(b), and 368(a)(1)(D); Rev. Ruls. 79-394 and 80-181

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201730010 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/28/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 332.01-00, 355.09-00,
355.04-00, 355.03-00 Person To Contact:
---------------------, ID No. ------------------
-------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------- ----------------------
------------------------------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------- CC:CORP:B03
PLR-118254-16
Date:
April 27, 2017

LEGEND:

Parent = -------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sub 1 = --------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Distributing 2 = ----------------------------------------------------

Distributing 1 = ----------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LLC 1 = --------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LLC 2 = ----------------------------------------

LLC 3 = ------------------------------------------------------

PLR-118254-16 2

State X = --------------

State Y = --------------

Business A = ---------------------------------------------

Business B = ---------------------------------------------------------------

Business B Contracts = ---------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear --------------------:

   This letter responds to your May 19, 2016, request for rulings regarding certain

federal income tax consequences of a series of proposed transactions (collectively, the
“Proposed Transaction”). The material information submitted in that request and in
subsequent correspondence is summarized below.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based on facts and representations

submitted on behalf of the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material
submitted in support of the request for rulings. Verification of the information,
representations, and other data may be required as part of the audit process.

   This letter is issued pursuant to section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 2017–1, 2017–1 I.R.B.

1, regarding one or more significant issues under sections 332, 351, 355, 368, or 1036.
The rulings contained in this letter only address one or more discrete legal issues
involved in the transaction. This office expresses no opinion as to the overall tax
consequences of the transactions described in this letter or as to any issue not
specifically addressed by the rulings below.

Summary of Facts

   Parent is a State X corporation and the common parent of a consolidated group

(the “Parent Group”). Parent’s stock is publicly traded and widely held. Parent, Sub 1,
Distributing 2 and Distributing 1 are members of the Parent Group. Unless otherwise
PLR-118254-16 3

stated, each entity described below is treated as a corporation for federal income tax
purposes.

    Parent wholly owns LLC 1, a State X limited liability company that, for federal

income tax purposes, is disregarded as an entity separate from Parent. LLC 1, in turn,
wholly owns Sub 1, a State X corporation. Sub 1 wholly owns (i) Distributing 2, a State
Y limited liability company that has elected to be treated as a corporation for federal
income tax purposes, (ii) LLC 2 and (iii) LLC 3. LLC 2 and LLC 3 are both State X
limited liability companies that, for federal income tax purposes, are disregarded as
entities separate from Sub 1. Distributing 2, in turn, wholly owns Distributing 1.

   Distributing 1 is engaged in Business A and Business B. Certain operational and

management activities of Business A and Business B are performed by employees of
certain corporations, which are indirectly owned by Parent but which are not members
of Distributing 1’s separate affiliated group. These activities are performed pursuant to
contractual arrangements among Parent and its affiliates, (as defined in section 1504(a)
without regard to section 1504(b), except the term “stock” includes nonvoting stock
described in section 1504(a)(4)) (each, a “Parent Affiliate”, and these arrangements, the
“Service Arrangements”). The Service Arrangements are subject to a framework
established to ensure that the activities performed for Distributing 1 are properly
governed and supervised by Distributing 1, adhere to Distributing 1’s policies and
practices and otherwise meet Distributing 1’s expected performance levels.

    Following the Proposed Transaction, Distributing 1 will continue the active

conduct of Business A utilizing the same Service Arrangements as are currently in
effect.

   Controlled, and, after the Proposed Transaction, LLC 2, will directly employ each

person who is currently employed by Distributing 1 and dedicated to Business B. In
addition, Controlled and, after the Proposed Transaction, LLC 2 will engage certain
corporations, which are indirectly owned by Parent but not all of which are members of
Sub 1’s separate affiliated group, to conduct on its behalf pursuant to the Service
Arrangements various operational activities of Business B. Each such corporation’s
performance under the Service Arrangements will be subject to oversight by Controlled
or LLC 2, as applicable.

   Business B operations involve the entry into Business B Contracts, which

constitute the primary assets of Business B. Certain of the Business B Contracts are
entered into by Distributing 1 directly with unrelated parties (“External Business B
Contracts”). More commonly, Parent Affiliates enter into contracts with unrelated
parties at the direction of Distributing 1, and offsetting Business B Contracts are
simultaneously entered into by Distributing 1 and such Parent Affiliates (“Affiliate
PLR-118254-16 4

    Business B Contracts”). As a result of the Proposed Transaction, LLC 3 will become
    the party common to all existing and future Affiliate Business B Contracts, including with
    respect to External Business B Contracts (the “Intercompany Arrangements”).

    Proposed Transaction

           For compelling business reasons, the most significant of which are new
    regulatory requirements that apply with respect to Distributing 1’s conduct of Business
    B, Distributing 1 proposes to separate Business B from its remaining businesses by
    consummating the Proposed Transaction described below:

(i) Distributing 1 will form a new State X corporation (“Controlled”) for the sole purpose
of facilitating the Proposed Transaction.

(ii) Distributing 1 will contribute the following assets and liabilities associated with
Business B to the capital of Controlled (the “Contribution”): (i) all Business B
Contracts other than certain External Business B Contracts, (ii) the employees of
Distributing 1 who are dedicated to the conduct of Business B and (iii) any ancillary
assets and liabilities of Business B.

(iii) Distributing 1 will distribute all of the stock of Controlled to Distributing 2 (the “First
Distribution”). The Contribution and the First Distribution together are intended to
qualify as a reorganization under section 368(a)(1)(D) and a distribution to which
section 355 applies.

(iv) Distributing 2 will distribute all of the Controlled stock to Sub 1 (the “Second
Distribution”). The Second Distribution is intended to qualify as a distribution to
which section 355 applies.

(v) Controlled will merge with and into LLC 3, with LLC 3 surviving (the “Merger”). The
Merger is intended to constitute a complete liquidation to which sections 332(a) and
337 apply.

(vi) LLC 3 and Distributing 1 will enter into one or more Business B Contracts with
respect to the then-existing External Business B Contracts retained by Distributing 1.

(vii) LLC 3 will transfer to LLC 2 all of the employees, assets and liabilities of Business B
(other than Business B Contracts).

    Representations

    Parent makes the following representations:
  PLR-118254-16                                 5

(a) Following the Distributions, Controlled and, after the Merger, Sub 1 (through its
disregarded subsidiaries) will continue the active conduct of Business B,
independently and with its separate employees and pursuant to the Service
Arrangements.

(b) After the Proposed Transaction, (i) Sub 1 does not have any plan or intention to
transfer either: the stock of Distributing 2, or any of the assets acquired by Sub 1 in
the Merger, other than in the ordinary course of business, (ii) Distributing 2 does not
have any plan or intention to transfer the stock of Distributing 1, and (iii) Distributing
1 does not have any plan or intention to transfer any of its assets, other than in the
ordinary course of business.

(c) At the time of the First Distribution, there will not be an excess loss account in the
stock of Distributing 1.

(d) At the time of the Second Distribution, there will not be an excess loss account in the
stock of Distributing 2.

  Rulings

        Based solely on the information submitted and the representations set forth
  above, we rule as follows:

  (1) Distributing 1’s receipt of services pursuant to the Service Arrangements will not
      prevent Business A from qualifying as an active trade or business of Distributing 1
      for purposes of section 355(b). Rev. Rul. 79-394, 1979-2, C.B. 141, amplified by
      Rev. Rul. 80-181, 1980-2 C.B. 121.

  (2) Neither (1) the receipt of services by Distributing 1 (prior to the Contribution),
      Controlled (after the Contribution) or Sub 1 (after the Merger, through its disregarded
      subsidiaries) pursuant to the Service Arrangements, nor (2) the Intercompany
      Arrangements will prevent Business B from qualifying as an active trade or business
      of Controlled for purposes of Section 355(b). Rev. Rul. 79-394, 1979-2, C.B. 141,
      amplified by Rev. Rul. 80-181, 1980-2 C.B. 121.

  (3) The qualification of (i) the Contribution and the First Distribution as a reorganization
      described in sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355, and (ii) the Second Distribution as a
      distribution described in section 355, in each case, will not be affected by the
      Merger.

PLR-118254-16 6

Caveats

   Except as specifically provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax treatment of the Proposed Transaction under any provisions of the
Code and regulations or the tax treatment of any condition existing at the time of, or
effects resulting from, the Proposed Transaction that are not specifically covered by the
above rulings. In particular, no opinion is expressed as to whether sections 355 and/or
368(a)(1)(D) applies to steps (ii), (iii) and, (iv), above. Section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 2017-

1. Also, no opinion is expressed as to the tax consequences of steps (v), (vi), and (vii).

Procedural Statements

  This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section

6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

   A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is

relevant. Alternatively, a taxpayer filing its return electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to the return that provides the date and control
number (PLR-118254-16) of this letter ruling.

    In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, copies of this

letter are being sent to your authorized representatives.

                                       Sincerely yours,




                                       __________________________
                                       Richard M. Heinecke
                                       Chief, Branch 5
                                       Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)